| pitti | Good morning | 06:03 |
|---|---|---|
| pitti | jbicha: I'm using Radiance, and the buttons look fine? | 06:03 |
| cdbs | seb | 06:04 |
| cdbs | oops, pressed enter instead of tab | 06:04 |
| TheMuso | Hey pitti. | 06:05 |
| jbicha | pitti: you're right, it's just the other themes that don't fit in | 06:13 |
| pitti | chrisccoulson_: can I ask you to do https://code.launchpad.net/~pitti/po2xpi/fix-update-data/+merge/59875 ? | 06:45 |
| cdbs | It appears that the latest update-manager in Oneiric doesn't launch | 08:02 |
| jbicha | yes, ImportError: No module named UnitySupport | 08:03 |
| cdbs | jbicha: So I'm not the only one | 08:04 |
| cdbs | hi seb128 , can you look at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-o-default-apps-unity-integration ? | 08:05 |
| pitti | seb128: bonjour | 08:10 |
| kenvandine | good morning folks | 08:10 |
| seb128 | hey kenvandine pitti | 08:10 |
| seb128 | hey cdbs | 08:10 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, what are you doing up still? ;-) | 08:11 |
| * kenvandine is just downloading offline maps to my phone before getting a few hours of sleep before flying | 08:11 | |
| pitti | hey kenvandine | 08:11 |
| kenvandine | seb128, and i was also working on building libido for gtk3 | 08:11 |
| pitti | seb128: how's Budapest? | 08:11 |
| seb128 | pitti, nice | 08:11 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, did you get it working? | 08:12 |
| kenvandine | not yet | 08:12 |
| kenvandine | it is less trivial than the others | 08:12 |
| kenvandine | quite a bit of stuff to change | 08:12 |
| kenvandine | enough for tonight though, i gotta get some sleep | 08:13 |
| seb128 | cdbs, what about it? | 08:13 |
| seb128 | kenvandine, 'night | 08:13 |
| kenvandine | good night, see you soon'ish :) | 08:13 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: we have a good reason for a libreoffice SRU: bug 775608. | 08:25 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 775608 in libreoffice "[Upstream] Libreoffice Calc's PRODUCT function doesn't calculate correctly with certain array formulas" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/775608 | 08:25 |
| Sweetshark | it would make us the only distri to have a current version of LibreOffice that actually calculates right, which I would consider a feature. | 08:29 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: eww, yes; I added a natty task | 08:32 |
| pitti | bbiab, bank/post office | 08:32 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: eww, yes; I added a natty task | 08:33 |
| pitti | bbiab, bank/post office | 08:33 |
| cdbs | seb128: Just wanted your opinion on it | 08:49 |
| seb128 | cdbs, seems like nice integration work for contributors | 08:49 |
| cdbs | seb128: And please do subscribe, I'll be attending remotely, and I can't gather folks for the session through remote robotic hands @ Budapest :) | 08:49 |
| seb128 | k, I will mention it to didrocks as well | 08:50 |
| cdbs | seb128: yup, could be a give-away for contributors as well, we just need to decide which apps needs what | 08:50 |
| cdbs | thanks seb128 | 08:50 |
| cdbs | DBO: seb128: Enjoying Budapest? | 08:52 |
| cdbs | Gosh, my age is such a damn barrier to enjoyment | 08:52 |
| jbicha | how do I properly do the maintainer script when the packaging has been reshuffled with an /etc file | 09:14 |
| seb128 | jbicha, define reshuffled | 09:16 |
| seb128 | jbicha, but basically http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling | 09:16 |
| seb128 | it has code you can use to clean or move those on upgrade | 09:17 |
| jbicha | the etc is now "owned" by -common instead of -bin or the other way around | 09:17 |
| jbicha | thanks, I'll see if I can figure that out, just rm'ing it in the prerm upgrade works but I didn't think it was very nice | 09:18 |
| seb128 | did you try to just use a replaces as for any file move to a new binary? | 09:19 |
| jbicha | can you explain that more?, I'm still learning packaging | 09:20 |
| jbicha | the wiki page points me to man dpkg-maintscript-helper which tells me how to move or remove a conf file | 09:22 |
| seb128 | jbicha, not sure what issue you are trying to solve, but usually when a file moves between binaries we use a Replaces to avoid conflicts on upgrade | 09:22 |
| seb128 | like | 09:22 |
| jbicha | ok, maybe I understand that | 09:23 |
| seb128 | it's the way to tell dpkg to not report a conflict between the binaries | 09:23 |
| seb128 | it seems like that the conffile being in a new binary should be handled without any need to manual work out of using the Replaces: -bin (<< new-version) | 09:24 |
| jbicha | if I just tell it that it replaces the older version, it may be smart enough to figure out how to upgrade it correctly | 09:24 |
| jbicha | ok, I'll try that, thank you | 09:24 |
| seb128 | to avoid conflicts if the new -common is unpacked before the new -bin which would make dpkg go "you have 2 binaries shipping the same file it's a bug" | 09:24 |
| jbicha | I'm trying to merge in Debian's version of gnome-session 3 and this should be my last step | 09:25 |
