=== yofel_ is now known as yofel [00:57] how important are failed to upgrades on packages? [00:57] (core packages) === ZNC is now known as {}localhost{} === {}localhost{} is now known as ZNC [03:25] when i run apps in xephyr they have no menu bar [03:25] should i report this against xephyr, or appmenu-gtk? [03:31] it doesn't happen when i uninstall appmenu-gtk so i guess that answers my question [09:05] http://theinvisiblethings.blogspot.com/2011/04/linux-security-circus-on-gui-isolation.html [10:02] gtriderxc: why are you dropping random links here? [10:04] sorry. by mistake. just a wrong room [10:04] however may be interesting 4 everyone === nisshh_linux is now known as nisshh [14:15] hi, i want to file a bug report, but first to check if is not already reported, i cant find a good way to limit the search nly with bugs for the 11.04 release [14:31] if the bug you are looking for was properly filed using apport it will have the 'natty' tag, so you can search for that [14:33] yofel: for kubuntu i must install apport to send a bug report? [14:35] no, apport is installed by default, use 'ubuntu-bug ' to file your bug, see... [14:35] !bugs [14:35] If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its derivatives, please file a bug using the command « ubuntu-bug » - See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs for other ways to report bugs - Bugs in/wishes for the IRC bots (not Ubuntu) can be filed at http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-bots [14:37] in fact i see apport-kde is installed 12and if you are not sure what package causes the bug, it happens during boot, so it could be the kernel or maybe the boot scripts [14:38] what happens? === nisshh_linux is now known as nisshh [14:42] yofel: the boot process stops, the key light turns off,if i press power button it resumes, and i also got an usefull [14:43] dmesg message log [14:43] 0.976296] NET: Registered protocol family 1 [ 0.976305] pci 0000:00:01.0: MSI quirk detected; subordinate MSI disabled [ 33.630072] pci 0000:01:05.0: Boot video device [ 33.632145] pci 0000:02:00.0: xHCI HW did not halt within 2000 usec status = 0x0 [14:44] see time stamps, it frezes for a while,untill i press the power button, i am not sure if is the kernel [14:44] not sure either, but from that I would guess it's the kernel. Use 'linux' as package [14:44] i tried to search launchpad for this issue but i did not find it,i think i will report it [14:45] simion314: What hardware? [14:47] yofel: Have you had any nepomuk crashes when opening dolphin? [14:47] penguin42: do you want exact details lspci? it is an asus mtherboard [14:47] simion314: no, I was really interested in whether it was a mac - we had someone on here with some odd mac problems [14:48] simion314: So that error message from dmesg looks like it got upset by the USB3 controller and thus sounds like a kernel bug - report it [14:49] penguin42: no, but I have nepomuk disabled on my main system, on the others I don't get any crashes [14:49] yofel: Hmm ok [14:49] a backtrace would be useful :P [14:49] penguin42: that MSI quick is the usb 3.0? [14:49] yofel: Yeh I've got a backtrace, I'd actually like a core file to work with [14:49] simion314: Well not sure, but the xHCI I think is [14:50] penguin42: well, the process isn't terminated as long as drkonqi is up, so maybe you can just attach whatever to that process [14:51] penguin42: also see http://techbase.kde.org/KDE_System_Administration/Environment_Variables#Troubleshooting_and_Debugging [14:51] yofel: Oh I see, I'm more used to the apport way of dumping a core and then extracting the bt [14:53] right, drkonqi uses ptrace instead of core files [14:53] yofel: It's entirely possible it's related to my ppa that lets you decrypt LUKS partitions from dolphin, but I'm not sure how that would interact with nepomuk yet [14:57] it could be something dumb like nepomuk trying to search the encrypted partition [16:18] Hi. I cant lanch ubuntu software center PLZ HELP!!! [16:18] (ubuntu 11.04) === emma is now known as em === Guest79536 is now known as twopoint718 [19:30] So I'm new to bug triaging, but I think I can confirm that Bug #747534 exists (common-lisp-controller is listed as a dependency of SBCL on my system too) [19:30] Launchpad bug 747534 in sbcl (Ubuntu) "common-lisp-controller should not be a recommended package for sbcl (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/747534