[00:00] <achiang> timholum: looks to be written in Vala
[00:01] <achiang> timholum: sounds like it, but i am far from authoritative. you might be able to find better answers in #ubuntu-desktop
[00:01] <achiang> timholum: plus, it's friday afternoon for many geographies, including mine. :)
[00:01] <achiang> timholum: good luck
[00:01] <timholum> :) thanks :), just knowing the terminology of what I am looking for will help a ton
[00:02] <timholum> who know's maybe someone has already written what I am looking for, if there are 3rd party lens's out there
[00:05] <Laney> ScottK: yay
[00:05]  * Laney becomes a little red person
[00:22] <bdmurray> @pilot out
[01:47] <afeder> does any ubuntu one devs hang out here? or is it elsewhere?
[02:33] <Saamm> i got a problem with software center where do i report
[02:34] <arand> Saamm: run "ubuntu-bug software-center" presumably
[02:36] <Saamm> ok can someone tell me if this is happening to anyone else? Software Center Shows 0 Rating for Chromium...But when click on more info it shows 121 raqting...
[02:38] <bryceh> Saamm, no, I see it says '82 ratings' when listed, clicked on, or doubleclicked for more info.  Seems consistent to me.
[02:40] <Saamm> bryceh, i dont know I think there is a bug that it shows ratings more than 100 as 0. My chromium says 121 ratings
[02:43] <ScottK> Saamm: #ubuntu is the support channel.
[02:43] <Saamm> ScottK, ok
[03:07] <bluefoxicy> okay, so after the upgrade something extremely stupid happened
[03:07] <bluefoxicy> and I can't figure out how to make it stop
[03:07] <bluefoxicy> when any application tries to open a folder, it opens it with VLC
[03:08] <bluefoxicy> so if I load the old style Gnome, hit Places->Home Folder, it runs vlc on my home folder
[03:08] <bluefoxicy> I ... have no idea how to fix this.
[03:13] <bluefoxicy> got it, had to edit ~/.local/share/applications/mimeapps.list and remove the entry for (get this) deleted associations for inode.directory
[03:15] <Saamm> bryceh, the rating problem is happening with GIMP also...it shows 0 but actual rating is 107
[04:59] <corno> Ampelbein, you here?
[05:46] <cdbs> Hello all, when an autosync happens, does the -changes list get flooded?
[05:46] <StevenK> It shouldn't.
[05:46] <cdbs> hmm
[05:47]  * cdbs subscribes
[06:19] <corno> after testing a fix, if you want to downgrade the package again to the latest stable version, or rather, just to put the version back before installing the fix to test
[06:19] <corno> is the best way to do this the following:  sudo apt-get install pkg=version  ?
[06:21] <corno> i chose the version to downgrade to by first:  apt-cache showpkg pkgname
[06:32] <Laibsch> corno: this is not the right channel for this kind of question.  FWIW, I use aptitude which allows me to graphically choose which version to install.
[06:34] <corno> Laibsch, apologies for posting question here, in hindsight not that relevant to this channel.  just the reason why i had to do this was becuase i've done a "pbuilder-dist <release> build ../<package>_<version>.dsc" for the usb-creator tool and then installed it with dpkg from the "pbuilder" dir.  just wanted to downgrade again.
[06:35] <Laibsch> Sure.  I fully understand.  I hope my answer got you going in the right direction.
[06:36] <corno> Laibsch, it sure did - appreciated.
[06:36] <Laibsch> cool :-D
[07:34] <Laibsch> I have a weird pbuilder problem that I hope you can help me with.  I want to recompile the latest grub2 for lucid.  I get an error "dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libdevmapper-dev (>= 2:1.02.34) libfuse-dev mtools", yet these should be available as logging in to pbuilder shows: http://paste.debian.net/115542/
[10:06] <cjwatson> jcastro,ScottK: uds-organizers> done
[11:17] <siretart> I'm going to upload libav 0.7_beta1 RSN (the successor of ffmpeg). Given its amount of reverse dependencies, I'd expect a number of changes required in other packages
[14:06] <ior3k> hey all
[14:06] <ior3k> conkeror is now marked as obsolete in synaptic (natty)
[14:06] <ior3k> does this mean the package has been abandoned?
[14:30] <ScottK> cjwatson: Thanks.
[15:36] <maxb> The Ubuntu Installation Guide for natty contains a broken link to the example preseed file from the page at https://help.ubuntu.com/11.04/installation-guide/amd64/appendix-preseed.html
[15:37] <maxb> Where should I be reporting this, and is it likely that the preseed file exists somewhere else that I can look at? Or perhaps it has not actually been written?