| seb128 | what file are you dealing with? | 09:25 |
| seb128 | jbicha, ^ | 09:27 |
| jbicha | /etc/X11/Xsession.d/55gnome-session_gnomerc | 09:28 |
| jbicha | there was a replaces in Debian's control, just have to tweak it slightly for Ubuntu | 09:28 |
| seb128 | that file doesn't come from Ubuntu, it must have moved in Debian as well so they probably deal with it | 09:28 |
| seb128 | ok, makes sense | 09:29 |
| rodrigo_ | morning | 09:43 |
| seb128 | hey rodrigo_ | 09:43 |
| jbicha | howdy | 09:46 |
| rodrigo_ | hi seb128, jbicha | 09:46 |
| chrisccoulson_ | pitti - yeah, sure. i can do that. ca-valencia is actually automatically blacklisted in my new firefox packaging, as i parse the list of languages to ship in the firefox source | 09:54 |
| chrisccoulson_ | and that one is not on the list (or it's !linux) | 09:55 |
| pitti | chrisccoulson_: for oneiric you mean? | 09:55 |
| pitti | (we need this for natty) | 09:55 |
| chrisccoulson_ | pitti - yeah, for oneiric | 09:56 |
| chrisccoulson_ | i was just saying that this won't be a problem in oneiric ;) | 09:56 |
| pitti | nice | 09:56 |
| chrisccoulson_ | pitti - http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/3ff945bdace7/browser/locales/shipped-locales | 09:59 |
| chrisccoulson_ | i parse that to build the list of xpi's to create | 09:59 |
| pitti | chrisccoulson_: straight from gitweb? that's done at source build time then? | 10:00 |
| chrisccoulson_ | pitti - no, that's shipped in the source tarball | 10:01 |
| chrisccoulson_ | (although, i don't actually parse it at package build time. i build a list from it at source build time so i can create the entries in debian/control) | 10:02 |
| chrisccoulson_ | hmmm, unity really doesn't like me docking my laptop | 10:03 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson_: unity doesn't like my uptime :) | 10:04 |
| RAOF | chrisccoulson_: Somewhat surprisingly, Unity quite likes me docking my laptop. | 10:05 |
| RAOF | Even *more* surprisingly, my laptop detects when I turn of my external DP monitor *and automatically disables it* | 10:06 |
| RAOF | It's crazy when things work as you'd hope them to :) | 10:06 |
| pitti | black magic! | 10:06 |
| chrisccoulson_ | i'm going to have to restart. restarting compiz hasn't fixed my problem, and now my display is even more messed up | 10:06 |
| RAOF | I was astounded the first time it happened :) | 10:06 |
| pitti | I still don't quite like how it messes up the resolution on both displays to 1024x768 when I open the lid | 10:07 |
| pitti | but it's come a looooong way | 10:07 |
| RAOF | Harumph. It *should* pick up your last used config, which would probably be spanned. | 10:07 |
| chrisccoulson | that's better. 2 functioning screens again | 10:09 |
| jbicha | rodrigo_: I synced gnome-session with Debian for the gnome3 PPA, here's the updated merge proposal: | 10:14 |
| jbicha | https://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/gnome-session/gnome3-support-ubuntu-session/+merge/59886 | 10:14 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: How do I do this "nominate for series" thingie for the SRU? | 10:14 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: I already added a natty task | 10:14 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: but below the task list there is a "Target to series..." link | 10:14 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: cant find it. | 10:16 |
| * Sweetshark is blind | 10:16 | |
| pitti | Sweetshark: you see the two buttons with a green plus? | 10:16 |
| * vish suspects Sweetshark is not in BugControl.. | 10:17 | |
| pitti | + Also affects project + Also affects distribution O Target to series | 10:17 |
| micahg | pitti: it's only available for bug control members | 10:17 |
| pitti | aah | 10:17 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: without that you won't be able to do much triaging indeed; can you please ping bdmurray (not sure who else) to add you? | 10:17 |
| * Sweetshark always wondered how one could get bugs in certain states that seemed unavailable to me ... | 10:18 | |
| micahg | Sweetshark: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl | 10:19 |
| chrisccoulson | pitti - thanks for accepting my firefox SRU :) | 10:20 |
| chrisccoulson | micahg, feel like doing some SRU verification> ;) | 10:20 |
| pitti | no worries, thanks for fixing stuff! | 10:20 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: maybe a bit later, need to get thunderbird out before I collapse | 10:20 |
| chrisccoulson | pitti - yeah, it's a shame i had to regress bug 548866, but i think the severity of bug 643899 justifies that for now | 10:21 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 548866 in firefox "forgets middlemouse.contentLoadURL on upgrade" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/548866 | 10:21 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 643899 in firefox "Firefox sending header "Accept-Language: chrome://global/locale/intl.properties"" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/643899 | 10:21 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: I think it might be better to file a new bug to track that regression | 10:21 |
