=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
MTecknology | we can almost have a penguin release :D | 00:48 |
---|---|---|
MTecknology | that just flew into my mind | 00:48 |
MTecknology | perfect penguin ? | 00:48 |
arand_ | MTecknology: I'd rather guess at "precocious pygoscelis" or so ;) | 00:53 |
MTecknology | arand_: from the name of this one - it wouldn't surprise me; but i'm hoping for something a little more off the wall this time :P | 00:54 |
MTecknology | proud penguin would be nice | 00:54 |
arand_ | MTecknology: Actually, it being unusual words is I'd say a good thing, "natty" makes a better codename than "proud", since it isn't really used in any other context. Oneiric is bad since it's spelly, and 3-4 syllables, though (I think..) | 00:58 |
* penguin42 notes a penguin release would be excellent | 00:59 | |
MTecknology | :P | 01:01 |
evfool | If I have two separate bzr branches of a project in separate directories, how can I merge them? | 02:27 |
MTecknology | evfool: do they share a common ancestor? | 02:34 |
evfool | MTecknology: branched a project, made some commits, but there were more commits in the project trunk since, and I'd like to update my branch for the latest trunk | 02:35 |
MTecknology | evfool: 'bzr merge' should work | 02:37 |
evfool | bzr merge where? in my branch dir, something like local-branch$ bzr merge lp:project? | 02:38 |
evfool | MTecknology^ | 02:38 |
MTecknology | evfool: example.. bzr branch lp:branch1; cd branch1; bzr merge branch2 | 02:39 |
evfool | thanks MTecknology | 02:40 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
G | ummm is it me, or is oneiric basically uninstallable when it comes to any SSL related voodoo? seems the current ca-certificates package requires openssl >=1.0.0 but openssl is still 0.9.8... | 07:09 |
broder | G: oneiric just opened a couple of days ago. it may take some time for the dust to settle | 07:11 |
micahg | G: ca-certs was sync'd, openssl needs a merge | 07:11 |
G | yeah, looks like ca-certificates got synced yeah | 07:12 |
G | micahg: yeah, just realised that after some digging | 07:12 |
G | was hoping to test a merge I was going to propose | 07:13 |
micahg | G: pull the ca-certs from natty | 07:14 |
broder | anybody around know about the armel ftbfs from apt? can i assume that someone will retry all of the failed builds once it gets taken care of? | 07:15 |
G | micahg: yep, just trying to remember how to do it with pbuilder, it's been a while | 07:16 |
ohsix | apport is pretty patronising post release | 07:17 |
=== Saamm is now known as Nitesh | ||
cjwatson | broder: yes, you can assume that | 08:55 |
cjwatson | G: I would be astonished if oneiric were installable right now | 08:55 |
cjwatson | I have an openssl merge in progress, but it's non-trivial | 08:55 |
G | cjwatson: yeah, I was just making sure that I wasn't going crazy | 08:56 |
cdbs | cjwatson: ping | 09:20 |
cdbs | cjwatson: Oneiric is installable | 09:20 |
* cdbs is using it | 09:20 | |
cdbs | cjwatson: moreover, did an autosync just take place? | 09:20 |
cjwatson | cdbs: don't ping me about oneiric being uninstallable a couple of days into the cycle. it's practically uninstallable *by design* at this point. :-) | 09:21 |
cjwatson | cdbs: I'm doing more or less daily autosyncs at the moment, and yes I just did one. | 09:21 |
cdbs | makes sense | 09:22 |
cdbs | cjwatson: I didn't ping about it being *not* installable, I was just answering your line: < cjwatson> G: I would be astonished if oneiric were installable right now | 09:22 |
cjwatson | oh, you said installable | 09:22 |
cjwatson | cdbs: why ping me then? | 09:22 |
cdbs | cjwatson: ignoring the autosync, I was just notifying and correcting you, since G had probably asked you earlier :) | 09:23 |
cdbs | okay, then, never mind | 09:23 |
cjwatson | anyway, I'm sure parts of it are installable and parts not. we have an automatic report for such things. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/testing/oneiric_probs.html | 09:23 |
cjwatson | armel:743 | 09:23 |
cjwatson | amd64:672 | 09:23 |
cjwatson | i386:678 | 09:23 |
cjwatson | (uninstallable counts in main by architecture) | 09:23 |
cdbs | I dunno after the autosync, before it oneiric was perfect | 09:23 |
cdbs | okay, /me g2g | 09:23 |
cjwatson | I stand by my previous comment. :-) | 09:23 |
cjwatson | before the autosync, oneiric was mostly natty :-) | 09:24 |
cjwatson | so of course it would be generally installable | 09:24 |
jsimmons | It looks like there's a bug in the libglew-1.5-dev package in 11.04, to the point you can't even compile code using it. | 09:36 |
jsimmons | I don't know how it could have possibly been missed but anyway. | 09:37 |
=== korn_ is now known as c_korn | ||
lfaraone | kenvandine: In natty, I'm not seeing that bug 621953 has been fixed; scrolling via the keyboard still doesn't work. | 12:01 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 621953 in gwibber (Ubuntu) "Can't scroll feed using keyboard" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/621953 | 12:01 |
