[09:35] <apw> do we have a launchpad team for the kernel stable team ?
[10:09] <smb> apw, Hm, I don't think so
[14:12] <JFo> mutt is making me crazy
[14:14] <tgardner> JFo, excessive tail wagging ?
[14:14] <JFo> tgardner, I wish... a friends cat decided to sit on my keyboard the other day and it has been wonky ever since
[14:15] <JFo> likely it was sitting on it because there was a mutt running :-)
[14:15] <tgardner> ho ho
[14:15] <JFo> yeah, kitty almost met wal, but I wasn't going for distance :-D
[14:15] <JFo> wal*
[14:15] <JFo> grrr
[14:15] <JFo> wall*
[14:16] <JFo> but it is doing stupid things... like it will show me that there is one new message in a folder and then, when I go to that folder, there will be more.
[14:16] <smb> kitty could see into future and had revenge before that
[14:16] <JFo> so it seems :)
[14:17] <JFo> another thing it will do is, while I am reading messages, one of the messages won't open when I get to it and mutt will say something like "can't open temporary file"
[14:17] <JFo> there are other oddities like that too
[14:17] <JFo> really annoying
[14:18] <JFo> I'll show you at UDS, I'm sure I won't have solved it by then
[14:35] <ogasawara> hrm, no bjf.  perfect, he can't object to me giving him a work item then :)
[14:36] <ogasawara> pgraner: work item definition error should be fixed now, let me know if you're still getting spammed
[14:36] <tgardner> ogasawara, assignment in absentia 
[14:36] <pgraner> ogasawara, thanks
[14:37] <ogasawara> JFo: the work item in your bug handling spec -> "[SRU Team] Develop/define process to address SRU release bugs.:TODO"
[14:37] <pgraner> ogasawara, thanks all I had was my phone until just now
[14:38] <pgraner> ogasawara, Oh so JFo broke it....
[14:38] <ogasawara> JFo: "SRU Team" isn't actually a valid launchpad ID, so I switched it to bjf for now
[14:38] <tgardner> pgraner, short flight? your calendar indicates you should be over Kansas or Nebraska by now.
[14:38] <pgraner> ogasawara, don't we have a kernel-sru lp team?
[14:39] <pgraner> tgardner, wifi on the plane
[14:39] <ogasawara> pgraner: I don't think so
[14:39] <ogasawara> sconklin: is there a kernel-sru lp team?
[14:39] <pgraner> ogasawara, I thought we did or maybe that was a project
[14:39] <tgardner> ah, anyways it would be out of your way to fly over those states on your way to Dallas.
[14:39] <pgraner> tgardner, yea I'm over tenn now or so the pilot said
[14:41] <ogasawara> tgardner: I've got the gcc error on arm fixed up only to run into the next build error.  am about to kick off a test build that hopefully resolves it.  Assuming that's the last of them, I'm gonna upload.
[14:42] <tgardner> ogasawara, ack. I was gonna ask you when you planned to upload, but as usual you're right on top of things.
[14:44] <pgraner> tgardner, are you set to run the daily kernel roundtables at UDS since I'll be off with QA?
[14:44] <tgardner> pgraner, guess I'll get that way.
[14:45] <pgraner> tgardner, :)
[14:45] <tgardner> pgraner, I may delegate once or twice since there are a couple of conflicting sessions, or at least there were a couple of days ago.
[14:46] <pgraner> tgardner, ack
[14:46] <JFo> ogasawara, sorry, I am still not getting ping notifications
[14:47] <JFo> ogasawara, switching that is cool with me :-)
[14:47] <JFo> I didn't even think of that existing
[14:53] <sconklin> ogasawara: there's the kernel-sru-workflow team, that's used for maintenance of the process tools, not sure that's what you want. 
[14:54] <ogasawara> sconklin: basically JFo has a work item on his bug handling spec that I think he wanted assigned to the kernel-sru team.  I've temporarily assigned it to bjf for now and I'll let him reassign accordingly
[14:55] <JFo> and for that matter, it may not even be necessary.
[14:55] <sconklin> ogasawara: ack
[14:55] <JFo> we can discuss at UDS 
[15:09]  * ogasawara back in 20
[16:00] <ogasawara> tgardner: you said you pushed the -rc6 rebase to oneiric master-next right?
[16:01]  * smb has been using it for a test
[16:02] <ogasawara> something doesn't seem right with it, for example the Makefile still claims it's -rc5 and I'm specifically looking for the changes in commit 498548ec69c6897fe4376b2ca90758762fa0b817 which should be in -rc6 and I'm not seeing it in master-next
[16:04] <smb> ogasawara, odd indeed, yeah. I was more interested in another one which was in there and also was supposed to me rc6 stuff
[16:05] <smb> So I did not check that closely
[16:09] <herton> ogasawara: may be related to this? https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/4/42 (tim may have pushed before linus fixed it)
[16:09] <smb> ogasawara, It looks like about 14 commits missing
[16:11] <ogasawara> herton: ah that's probably it
[16:11] <smb> sounds very possible
[16:14]  * ogasawara rebases master-next to pull in the missing bits
[16:19] <tgardner> ogasawara, doh! I didn't even check that I got the -rc6 tag. oops.
[16:19] <ogasawara> tgardner: no worries, I've just rebased, was painless
[16:20] <tgardner> ogasawara, you haven't pushed yet, right ?
[16:20] <ogasawara> tgardner: not yet, about to in 1min
[16:20] <tgardner> ogack
[16:20] <tgardner> ogasawara, ack
[16:28] <herton> bjf, sconklin: some nitpicking for you, bug 722185 can be marked as fixed after natty update to 2.6.38.5, needs natty nomination etc. on it as well
[16:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 722185 in linux "Regression: Does not list available WLAN networks (p54)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/722185
[16:30] <bjf> herton, thanks
[16:30] <herton> also bug 736490 is a duplicate of this
[16:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 736490 in linux "[natty][p54usb] wifi cannot connect to the ap" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/736490
[16:30] <herton> JFo: I think you could mark it as duplicate and triage 722185 to show on your hotlist right?
[16:31] <herton> I didn't mark as duplicate yet as I guess it'll drop from hotlist bugs, not sure
[16:31] <JFo> yep, I can do that herton :)
[16:31] <bjf> JFo, herton done
[16:31] <JFo> bjf, thanks
[16:31] <herton> thanks :)
[16:54] <jbarnes> apw: did you ever submit your fbcon race fix upstream?
[16:54] <jbarnes> would be cool to get it fixed for 2.6.39
[16:55] <tgardner> jbarnes, I've bugged him a couple of times about that, and some other patches. He's kind of tied up for the rest of this week, but I'll be sure to hassle him on Monday.
[16:55] <jbarnes> cool, thanks
[16:55] <smb> jbarnes, The real (non-bip) apw may or may not be listening. Me will try to if tgardner forgets
[16:56] <jbarnes> it's a good fix, much  more complete than mine
[16:56] <tgardner> jbarnes, yeah, it seems to be working well for us.
[16:58] <smb> tgardner, Are you arriving Sat or Sun ?
[16:58] <tgardner> smb, I should be at the hotel by noon Sat
[16:59] <smb> tgardner, Ah cool, I should be there a tad later. Landing around noon on Sat
[17:00] <JFo> I'll be there about 6:30PM on Sat
[17:00] <smb> JFo, Right in time for the b-meeting
[17:00] <JFo> ?
[17:00] <JFo> I thought that was Sunday?
[17:00] <smb> b= bar or beer at your choce
[17:00] <JFo> oh, yes.. just in time :-)
[17:17] <sforshee> JFo, looks like you and I have the same flight into BUD
[17:17] <JFo> sforshee, awesome
[17:17] <JFo> :)
[17:18] <JFo> what flight?
[17:18] <sforshee> AA6601/BA868
[17:18] <sforshee> there are others on that flight too
[17:19] <JFo> cool
[17:19] <JFo> we can hang out in Heathrow
[17:20] <sforshee> yep, hopefully it will help pass the time
[17:20] <sforshee> I'm going to be in Heathrow for a while :(
[17:21] <smb> Hopefully not as bad as the Portlanders had last time to arrive for Prague...
[17:22] <smb> or was that some other place...?
[17:22]  * smb tends to forget. Its travel...
[17:22] <JFo> looks like I have about 2 hours layover in LHR
[17:23] <JFo> smb, I'm the same way
[17:23] <sforshee> my layover there is 5 hours, total travel time is about 20
[17:24] <JFo> hmmm
[17:27] <JFo> need some food... back in a bit
[19:05]  * tgardner --> lunch
[19:25] <JFo> just remembered I need to run some errands before I leave tomorrow and I am not likely to get to them tomorrow if I put them off. 
[19:25] <JFo> bbiab
[19:36] <introiboad_> hi there, runnin linux-next (2.6.39-rc) on Ubuntu 10.10 and 11.04 using the stock ubuntu .config (updated with oldconfig) and the kernel boots fine but it looks like every time I invoke dmesg the system slows down to a crawl. Any ideas? much appreciated!
[20:03]  * jjohansen -> lunch
[20:28] <Kano> hi, now amd64 daily does not build, but at least i386
[22:07]  * ogasawara back on later