[09:10] <pitti> jelmer: yes, it overlapped with the control-panel porting one, so that half of the relevant people werent' there any more
[09:11] <jelmer> pitti: aha
[10:10] <broder> small nit about the sru process i just realized - since average people can't accept sru nominations in lp, devs can get stuck in a position where the bug is fix released. how do you guys feel about changing the sponsorship queue to include bugs of *any* status that have ~ubuntu-sponsors subscribed?
[10:11] <broder> (i looked - there are currently about 80 bugs that are fix released but still have ~sponsors subscribed, so it would be a one time cleanup)
[10:12] <micahg> broder: MOTUs can accept universe nominations and core-devs all, unless that changed recently
[10:12] <broder> micahg: yeah, but if we never see the nominations in the first place...
[10:13] <micahg> broder: maybe just add it to the list if there's a nomination there
[10:13] <broder> that could work. i'll see if i can query for that
[10:15] <highvoltage> what happened with https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveReorganisation ?
[10:15] <highvoltage> that process didn't quite seem finish yet and there doesn't seem to be any sessions on it
[10:15] <broder> micahg: but also, the ability to even nominate was restricted some time recently, so this still might be a stumbling block for non-~ubuntu-dev members
[10:16] <micahg> broder: yeah, that's a good point, idr what the wiki says to do ATM about that
[10:17] <broder> it says to nominate, which you can't do unless you're in bugcontrol or something like that
[10:18] <micahg> broder: yeah, we should fix that to be a process that everyone can do or have an option for people that can't nominate
[10:19]  * micahg would suggest asking to ping in IRC for a nomination
[10:19] <broder> yeah, the problem is that the nominate link was restricted because it was overused
[10:20] <micahg> broder: maybe there's a session we can discuss this in?
[10:20] <broder> unfortunately, i think that session just ended this morning :)
[10:20] <micahg> ugh, yeah
[10:25] <broder> dholbach: do you think there's room for that sru discussion in the sponsorship session?
[10:25] <dholbach> broder, let's see how much stuff we have to go through
[10:49] <Laney> highvoltage: I think it stalled... persia or cjwatson might know more
[10:52] <cjwatson> it's stalled for now, yes
[10:56] <Laney> Much of the metadata needed to solve these problems already exists, but is not exposed to users in any useful form; instead, everything of concern to "supported" derivatives is conflated into "main", losing the ability to express very much more than a binary state.
[10:57] <Laney> [BOTTOM][TOP]Tracking of packages
[10:57] <Laney> erg
[10:57] <Laney> let me disable x paste!
[14:23] <jerry256> ..
[14:39] <micahg> slangasek: bug 779174 is the one, thanks
[14:40] <slangasek> micahg: oh, *that* nss, right ;p
[14:41] <micahg> slangasek: heh, yeah, I remember some of the recent conversions on debian-devel about the other NSS
[14:41] <slangasek> micahg: if you can find jamespage, he's probably in a better position than I am to fix that
[14:42] <micahg> slangasek: k, I'll try to track him down, thanks
[14:42] <slangasek> micahg: he already fixed a similar bug in some java packages before natty release, so he knows the landscape very well
[14:57] <alex6567> hello! i can't find out gtkmm-3.0
[14:57] <alex6567> please help me
[15:03] <sladen> alex6567: --> PPA
[16:07] <tseliot1> Sarvatt: are you around?
[16:09] <bryceh> tseliot1, he's in the multiarch session with me
[16:11] <tseliot1> bryceh: ok, thanks
[17:31] <jdstrand> hallyn: re X-Python-Version: it should be upped to 2.7 I think
[17:31] <hallyn> jdstrand: ok, that's what I did
[17:31] <hallyn> jdstrand: I'm trying to get more info on the 'test-poll' failure, but other than that the package is IMO ready to be pushed
[17:32] <jdstrand> hallyn: I haven't had time to look at the package yet btw. it is likely I will not before tuesday
[17:32] <hallyn> jdstrand: do you prefer I wait?
[17:32] <jdstrand> hallyn: I culd do a shallow review before that perhaps
[17:32] <hallyn> nah, you've got enough to do
[17:32] <hallyn> one more day of UDS!
[17:32] <jdstrand> hallyn: well, aiui, a) needs a simple rebuild in oneiric, and b) needs to be merged
[17:33] <hallyn> ?  what are a and b?
[17:33] <jdstrand> hallyn: I thought you msgd me about a libvirt needing a rebuild and you having a merge
[17:33] <jdstrand> hallyn: am I imagining things?
[17:33] <hallyn> for now I"ve pushed a patch to just comment out test-poll from gnulib/tests/Makefile*
[17:33] <hallyn> oh,
[17:34] <hallyn> the libvirt rebuild is done
[17:34] <hallyn> (for brctl)
[17:34] <jdstrand> ok good-- I was going to suggest that :)
[17:34] <hallyn> so now I"m just looking to sync 0.9.1-1 from debian
[17:34] <jdstrand> cool
[17:34] <hallyn> jdstrand: let's just talk on tue or wed I guess
[17:35] <hallyn> if you want to take a look, people.canonical.com has my current package
[17:35] <jdstrand> hallyn: well, you have per-package upload rights now, you could upload if it's good. If you want me to look at it you know I will take a lot of time testing it myself ;)
[17:35] <jdstrand> (which means tuesday)
[17:35] <hallyn> heh, tha'ts why i'm tempted to wait
[17:36] <jdstrand> hehe
[17:36] <jdstrand> I just have a dinner tonight, then all day tomorrow, and an event tomorrow, then travel and holiday on monday
[17:36] <jdstrand> hallyn: if my review is going to be worth anything, I need to wait a bit :/
[17:37] <hallyn> jdstrand: no problem.
[17:37] <hallyn> jdstrand: actually, feh, I think I just found another snafu
[17:37] <hallyn> debian's support of non-linux os is killing me :)
[17:40] <hallyn> well this is weird, for some reason
[17:40] <hallyn> ifneq (,$(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS), linux))
[17:40] <hallyn> is parsing as false in debian/rules
[17:41] <hallyn> bug dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_OS gives me 'linux'
[17:44] <hallyn> ah, i see
[18:09] <p0s> SpamapS: hi. how's the raid startup bug?