=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[02:37] <Patrickdk> hmm
[03:09] <Bronz> Hey guys; I'm trying to install the new 11.04, but I get a problem, and #ubuntu is too busy to get any attention. I'll ask my question here, hopefully someone has ideas:
[03:09] <Bronz> I just downloaded 11.04 and tried to run it, but the graphical environment would fail to load. I'd get the "ubuntu" splash screen (with the progressive dots), then blink to a garbage screen of static, and the computer would freeze. I have a run-of-the-mill 2Ghz AMD machine, my video card is an NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT, 256Mb... If I can get it to boot the graphical environment, I should be fine.
=== McPeter_ is now known as McPeter
=== McPeter is now known as Noob`s
[12:58] <ousmanes> hi all did someone have huge amount of wakeups whit powertop
[12:59] <ousmanes> it's about 1072 wakeups interval10second
[13:04] <txomon> hello, how can someone post a bug about gnome-power-manager?
[13:06] <txomon> jibel, ubuntu-bug can't report gnome bugs, can it?
[13:07] <jibel> txomon, did you tried to run: ubuntu-bug gnome-power-manager ?
[13:08] <txomon> yes
[13:08] <txomon> non-genuine packet
[13:08] <txomon> (gnome3)
[13:10] <jibel> txomon, ubuntu-bug can't report bug for package that are not from the official archive.
[13:11] <jibel> txomon, in this case you can use https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+filebug and attach all the relevant information.
[13:11] <txomon> ty
[13:12] <jibel> also attach the output of apt-cache policy gnome-power-manager and all the relevant information.
[13:12] <jibel> only file the type of bug if gnome-power-manager is from the archive otherwise it will be invalid.
[13:13] <jibel> txomon, you can ask on #ubuntu-bugs for help with filing and triaging bugs.
[13:13] <txomon> thank you!
[13:13] <txomon> join #ubuntu-bugs
[14:40] <jibel> primes2h, ping
[14:41] <jibel> primes2h, can I replace Natty Beta 2 with Natty Final on the laptop tracker ?
[15:04] <primes2h> Hey jibel, yes, I had to ask you about that. Thank you.
[15:56] <primes2h> jibel: thanks. :-)
[15:56] <jibel> primes2h, you're welcome
[16:43] <patrickmw> jibel, bug 772320
[16:43] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 772320 in gally (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "Gally needs to be rebuild with kdebindings 4:4.6.2b-0ubuntu1.1 (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/772320
[16:43] <patrickmw> would we expect the package to be available in natty-proposed by now?  I can see it when I run radmison, but it doesn't seem to be downloading it into cache to update it
[16:44]  * jibel looking
[16:50] <sbeattie> patrickmw: my understanding is the mirroring processes from launchpad to archive/security.ubuntu.com are seriously slammed right now.
[16:51]  * jibel still waiting for the mirror to respond... 16Kb/s ...
[16:51]  * sbeattie pubished a php5 update about 9 hours ago that hasn't shown up on the mirrors, normally they show up within 2 hours or so.
[16:51] <patrickmw> sbeattie, ah ha.  that would explain the backlog then.  thanks
[16:52] <patrickmw> jibel ^
[16:52] <jibel> patrickmw, I agree with sbeattie the package is built and available but not synced to your mirror.
[16:52] <jibel> patrickmw, you can download it from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/gally_0.5.1-1build1_all.deb
[16:52] <patrickmw> jibel, k, will do
[16:53] <jibel> patrickmw, it will be slow for the next few days due to users upgrading to natty
[16:58] <patdk-wk> jibel, I setup a new install of lucid, setup dhcp,tftp,iscsi target on it, and still had same iscsi issues
[17:02] <jibel> patdk-wk, I didn't had time to setup a test environment. I need to replicate it to help cjwatson in investigating the issue. I'll wok on it early next week.
[17:02] <patdk-wk> just posted my configs to bug#728088
[17:03] <patdk-wk> I've replicated my enviroment 3 times now :)
[17:04] <jibel> which is good, and means that we need to find out the missing bit to replicate.
[17:05] <patdk-wk> my tests never used kvm
[17:05] <patdk-wk> and where always done with multible machines
[17:06] <patdk-wk> as that shouldn't make a different, dunno :)
[17:06] <patdk-wk> that is the only known difference that I know of between his and mine
[17:08] <jibel> patdk-wk, I'll try on real hw and see if it makes a difference.
[17:38] <txomon> is there any documentation program (organisation, entity, group, whatever) that documents kernel options?
[17:39] <txomon> I mean documentation for makemenuconfig
[17:41] <txomon> uops sry
[21:15] <patrickmw> jibel, bug 771804
[21:15] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 771804 in pithos (Debian) (and 9 other projects) "Need v30 protocol/keys -- "Pandora does not support your client version" (affects: 39) (dups: 2) (heat: 166)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771804
[21:17] <patrickmw> this bug affects multiple projects and is marked  Fix Committed for Marerick and Natty.
[21:18] <patrickmw> In addition, pithos is also affected and Fix Committed.
[21:18] <patrickmw> Does the verification-needed apply to all?
[22:24] <jibel> patrickmw, it's "fix committed" in natty and maverick because it needs verification in natty and maverick and the fix in not release to -updates.
[22:25] <patrickmw> jibel, thanks.  bdmurray was able to explain it to me
[22:25] <jibel> if the bug affects more than one release and the fix is verified for only 1 release, it is not a problem. It will be published to the release it has been verified.
[22:25] <jibel> ok
[22:26] <jibel> patrickmw, you must pay attention to status of the development task which must be set to 'fix released'
[22:26] <jibel> patrickmw, we can't push to -updates a fix that is not already available in the development release to avoid regressions
[22:27] <jibel> but in this particular case, since oneiric just opened today, the fix can't be there.
[22:27] <jibel> patrickmw, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification
[22:27] <jibel> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates