| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| evaluate | Hello. | 07:04 |
|---|---|---|
| evaluate | There is a fix for a pretty serious bug for a package in natty. I currently can't upload it to Debian because of the perl transition. Can someone update it in Ubuntu directly or should I best mail the maintainer of the package in Ubuntu? | 07:05 |
| micahg | evaluate: which package? | 07:06 |
| evaluate | micahg, http://packages.ubuntu.com/natty/clipit | 07:07 |
| evaluate | The bug which I'm talking about is bug #702316 | 07:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 702316 in clipit (Ubuntu) "Generic Libindicate fallback support breaks applications (such as clipit) on non-Unity WMs/DEs" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/702316 | 07:07 |
| evaluate | And it is fixed in the 1.3.13 release, which is available on http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkclipit/files/Version%201/ | 07:08 |
| micahg | evaluate: best to file a bug, prepare debdiffs for oneiric and natty-proposed and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors | 07:09 |
| evaluate | I wasn't talking about oneiric, I rather thought about a SRU for natty... | 07:10 |
| micahg | evaluate: SRUs have to go to dev release first :) | 07:12 |
| evaluate | oic | 07:13 |
| micahg | evaluate: it would be the same debdiff, just a different version/suite | 07:13 |
| evaluate | Is this the procedure you're reffering to: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff ? | 07:13 |
| micahg | evaluate: yeah | 07:13 |
| Rhonda | Can we get the next release done sooner? I fear I might mistype the codename far too regularly for it to be useful. | 07:13 |
| micahg | evaluate: version is ubuntu2 for oneiric and ubuntu1.1 for natty-proposed | 07:13 |
| micahg | Rhonda: 5.5 months isn't soon enough? | 07:14 |
| evaluate | ok, I'll try to go through that... | 07:14 |
| Rhonda | micahg: I fear I will have to type it too often in that time. :) | 07:14 |
| * micahg guesses debian is easier since it's almost always unstable or experimental | 07:15 | |
| Rhonda | almost always fits pretty well, though I am one of these rare persons who seem to have uploaded to every single other possibility out there, too ;) | 07:21 |
| Rhonda | Preparing security updates yourself to reduce the workload of the security team seems to entail that somehow. | 07:22 |
| nigelb | Rhonda: heh | 07:23 |
| Rhonda | nigelb: Hey, I like to give everything a try on my own, to form my own opinion instead of being guided by prejudices handed by others. | 07:24 |
| nigelb | Rhonda: No no, i was smiling about the bit were you wanted the release early ;) | 07:24 |
| Rhonda | The one time I tried emacs it though ended in a reboot of the server I was sitting infront of. | 07:24 |
| nigelb | vim ftw | 07:25 |
| Rhonda | I wondered how to exit it, and a "helpful" collegue said "I think it's control, meta … and me thinks delete" | 07:25 |
| Rhonda | Ah, that one. :) | 07:25 |
| nigelb | heh | 07:25 |
| evaluate | What should I use in the changelog, natty or natty-proposed (or oneiric)? | 07:28 |
| nigelb | natty-proposed I guess | 07:30 |
| nigelb | but shouldn'd you fix it first in oneiric? | 07:30 |
| micahg | evaluate: natty-proposed for natty, oneiric for oneiric | 07:30 |
| evaluate | So do I need to create two debdiffs? | 07:31 |
| micahg | evaluate: yep | 07:31 |
| micahg | evaluate: same debdiff, just change the version/changelog | 07:31 |
| evaluate | ok, got it. | 07:31 |
| evaluate | ok, could someone please have a look at the debdiff and tell me if it's fine before I submit it: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/603123/ ? | 07:36 |
| Bachstelze | should be ubuntu1.2 I think | 07:40 |
| micahg | evaluate: version should be ubuntu1.1, for oneiric ubuntu2 | 07:41 |
| Bachstelze | also you should fill out the DEP3 info in the patch | 07:41 |
| evaluate | Bachstelze, which information is needed exactly? | 07:44 |
| Bachstelze | evaluate: lines 39-45 of your paste | 07:44 |
| micahg | actually, he already filled it out in 31-32 | 07:45 |
| evaluate | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/603125/ | 07:48 |