| chrisccoulson | pitti - oh, you have an automated script? ;) | 10:22 |
| pitti | chrisccoulson: for what? | 10:22 |
| chrisccoulson | pitti - you can probably unassign sru-verification from bug 548866, as i just need to reopen that (but i mentioned that in the changelog) | 10:23 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 548866 in firefox "forgets middlemouse.contentLoadURL on upgrade" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/548866 | 10:23 |
| chrisccoulson | i guess your script caught that ;) | 10:23 |
| chrisccoulson | **unsubscribe | 10:23 |
| pitti | ah, right | 10:23 |
| pitti | don't close bugs in the changelog which you want to reopen :) | 10:24 |
| pitti | set back to triaged, and followed up with a comment | 10:24 |
| micahg | that's going to get confusing, can we please open a new bug since this is only a natty regression at this point? | 10:25 |
| micahg | that bug was a regression on a previous release before that | 10:25 |
| chrisccoulson | wtf - bug 776970 ? what on earth does the title have to do with the description? | 10:30 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 776970 in firefox "window.opener.content.document.nodePrincipal;" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/776970 | 10:30 |
| chrisccoulson | jeez, i can't escape from people using the words "Fitt's Law". now, people aren't just using it in mailing lists, but they're using it in bug reports too! | 10:32 |
| chrisccoulson | (bug 776930) | 10:32 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 776930 in unity "Attempted mouse-overs for the Firefox back button and Find box close button will bring up the Launcher (Fitts's Law)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/776930 | 10:32 |
| chrisccoulson | i think i'm going to go and hide in a cave | 10:32 |
| micahg | chrisccoulson: there's a 2 yr old bug with it in the title I think as well :) | 10:32 |
| pitti | but indeed this is annoying | 10:32 |
| pitti | I can't properly select stuff from firefox due to that, until I disabled launcher-on-edge in the prefs again | 10:32 |
| chrisccoulson | pitti - yeah. you must have that with other applications as well though? | 10:33 |
| chrisccoulson | i can't see what i could possibly do in firefox about this :/ | 10:33 |
| pitti | chrisccoulson: in principle yes, but it's one of the few apps I run fullscreen (the other is weechat, which I don't c&p from) | 10:33 |
| pitti | it's a unity design failure though, not a firefox bug | 10:34 |
| pitti | (which was discussed over and over, and this got pointed out as regression potential, but it was done anyway) | 10:34 |
| chrisccoulson | yeah, it is pretty annoying | 10:35 |
| pitti | RAOF: xserver-xorg-video-nv was removed in Debian, ok to follow suit? | 10:38 |
| pitti | debian bug 612189 | 10:38 |
| ubot2 | Debian bug 612189 in ftp.debian.org "RM: xserver-xorg-video-nv -- ROM; unmaintained" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/612189 | 10:38 |
| RAOF | pitti: We didn't do that already? :) | 10:39 |
| pitti | *flush* | 10:39 |
| RAOF | pitti: Perfectly fine to. It's patched so that it can't actally load in all but unusual circumstances, anyway :) | 10:39 |
| pitti | RAOF: apparently nobody did a process-removals run in a long time :) | 10:40 |
| pitti | (s/did/has done/, right?) | 10:40 |
| RAOF | Right. | 10:41 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: can you nominate bug 775608 and bug 746375 for series natty? And set set importance to critical for 775608? I will then subscribe ubuntu-sru. Im unsure about who is to assign the "verification-needed" tag. | 10:44 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 775608 in libreoffice "[Upstream] Libreoffice Calc's PRODUCT function doesn't calculate correctly with certain array formulas" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/775608 | 10:44 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 746375 in libreoffice "soffice.bin crashed with SIGSEGV in uno_type_sequence_construct()" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/746375 | 10:44 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: v-needed will be done by sru team when accepting the fix | 10:44 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: done | 10:45 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: Ok, this is finished for my part. You would need to take over for sponsoring etc. | 10:52 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: can you please upload the source package (to "natty-proposed") to chinstrap again? | 10:52 |
| pitti | (or PPA) | 10:52 |
| pitti | but PPA would waste buildd power | 10:53 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: I am already wasting: https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/1711276/+listing-archive-extra | 10:55 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: do you have a version with a better changelog for the second one? | 10:55 |
| chrisccoulson | heh, it seems the PPA builders are a bit behind | 10:56 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: i. e. which describes the actual problem instead of "tentative patch"? | 10:56 |
