| trentg | Hello | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| trentg | Anybody know why I get connection refused trying to connect/upload to ppa.launchpad.net? | 00:18 |
| trentg | Using ftp, using sftp or scp it times out. | 00:18 |
| penguin42 | trentg: It broke | 00:18 |
| trentg | Oh | 00:18 |
| trentg | Any ideas when it might be back online? | 00:19 |
| oojah_ | It worked for me just now. | 00:21 |
| elmo | it's back online at the moment | 00:21 |
| kri0 | This is kinda offtopic, but does anyone one know if there is a bug tracker that allows setting a bounty for a bug, real money? ) | 00:22 |
| trentg | Thanks, it's working now | 00:23 |
| kri0 | for an open source project | 00:25 |
| penguin42 | kri0: There are bug bounty sites out there - never used ones; of course there are also places that youc an buy support (as you say OT) | 00:29 |
| kri0 | yeah, i see some 'bug bounty programs' from different vendors, what i'd like is to have a reverse 'bounty option' built-in to a tracker. That is, when someone submits a bug he would really like to see fixed, he could assing a bounty from his pocket, not the vendors. and others to be able to chip in micropayment like. The bounty goes to the developer who fixes it. | 00:40 |
| MTecknology | GAH!!! | 01:54 |
| MTecknology | I build perfect in a pbuilder environment; but breaks right near the tail end on lp | 01:54 |
| Ampelbein | MTecknology: do you have a buildlog? | 01:55 |
| MTecknology | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/70703826/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-amd64.nginx_1.0.0-svn3185-ppa205~maverick1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 01:55 |
| MTecknology | Ampelbein: builds nginx-light and nginx-full great; almost finishes nginx-extras; poof | 01:56 |
| MTecknology | aah........ | 01:58 |
| MTecknology | it's missing from the pushed branch | 01:58 |
| MTecknology | that'll make a big difference. :P | 01:59 |
| MTecknology | wow! | 02:24 |
| MTecknology | estimated time until build.... on 2011-05-01 | 02:24 |
| reviczky | Hi, I'm trying to make a launchpad-recipe, merging 2 branches. They have partially common folders, but no common files, like branch1: test/file1 and branch2: test/file2. If I try "merge" I get "Branches have no common ancestor", if I try "nest-part" I get "ERROR: Conflicts from merge" It's somewhat bug #515731, but not packaging related. Any solutions or workarounds? I have to keep the branches separately. | 02:37 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 515731 in bzr-builder "Support merge of two branches that have no common ancestor" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515731 | 02:37 |
| wgrant | reviczky: Why must they be set up like that? | 02:40 |
| wgrant | That sounds like an awful mess :( | 02:40 |
| reviczky | because they are two different projects | 02:40 |
| MTecknology | even messier than the recipes I needed to come up with :P | 02:40 |
| wgrant | reviczky: And you have to merge the trees at the same level to build? | 02:41 |
| reviczky | yes | 02:41 |
| wgrant | Why? | 02:41 |
| reviczky | so I'm importint the code into launchpad, 2 different branches, and one is the main containing the program, the others are extension modules that needs to be there at build time | 02:42 |
| wgrant | You can't include them as a subdirectory instead? | 02:42 |
| reviczky | the use the same folder structure | 02:42 |
| reviczky | scripts/... doc/.. are all shared | 02:42 |
| reviczky | but no conflicts | 02:42 |
| wgrant | Well, there are conflicts :) | 02:42 |
| wgrant | Just not file conflicts. | 02:42 |
| reviczky | yeah, thats what i mean | 02:43 |
| MTecknology | a directory is a conflict the same as a file | 02:43 |
| reviczky | i see | 02:43 |
| reviczky | until now i was merging by hand, means copying together, i wanted to have some automation | 02:43 |