| evaluate | Bug, Bug-Debian and Reviewed-By don't apply. | 07:48 |
| evaluate | Not sure why it says 'debian-changes-1.3.12-1ubuntu2' on the last line though. Is that normal? | 07:48 |
| Bachstelze | [08:48] < evaluate> Bug, Bug-Debian and Reviewed-By don't apply. <= delete them, then | 07:51 |
| evaluate | You mean the whole part between lines 36-47? | 07:51 |
| Bachstelze | the lines that don't apply | 07:52 |
| Bachstelze | though since Origin is upstream, you should probably have a Bug line | 07:52 |
| evaluate | What do you mean with Bug line please? | 07:52 |
| evaluate | The bug only applies to Ubuntu, since it's indicator related... | 07:53 |
| Bachstelze | the Bug line should give the URL of the bug in the upstream bug tracker | 07:53 |
| Bachstelze | then why does Origin say upstream? | 07:53 |
| evaluate | Isn't Origin reffering to the source of the patch? | 07:54 |
| Bachstelze | yes | 07:54 |
| evaluate | Well, the bug was fixed upstream, so I guess that should be fine then...? | 07:55 |
| Bachstelze | then you shoukd out an URL to the bug in the upstream bug tracker in Bug | 07:55 |
| Bachstelze | and normally the URL to the upstream VCS commit in Origin | 07:56 |
| Bachstelze | it's all there really: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ | 07:56 |
| Bachstelze | put* | 07:59 |
| evaluate | Well, there's no bug in the upstream bug tracker about this. It's just in launchpad.... | 08:00 |
| Rhonda | Is an int signed or unsigned by default? | 08:01 |
| nigelb | I think signed | 08:03 |
| Bachstelze | yes | 08:05 |
| evaluate | Bah, this is too complicated. I'll just request a sync once it gets into Debian. | 08:06 |
| Rhonda | That's the spirit! :) | 08:13 |
| micahg | evaluate: to get into natty, you still need a debdiff/test case | 08:42 |
| evaluate | Well, I don't. I just wanted to help fix that bug, if you're making such a simple patch so complicated, then you can fix it. | 08:44 |
| micahg | evaluate: Debian doesn't have requirements about DEP-3 headers on patches? | 08:46 |
| evaluate | micahg, it does, but the way to place them there is more sane. If I run debuild -S they are generated automatically and I don't have any influence about what gets put there apparently. | 08:47 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| micahg | evaluate: you should be able to use DEP-3 headers the same way in Ubuntu as Debian, it just requires a Bug-Ubuntu instead of a Bug-Debian, they're auto-generated, but that's meant as a guide, you can remove the auto-generated ones if you don't need them | 08:49 |
| evaluate | Also, since the bug was fixed upstream, I don't see the logic behind also creating a patch for Ubuntu. Why not just import the package from upstream? | 08:50 |
| micahg | evaluate: we can't take a new upstream version in a stable release without an SRU exception | 08:50 |
| micahg | evaluate: would be fine for oneiric though | 08:50 |
| evaluate | And wouldn't a complete freeze of X justify a SRU exception? | 08:51 |
| micahg | evaluate: not if it can be fixed with a simple patch | 08:51 |
| micahg | evaluate: I think the only thing missing was a link to the "upstream" commit, that would go on the Origin line following upstream, | 08:55 |
| Rhonda | And actually, the Description that debuild -S produces isn't really sane. | 09:01 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| Rhonda | The whole created thing screams "I'm a template - please adjust me!" in most of its part. | 09:02 |
| evaluate | micahg, would this be acceptable: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/603147/ ? | 09:07 |
| micahg | evaluate: that looks good to me | 09:08 |
| evaluate | Do I just attach it to the bug report or should I also ping a list or something? | 09:09 |
| micahg | evaluate: attach to the bug, subscribe ubuntu-sponsors | 09:09 |
| evaluate | Also, about oneiric, do I need to do it for oneiric too? Wouldn't it be wiser to just sync the patch from Debian once it's there? | 09:10 |
| micahg | evaluate: you can attach a second one to the bug for oneiric, just changing the version to 1.3.12-1ubuntu2 and the suite to oneiric | 09:10 |
