=== sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: wgrant | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === head_v is now known as head_victim === cinerama_ is now known as cinerama [07:01] hi! [07:21] ... === henninge is now known as henninge-bbl === med_out is now known as medberry === henninge-bbl is now known as henninge === rvba_ is now known as rvba === joey is now known as canonical === canonical is now known as joey [10:08] What's the Difference between LaunchPad and GitHub? [10:08] lots ;) [10:09] cool [10:09] Launchpad is more geared towards project management, GitHub is mostly code hosting [10:09] that, and and LP uses Bzr rather than Git [10:09] Ah [10:10] I'm writing a PHP Application Framework, would it be logical for me to choose one of these services or neither? [10:11] It's mainly in PHP, MySQL5, CSS3, JavaScript...etc [10:12] it's up to you really, have a look at https://launchpad.net/+tour to see what things you can do in LP [10:12] ok awsome thanks [10:12] if you mostly just want code hosting, then either would work fine === henninge is now known as henninge-lunch === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === vila is now known as vila-afk === jcsackett changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: jcsackett | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ === vila-afk is now known as vila [14:31] deryck, morning. [14:31] coffeedude: morning, bro === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === fjlacoste is now known as flacoste === ariweil_ is now known as ariweil [17:30] hi, have a question about upload.ubuntu.com [17:31] accidentally uploaded a *proprietary* in-house package there (my dput was misconfigured) [17:31] told me it was denied. still, would like to be sure, that a copy of the package is not retained in incoming === ariweil_ is now known as ariweil === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [17:39] Is this an appropriate channel for asking a question about renaming a project and a bzr branch contained within it? [17:46] jelkner, hi [17:48] jelmer, hi [17:48] jelkner: Please ask a question in http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad about having the project renamed. [17:49] i will [17:49] but i was hoping to get help formulating the question [17:49] i'm not exactly sure what to ask for [17:50] basically, we have a series of tutorials we want to translate into spanish [17:50] jelkner, Ask for a project to be renamed and mention the old project name and the new project name, as well as your relation to the project. [17:50] ok [17:50] thanks === ariweil_ is now known as ariweil === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [18:35] /bin/sh: python2.6: not found - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/71593226/buildlog_ubuntu-natty-amd64.dvsmon_1.1-2ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [18:36] Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.49), debhelper (>= 5.0.38), python-central (>= 0.6.0), python (>= 2.4) [18:36] what is specifying 2.6? [18:38] http://dpaste.de/wy3i/ debian/control [18:48] CarlFK: from your pasted log: "set -e; for buildver in 2.6 2.7; do \" [18:48] CarlFK: probably in debian/rules === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [18:49] rules... include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/python-distutils.mk [18:49] hmm. === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [18:52] CarlFK: I'd guess you're missing Build-Depends: python-all-dev [18:52] maxb: k - seems harmless :) [18:53] should I pull python (>= 2.4) ? [18:53] pull? [18:54] remove it from Build-Depends [18:54] Yes [18:55] What Ubuntu series are you targetting with this? [18:55] natty [18:56] Only? [18:56] kinda. might do maverick too. I am 90% of the user base [18:56] k [18:56] If it was natty only, I'd say it's time to stop using python-central [18:57] In any case, you should remove python (>= 2.5) from your binary package dependencies, and include ${python:Depends} [19:05] heh - my fresh natty install is broken. falling back to mav... === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [19:19] "[PPA carlfk] [ubuntu/maverick] dvsmon 1.1-2ubuntu3 (Accepted)" - this should have a link to the lp status page [19:21] https://launchpad.net/~carlfk/+archive/ppa/+build/2500987 Finished 16 minutes ago (took 9 minutes, 16.1 seconds) [19:21] huh, I didn't get the email === medberry is now known as med_out [19:48] Hi, is it possible to move a ppa to a new location? Preferably so that users don't have to update their sources with the new URL... [19:53] joh: um, what's the point? [19:53] CarlFK: https://answers.launchpad.net/alarm-clock/+question/157236 [19:55] i still don't see the point [19:56] CarlFK: I guess it's cleaner to have the ppa under a team rather than a person..? [20:04] I think the "preferably... redirect" muddles the cleaner [20:08] joh: make a new ppa [20:08] joh: upload the things you want to it [20:09] and delete the old one [20:09] we don't support redirects to newer ppa urls (for a few reasons, including apt not having a UI for it) [20:09] lifeless: ah ok, then I'm not sure it's worth it... [20:10] if you want it team maintained it is :), but only you can decide that [20:11] yeah, well it's basically just to keep packages which haven't been updated in universe yet. [20:13] lifeless: what are the advantages of having it team maintained? [20:17] joh: multiple people can upload to it [20:20] lifeless: ah ok [20:30] sinzui: you free for help contact? [20:30] yes, sorry === sinzui changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contacts: sinzui | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ [20:31] sinzui: thanks, and no worries. :-) === warp10` is now known as warp10 [22:10] hi, [22:11] is this the right place to ask a question about upload.ubuntu.com? [22:11] sure [22:11] (already tried to ask before, but didn't got a reply) [22:12] today i accidentally uploaded a proprietary package to upload.ubuntu.com, [22:12] which was immediately rejected [22:12] still, I figure, the data may continue to be stored in the incoming directory for some time? [22:12] (unreadable to me, it seems, but who knows who has access?) [22:13] startled? :) [22:13] package was ment to be but into a company-internal repository via 'dput' [22:14] but the 'dput' shipped with ubuntu uploads to upload.ubuntu.com by default (i.e. no server given on command line) [22:17] so my question is: (a) are uploads rejected due to missing signature immediately deleted? and (b) whom to contact to ask for deletion if (a)'s anwer is "no". [22:20] I believe they are [22:20] each upload goes into a unique temp dir [22:20] and that is either blessed or discarded [22:20] lifeless: ah cool. that's what i hoped for [22:20] then maybe i'll be able to keep my job :) [22:21] I can confirm that in a bit, if you like [22:21] (to be absolutely sure, I mean) [22:21] lifeless: that would be incredible (and make me sleep better :) [22:21] some folk intimately familiar with this part of the system come online in ~1.5 hours. [22:21] I will double check with them. [22:22] lifeless: do you need the name of the package? to look for? [22:22] if the thing hasn't been immediately deleted, only the sysadmins would be able to see it [22:22] and we can get them to delete all failed uploads if thats the case [22:22] dvdk: I don't think so, no. [22:22] but if you want to msg it to me that can't hurt === yofel_ is now known as yofel