| seb128 | hum | 10:56 |
| chrisccoulson | hi seb128 | 10:56 |
| seb128 | pitti, wasn't remmina blocked by the security team? | 10:56 |
| seb128 | hey chrisccoulson | 10:56 |
| pitti | seb128: yes, but for IMHO weird reasons; tsclient isn't any better | 10:56 |
| seb128 | pitti, right, well I was just wondering if you talked to kees about it | 10:57 |
| pitti | not yet | 10:57 |
| pitti | easier at UDS when Kees, Robert, and we are all in the same TZ | 10:57 |
| seb128 | ok, I just got confused by the work iteam | 10:58 |
| seb128 | item | 10:58 |
| seb128 | let's discuss it next week ;-) | 10:58 |
| pitti | iTeam sounds like a shiny new apple product, let's register it! | 10:58 |
| seb128 | ;-) | 10:59 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: uploaded to chinstrap | 11:05 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: hm, needs to go to natty-proposed, not natty (see above) | 11:06 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: urgency is irrelevant for Ubuntu, FYI (doesn't hurt to set it to high, but won't do anything) | 11:06 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: fixed | 11:14 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: uploaded, thanks! | 11:16 |
| seb128 | pitti, doing a gdm merge on debian would be a challenge but if someone feels like doing it ;-) | 11:24 |
| pitti | seb128: I added a question mark to it; but at some point we want to upgrade to gdm3 anyway, right? | 11:24 |
| pitti | seb128: and at that point we should at least rename our package to gdm3; we don't actually need to merge the Debian changes if that's impractical | 11:25 |
| pitti | but I guess the bigger challenge is to port gdmsetup etc. to gdm3 (in case it's actually necessary) | 11:25 |
| seb128 | right | 11:25 |
| seb128 | we will upgrade to gdm3 this cycle I guess | 11:25 |
| pitti | updated pad | 11:25 |
| pitti | seb128: also depends if we'll switch to lightdm by default; if we do, we might be able to drop a lot of patches | 11:26 |
| seb128 | well, maybe | 11:26 |
| chrisccoulson | aren't most of the features of gdmsetup in control-center now? | 11:28 |
| chrisccoulson | i think they were last time i tried a fedora live CD | 11:28 |
| seb128 | we need to rebase our gdm on accountsservice I guess | 11:29 |
| seb128 | pitti, the issue so far is that nobody though merging gdm on debian was worth the effort | 11:31 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: who should be the approver blueprints desktop-o-libreoffice-communities and desktop-o-libreoffice-packaging? You? Or jasoncwarner? They would need to be approved for UDS, right? | 11:31 |
| jbicha | gdm3 is in the PPA | 11:31 |
| seb128 | it's like going to take over a day of work and not going to bring any value especially if we want to switch away from using it | 11:31 |
| seb128 | jbicha, there is a broken version in the ppa yes | 11:32 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: doh, you are already the approver | 11:32 |
| seb128 | like distro patches, gdmsetup, integration etc got commented | 11:32 |
| jbicha | dunno, works for me | 11:32 |
| pitti | seb128: approver means approving the content of the spec for implementation, not ack'ing for UDS | 11:32 |
| seb128 | pitti, wrong s<tab>? ;-) | 11:32 |
| pitti | sorry | 11:33 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: approver means approving the content of the spec for implementation, not ack'ing for UDS | 11:33 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: ah, now I can hear you ;) | 11:33 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: ok, I already mailed jasoncwarner1 about it, so when we should do something about the blueprints on UDS I'd assume its taken care of. | 11:35 |
| pitti | Sweetshark: accepted for uds-o and oneiric | 11:36 |
| Sweetshark | pitti: ah, great! | 11:38 |
| * Sweetshark is beginning to get conditioned to nag pitti with random tasks. | 11:39 | |
| * pitti is beginning to think he accumulated way too many team memberships over the yeasrs | 11:39 | |
| jbicha | oh, now that I think about it, gdm does something weird to my $PATH | 11:43 |
| seb128 | jbicha, it probably does to your locales as well | 11:44 |
| rodrigo_ | ugh, was disconnected | 11:58 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, ok, so what you told me yesterday about rebasing from debian, so what's the proper way to do it? I have branched trunk and applied the diff from the debian branch, and then I go over all the changes in our branch, right? | 11:58 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, not sure what is the proper way to merge on debian, pitti and other probably are closer than me from a "clean" way | 12:01 |
| seb128 | https://merges.ubuntu.com/main.html has diffs | 12:01 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, there is a bzr merge-package which works as well for things with sources in debian | 12:02 |
| rodrigo_ | ah, cool | 12:02 |
| seb128 | the way I do it is probably old school | 12:03 |