| evaluate | Since oneiric isn't limited to any SRU exceptions or anything... | 09:10 |
| micahg | evaluate: yeah, you can sync from Debian if you want to wait for that, but it needs to go in oneiric before ubuntu SRU will accept to natty | 09:10 |
| evaluate | ohh well | 09:10 |
| micahg | evaluate: you could prepare a new version upload for oneiric if you like as well, but that's up to you | 09:11 |
| micahg | evaluate: seems like the least amount of work would be to get this patch uploaded to oneiric and then sync from Debian once it's ready there | 09:12 |
| evaluate | micahg, ok. | 09:13 |
| evaluate | Gah. "You cannot make any changes at this time. Launchpad is undergoing maintenance and is running in read-only mode." | 09:14 |
| micahg | evaluate: oops, yeah, should be over by 9:30 UTC | 09:16 |
| micahg | evaluate: thanks for your work on this :) | 09:18 |
| evaluate | micahg, sure. It's my package after all... :-) | 09:19 |
| micahg | evaluate: you should find that after the first few bumps, it should be clear sailing to get stuff sponsored, if you have any ideas for making the process easier/better, please let us know | 09:22 |
| evaluate | micahg, I don't see anything wrong with the process of having something sponsored, but rather with the idea behind preffering a ubuntu patch rather than a new upstream version in a SRU... | 09:25 |
| micahg | evaluate: this might help with that: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Why | 09:32 |
| evaluate | micahg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clipit/+bug/702316 -- hope it's ok now | 09:43 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 702316 in clipit (Ubuntu) "Generic Libindicate fallback support breaks applications (such as clipit) on non-Unity WMs/DEs" [Undecided,Fix committed] | 09:44 |
| === hannesw_ is now known as hannesw | ||
| ScottK | micahg: DEP-3 is not required in Debian. | 12:27 |
| ScottK | And I think this is a good example of why. | 12:27 |
| Rhonda | Actually that patch is only a good example that debuild -S creates only a template and requires a fair amount of tweaking afterwards. :) | 12:45 |
| c2tarun | can anyone please tell me how can I edit this page and write comments? https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html | 12:46 |
| geser | c2tarun: there is a hidden input field in the comment column | 12:54 |
| c2tarun | geser: in natty there was a linker problem due to binutils-gold linker. is this also problem in oneiric? | 12:56 |
| c2tarun | here is a debian/changelog file http://paste.kde.org/50683/ in line 14 its adding a patch, but when I checked into the file the patch is all ready applied. How is this possible? | 13:10 |
| geser | c2tarun: yes, oneiric uses the same linker defaults as early natty | 13:11 |
| c2tarun | geser: can you please look at the problem I just posted? | 13:12 |
| geser | c2tarun: see line 10; the package now uses v3 (quilt) where package are automatically applied after unpacking | 13:12 |
| c2tarun | geser: I also thought so, but when I checked by quilt top I got no patches applied. | 13:13 |
| geser | hmm | 13:13 |
| c2tarun | geser: I got this error while applying the patch Patch 01_local_hiscores_file_check.patch can be reverse-applied | 13:14 |
| c2tarun | geser: I grabbed the package by grab-merge.sh script | 13:16 |
| c2tarun | grab-merge.sh bastet | 13:16 |
| c2tarun | geser: I am getting similar error with the other patch mentioned in line 17 | 13:18 |
| c2tarun | geser: ping | 13:19 |
| c2tarun | geser seems to be busy, can anyone please help me? | 13:22 |
| Laney | you don't need to ping specific people for questions like that | 13:23 |
| Laney | that message usually means that the patch has been applied upstream or in debian, and you can remove it | 13:23 |
| Laney | (or you are attempting to apply it twice) | 13:23 |
| geser | hmm, does MoM the right thing for v3 packages? | 13:25 |
| c2tarun | Laney: in changelog its mentioned about adding the patch, how can that be applied upstream? | 13:25 |
| geser | Laney: see the changelog entry c2tarun linked; that patch got added in the current Debian revision | 13:26 |
| Laney | sure, I was giving a generic answer | 13:27 |
