[09:38] <mr_pouit> bdmurray: please untag all xfce bugs you recently added the 'patch' tag to... A .po file is not what I'd call a patch... thanks.
[09:41] <bdmurray> mr_pouit: please send me an email about it and I'll look into it next week
[09:43] <mr_pouit> bdmurray: are they tagged automagically by a script of yours?
[09:43] <bdmurray> mr_pouit: yes, it looks for attachments flagged as patches
[09:46] <mr_pouit> grmbl, okay, the reporter flagged them incorrectly as patches then, and you script reacted
[09:46] <mr_pouit> *your
[09:46] <mr_pouit> I'll change them myself then ;-)
[09:47] <bdmurray> mr_pouit: okay thanks
=== joshua__ is now known as JoshuaL
[11:09] <JoshuaL> Can someone give an importance to bug 754840
[11:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 754840 in linux (Ubuntu) "Have to switch manually between audio output connectors (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 120)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/754840
[15:12] <txomon> hello, can someone tell me which is the state of the bug 485067
[15:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 485067 in linux (Ubuntu) "wireless card malfunction (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485067
[15:19] <JoshuaL> txomon, have you tried the latest upstream kernel?
[15:23] <txomon> JoshuaL: yes
[15:25] <JoshuaL> txomon, so you have tried the 2.6.39 kernel?
[15:25] <txomon> im going to check it
[15:26] <Pimmetje> Can anyone tell me what i can do with this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/779453
[15:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 779453 in xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) "Display port color problem (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[15:27] <Pimmetje> i think the driver fails
[15:58] <trinikrono> Pimmetje: did you try out in #ubuntu-x , they handle the xorg bugs and stuff
[15:58] <Pimmetje> no thx
[15:58] <Pimmetje> ill try
[16:03] <JoshuaL> txomon, and?
[16:27] <txomon> JoshuaL: Upgrading 11.04...
[16:31] <txomon> JoshuaL: Is there any way to know if they have read and tried to fix the bug?
[16:33] <JoshuaL> txomon, if they are busy fixing the bug the status would most likely change to In progress.
[16:37] <txomon> JoshuaL: .. This bug has been reported a lot ago... doesn't seem to be... seen
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-ohnomnom
[17:00] <txomon> JoshuaL: last stable kernel is 2.6.38.6
=== Ursinha-ohnomnom is now known as Ursinha
[18:48] <JoshuaL> EeeBotu is gone?
[18:54] <ttcudif> we use ubot4 JoshuaL
[18:54] <JoshuaL> ttcudif, ah ok, since in #ubuntu-bugs-announce there have been no announcements for a while
=== joshua__ is now known as JoshuaL
[19:27] <ttcudif> JoshuaL: it looks like the bot is missing lol
[19:28] <JoshuaL> ttcudif, so it seems
[19:28] <JoshuaL> ttcudif, shall I report a bug? ;-)
[19:28] <ttcudif> hmm i dont see hggh2 and its his bot
[19:28] <ttcudif> prolly got disconnected
[19:29] <ttcudif> JoshuaL: might be better to wait a bit
[19:30] <JoshuaL> ttcudif, will do and pake hggh2 if i see him
[20:01] <yofel> geh, eeeBotu is foobared and hggdh is nowhere to be found :(
[20:01] <ttcudif> maybe a netsplit :D
[20:02] <yofel> I sent him a memo
[20:17] <RedSingularity> Any tool out there that will alert you of any unofficial packages installed on the system?  For example, packages from PPA's instead of the official ubuntu repo's
[20:19] <yofel> for what purpose? Apport for example has a check for that
[20:20] <paultag> RedSingularity: if [ "x`grep ppa /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ -R`" == "x" ]; then echo "PPA Free"; else echo "PPAs installed"; fi
[20:20] <paultag> RedSingularity: that won't account for ppas installed against sources.list
[20:20] <paultag> I guess it will also bomb on commented out lines
[20:20] <yofel> it also will only account for ppas, not any other 3rd party repos
[20:20] <paultag> but it's something to start with. And I think yofel's right
[20:21] <RedSingularity> paultag: brilliant.  Will give it a go :)
[20:21] <paultag> apport should work that out, though :)
[20:21] <yofel> like I said, for what purpose?
[20:21] <RedSingularity> paultag: not in beginners atm??
[20:21]  * yofel looks
[20:21] <paultag> RedSingularity: no, not atm
[20:22] <yofel> also, it's not like having a PPA in your sources means it's actually used. The user could have an APT PIN on the package
[20:22] <paultag> truth
[20:22] <paultag> apport checks the package installed
[20:22] <RedSingularity> yofel: sometimes a package holds back an upgrade.  I am trying to figure out a way to find the unofficial one and revert it to an official one.
[20:23] <yofel> to reliably check this you would need a whitelist of repositories, and check every package if the version from there is installed
[20:23] <paultag> or that the package is signed with the archive key
[20:24] <yofel> RedSingularity: as I said, apport has some code for that, maybe look at that
[20:24] <ttcudif> cant just rmadison the package?
[20:24] <RedSingularity> yofel: looking now...
[20:26] <yofel> RedSingularity: specifically apport/backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py is_distro_package()
[20:27] <RedSingularity> Be back in a min..
[22:49] <virusuy> hi guys, i'm interested in join to bug squad
[22:49] <virusuy> can you suggest me some documentation, to warm up ?
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
[22:59] <RedSingularity> sorry for the delay yofel.  Is what you suggested part of the apport package?  I am looking for a man page...
[23:03] <yofel> RedSingularity: no, apport has it as an internal check, so it's a python function (lp:apport -> backends/packaging-apt-dpkg.py -> is_distro_package() )
[23:03] <yofel> there you can find an example how to check that in pythong
[23:04] <yofel> *python
[23:04] <RedSingularity> yofel: ahhh ok
[23:06] <yofel> since you said that you want to check this in update-manager I guess that python sounds appropriate