| seb128 | I diff the debian dirs between current ubuntu and debian | 12:03 |
| seb128 | then reapply changesets and list those in the changelog manually | 12:03 |
| rodrigo_ | ok | 12:03 |
| seb128 | on whatever way is easier | 12:04 |
| seb128 | like I might copy the debian control.in file over our version and readd the vcs and ubuntu maintainer if that's easier this way | 12:04 |
| seb128 | or just keep the vcs version and document the diff if there is nothing from debian to take | 12:04 |
| seb128 | but I guess you got what I mean there | 12:04 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, yes, some things are easier to do manually | 12:05 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, one way to do it easily is take the vcs, copy the debian dir over and clean the bzr diff | 12:05 |
| seb128 | debian dir = the one coming from the debian source | 12:06 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, but the changelog, we keep the whole debian one, + one entry with the ubuntu specific changes, right? | 12:06 |
| seb128 | so you have the diff in bzr | 12:06 |
| rodrigo_ | yes | 12:06 |
| seb128 | and the goal is to have only useful things to Ubuntu remaining | 12:06 |
| seb128 | it also allow you to bzr revert one file if there was no useful addition in debian | 12:06 |
| seb128 | some people do merge the changelogs but I usually just summarize the diff in the current upload | 12:06 |
| seb128 | see eog or the gedit upload I just did | 12:07 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, I think that's the easiest | 12:07 |
| seb128 | ok | 12:07 |
| seb128 | time for lunch there, bbl | 12:07 |
| chrisccoulson | has anyone upgraded to oneiric yet? | 12:09 |
| pitti | I traditionally upgrade on UDS Friday afternoon | 12:09 |
| seb128 | same here, I need a working laptop for UDS | 12:09 |
| seb128 | so I'm just doing the merges on natty until then ;-) | 12:10 |
| seb128 | ok, lunch, bbl | 12:10 |
| chrisccoulson | heh, i think i'll probably wait too ;) | 12:10 |
| rodrigo_ | chrisccoulson, usually upgrading before going to a conference is a way of looking for problems :-) | 12:11 |
| chrisccoulson | rodrigo_, i like problems ;) | 12:12 |
| chrisccoulson | keeps things exciting! | 12:12 |
| chrisccoulson | b'ah, i'm really starting to hate bzr | 12:14 |
| chrisccoulson | that's twice in a few weeks that my branch has screwed up and i can't push it to launchpad | 12:15 |
| jbicha | I'm crazy, I'm using Oneiric now | 12:15 |
| rodrigo_ | chrisccoulson, :) | 12:15 |
| rodrigo_ | so, what's the replacement for the .gconf-defaults files for gsettings? | 12:15 |
| orange1 | hi all - trying to get workrave going in unity - it used to be an applet - pointers would be appreciated.... | 12:16 |
| Laney | rodrigo_: debian/package.gsettings-override | 12:17 |
| Laney | see dh_installgsettings(1) | 12:17 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, ok cool | 12:17 |
| Laney | needs debhelper >= 8.1.3 too | 12:18 |
| rodrigo_ | hmm, natty only has 8.1.2ubuntu4 | 12:19 |
| Laney | yeah, O only | 12:21 |
| Laney | or -backports | 12:21 |
| rodrigo_ | ok | 12:26 |
| rodrigo_ | I'll add a work item for now | 12:26 |
| Laney | you can probably install Oneiric's debhelper in Natty tbh | 12:28 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, yes, sure, just want to finish this merge, it's been taking me a few days now | 12:29 |
| Laney | well, oneiric chroots are easy to create :-) | 12:30 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, yes, I will do it as soon as I've got some time | 12:32 |
| rodrigo_ | what's the file to change so that 'oneiric' is understood by dpkg-buildpackage & co? | 12:43 |
| rodrigo_ | I always forget | 12:43 |
| === Pendulum_ is now known as Pendulum | ||
| seb128 | re | 13:18 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, we have overrides for gsettings | 13:18 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, right | 13:20 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, btw, just pushed g-s-d rebase to ubuntu-desktop branch, if you want to do a quick review before I upload | 13:21 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, can do in a bit | 13:21 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, no hurry, will go out for lunch in a bit, so no hurry :) | 13:22 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, I will have it reviewed for when you come back from lunch | 13:22 |
| desrt | seb128: ahah. i found you. | 13:22 |
| desrt | can you package something for me? | 13:22 |
| seb128 | you are next in the queue | 13:22 |
| desrt | rodrigo_: you will come next week? | 13:22 |
| rodrigo_ | desrt, to budapest? yes | 13:23 |
| rodrigo_ | I arrive on Sunday | 13:23 |
| rodrigo_ | desrt, you're there already? | 13:23 |
| desrt | yes | 13:23 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, cool | 13:23 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, lunch now, bbl | 13:25 |
| desrt | DBO: hey steve | 13:28 |
| * pitti hugs desrt | 13:30 | |
| desrt | pitti: hi :) | 13:30 |
| desrt | pitti: i want to talk to you next week about umask | 13:30 |