| c2tarun | I just pulled-debian-source bastet and patch is not applied there. | 13:30 |
| c2tarun | grab-merge.sh can only apply the ubuntu1.patch and no internal patches | 13:31 |
| * c2tarun confused, what went wrong and where? | 13:31 | |
| c2tarun | Laney: are you suggesting that I should drop the patch? | 13:31 |
| geser | c2tarun: do you have a .pc/ directory in the package directory? | 13:32 |
| c2tarun | geser: yes but its empty. | 13:33 |
| c2tarun | geser: nope its not | 13:33 |
| c2tarun | geser: it contains three files . .. .quilt_patches .quilt_series .version | 13:33 |
| geser | perhaps it would be best if you take the (unmodified) Debian package and merge manually | 13:34 |
| Laney | does it need a merge? | 13:35 |
| Laney | changelog suggests not | 13:35 |
| c2tarun | Laney: I too think so, let me check it | 13:35 |
| Laney | this http://launchpadlibrarian.net/65435629/bastet_0.41-6_0.41-6ubuntu1.diff.gz was the previous diff | 13:37 |
| Laney | and the bug logs and debian changelog suggest that that is now upstream | 13:37 |
| Laney | so it looks like a sync to me | 13:37 |
| c2tarun | Laney: sorry I got disconnected, did you replied to my query? | 13:49 |
| Laney | c2tarun: didn't see it | 13:49 |
| c2tarun | Laney: how can I request for sync? I tried with reqeuestsync script but dont know why its not working. Is there any particular format for sync bug for LP? | 13:53 |
| Laney | c2tarun: did you try with requestsync --lp | 13:57 |
| Laney | ? | 13:57 |
| Laney | otherwise, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess | 13:58 |
| c2tarun | Laney: I posted a sync bug 777083 please check and tell me if more details are required? | 13:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 777083 in bastet (Ubuntu) "Please Sync package bastet-0.43 from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777083 | 13:58 |
| Laney | usually the debian changelog is included | 13:58 |
| Laney | and it'd be nice if you said that the only fixes were build fixes which are now incorporated upstream | 13:58 |
| c2tarun | Laney: ok, I'll do that, and sorry I requested a sync for the first time so its little bit less in details | 13:59 |
| Laney | no problem at all | 13:59 |
| c2tarun | Laney: complete debian changelog or latest entry? | 14:00 |
| Laney | the new ones | 14:01 |
| c2tarun | Laney: please take a look now. | 14:01 |
| Laney | c2tarun: looks good, please subscribe ubuntu-sponsors and that's it | 14:06 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === aalex is now known as aalex-home | ||
| debfx | how can I remove a merge request from the sponsoring overview? | 15:07 |
| debfx | (the equivalent to setting a bug status to invalid) | 15:07 |
| Laney | set the status of the merge request | 15:09 |
| debfx | to work in progress? | 15:09 |
| === Tonio__ is now known as Tonio_ | ||
| Laney | debfx: sounds good | 15:34 |
| Laney | barry: regarding your winpdb upgrade request, have you seen that debian has 1.4.8 now? | 15:46 |
| Laney | it has in fact been autosynced | 15:47 |
| c2tarun | there is a package named dares, there was a patch to fix binutils-gold error. Debian developer just included this patch in its newer version. No other changes and patch is also not applied in source code, just included as a patch. Is there any need of sync in this case? | 17:03 |
| Laney | c2tarun: might as well while you are looking at it, then it'll be autosynced in future | 17:53 |
| c2tarun | ok, this question may not be relevant but there was a guy with IRC nick persia, I haven't seen him from very long time on any channel. why so? | 17:54 |
| c2tarun | I asked because he was very with everything we do on this channel | 17:55 |
| c2tarun | I asked because he was very good with everything we do on this channel | 17:56 |
| nigelb | c2tarun: he's in japan, he's having internet trouble for a while. | 17:56 |
| c2tarun | ohh... | 17:56 |
| c2tarun | I have a question about grab-merge.sh script. This script downloads the source code from debian and then applies the ubuntu.patch file to it? is there any way to make it stop applying that patch? | 19:34 |
| micahg | c2tarun: just unpack the debian source separate if you want to see it, it'll be in a different dir | 19:41 |
| c2tarun | micahg: got it. in previous ubuntu version, a patch was introduced to fix ftbfs due to binutils-gold, that patch is not included in new debian release. This should be a merge. What should I write in changelog, patch imported from previous ubuntu version? | 19:42 |
| micahg | c2tarun: list the patch in remaining changes | 19:43 |
| yofel | doesn't debian use the gold linker too? | 19:44 |
| c2tarun | yofel: dont think so. :/ because new version is giving same error due to gold linker :( | 19:44 |
| yofel | :/ | 19:44 |
| micahg | the patch should be forwarded if they're affected, but that doesn't mean they'll include it | 19:44 |
| micahg | yofel: not yet by default | 19:45 |
| yofel | ah ok | 19:45 |
| c2tarun | one more problem, whenever i try to use the grab-merge.sh script, none of the patches in debian/patches folder apply. On executing quilt top i see no patches applied, but on pushing the patches none of them apply :( Even the patches introduced in the same version also didn't apply. why so? | 19:49 |
| yofel | is the series file intact? I just merged kaffeine, and there the patch got applied without quilt and the series file got renamed to series.UBUNTU | 19:51 |
| c2tarun | yofel: on series file isn't intact I have to modify it to include all the patches. can you please try this on your system. grab-merge.sh dma | 19:52 |
| c2tarun | yofel: then go inside the folder and check whether any patch is applied or not? then modify the series file in proper format and then try to apply the patches. | 19:52 |
| yofel | yeah, it seems the ubuntu patch is applied now and the series file has conflicts | 19:55 |
| yofel | everyone: what's the right way to fix that? | 19:55 |
| c2tarun | yofel: conflict is because ubuntu patch is not included and few new patches are introduced. We have to include ubuntu patch as well all the debian patches | 19:56 |
| yofel | that is true, what I'm not sure is how to handle that fact that 38_fix_ftbfs_binutils-gold.patch is already applied to the source | 19:57 |
| yofel | unless all patches were automatically applied.. | 19:57 |
| c2tarun | yofel: well there is no information in changelog that 38_fix_ftbfs_binutils-gold.patch is applied. | 19:58 |
| yofel | nono, I meant that it was applied by MOM | 19:58 |
| c2tarun | yofel: and try to pop the patches, none of them are applied :/ or something weird is happening which I have never seen before. | 20:01 |
| c2tarun | hmmm.... thats new to me. I didn't know that MOM also applies the patch. | 20:01 |
| yofel | nah, I'm wondering if MOM just doesn't consider that dpkg-source now automatically applies patches with 3.0(quilt) | 20:01 |
| c2tarun | yofel: what should I do here? get the debian source, copy the debian folder from dma-0.0.2010.06.17-10ubuntu1 and try to build it on oneiric? | 20:02 |
| yofel | no idea, I'm pretty new to merging myself and was just asking myself the same.. | 20:02 |
| dupondje | there is a magic tool for this | 20:03 |
| yofel | in this case you could probably just revert that one patch in the Makefile since it's just a one line patch and then rename the patch file and update series | 20:03 |
| dupondje | grab-merge package | 20:03 |
| dupondje | :) | 20:03 |
| dupondje | does alot by itself | 20:04 |
| yofel | dupondje: yeah, and that gets us a source with applied quilt patches and quilt says no patch applied | 20:04 |
| dupondje | euh, but thats because no patches are loaded in quilt ? | 20:04 |
| c2tarun | can anyone please help us here? | 20:04 |
| yofel | dupondje: yes, but it seems that the patches were applied by MOM before merging | 20:05 |
| dupondje | what package are we talking about , | 20:05 |
| yofel | or MOM just doesn't check if dpkg-source auto-applies the patches | 20:05 |
| c2tarun | dupondje: what does that mean that no patches are loaded in quilt? | 20:05 |
| yofel | dma | 20:05 |
| yofel | it's the 38_fix_ftbfs_binutils-gold.patch from ubuntu | 20:06 |
| yofel | the series file has conflicts, but the patch is already applied | 20:06 |
| yofel | and that's not because it's in debian or upstream | 20:07 |
| dupondje | grab-merge dma | 20:09 |
| dupondje | fix conflict in debian/patches/series | 20:10 |
| dupondje | and that does it no ? | 20:10 |
| dupondje | :) | 20:10 |
| yofel | dupondje: yes, but why is the patch (that needs to be kept) already applied? | 20:10 |
| yofel | that's not how quilt works... | 20:10 |
| micahg | yofel: source format 3 and grab-merge will not work well together | 20:11 |
| yofel | that's what I feared... | 20:11 |
| c2tarun | micahg: that means we have to merge it manually. | 20:12 |
| c2tarun | I tried and encountered this error http://paste.kde.org/51187/ | 20:13 |
| c2tarun | can anyone help me with this error ^^ | 20:16 |
| geser | c2tarun: which package is this? | 20:16 |
| yofel | still dma | 20:17 |
| c2tarun | geser: dma | 20:17 |
| dupondje | that patch is applied | 20:18 |
| dupondje | because its fixed in the package itself | 20:18 |
| dupondje | see ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dma/dma_0.0.2010.06.17.orig.tar.gz | 20:18 |
| c2tarun | dupondje: I extracted fresh tarball and then applied all the patches and then on buliding I got this error. | 20:19 |
| yofel | a) it's not applied, b) all patches were applied, it's just that MOM can't handle source format 3.0(quilt) | 20:19 |
| c2tarun | yofel: was that ^^ for me? | 20:20 |
| yofel | no, re dupondje | 20:20 |
| yofel | but I got the same error if it helps (no, not really...) | 20:20 |
| c2tarun | yofel: you got some different error? | 20:20 |
| yofel | no, same | 20:21 |
| yofel | crypto.c:92:7: error: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror] | 20:21 |
| yofel | not sure if debian builds with -Werror | 20:21 |
| micahg | yofel: they don't | 20:21 |
| yofel | good, then we have the problem at least | 20:22 |
| geser | c2tarun: change crypto.c:87 to "const SSL_METHOD *meth = NULL;" (add the const to the beginning) | 20:22 |
| c2tarun | geser: should I create a patch for this? | 20:24 |
| geser | yes, as the package is in v3 (quilt) format | 20:25 |
| c2tarun | geser: it worked :) thanks | 20:27 |
| geser | np | 20:27 |
| dupondje | btw: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622052 | 20:36 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 622052 in src:dma "dma: FTBFS: crypto.c:92:7: error: assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type" [Serious,Open] | 20:36 |
| c2tarun | dupondje: ohh.. I should close this bug in my changelog . Thanks :) | 20:38 |
| c2tarun | no I cant | 20:38 |
| c2tarun | its a debian bug I guess. | 20:38 |
| dupondje | ye :) | 20:38 |
| dupondje | but you could reply to it with the fix for example :) | 20:38 |
| dupondje | the old ftbfs (38_fix_ftbfs_binutils-gold.patch) got fixed this way in debian | 20:38 |
| geser | c2tarun: I sometimes add "Closes: #xxx" to my changelog entries, even if it does nothing in Ubuntu but it good for a reference | 20:39 |
| geser | it helps checking later if the Ubuntu delta needs merging or can be dropped (because the bug got fixed in Debian too) | 20:40 |
| c2tarun | ok then, I'll add "Closes: #debian-bug" to my changelog entry, should I send it to debian as well? | 20:40 |
| geser | the patch yes | 20:41 |
| dupondje | add the diff to the bug yep | 20:41 |
| dupondje | always usefull for debian :) | 20:41 |
| dupondje | geser: you have upload rights in universe? | 20:45 |
| geser | yes, like any other MOTU too | 20:46 |
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
| dupondje | want to check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/toonloop/+bug/775588 ? | 20:46 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 775588 in toonloop (Ubuntu) "Merge toonloop 2.0.6-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] | 20:46 |
| micahg | dupondje: you can ask jdstrand, he's piloting in #ubuntu-devel | 20:48 |
| dupondje | also for universe packages ? :) | 20:49 |
| geser | for everything in the sponsoring queue | 20:49 |
| dupondje | oh ok | 20:49 |
| Laney | bigon: I feel like looking at merging epiphany 3, mind if I take it over from you, or are you planning on doing it yourself? | 21:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!