| MTecknology | a copy isn't a merge | 02:43 |
| MTecknology | a merge is for branches that separated | 02:44 |
| wgrant | reviczky: How do you normally build it during development? | 02:44 |
| wgrant | reviczky: Having to manually merge two trees together sounds like a terrible task. | 02:44 |
| reviczky | well this is what i did until now, by hand: | 02:44 |
| reviczky | getting the two branches | 02:44 |
| reviczky | copying them together | 02:44 |
| reviczky | add the debian tree | 02:44 |
| reviczky | and build | 02:44 |
| reviczky | so i could do the same in 1 branch | 02:45 |
| reviczky | but it since they are maintained deparately it would be nicer to hve them in separate branches | 02:45 |
| wgrant | It seems like a fairly bad idea to be trying to merge two trees together like that. | 02:45 |
| MTecknology | the branches? | 02:45 |
| wgrant | They should either be one branch, separate packages, or one should be in a subdirectory of the other. | 02:45 |
| reviczky | what does the Fix commited in bug 515731 mean? is it solved? how? is it available on the launchpad buildfarm? | 02:46 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 515731 in bzr-builder "Support merge of two branches that have no common ancestor" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515731 | 02:46 |
| wgrant | It's not available on Launchpad yet. | 02:47 |
| MTecknology | reviczky: what branches? | 02:47 |
| reviczky | so this is what i have right now: https://code.launchpad.net/context-beta | 02:47 |
| reviczky | its more then 2 branches, but that doesnt matter | 02:47 |
| wgrant | What's the difference between /context and /context-beta? | 02:48 |
| reviczky | that this uses an experimental tree | 02:48 |
| wgrant | It should probably not be a separate project unless it's a fork, but OK. | 02:49 |
| reviczky | i have some own modifications | 02:49 |
| reviczky | but yeah, ive noticed that | 02:49 |
| reviczky | but until i dont really have it working, i just wanted to experiment with the repices | 02:49 |
| wgrant | reviczky: Is there a good reason to not have the separate trees as separate packages? | 02:50 |
| wgrant | A reasonable rule is that one source tree => one source package | 02:50 |
| MTecknology | reviczky: something like that... each separate module you're building should be in it's own sib directory and your packaging should handle bringing the process together, even better - the vompile process .. (assuming these are modules) | 02:50 |
| wgrant | s/rule/guideline/ | 02:50 |
| wgrant | Or that, yes. | 02:51 |
| reviczky | hmm, right, i can do that | 02:51 |
| reviczky | thanks, im gonna give that a try | 02:51 |
| wgrant | reviczky: I would really encourage you to use the existing https://launchpad.net/context project instead. | 02:52 |
| reviczky | ok, im gonna get in touch with them | 02:52 |
| wgrant | You can just push branches up there. | 02:53 |
| reviczky | i see | 02:53 |
| reviczky | the problem is also btw, that they dont have a version controlled source code ... | 02:55 |
| reviczky | and that wont change in the near future | 02:55 |
| wgrant | That is quite spectacular. | 02:55 |
| reviczky | so i have to import the code myself or with a script | 02:56 |
| wgrant | :/ | 02:56 |
| reviczky | and this is why id like to have the branches separate, because i would loose the overview | 02:56 |
| wgrant | I guess this explains why it seems somewhat insane and completely VCS-unfriendly. | 02:57 |
| reviczky | right, so using separate subdirs is fine, thanks for the help | 02:57 |
| wgrant | :( | 02:57 |
| reviczky | yeah, its all a mess a right now :( | 02:57 |
| reviczky | and it doesnt work out of the box in ubuntu anymore | 02:58 |
| reviczky | thats why i have some patches | 02:58 |
| MTecknology | wgrant: please make builds go faster! :'( | 03:02 |
| MTecknology | buy 500 machines for builders! | 03:03 |
| cody-somerville | MTecknology, You could use AWS yourself. | 04:05 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: hm? | 04:19 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: oh! amazon? | 04:20 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: It was building perfectly fine in my own setup; turns out i missed svn add on 3 files in obscure places | 04:20 |
| cody-somerville | MTecknology, My comment was in reference to "buy 500 machines for builders!". ;) | 04:21 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: i don't think my purchase of amazon systems would help launchpad ... and i'm still struggingling to pay for taxes in the next 3 months | 04:22 |
| cody-somerville | I'm suggesting using in lieu of Launchpad. It would be pretty cheap for just yourself and you could spawn as many builders as you needed. | 04:24 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: but then how would the nightly builds end up on launchpad? | 04:25 |
| MTecknology | https://code.launchpad.net/~nginx/+recipe/nginx-nightly | 04:25 |
| MTecknology | Don't ask me why I sent it to build for oneiric..... | 04:25 |
| MTecknology | is the toolchain for 11.11 even close to settled yet? | 04:27 |
| cody-somerville | This probably isn't the right place to ask that. | 04:28 |
| MTecknology | true, i'd go bug in +1 but that's still closed | 04:28 |
| StevenK | MTecknology: *11.10* | 04:29 |
| MTecknology | ..... | 04:30 |
| MTecknology | wow.... i've been calling it 11.11 for so long too | 04:30 |
| MTecknology | face meets palm moment | 04:30 |
| cody-somerville | maybe its a sign :) | 04:30 |
| StevenK | MTecknology: And if you read ubuntu-devel-announce, you'd see that doko announced 11.10 is open for uploads over eight hours ago. | 04:31 |
| MTecknology | cody-somerville: a sign that i need sleep? | 04:33 |
| wgrant | StevenK: Over eight hours ago? | 04:33 |
| MTecknology | StevenK: i thought the toolchain still changed after uploads were opened | 04:33 |
| wgrant | StevenK: It was well over 12. | 04:34 |
| wgrant | MTecknology: It's mostly done before that. | 04:34 |
| wgrant | There will be further minor changes, mostly after UDS. | 04:34 |
| wgrant | The major toolchain changes are done in a PPA per | 04:34 |
| wgrant | ... before release. | 04:34 |
| wgrant | So the new series can be opened within hours of the previous series' release. | 04:34 |
| wgrant | (assuming the mirrors aren't misbehaving, which caused this one to take almost 24 hours :/) | 04:35 |
| StevenK | wgrant: Meh, the point is, it was multiple hours ago, so there is no point going "Geee, when does Oneiric open for uploads?" | 04:36 |
| wgrant | Indeed. | 04:36 |
| MTecknology | StevenK: pretty sure, that's not what I asked | 04:39 |
| MTecknology | I sent this to upload... | 04:39 |
| StevenK | MTecknology: However, wgrant answered your question anyway. | 04:39 |
| MTecknology | yes, he did | 04:39 |
| MTecknology | StevenK: I used to remember you being a really helpful and friendly person. :( | 04:41 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| c_korn | hello, I keep getting this error with my script: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=72urwRAa | 15:55 |
| wgrant | c_korn: staging's broken at the moment. You might want to use qastaging.launchpad.net for the next few days instead. | 16:09 |
| c_korn | hm, if I knew how to change this. I think this is the line I somehow need to configure: launchpad = Launchpad(credentials, EDGE_SERVICE_ROOT, cachedir) | 16:22 |
| maxb | c_korn: Thats a pretty old-style invocation of launchpadlib, what version are you using? | 16:51 |
| c_korn | the version of natty I think | 16:55 |
| c_korn | Installed: 1.9.7-0ubuntu2 | 16:56 |
| maxb | c_korn: OK, for your immediate issue, pass 'qastaging' instead of EDGE_SERVICE_ROOT | 17:12 |
