[02:23] <doctormo> paultag: Hey, are you around?
[02:24] <paultag> doctormo: sure am friendo!
[02:24] <paultag> doctormo: what can I do?
[02:30] <paultag> Just saying hi? :)
[02:30] <doctormo> nop
[02:32] <paultag> k :)
[02:39] <Technoviking> popey: could  restore, but it would be best to create a new one that has more upto date info,
[02:41] <Technoviking> popey: sorry blame jcastro :)
[08:37] <popey> Technoviking: thats what i did :)
[09:27] <nigelb> AlanBell, ping
[09:28] <AlanBell> o/
[09:30] <nigelb> AlanBell, have you gotten the twitter style tags on etherpad working locally?
[09:30] <nigelb> it fails for me on mine
[09:30] <AlanBell> no, they just come up empty
[09:30] <nigelb> aha, so its not just me
[09:31] <nigelb> AlanBell, did you use the latest from source control or did you install the apt one?
[09:31] <AlanBell> the apt one
[09:31] <AlanBell> Daviey has them working on pad.ubuntu-uk.org
[09:31] <nigelb> aha
[09:31] <nigelb> I shall poke Daviey.
[09:32] <AlanBell> http://mumble.libertus.co.uk:9000/ep/search?query=uds-o
[09:32] <AlanBell> I get that
[09:32] <nigelb> AlanBell, the plan is to use [#nigelbabu] next time, so we can search by tag for action item
[09:32] <AlanBell> oooooh
[09:32] <AlanBell> good plan
[09:32] <nigelb> because one of the complaints is that "I have lots of action items, but I can't see them"
[09:32] <nigelb> I talked to pitti, and he said, next uds, he can modify the burn down chart script to escape the # optionally
[09:32] <AlanBell> yeah, that is a great idea
[09:33] <nigelb> so we just need to get pad.ubuntu.com up-to-date and get the word out
[09:33] <nigelb> (its mike's idea, I'm just executing it)
[09:34] <nigelb> I wonder if Daviey's home yet
[09:35] <nigelb> AlanBell, I think it was fixed later on. So, we must be running an older version. Is it worth the trouble having an updated package for lucid? (I could just backport dustin's work)
[09:41] <AlanBell> dunno if it was something that has been fixed or whether it is a missing search dependency or something
[09:42] <nigelb> I enabled all the search thingies on mine, didn't help
[09:42] <nigelb> I mailed Daviey, I'll wait to hear what he thinks
[13:14] <cjohnston> AlanBell: fwiw, if we use a # for names in etherpad and dont remove the # before moving it to the blueprint it will break the work items scripts.. which I am not going to make work with some people using the # and others now.
[13:14] <cjohnston> not
[13:14] <cjohnston> my suggestion is that the work items scripts will now show by user once i get it upgraded
[15:41] <cjohnston> hehehe.. summit spam
[15:44] <paultag> cjohnston: thanks for rocking that bug, man
[15:44] <paultag> i'm stoked to see it in-progress
[15:44] <cjohnston> does that look good?
[15:44] <paultag> cjohnston: the branch?
[15:45] <cjohnston> ya
[15:45] <paultag> cjohnston: not checked it out yet, just got the mail. I'll pull it now (not that I'll have too much to say about it)
[15:45] <cjohnston> i just want feedback on what i did, more than if it works or not
[15:46] <paultag> cjohnston: of course
[15:46] <paultag> sec just pulling up the delta
[15:47] <vish> paultag: hey.. have you blocked commenting on your blog posts?  (the other day dholbach was looking to post a comment and we couldnt figure it out)
[15:48] <paultag> vish: the old comment system was js only (super lame), so I'm using stock tumblr, which lets you comment if you have a tumblr account. I know it's sub-par, but the old system was way worse
[15:48] <paultag> cjohnston: I dig the change to like 83 in the team model ;)
[15:48] <cjohnston> does that successfully meet the needs?
