[00:10] <fisch246> so...
[00:10] <fisch246> who here thinks WWDC is going to be boring this year?
[00:10] <fisch246> o/
[00:39] <tonyyarusso> WWDC?
[00:40] <fisch246> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=WWDC
[00:40] <tonyyarusso> Oh.  That's boring every year - no Linux.
[00:48] <fisch246> nothing amused me more than when kiko said "what's with all this mac crap"
[03:50] <invisiblek> sorry i just had to find a minnesota channel to bitch about the twins and how they need to fire ron gardenhire
[03:51] <invisiblek> i think i used to hang here a little before, ive long since become a gentoo follower personally though
[03:52] <invisiblek> i have yet to try out unity, it wont run on my headless virtualbox machine :(
[03:55] <fisch246> that's because virtualbox doesn't support unity
[03:55] <fisch246> might as well just make a second partition and try it on there
[03:55] <invisiblek> i read it does if you can enable 3d acceleration
[03:56] <invisiblek> which i cannot on the headless server
[03:56] <fisch246> it runs unity... but it hardly works
[03:56] <invisiblek> oh
[03:56] <fisch246> but Unity 3D is nice
[03:56] <invisiblek> ive been considering dumping win7 on my htpc, maybe ill have to try 11.04 on it
[03:56] <fisch246> better than Gnome 3 imo
[03:56] <invisiblek> i havent used gnome 3, ive always been a kde guy
[03:57] <fisch246> i would say you might first want to try 10.04 first
[03:57] <fisch246> if you're not used to the newer features of Ubuntu
[03:57] <fisch246> well there is Kubuntu
[03:57] <invisiblek> meh, i wont need much for features anyway, xbmc and chrome is all id need
[03:57] <fisch246> haha
[03:57] <invisiblek> but id like to play with unity some, i hear good things about it
[03:58] <fisch246> then i still suggest 10.04
[03:58] <fisch246> Unity has flaws, but if you get it to work it's quite amazing :)
[03:58] <invisiblek> i think i tried putting 10.04 on there last time, at the time nvidia drivers still didnt have audio over hdmi, wonder if they do now...
[03:58] <invisiblek> thats the biggest reason taht thing still runs win7
[03:59] <fisch246> well if i don't have standard hardware, i would suggest just using Arch or Gentoo
[03:59] <fisch246> s/i/you
[03:59] <invisiblek> its pretty standard, its an nvidia chipset board with onboard hdmi
[04:00] <fisch246> didn't know hdmi was standard >.>
[04:00] <fisch246> never used HDMI myself
[04:01] <invisiblek> i use it wherever i can
[09:01] <fisch246> wow... if you ever want something to be found on the net... apparently tying it into stumbleupon REALLY gets you traffic...
[09:21] <mysteriousdarren> fisch246: did u start a website or blog  and see a spike?
[21:01] <BlackRat90> Hey, anyone here know if a AM3 Processor will work in a AM2+ socket?
[21:45] <Takyoji> Doesn't seem like it would
[21:45] <Takyoji> actually: "AM3 processors work on AM2+ motherboards due to the presence of both the DDR2 and DDR3 memory controller " Source: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Socket_AM2%2B
[21:46]  * Takyoji pokes BlackRat90, as he forgot to mention the name prior.
[22:53] <invisiblek> yea am3 chip will work on am2+ board (NOT am2 board though)
[22:53] <invisiblek> but am2+ chips will NOT work on am3 boards i think was the caveat
[23:00] <BlackRat90> awesome is there any downgrade in the power using a am3 on a am2+
[23:02] <invisiblek> i dont think so, iirc am2+ cpus used more power than am3 (but i may be wront about that)
[23:02] <invisiblek> wrong*
[23:03] <BlackRat90> I have seen some that look better then AM3
[23:03] <BlackRat90> But AM3 are easier to find... and perhaps cheaper
[23:04] <invisiblek> id go am3 over am2+ any day, i think they have faster bus speeds, support for ddr3, probably more cache
[23:09] <BlackRat90> my motherboard holds DDr2 though, unless ddr3 and drr2 and interchangble
[23:10] <BlackRat90> but the quad core am3 are hellas cheaper
[23:13] <BlackRat90> Well I got you, which works better AMD or intel?
[23:13] <Takyoji> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/nintendo3ds