| c_korn | maxb: ok, this works now, launchpad = Launchpad.login_with('My Application', 'production'). thanks for the hint | 17:12 |
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| MTecknology | my day wait for build is almost up :D | 20:18 |
| timrc | 0 source packages (5.3 KiB) | 21:08 |
| timrc | seems odd to me that 0 source packages takes up 5.3 KiB of space :) | 21:09 |
| timrc | perhaps due to lazy package deletion? | 21:09 |
| cody-somerville | timrc, indexes probably count | 21:22 |
| akoskm | hi! can anybody help my in using my existing gpg key. debsign returns with "...secret key not available" even if my key is showing up in gpg --list-keys | 22:06 |
| lifeless | If I remember gpg --edit-secret <email> | 22:07 |
| lifeless | will let you see that | 22:07 |
| akoskm | hmm. it says invalid options | 22:08 |
| lifeless | check the help :) | 22:12 |
| lifeless | [sorry I'm not all that helpful, I'm really not here today] | 22:13 |
| maxb | akoskm: Try gpg --list-secret-keys | 22:13 |
| akoskm | just tried, that shows nothing | 22:14 |
| maxb | akoskm: That would imply you have no secret keys available in your current keyring | 22:16 |
| akoskm | what I did was # gpg --search-keys akoskm, it listed me I selected that entry | 22:16 |
| akoskm | maxb: indeed. what should I do to add the secret key too? | 22:16 |
| maxb | Where is your secret key currently stored? | 22:16 |
| akoskm | in ~/.ssh/ | 22:17 |
| maxb | Your GPG key is stored in your ~/.ssh/ ? I am sceptical | 22:17 |
| akoskm | if that one is which end with .asc | 22:17 |
| akoskm | I'm not really sure in these terms, just followed the guide on launchpad.. | 22:18 |
| maxb | Which guide? | 22:19 |
| akoskm | where I can modify the OpenPGP keys | 22:19 |
| akoskm | there were the instructions to create and upload the key | 22:19 |
| akoskm | I did that and signed my packages so far successfully | 22:20 |
| maxb | akoskm: I'm fairly sure none of that would have told you to put OpenPGP keys in ~/.ssh, because that would just be weirdly confusing | 22:20 |
| maxb | Well, what have you changed since you last signed a package successfully? | 22:21 |
| akoskm | upgraded my ubuntu to natty | 22:21 |
| akoskm | so I suppose some things were gone | 22:21 |
| maxb | Did this involve doing anything destructive to your home directory? | 22:21 |
| akoskm | no, it is on a separate drive | 22:22 |
| akoskm | here is the message what I'm getting at the end of debuild: http://pastebin.com/6eMP9pfX | 22:25 |
| akoskm | and my key is uploaded to http://keyserver.ubuntu.com/ | 22:25 |
| maxb | This seems to indicate that you have somehow lost your secret key from where it should be stored in ~/.gnupg/secring.gpg | 22:26 |
| akoskm | Indeed, all files in that directory were created today. :/ | 22:31 |
| maxb | Oh dear. | 22:32 |
| maxb | Did you have a backup? | 22:32 |
| Ampelbein | akoskm: just a wild guess, is the filesystem with your home mounted? as you indicated it is on a seperate drive. | 22:33 |
| akoskm | from that directory? no. | 22:33 |
| akoskm | Ampelbein: it is | 22:33 |
| akoskm | :) | 22:33 |
| Ampelbein | akoskm: ok, I had the same problem once, wondered where all my stuff is gone ;-) | 22:33 |
| akoskm | maxb: so, if there is no backup about that directory I can't use my key, it is simple like that? | 22:40 |
| maxb | yes | 22:40 |
| maxb | You will have to generate a new one from scratch, and redo all setup steps involved. | 22:40 |
| akoskm | hmm | 22:41 |
| akoskm | can I sign the code of conduct with one account twice? | 22:41 |
| maxb | (and there is no way to remove your old key from the public keyservers, ever) | 22:41 |
| maxb | Oh, you can skip the CoC step - your old signature still counts for that | 22:44 |
| akoskm | maxb: thank you, I'll back up my key next time ;) | 23:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!