=== kancerman_ is now known as kancerman
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[03:55] <Drone4four> I'm trying to purge maverick of the nightly releases of firefox installed and revert back to the latest stable release.  details here:  http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1740332
[03:56] <Drone4four> nightly *alpha/beta* releases
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
[16:25] <fta> micahg, jdstrand: linux/stable (10.0.648.205 -> 11.0.696.57)   will work on it later today
[16:41] <micahg> fta: ACK
[17:22] <chaat> does anyone know if the ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa will be updated to have the current daily build of the firefox trunk version ?
[17:22] <micahg> chaat: it already should have it
[17:23] <micahg> oh, hmm, FTBFS
[17:23] <chrisccoulson> the build has been broken for a few days
[17:23] <chaat> 2011-04-22 06:03:57 UTC 	firefox-trunk 	6.0~a1~hg20110421r68406+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~maverick
[17:25] <chaat> chrisccoulson: do you know if the build will be fixed soon ?
=== davida is now known as davidascher
[17:25] <chrisccoulson> whenever i find some time to look at it, i'm busy with other stuff right nowe
[17:28] <chaat> thanks crisccoulson, i'm new to linux and thought that i was doing something wrong when i tried to update the build using the mozilla-daily/ppa
[17:31] <chrisccoulson> chaat, if you are new to linux, then why are you running daily builds? ;)
[17:31] <chrisccoulson> did someone recommend them to you?
[17:31] <chaat> i've gotten used to running the daily builds on windows and wanted to continue using them on ubuntu
[17:33] <chrisccoulson> ah, ok
[17:34] <chaat> i've been experimenting with linux in a vm to determine if i could move my computer to linux from windows. I'm trying to determine if i can run all the software that i currently run on windows.
[17:34] <chaat> i've been impressed with the ability to run windows software using the dev version of wine
[17:36] <chaat> i'm an ibm mainframe COBOL programmer and use some windows compilers and editors which emulate those on the mainframe.
[18:02] <fta> micahg, once again, most of the security bugs are in webkit :(
[18:04] <fta> micahg, how come i don't see similar updates of our system webkit?
[18:06] <chrisccoulson> heh, the last webkit update was over 6 months ago ;)
[18:06] <chrisccoulson> i'm glad i'm not using epiphany or midori
[18:08] <fta> I already reviewed 20 out of the 27 security bugs, 15 are in webkit
[18:09] <fta> chrisccoulson, ch probably had 100 webkit sec bugs in the last 6 months
[18:11] <chrisccoulson> ouch
[18:12] <micahg> fta: I'm a little behind
[18:13] <micahg> I hope to be caught up in another month or so
[18:24] <fta> micahg, i dropped two bugs from the release notes (the last 2), they are about the pdf plugin we don't have
[18:26] <micahg> fta: k, sounds good
[18:44] <fta> how come i can no longer Nominate for series my own bugs?
[18:44] <fta> bug 771935
[18:44] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 771935 in chromium-browser "10.0.648.205 -> 11.0.696.57" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771935
[18:51] <chrisccoulson> fta - weird, i can't approve them either
[18:51] <chrisccoulson> oh
[18:51] <chrisccoulson> the security updates have been published to main
[18:51] <chrisccoulson> that's why
[18:52] <micahg> jdstrand: ^^ can you demote?
[18:53] <fta> chrisccoulson, ? to main?
[18:53] <fta> where?
[18:53] <micahg> fta: natty will have to go through -security at this point as well
[18:54] <jdstrand> why yes I can
[18:54] <micahg> jdstrand: thanks
[18:54] <fta> i don't understand
[18:55] <micahg> fta: which?
[18:55] <chrisccoulson> fta - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser says that the lucid and maverick updates are in main
[18:55] <fta> well, if i can no longer upload to natty, i've done my part. the -stable ppa is now up-to-date
[18:56] <micahg> fta: yep, oneiric will hopefully open next week, if you can provide natty w/lucid and maverick that would be great (one should be -sa and the others can be -sd)
[18:57] <jdstrand> micahg: done
[18:57] <micahg> jdstrand: thanks
[18:57] <fta> maybe it's time for me to give up the role of maintainer
[18:57] <fta> i hate that last part where i have no control
[18:58] <micahg> fta: well, it's usually blocked on regression testing which I try to do same or next day, then blocked on armel build
[19:07] <micahg> fta: are you going to UDS?
[19:07] <fta> no
[19:20] <micahg> fta: well, assuming no build failures, we can push this out tomorrow evening if we get it up soon
[21:02] <vish> do we have an aurora ppa? or is it only nightlies..
[21:22] <fta> jcastro, ch11 is now in the -stable ppa with the webapp final fix, could you please test?
[21:33] <JanC> test "chapter 11" ?  :P
[21:56] <fta> JanC, nope, chromium 11 ;) no bankrupt here
[21:57] <fta> micahg, http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/11.0.696.57~r82915/
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
[22:36] <Omega> vish: nope, don't think we're getting one soon either.
[22:36] <Omega> we have a central ppa though
[22:38] <micahg> fta: ACK, thanks
[22:38] <micahg> vish: we'll be tracking trunk and beta for the moment
[23:04] <micahg> chrisccoulson: any opinion about killing the karmic mozilla dailies a few days early and hardy a couple weeks early?