/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/05/13/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

mr_pouitbdmurray: please untag all xfce bugs you recently added the 'patch' tag to... A .po file is not what I'd call a patch... thanks.09:38
bdmurraymr_pouit: please send me an email about it and I'll look into it next week09:41
mr_pouitbdmurray: are they tagged automagically by a script of yours?09:43
bdmurraymr_pouit: yes, it looks for attachments flagged as patches09:43
mr_pouitgrmbl, okay, the reporter flagged them incorrectly as patches then, and you script reacted09:46
mr_pouit*your09:46
mr_pouitI'll change them myself then ;-)09:46
bdmurraymr_pouit: okay thanks09:47
=== joshua__ is now known as JoshuaL
JoshuaLCan someone give an importance to bug 75484011:09
ubot4Launchpad bug 754840 in linux (Ubuntu) "Have to switch manually between audio output connectors (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 120)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/75484011:09
txomonhello, can someone tell me which is the state of the bug 48506715:12
ubot4Launchpad bug 485067 in linux (Ubuntu) "wireless card malfunction (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/48506715:12
JoshuaLtxomon, have you tried the latest upstream kernel?15:19
txomonJoshuaL: yes15:23
JoshuaLtxomon, so you have tried the 2.6.39 kernel?15:25
txomonim going to check it15:25
PimmetjeCan anyone tell me what i can do with this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/77945315:26
ubot4Launchpad bug 779453 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "Display port color problem (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]15:26
Pimmetjei think the driver fails15:27
trinikronoPimmetje: did you try out in #ubuntu-x , they handle the xorg bugs and stuff15:58
Pimmetjeno thx15:58
Pimmetjeill try15:58
JoshuaLtxomon, and?16:03
txomonJoshuaL: Upgrading 11.04...16:27
txomonJoshuaL: Is there any way to know if they have read and tried to fix the bug?16:31
JoshuaLtxomon, if they are busy fixing the bug the status would most likely change to In progress.16:33
txomonJoshuaL: .. This bug has been reported a lot ago... doesn't seem to be... seen16:37
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-ohnomnom
txomonJoshuaL: last stable kernel is 2.6.38.617:00
=== Ursinha-ohnomnom is now known as Ursinha
JoshuaLEeeBotu is gone?18:48
ttcudifwe use ubot4 JoshuaL18:54
JoshuaLttcudif, ah ok, since in #ubuntu-bugs-announce there have been no announcements for a while18:54
=== joshua__ is now known as JoshuaL
ttcudifJoshuaL: it looks like the bot is missing lol19:27
JoshuaLttcudif, so it seems19:28
JoshuaLttcudif, shall I report a bug? ;-)19:28
ttcudifhmm i dont see hggh2 and its his bot19:28
ttcudifprolly got disconnected19:28
ttcudifJoshuaL: might be better to wait a bit19:29
JoshuaLttcudif, will do and pake hggh2 if i see him19:30
yofelgeh, eeeBotu is foobared and hggdh is nowhere to be found :(20:01
ttcudifmaybe a netsplit :D20:01
yofelI sent him a memo20:02
RedSingularityAny tool out there that will alert you of any unofficial packages installed on the system?  For example, packages from PPA's instead of the official ubuntu repo's20:17
yofelfor what purpose? Apport for example has a check for that20:19
paultagRedSingularity: if [ "x`grep ppa /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ -R`" == "x" ]; then echo "PPA Free"; else echo "PPAs installed"; fi20:20
paultagRedSingularity: that won't account for ppas installed against sources.list20:20
paultagI guess it will also bomb on commented out lines20:20
yofelit also will only account for ppas, not any other 3rd party repos20:20
paultagbut it's something to start with. And I think yofel's right20:20
RedSingularitypaultag: brilliant.  Will give it a go :)20:21
paultagapport should work that out, though :)20:21
yofellike I said, for what purpose?20:21
RedSingularitypaultag: not in beginners atm??20:21
* yofel looks20:21
paultagRedSingularity: no, not atm20:21
yofelalso, it's not like having a PPA in your sources means it's actually used. The user could have an APT PIN on the package20:22
paultagtruth20:22
paultagapport checks the package installed20:22
RedSingularityyofel: sometimes a package holds back an upgrade.  I am trying to figure out a way to find the unofficial one and revert it to an official one.20:22
yofelto reliably check this you would need a whitelist of repositories, and check every package if the version from there is installed20:23
paultagor that the package is signed with the archive key20:23
yofelRedSingularity: as I said, apport has some code for that, maybe look at that20:24
ttcudifcant just rmadison the package?20:24
RedSingularityyofel: looking now...20:24
yofelRedSingularity: specifically apport/backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py is_distro_package()20:26
RedSingularityBe back in a min..20:27
virusuyhi guys, i'm interested in join to bug squad22:49
virusuycan you suggest me some documentation, to warm up ?22:49
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
RedSingularitysorry for the delay yofel.  Is what you suggested part of the apport package?  I am looking for a man page...22:59
yofelRedSingularity: no, apport has it as an internal check, so it's a python function (lp:apport -> backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py -> is_distro_package() )23:03
yofelthere you can find an example how to check that in pythong23:03
yofel*python23:04
RedSingularityyofel: ahhh ok23:04
yofelsince you said that you want to check this in update-manager I guess that python sounds appropriate23:06

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!