[01:20] <DJKorbit> good evening
[01:21] <DJKorbit> i've just set up my first ppa
[01:21] <DJKorbit> i'm testing it by adding it to my system but it doesn't work
[01:21] <DJKorbit> i'm getting this error
[01:21] <DJKorbit> $ sudo apt-add-repository ppa:hmrocha-fc/geforcego7400
[01:21] <DJKorbit> Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint at https://launchpad.net/api/1.0/~hmrocha-fc/+archive/geforcego7400
[01:22] <DJKorbit> any help?
[01:22] <micahg> DJKorbit: you might want to try #launchpad
[01:22] <DJKorbit> ok
[13:40] <stefanlsd> anyone seen this -   Uploading dahdi-tools_2.4.1-1ubuntu1_source.changes: 3k/4k550 Changes file must be signed with a valid GPG signature: Verification failed 3 times: ["(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')", "(7, 9, u'No public key')"] : Permission denied
[13:40] <stefanlsd> when dputing
[13:40] <geser> stefanlsd: yes, seen other "complain" about it in the past weeks
[13:41] <geser> the LP FTP server checks the GPG signature upon upload, but sometimes the keyserver doesn't like to talk to the FTP server
[13:41] <geser> if you uploaded with that key successfully in the past, check if your upload got accepted despite that error
[13:41] <stefanlsd> geser: mm. dont think its my side. gpg --verify says good signature. oki. i'll try later
[13:42] <stefanlsd> geser: aah yeah. just got he email. looks like it did go through
[13:43] <geser> stefanlsd: the Ubuntu keyserver and the FTP server don't like to talk to each other sometimes so the FTP server doesn't get a key to verify the signature during upload
[13:44] <geser> wgrant: ^^ is there a bug about it (failed signature check during dput) which I can point person asking about it to?
[19:26] <bullgard4> http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppas/47: "This repository is available for: Stable." What does »Stable« mean here?
[19:30] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: 'stable' refers to the current debian release
[19:30] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: currently the 'stable' release is also known as 'squeeze'
[19:33] <bullgard4> Ampelbein: Right. What is the conclusion for Ubuntu?
[19:34] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: well, stable isn't used as a codename in ubuntu at all.
[19:35] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: current "stable" releases of ubuntu are: 11.04, 10.10, 10.04, 8.04, 6.06
[19:36] <bullgard4> Ampelbein: Well, the website's URL is "http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppas/47". So there must be a relation to Ubuntu, mustn't it.
[19:37] <bullgard4> Ampelbein: Didn't you just say that "Stable" here refers to Debian's Squeeze?
[19:39] <broder> bullgard4, Ampelbein: for google's apt repositories, stable refers to the version of *google's* code, not ubuntu's
[19:40] <broder> their software generally works irrespective of ubuntu version you're using (or debian)
[19:40] <broder> e.g. for chrome, i know they have stable, beta, and unstable (or something like that) for the stable, beta, and dev channels
[19:42] <bullgard4> broder: I have used this PPA successfully with Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS. But the same PPA in Natty throws a warning and persistently annoys its Update Manager.
[20:10] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: regarding the "it's on ubuntuupdates so there must be a relation" - not really. It's just another 3rd party site and in no way official.
[20:10] <Ampelbein> broder: thanks, I didn't know that about google's naming policy.
[20:13] <bullgard4> broder: In Natty I followed the instructions given in http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppas/47 for installing the PPA google-talkplugin. It seems that now google-talkplugin no longer annoys Update manager. My personal explanation is that during the distant upgrade 10.10 to 11.04 alpha something went wrong and I only today fixed this by following the instructions in http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppas/47
[20:13] <bullgard4> . --  Thank you for your help.
[20:14] <bullgard4> Ampelbein: broder convincingly explained that this is Google's terminology.
[20:15] <Ampelbein> bullgard4: yes, I didn't know that.
[20:16] <bullgard4> Ampelbein: So thank you very much for your help and encouragement.