| pitti | desrt: DBO is Jason, not a Steve :) | 13:30 |
| desrt | because i am very confused | 13:30 |
| desrt | pitti: no. he's steve. :) | 13:31 |
| pitti | now I am very confused as well | 13:31 |
| chrisccoulson | me too | 13:31 |
| desrt | jason is across the table from me | 13:31 |
| desrt | if you want confusion, perhaps we should start calling jason rick instead of steve jason | 13:31 |
| desrt | pitti: do you have any awareness of what happened, exactly? | 13:32 |
| desrt | (with umask) | 13:32 |
| pitti | desrt: about umask? | 13:32 |
| desrt | ya. | 13:32 |
| desrt | i thought it was done in brussels | 13:32 |
| desrt | then it was reversed or something | 13:32 |
| pitti | hmm, apparently nobody actually implemented it | 13:32 |
| desrt | lol. | 13:32 |
| desrt | it was adding one line to a file and deleting a line from another :) | 13:33 |
| pitti | hmm, Assignee: desrt; that was probably inadequate then? | 13:34 |
| desrt | well | 13:34 |
| desrt | considering that i don't have the ability to upload... | 13:34 |
| pitti | right, it just apparently fell off everyone else's radar | 13:35 |
| * pitti accepts for oneiric and assigns to himself | 13:35 | |
| desrt | great. thanks. :) | 13:35 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, let me know when you are back | 14:53 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, I'm back | 15:08 |
| rodrigo_ | I'll try again: what's the file to edit to add oneiric to the list of known ubuntu versions, so that bzr-builddeb works? :) | 15:10 |
| cyphermox | rodrigo_, isn't that usually backported or something? | 15:13 |
| rodrigo_ | cyphermox, I remember having edited one file for natty, months ago, to make it work | 15:14 |
| cyphermox | yeah | 15:14 |
| rodrigo_ | but I don't remember which file | 15:14 |
| rodrigo_ | and i can't really find it | 15:14 |
| cyphermox | which error do you get? | 15:14 |
| * cyphermox has already switched to oneiric | 15:14 | |
| rodrigo_ | 'oneiric not known' or something like that | 15:14 |
| cyphermox | but does it say something before that, like dpkg-source or whatever? | 15:15 |
| rodrigo_ | let me try again | 15:15 |
| rodrigo_ | hmm, seems to start building the package ok now | 15:16 |
| cyphermox | ok | 15:16 |
| * rodrigo_ waits for it to finish | 15:16 | |
| cyphermox | might be dist-packages/bzrlib/plugins/builddeb/util.py though | 15:16 |
| pitti | good bye everyone, see you tomorrow! | 15:16 |
| cyphermox | ciao pitti | 15:16 |
| rodrigo_ | bye pitti | 15:16 |
| rodrigo_ | cyphermox, yes, that one, I guess it was updated in my last system update | 15:18 |
| rodrigo_ | it now contains oneiric indeed | 15:18 |
| cyphermox | yeah it's possible | 15:18 |
| rodrigo_ | cyphermox, already switched to oneiric? and dist-upgraded? any problem so far? | 15:19 |
| cyphermox | no, but it's gotta come eventually ;) | 15:19 |
| rodrigo_ | yeah :) | 15:19 |
| cyphermox | actually, I had a dist-upgrade to do this morning, I'm just about to reboot | 15:19 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, if you're not back, we'll know why :) | 15:19 |
| cyphermox | indded | 15:19 |
| * cyphermox reboots | 15:20 | |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, sorry I as pulled into a session | 15:37 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, so small comments on g-s-d | 15:38 |
| seb128 | the first one is the current commit text, you probably want to limit to the current changelog and not let it list all the debian changelog entries you add | 15:38 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: ping | 15:38 |
| robert_ancell | vuntz, hello | 15:38 |
| seb128 | hey robert_ancell | 15:38 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: hi my friend | 15:38 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: are you still using http://people.gnome.org/~vuntz/tmp/versions/ ? | 15:38 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, what are you still doing up so late? | 15:39 |
| seb128 | vuntz, we do | 15:39 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: if yes, you might want to be aware of a few changes :-) | 15:39 |
| vuntz | ah | 15:39 |
| robert_ancell | vuntz, cheers for the gcalctool uploading | 15:39 |
| vuntz | seb128: well, I prefer to talk to robert_ancell and not you :-P | 15:39 |
| robert_ancell | sure are | 15:39 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, just got to budapest | 15:39 |
| * vuntz hugs seb128 | 15:39 | |
| seb128 | vuntz, ok great, I didn't want to talk to you either | 15:39 |
| vuntz | heh | 15:39 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, joining the somehands? | 15:39 |
| vuntz | oh, it's uds soon | 15:39 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, yup | 15:39 |
| vuntz | hope you'll have fun there | 15:39 |
| vuntz | a few things | 15:39 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, we are at the dx, design sprint today if you want to come and say hello | 15:39 |
| seb128 | it's at the first floor on the left of the building | 15:40 |
| vuntz | - there's now versions-stable-extras and versions-unstable-extras | 15:40 |
| robert_ancell | seb128, ok, will head up in a while | 15:40 |
| vuntz | (those can be used to track everything on ftp.gnome.org that is not part of the release sets -- ie, not part of gnome-stable/gnome-unstable) | 15:40 |
| vuntz | - there can be one than more line for a module | 15:40 |
| seb128 | robert_ancell, second comment is that usually we try to keep the changelog description for patches rather than just list everything with "ubuntu patches" | 15:40 |
| vuntz | for instance: glib:1.2.10 and glib:2.28.6 | 15:40 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, hmm, what do you mean? I copied debian's changelog and just added one entry | 15:40 |
| vuntz | this happens for branches | 15:40 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, bzr log and see the commit description from the most recent commit? | 15:41 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, ah, right | 15:41 |
| vuntz | so you need to make sure you take the right glib (not the first one, but the one with the higher version, for instance) | 15:41 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, do we still need 02_missing_libs.patch? | 15:42 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, yes, seems so, although haven't really tried removing it | 15:42 |
| robert_ancell | vuntz, I think I already do that as I had to differentiate between the mobile and normal packages | 15:42 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, is that distro specific? | 15:42 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: in case you have anything weird, just tell me | 15:43 |
| robert_ancell | vuntz, will do, cheers | 15:43 |
| vuntz | robert_ancell: there's one issue I'm aware of: dia is listed with version "1". But that's a bug on ftp.gnome.org actually | 15:43 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, seems so, doesn't seems to fail on any other distro | 15:43 |
| seb128 | weird | 15:43 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, hmm, so how do I fix the log entry? bzr revert and commit again? | 15:43 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, don't bother for this one | 15:43 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, we might not need it anymore, just left it there just in case | 15:43 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, so diff with debian has | 15:44 |
| seb128 | - libgnome-desktop-3-dev (>= 2.91.5), | 15:44 |
| seb128 | + libgnome-desktop-3-dev (>= 2.91.93), | 15:44 |
| seb128 | is that needed? | 15:44 |
| seb128 | if it is we should forward that to debian so they fix it | 15:44 |
| seb128 | otherwise we should drop it | 15:44 |
| seb128 | we should drop the debian vcs control lines as well so debcheckout doesn't get confused | 15:44 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, I think it's indeed needed because of some API changes there were, although upstream checks for 2.91.5 indeed | 15:45 |
| rodrigo_ | let me check gnome-desktop source | 15:45 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, we add a .gconf-defaults which is not listed in the changelog summary, still needed? | 15:46 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, needs to be converted to gsettings, but since it needs oneiric debhelper version, I just added a work item to the blueprint | 15:46 |
| seb128 | the postinst diff is not needed since we don't support update from before the lts and it has a version newer than the one concerned | 15:46 |
| rodrigo_ | ok | 15:47 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, ideally we should still list it in the changelog so full merge we have a summary in the changelog | 15:47 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, ok | 15:47 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, otherwise great work, those are really minor nitpick | 15:48 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, you mean removing the .postinst file? | 15:49 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, no the diff | 15:49 |
| seb128 | - if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt-nl "2.26.1"; then | 15:49 |
| seb128 | - rm -f /etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-settings-daemon.desktop | 15:49 |
| seb128 | - fi | 15:49 |
| rodrigo_ | ah, I removed that? | 15:50 |
| seb128 | that's a diff we had that we can drop | 15:50 |
| seb128 | i.e get back closer from debian | 15:50 |
| seb128 | just copy their postinst | 15:50 |
| rodrigo_ | it's dropped in trunk now | 15:50 |
| rodrigo_ | ah, ok | 15:50 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, so the libgnome-desktop-3-dev version check, the postinst, anything else? | 15:51 |
| rodrigo_ | before I push? | 15:51 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, ideally you would keep the changelog description of each patch and what they do | 15:52 |
| rodrigo_ | ok | 15:52 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, cf the 2.30.1-1ubuntu1 changelog entry from the natty source | 15:53 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, otherwise it's fine, nice work ;-) | 15:53 |
