spiv | mhall119: yes this is a good place to ask, although it tends to be quiet on the weekend | 02:33 |
---|---|---|
spiv | mhall119: to clear the revision history of a branch you could probably just call your_branch.set_last_revision_info(0, bzrlib.revision.NULL_REVISION) | 02:34 |
spiv | mhall119: although I'm guessing you want to change the workingtree as well as the branch? | 02:34 |
spiv | mhall119: which IIRC is wt.set_parent_ids([]) | 02:36 |
mhall119 | spiv: thanks for the reply, I want to keep the working tree | 02:50 |
mhall119 | basically I'll have a branch I want to use as a "template" | 02:51 |
mhall119 | when starting a new project, I want a copy of the latest of that "template" to be the start of my project's branch, but I don't want the template's revision history to be included in my project's revision history | 02:51 |
mhall119 | spiv: those worked perfectly, thanks! | 02:57 |
=== nixness is now known as foocraft | ||
maxb | jelmer: Hi. If you have a moment, could you outline the motivation for switching to cython? (Mainly to help in assessing whether the switch is applicable for PPA builds for older Ubuntus) | 15:25 |
jelmer | maxb: It wasn't really an important change - cython is required by e.g. meliae, and is supposed to generate quicker code. | 15:28 |
maxb | right - take the "try it and see" approach, then, do you think? | 15:29 |
jelmer | maxb: with python-pyrex you mean? | 15:29 |
maxb | I mean, we might as well see if the cython versions in older Ubuntus will work | 15:30 |
maxb | And if they don't, we can switch back to pyrex for those | 15:30 |
jelmer | ah | 15:32 |
jelmer | yeah, I think that makes sense | 15:32 |
Peng | Cython isn't as useful if you maintain backwards compatibility with archaic Pyrex. | 15:39 |
Peng | s/\./ versions./ | 15:39 |
cyberkilla | <3 Bazaar | 16:28 |
naoki | bzr source archive is distributed with generated c sources. | 17:34 |
naoki | So I don't feel compatibility with old Pyrex is big issue. | 17:34 |
naoki | http://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/pyrex_differences.html | 17:43 |
lamont | any plans for a 2.4.0 backport to hardy/lucid that doesn't require newer-than-lucid python? | 22:59 |
lamont | 2.4.0~beta2-2~bazaar1~lucid1 happens to build-depend on a slightly-newer-than-maverick python, and therefore is FTBFS | 23:01 |
maxb | lamont: hmm. it's not FTBFS | 23:06 |
maxb | It may, however, not be particularly useful :-) | 23:06 |
maxb | lamont: I see no issue with the lucid build | 23:09 |
* jelmer waves to lamont, maxb | 23:10 | |
maxb | lamont: Oh, but you're trying to rebuild it in a secret Canonical IS archive aren't you | 23:11 |
maxb | Without including our builddeps PPA | 23:11 |
* maxb blinks | 23:44 | |
maxb | I'm getting a test failure for 2.4b2 on hardy | 23:45 |
maxb | NotImplementedError: <bound method SilentUIFactory.get_password of SilentUIFactory()> | 23:45 |
* maxb wonders how that managed to behave differently there | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!