[00:20] <lfaraone> slangasek: could you approve the 3 SRUs in bug 771804? (I uploaded one of them accidentally 4 times because of the error given by bug 757248 )
[01:24] <slangasek> lfaraone: pianobar srus accepted; the pithos one also includes a change for bug #705271, but there's no SRU info in this bug (it's not even filed against the Ubuntu package) - could you fix this up?
[01:45] <lfaraone> slangasek: oh my, that's the wrong bug. or rather, a duplicate of the bug
[01:54] <lfaraone> slangasek: that bug is now a duplicate of bug 771804 which has the correct SRU info
[01:54] <lfaraone> slangasek: duplicate of bug 759699
[05:49] <luciano> hi all, i have a question
[05:49] <luciano> i solved a typo bugfix in debian
[05:49] <luciano> and create a debdiff..
[05:49] <luciano> should i just attach to bug's report on Debian ?
[05:49] <luciano> or do someting else ?
[06:14] <Rhonda> Just attach it to the bugreport in Debian and tag it p+ patch.
[06:14] <Rhonda> Are you familiar with working with the Debian BTS? There are somewhere the logs of my classroom session about it.
[06:15] <Rhonda> luciano: ``
[06:15] <luciano> Rhonda, no, i'm not really familiar with BTS
[06:16] <luciano> where are logs of that session ?
[06:20] <luciano> Rhonda, i'll take a look at http://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS
[06:20] <luciano> Rhonda, thanks for your help
[06:30] <Rhonda> That's one of the logs, yes ;)
[07:46] <dholbach> good morning
[07:48]  * lucidfox waves
[08:22] <iulian> Morning dholbach.
[08:22] <dholbach> hey iulian
[15:20] <nicoulaj> Hi, just wanted to know, is REVU still the standard to submit new packages to Ubuntu repositories ? I see there are packages awaiting validation here since 2009
[15:20] <nicoulaj> the standard way*
[17:31] <tumbleweed> bdmurray: bug 773391
[17:32] <bdmurray> tumbleweed: I've seen it thanks
[17:32] <yofel> :)
[17:34] <tumbleweed> cool :)
[17:48] <lucidfox> When trying pbuilder-dist oneiric create, I get this error:
[17:48] <lucidfox> E: Couldn't download dists/oneiric/main/binary-amd64/Packages
[17:48] <lucidfox> what should I do?
[17:49] <lucidfox> weirdly, reloading http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/oneiric/main/binary-amd64/, sometimes I get the files and sometimes I don't
[17:49] <lucidfox> mirrors?
[17:50] <lucidfox> ah well, creating with ru.archive.ubuntu.com as a mirror resolved it
[17:55] <lucidfox> Which gcc version will oneiric use as default? 4.6?
[17:55] <ScottK> Yes
[17:56] <lucidfox> good!
[17:56] <ScottK> It's already default.
[18:00] <lucidfox> Huh. What the heck? http://paste.ubuntu.com/600863/
[18:08] <lucidfox> okay, an update resolved it
[20:10] <gaspa> hi, can I see somewhere in launchpad the same infos of the -changes lists?
[20:11] <tumbleweed> gaspa: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+queue?queue_state=3
[20:22] <lucidfox> If a package synced from Debian was removed in Debian, will it be automatically removed from Ubuntu too?
[20:23] <Laney> semi-automatically
[20:23] <Laney> there's an archive admin script
[20:38] <gaspa> tumbleweed: great, thanks.
[21:45] <kl__> Hi when I try to build a package source I get this error http://pastebin.com/Wvv2fTFg
[21:55] <Laney> kl__: you need to install gnome-pkg-tools
[21:57] <kl__> Laney: thanks I figured how remove the comment. But now I cannot remove a patch.
[21:59] <kl__> to disable a patch I just comment the series file right?
[22:05] <arand> kl__: Yea, or just remove the name from there, I think is proper
[22:17] <kl__> arand: did not work had to pop all patches then remove it.. and push them back
[22:18] <arand> kl__: Ah, yes, since if you remove a patch it won't pop it if it's already applied then.