[00:00] brb [00:00] gonna go pick up my pizza, bbiab [00:19] mdke: I filed bug 773105 re: using firefox's start page by epiphany & others [00:19] Launchpad bug 773105 in ubuntu-website "start.ubuntu.com should redirect based on user's language" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/773105 [02:16] hey guys [02:22] Is there a way to set opacity of the top bar in Ubuntu Classic? cause if not, when you have a dark background you can't read the test of Applications, Places, etc. [03:26] any commiters around? [03:29] if so: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~steven.richards/+junk/gnome-help/revision/1553 [03:47] Captainkrtek: do you have bluetooth? [04:58] jbicha, yes [04:59] little dongle [05:16] jbicha, ^ [05:55] hey nhandler [05:55] Hello Captainkrtek [05:55] have a patch if you wish to apply it http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~steven.richards/+junk/gnome-help/revision/1553 [05:55] just reviewed a few pages [05:56] Captainkrtek: I don't have commit access and I'm about to head to bed [05:56] oh okay [05:56] just saw your mask saying ubuntu.member [05:58] Yeah, I'm an Ubuntu Member, but not part of the core doc team [05:58] gotc [05:58] gotcha* [05:58] thought I was as well, no mask for me :P [06:00] m/63 [06:02] ? [07:46] how do you get the ubuntu/member/nickname mask? [07:52] !member | Captainkrtek [07:53] Captainkrtek: Ubuntu Membership means recognition of a significant and sustained contribution to Ubuntu and the Ubuntu community. For more info see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Membership [07:53] become an ubuntu member, and you get a hostmask cloak [07:58] ahh cool [08:00] guess I'll have to wait 6 months :| [08:00] Captainkrtek, if you just want to mask your IP in the meantime, Freenode will cloak you. #freenode and ask. [08:00] well I already had an unaffiliated and now I have the donor one [08:00] so I'm good for now [08:01] Captainkrtek, you're currently showing your IP, not a mask, fwiw. Not identified to services right now? [08:01] oh whoops [08:01] there [08:02] thought I had my ns ident in my xchat onconnect [08:02] oh still there... [08:02] odd [08:06] yeah im cloaked now [09:58] morning all [17:15] I'm not sure what to do with this bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/774575 [17:15] Launchpad bug 774575 in ubuntu-docs "package ubuntu-docs 11.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: パッケージが非常に矛盾した状態に陥りました。 削除を行う前にこのパッケージを再インストールすべきです。" [Undecided,New] [21:08] is bug 651707 actually an ubuntu-docs one? Or does that belong to the installer package (debian-installer?) [21:08] Launchpad bug 651707 in ubuntu-docs "brltty refers to http://access.ubuntu.com/braille but that doesn't exist" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/651707 [21:29] Rocket2DMn: no, I think that is invalid for ubuntu-docs [21:30] hey j1mc [21:32] mdke, quick question about images. I'm going through those in libs/img/. There are some that are not mentioned in any of the /C/ directories but still have references in po files [21:32] why would that be, and is it safe to remove the image? [21:35] Rocket2DMn: yes I guess it is safe, the English has probably moved on since the image was added. But I wouldn't bother working on that, as none of the files will be in Oneiric [21:35] Rocket2DMn: removing images that aren't used in the package isn't worth doing for an SRU either [21:35] (as it doesn't affect the binary package) [21:36] mdke, i'm looking at bug 681679 - i was going to add them to the fix-urls.sh script and add the images that arne't even currently there [21:36] Launchpad bug 681679 in ubuntu-docs "Incorrect image urls on help.ubuntu.com Applications page" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/681679 [21:37] the others i was going to update to use the correct image, some are outdated [21:37] i was just going to do it for all images that are being used [21:37] Rocket2DMn: cool, yes adding images and fixing links is definitely worth doing :) [21:37] no string change is associated with any of that [21:38] is it a problem if i remove the unused images? [21:38] i already have them marked [21:38] nope, wouldn't have thought so [21:39] ok i'll just go ahead and do it [21:48] do you think that we should keep the revision history from gnome-user-docs in our oneiric ubuntu-docs branch? [21:49] pro: possible greater ease in merging from upstream master (perhaps unlikely to happen and may require manual work anyway) [21:49] con: it's about 130,000KB download [21:50] I think myself that it may well be appropriate to start afresh this time [21:51] we can't take revision history from both ubuntu-docs and gnome-user-docs; gnome-user-docs is more relevant to the work we will do in oneiric but I think it's probably better to start without revision history given the size [21:52] mdke, if we dont think we will ever need to reference the history, then dont take it if its a problem [21:53] as long as we still have the history for the natty branch, we should be ok [21:53] yeah, we would still have it there [22:07] bzr really needs a light checkout option, Ubuntu distributed development is cool because you can fix something easily [22:08] but if you have to download a few hundred MB slowly first, it's not as cool [22:09] the Desktop Team cheats and only has the debian/ directory in bzr which confuses newbies like me [22:09] but I think I figured it out now [22:14] hey jbicha submitted some more diffs [22:15] I have to go though, mountain biking :-) [22:16] ok, have fun! [22:19] mdke: hey, you were talking about glossary terms the other day, yes? [22:20] I have a back-of-the-brain idea for an extension, would allow us to do things like a quick definition popup on hover, click through for more details [22:20] all aggregated in a very mallard-y way. actually kind of a mix between a glossary and an index [22:21] how interested would people be in this? [22:22] um, put another way, I've got three extensions I'm working on: facets/tagging, conditional processing, and the glossary stuff [22:22] tell me how you'd prefer I prioritize [22:24] which is more useful to users? [22:30] shaunm: I think that sounds pretty cool - I think the glossary thing could be quite important myself [22:30] shaunm: what's an extension? [22:43] shaunm: facets/tagging. is that like providing keywords? [23:37] back [23:37] how's it going everyone?