=== emma is now known as em [02:03] I am having a proc filesystem problem. My program is running at root and is PTRACE attached to a process. When I look at /proc//map I have an entry that reads: [02:03] f2e478eb000-7f2e47900000 r-xp 0 8:1 261712 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 [02:03] But if I seek to 0xf2e478eb000 in /proc//mem and attempt to read the block, my ifstream reports it failed (via fmem.bad()). Anyone have any ideas? === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero [07:32] morning apw [10:47] Hi, how I can I build the package linux-libc-dev? [10:50] Hi, how I can build the package linux-libc-dev? [10:57] well, I explain more: I've tried with "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-headers" but "mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/simon/sources/kernel/ubuntu-natty/debian/linux-libc-dev/usr/include/': File exists make: *** [install-arch-headers] Error 1" [10:57] It's the same process but it gives error! [10:59] I means, the same process "binary-arch-headers" creates this folder and the same process gives error because it is created!! o_O [11:02] I've searched in Google, etc... but I found nothing about this. :-( [11:46] Hi, how I can build the package linux-libc-dev? [11:46] well, I explain more: I've tried with "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-headers" but "mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/simon/sources/kernel/ubuntu-natty/debian/linux-libc-dev/usr/include/': File exists make: *** [install-arch-headers] Error 1" [11:48] I means, the same process "binary-arch-headers" creates this folder and the same process gives error because it is created!! o_O [12:20] hi, is ist possible to get 32+64 bit kernels in one dir [12:20] like for rc6 [12:29] will there be a natty update kernel for .5 soon? [13:21] Hi, how I can build the package linux-libc-dev? [13:21] well, I explain more: I've tried with "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-headers" but "mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/simon/sources/kernel/ubuntu-natty/debian/linux-libc-dev/usr/include/': File exists make: *** [install-arch-headers] Error 1" [13:21] I means, the same process "binary-arch-headers" creates this folder and the same process gives error because it is created!! o_O [14:26] Hi, how I can build the package linux-libc-dev? [14:26] well, I explain more: I've tried with "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-headers" but "mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/simon/sources/kernel/ubuntu-natty/debian/linux-libc-dev/usr/include/': File exists make: *** [install-arch-headers] Error 1" [14:26] I means, the same process "binary-arch-headers" creates this folder and the same process gives error because it is created!! o_O [15:32] hi [15:33] someone from the kernel team present? [15:34] vasco, the kernel team is currently at a conference (uds) in hungary [15:34] aha I see [15:35] I like to give notice of a bug [15:36] shall I wait for the team to return [15:36] vasco, have you filed the bug in Launchpad ? [15:36] yes it is filed in launchpad [15:36] for a while now [15:36] what's the bug # ? [15:37] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/550559/ [15:37] Launchpad bug 550559 in ubuntu "hdd problems, failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED" [Undecided,Confirmed] [15:37] I think this one is interesting for the kernel team: [15:37] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/550559/comments/41 [15:37] that comment I mean [15:41] does a reboot work? then it maybe needs just a delay [15:43] what do you mean with does a reboot work? does it make the problem go away, no. [15:43] i read about lots of problems with ssd on amd boards [15:44] this is not about ssds [15:44] plain old fashion harddisks [16:23] Hi, how I can build the package linux-libc-dev? [16:23] well, I explain more: I've tried with "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch-headers" but "mkdir: cannot create directory `/home/simon/sources/kernel/ubuntu-natty/debian/linux-libc-dev/usr/include/': File exists make: *** [install-arch-headers] Error 1" [16:23] I means, the same process "binary-arch-headers" creates this folder and the same process gives error because it is created!! o_O [18:09] heya, what would be the best way to submit a driver for ubuntu to include? [18:12] ikt: Ideally, get it upstream [18:17] yeah [18:17] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/779484 [18:17] Launchpad bug 779484 in linux "Ralink 5390 wireless driver not included in Natty" [Undecided,Confirmed] [18:17] if you want to throw them a rope :P [18:21] ikt: That driver's a binary-only module [18:22] Which HP appear to be supplying without source even though it claims to be GPLed [18:22] hmm [18:23] would this be something jockey would be better suited for? [18:23] There is source available, it seems [18:23] Well, the binary pointed to from there won't work because it's built for the wrong kernel [18:23] ah that makes sense [18:24] so there's no source, built for the wrong kernel, and the source that's in the main linux kernel is considererd experimental [18:24] There's source at https://build.opensuse.org/package/binaries?package=rt5390sta&project=driver%3Awireless&repository=11.4-update [18:25] hrmm, is there any obvious reason why it's not in .38/39 kernel? [18:25] Hasn't been submitted? [18:25] It'd probably only get as far as staging [18:26] http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/ralink.html [18:27] Ralink is sending patches for the upstream rt2x00 driver for their new chipsets, [18:27] Huh. Ok. [18:27] so work in progress? [18:27] Probably appear in .40, then [18:27] yea === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero