[00:10] so... [00:10] who here thinks WWDC is going to be boring this year? [00:10] o/ [00:39] WWDC? [00:40] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=WWDC [00:40] Oh. That's boring every year - no Linux. [00:48] nothing amused me more than when kiko said "what's with all this mac crap" [03:50] sorry i just had to find a minnesota channel to bitch about the twins and how they need to fire ron gardenhire [03:51] i think i used to hang here a little before, ive long since become a gentoo follower personally though [03:52] i have yet to try out unity, it wont run on my headless virtualbox machine :( [03:55] that's because virtualbox doesn't support unity [03:55] might as well just make a second partition and try it on there [03:55] i read it does if you can enable 3d acceleration [03:56] which i cannot on the headless server [03:56] it runs unity... but it hardly works [03:56] oh [03:56] but Unity 3D is nice [03:56] ive been considering dumping win7 on my htpc, maybe ill have to try 11.04 on it [03:56] better than Gnome 3 imo [03:56] i havent used gnome 3, ive always been a kde guy [03:57] i would say you might first want to try 10.04 first [03:57] if you're not used to the newer features of Ubuntu [03:57] well there is Kubuntu [03:57] meh, i wont need much for features anyway, xbmc and chrome is all id need [03:57] haha [03:57] but id like to play with unity some, i hear good things about it [03:58] then i still suggest 10.04 [03:58] Unity has flaws, but if you get it to work it's quite amazing :) [03:58] i think i tried putting 10.04 on there last time, at the time nvidia drivers still didnt have audio over hdmi, wonder if they do now... [03:58] thats the biggest reason taht thing still runs win7 [03:59] well if i don't have standard hardware, i would suggest just using Arch or Gentoo [03:59] s/i/you [03:59] its pretty standard, its an nvidia chipset board with onboard hdmi [04:00] didn't know hdmi was standard >.> [04:00] never used HDMI myself [04:01] i use it wherever i can [09:01] wow... if you ever want something to be found on the net... apparently tying it into stumbleupon REALLY gets you traffic... [09:21] fisch246: did u start a website or blog and see a spike? [21:01] Hey, anyone here know if a AM3 Processor will work in a AM2+ socket? [21:45] Doesn't seem like it would [21:45] actually: "AM3 processors work on AM2+ motherboards due to the presence of both the DDR2 and DDR3 memory controller " Source: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Socket_AM2%2B [21:46] * Takyoji pokes BlackRat90, as he forgot to mention the name prior. [22:53] yea am3 chip will work on am2+ board (NOT am2 board though) [22:53] but am2+ chips will NOT work on am3 boards i think was the caveat [23:00] awesome is there any downgrade in the power using a am3 on a am2+ [23:02] i dont think so, iirc am2+ cpus used more power than am3 (but i may be wront about that) [23:02] wrong* [23:03] I have seen some that look better then AM3 [23:03] But AM3 are easier to find... and perhaps cheaper [23:04] id go am3 over am2+ any day, i think they have faster bus speeds, support for ddr3, probably more cache [23:09] my motherboard holds DDr2 though, unless ddr3 and drr2 and interchangble [23:10] but the quad core am3 are hellas cheaper [23:13] Well I got you, which works better AMD or intel? [23:13] http://www.defectivebydesign.org/nintendo3ds