[15:57] <cjwatson> maxb: IIRC ubuntu-doc maintains that part of the site (although ubuntu-installer maintains the actual manual itself).  And it certainly has been written - see e.g. https://help.ubuntu.com/10.10/installation-guide/example-preseed.txt
[15:57] <cjwatson> (which can't be transferred exactly, although it's similar)
[16:18] <hyperair> hi. is there any core dev around here willing to look into a patch for samba which fixes a winbind bug that causes libc to segfault on lookups?
[16:19] <hyperair> bug #529714
[17:04] <thechef> Is it technically possible to run two sessions on one screen concurrently (without using Xnest)?
[17:14] <geser> cjwatson: Hi, do you want to sponsor my vim merge or should I add it to the sponsoring queue? (bug 774233)
[17:17] <cjwatson> geser: just add it to the queue, I certainly won't get to it until at least Tuesday and most of next week is likely to be taken up with UDS planning
[17:24] <cjwatson> hm, merges.u.c is broken again, will have to look at that
[19:05] <tiagoboldt> so, I'm having major issues with my wifi module, read in launchpad that fix has been commited to the kernel and will be released on the next update, any idea when will that happen? on natty
[19:58] <corno> i was wondering, when i want to start working on a bug, what is the best process:  to do dev in local environment and then just add a patch to the bug in LaunchPad.   or to actually push (bzr push) it to LaunchPad and then do the "Propose for merging"?
[20:02] <cjwatson> update on merges.ubuntu.com: turns out there's a package in Debian that requires patch 2.6 to unpack, so I've sent an RT to upgrade the system in question to a suitable version
[20:04] <geser> just curious: how long do such tickets usually take to get done?
[20:05] <cjwatson> I can't say I would necessarily expect it to be done over the weekend :P
[20:05] <cjwatson> I imagine early next week
[20:06] <geser> is was clear to me that it doesn't happen over the weekend, more if it happens during the next week, the next two weeks or even longer
[20:07] <cjwatson> I would expect only a few days, not least because I'll pester about it once I'm actually at work ;-)
[20:11] <dupondje> Somebody knows when a new kernel will appear in Natty ?
[20:12] <dupondje> having some annoying bug atm :(
[20:31] <geser> hmm, every armel build in oneiric fails with "/usr/bin/apt-cache exit status 11"
[20:32] <ScottK> geser: Bug #774175
[20:42] <penguin42> it's in a vsnprintf so it's pretty likely the shrink wrap bug (although the 1GB memory mmap is suspicious)
[20:48] <cjwatson> penguin42: if it were just the shrink-wrap bug, then it surely would also have affected natty's apt built on oneiric.  ScottK tested that and ruled it out.
[20:49] <penguin42> true I guess
[20:50] <penguin42> (How do you rebuild the apt-cache in the archive if every build including the apt-cache build fails?)
[20:51] <cjwatson> penguin42: we would get lamont to explicitly roll back the chroots to natty's version of apt, and build apt with that
[20:51] <penguin42> ah ok
[20:54] <lamont> cjwatson: do we have source uploaded  yet?  and is it just armel that will need the extra love?
[20:54] <cjwatson> lamont: no
[20:54] <cjwatson> I mean, no source uploaded yet.  just armel as far as I know ...
[20:54] <lamont> ok.
[20:55] <geser> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ shows only armel having this problem
[21:39] <Who__> Are there any Mac/OS X specialists who can take a look at this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/774089
[21:40] <Who__> Apple claim that a new logic board is required to fix the issue, which is major for something that one can run in to on a close to default install
[21:41] <Who__> I presume there's a way to fix whatever boot/EFI stuff that seems to be corrupted, but the Apple Genius didn't know of one...
[21:41] <Who__> Note that I swapped out hard drives...
[21:43] <penguin42> Who__: Do you have an external monitor on - I'm just curious if something was on the external display?
[21:44] <Who__> penguin42: didn't connect one
[21:44] <mdke> SpamapS: thanks for the -proposed love
[21:44] <penguin42> Who__: Might be worth a go, nothing to lose
[21:44] <Who__> but seeing as the network debug utility that the Apple Store use didn't even start, I think it's deeper than that
[21:44] <Who__> penguin42: I don't have the computer with me now _ I left it with them to debug
[21:44] <Who__> a shame I know, but I need it to work again reliably asap and I don't have forever to debug it!
[21:50] <dupondje> bleh :( Kernel of natty feels bugged :(
[21:57] <MTecknology> root@panther:/opt/chroot# chroot oneiric/
[21:57] <MTecknology> groups: cannot find name for group ID 0
[21:57] <MTecknology> I have no name!@panther:/#
[21:57] <MTecknology> neat...
[23:35] <penguin42> hmm and I've got an arm one in qemu, and yep apt segs there as well