| jhunt_ | hi all - you might be interested in bug 777011. If we can fix this, it may well boost gnome/Unity performance. | 15:53 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 777011 in gdk-pixbuf "gdk-pixbuf uses temporary files when loading xpm images" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777011 | 15:53 |
| seb128 | pitti, can we drop our libnotify double source to get back on debian on the naming of the binaries? | 15:54 |
| Laney | rodrigo_: if you are packaging for oneiric, what's wrong with build-depending on the appropriate debhelper version and using installgsettings? | 15:54 |
| seb128 | jhunt_, do we use xpm images? | 15:54 |
| Laney | also it looks like the version should be -1ubuntu1 not -2ubuntu1 :-) | 15:54 |
| jhunt_ | seb128: seemingly for everything - every mouse click and every scroll wheel move creates a ton of tmp files. | 15:55 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, nothing wrong | 15:55 |
| seb128 | weird, it's worth bringing up to dx I guess | 15:55 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, I'm just building for oeniric in natty, that's the "problem" | 15:55 |
| Laney | right, I use sbuild for that | 15:56 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, yes, will set it up as soon as I've got time, as I told you before | 15:56 |
| Laney | ok ok, just trying to help | 15:57 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, yes, I know, thanks :) | 15:57 |
| rodrigo_ | Laney, just want to finish this merge and add work items for the remaining issues, so that I can move to merge other stuff from the gnome3 ppa | 15:57 |
| rodrigo_ | we have lots of patches to rebase, so those take precedence | 15:58 |
| dpm | seb128, pitti, I've got a blueprint to discuss enabling upstream translation imports from bzr branches into Ubuntu source packages, as the LP feature is now complete, mind if I add you as "participation essential"? | 16:00 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, 06_use_application_indicator.patch looks wrong | 16:00 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, why? | 16:00 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, the configure.ac checks for appindicator-0.1 | 16:00 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, hmm | 16:00 |
| seb128 | shouldn't that be appindicator3-0.1 | 16:00 |
| seb128 | i.e the gtk3 version? | 16:01 |
| rodrigo_ | yes, good catch :) | 16:01 |
| seb128 | did that got any testing in the ppa? just curious I would have though that mixing gtk version would make it exit due to symbols conflict | 16:02 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, it was disabled in the ppa | 16:04 |
| seb128 | oh ok | 16:04 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, ok, pushed all fixes, if you want to do a quick review, I'll upload as soon as it looks ok | 16:04 |
| rodrigo_ | the patches would need lots of testing, I'm just rebasing blindly for now | 16:04 |
| rodrigo_ | although I guess I can just install the package I build :) | 16:05 |
| seb128 | ok, seems like for system component we should have a least one run with it before uploading | 16:05 |
| seb128 | would be nice | 16:05 |
| rodrigo_ | seb128, ok, building and installing now | 16:05 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, version should be 1ubuntu1 not 2ubuntu1 | 16:06 |
| seb128 | otherwise looks fine to upload after a round of testing and running it | 16:06 |
| rodrigo_ | ok, thanks for the review | 16:06 |
| seb128 | rodrigo_, yw | 16:07 |
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| dobey | hrmm, it is so quiet | 18:24 |
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| kklimonda | jcastro: fta yeah, I've been looking into integrating Transmission into Unity launcher, but I'm not sure what info I should provide - using progress bar doesn't really fit Transmission imo, I'll add an emblem for "turtle mode" for sure | 18:56 |
| jcastro | what's turtle mode? | 18:56 |
| jcastro | sounds neat | 18:56 |
| kklimonda | bah, another review of Unity where it's described as a good idea that "has been killed by rushing it too fast". | 18:56 |
| kklimonda | jcastro: it's a temprary speel limit mode. | 18:56 |
| jcastro | oh, cool, yeah | 18:56 |
| bryceh | should call it tortoise mode | 18:59 |
| dobey | kklimonda: launchers don't have emblems | 19:07 |
| dobey | kklimonda: that was removed | 19:10 |
| dobey | kklimonda: i think you could probably set the number of current transfers on the launcher though, and unity will ad the (NN) emblemy thing on it | 19:10 |
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
| fta | kklimonda, hey, wrt to transmission, i expect something like chromium and ff download progress bars, and maybe a counter with the remaining active downloads | 21:01 |
| fta | kklimonda, imho, no need to report anything about uploads/seeds. | 21:02 |
| fta | jcastro, ^^ | 21:02 |
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === zyga is now known as zyga-bbl | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === chaotic_ is now known as chaotic | ||
| === zyga-bbl is now known as zyga | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!