echo6 | I'm trying to compile splashutils from source on Narwal, /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29 fata error: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or directory | 12:06 |
echo6 | Not sure if this is a bug in libklibc-dev or other? and whether I should report it as such on launchpad | 12:06 |
lfaraone | let me see, echo6. | 12:09 |
lfaraone | echo6: that's not an Ubuntu package, is it? | 12:10 |
echo6 | splashutils isn't, but libklibc-dev is | 12:11 |
Laibsch | I have a weird pbuilder problem that I hope you can help me with. I want to recompile the latest grub2 for lucid. I get an error "dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libdevmapper-dev (>= 2:1.02.34) libfuse-dev mtools", yet these should be available as logging in to pbuilder shows: http://paste.debian.net/115542/ | 12:40 |
geser | Laibsch: have you tried to install those packages (in your pbuilder)? | 12:44 |
AndreaAzzarone | hi, someone can help me? | 13:00 |
AndreaAzzarone | regards libglade and gtk | 13:01 |
AndreaAzzarone | *gtk3 | 13:01 |
Laibsch | geser: you mean to include those packages in base.tgz? Good idea, I actually hadn't though about that. Hopefully that will get me to build the package. I still wonder why the installation from inside the pbuilder run itself doesn't seem to work. | 13:10 |
Laibsch | AndreaAzzarone: Ask your question and you will see if somebody can help you. libglade and gtk sounds like you want to ask in #ubuntu-app-devel, though | 13:11 |
geser | Laibsch: I meant to try installing it to check if they're installable or not | 13:13 |
AndreaAzzarone | Laibsch, thanks! I already solved my problem ;) | 13:17 |
Laibsch | geser: yes, the packages are installable: http://paste.debian.net/115629/ (from inside the pbuilder) | 13:27 |
geser | hmm, then I wonder why you got the error | 13:27 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== fabbione is now known as fabbione_vac | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
Laibsch | geser: hehe, yes, me too. I really don't understand that one. | 14:36 |
Laibsch | I'm now including the packages in base.tgz temporarily. Build the package and then purge them again. | 14:36 |
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
dupondje | dev's are taking a nap ? : | 16:19 |
dupondje | :) | 16:19 |
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== emma is now known as em | ||
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
=== dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | ||
=== dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | ||
echo6 | It would appear Narwal linux-libc-dev: 2.6.38-8.42 is missing /usr/include/asm/ directory | 18:40 |
ogra_ | should be in asm-generic | 18:44 |
micahg | echo6: now in the multiarch path | 18:44 |
echo6 | yes, i had to create a symlink to ./i386-linux-gnu/asm | 18:45 |
Ampelbein | echo6: that defeats the purpose of multiarch, doesn't it? | 18:46 |
micahg | echo6: you shouldn't need to create the symlink | 18:46 |
echo6 | it was the only way I could compile something from source | 18:46 |
micahg | echo6: the package is broke then, each arch has the proper path | 18:47 |
Ampelbein | the application should be fixed then | 18:47 |
echo6 | thanks, at least I can contact the author | 18:47 |
echo6 | hmm, the error was generated from /usr/lib/klibc/linux/posix_types.h:47:29 | 18:49 |
echo6 | it expects to find asm/posix_types.h | 18:52 |
Ampelbein | echo6: what error? If the application uses the correct -I parameter, there should be no problem. | 18:52 |
echo6 | Ampelbein: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rootskel/+bug/765903 | 18:53 |
ubottu | Ubuntu bug 765903 in rootskel (Ubuntu) "rootskel version 1.94ubuntu1 failed to build on i386" [High,New] | 18:53 |
Ampelbein | echo6: hmm, that should be fixed with newest klibc, see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/1.5.20-1ubuntu6 | 19:03 |
echo6 | Ampelbein: That is the version I'm using and getting errors with | 19:08 |
echo6 | Ampelbein: Sorry, I see now there is a patch 1.5.20-1ubuntu61.5.20-1ubuntu6 | 19:09 |
ScottK | slangasek: It looks like Bug 764096 may be a multiarch related issue. Would you please have a look. | 19:21 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 764096 in postfix (Ubuntu) "DNS hostname lookups fail in chroot after natty upgrade" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/764096 | 19:21 |
cjohnston | Is something wrong with apport retrace? | 20:40 |
* arpan is away: Gone away for now | 21:38 | |
lifeless | cjohnston: why do you ask? | 22:05 |
calc | anyone happen to know why the ubuntu desktop amd64 zsync file doesn't work? | 22:39 |
calc | it downloads then won't proceed to download the iso itself | 22:39 |
calc | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/602014/ | 22:41 |
arand_ | calc: Seems like all of the zsync isos fail for some reason.. | 22:46 |
calc | arand_: any idea who should be alerted to the issue? | 22:51 |
arand_ | calc: 'fraid no.. | 23:08 |
cjwatson | calc,arand_: you can file a bug on the ubuntu-cdimage project | 23:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!