[15:49] <paultag> cjohnston: 90% there -- the reason I was poking about it was because I had no country to put the global event in for an IRC series (LoCo Week)
[15:49] <vish> paultag: ha! actually thats a good feature ;)  unless ofcurse you cant get nicer/well-behaved people (dholbach?) to comment ;p
[15:49] <paultag> sorry, local event off the global virtual series cjohnston
[15:50] <paultag> what I said makes no sense
[15:50] <paultag> vish: :)
[15:50] <paultag> vish: tumblr is really screwey sometimes (but it's pretty cool overall)
[15:50] <cjohnston> paultag: so you want virtual global events as well?
[15:50] <paultag> vish: I heard it got brought up at UDS. I really hope no one thought I was trying to be an ass about it, I really meant it as productive (even if it was super brash)
[15:50] <cjohnston> i think some shared the sentiment
[15:51] <paultag> cjohnston: Well, I think that virtual local events should come from virtual global events -- what screwed me up last time is when I tried to think of what country to put an IRC channel in :)
[15:51] <paultag> cjohnston: but the devoted channel field helps for sure
[15:52] <vish> paultag: well, you do write a ***lot*** of good posts, but that one was full of wrong assumptions …  so one bad post is not too bad/forgivable ;)
[15:52] <vish> *not unforgivable
[15:53] <paultag> vish: I figure if I hit 1 post of static among good ones, I'll be fine :)
[15:53] <vish> yup.. :)
[15:53] <cjohnston> paultag: but a global event can be defined as virutal without any code changes i think?
[15:54] <paultag> cjohnston: you know the code base way better then me. I've not tried this for a while. If you think it's fixed, I'm cool with calling it fixed. I can pull it and test it, but I trust your judgement on it
[15:55] <cjohnston> I woudl thing that a global evnet could be called loco week and then in the description say this is a virutal blah blah blah whatever else we want it to say
[15:55] <paultag> cjohnston: good 'nuff for me
[15:55] <paultag> cjohnston: I'll post on the bug, one sec
[15:55] <cjohnston> and then now when a team creates a team event for the global event theyw ould enter the channel for the locate
[15:56] <cjohnston> location
[15:56] <cjohnston> not that i can type
[16:27] <paultag> aye :)
[20:16] <doctormo> paultag: I have a crazy idea and I'd like your opinion.
[20:32] <AlanBell> cjohnston: I see your point #name on work items isn't ideal
[20:32] <cjohnston> :-)
[20:32] <AlanBell> all it would do anyway is link all the whole pads where you are mentioned
[20:33] <cjohnston> right..
[20:33] <AlanBell> which you could get close to in summit with a list of meetings you subscribed to
[20:33] <cjohnston> ya..
[20:34] <cjohnston> if you look at status.linaro.com
[20:34] <cjohnston> you can look by person
[20:34] <AlanBell> we should do more of a personal daily schedule view for summit
[20:35] <cjohnston> we discussed that at 30000 feet last night
[20:35] <AlanBell> always good to take a high level view of such things :)
[20:36] <cjohnston> lol
[20:36] <cjohnston> that was very nice about flying with mike.. even tho we are only an hour or so apart, we dont get toghether to work on stuff much
[21:28] <paultag> doctormo: yo!
[21:28] <paultag> doctormo: let's hear it :)
[21:29] <paultag> jono: Howdy, got a sec?
[21:29] <paultag> jono: less then five minutes, I swear :)
[21:34] <jono> paultag, sure
[21:34] <cjohnston> jono: make it home safe I guess?
[21:34] <jono> cjohnston, yup :-)
[21:34] <jono> you?
[21:34] <cjohnston> yup.. after a slight mishap at JFK
[21:34] <paultag> jono: I'll throw you a PM :)
[22:20] <doctormo> paultag: I have a module xdgvalidate which is being under used, it's freeking awesome.
[22:20] <doctormo> So, I'm thinking of renaming it validate-json and pushing it towards all those web devs.
[22:21] <doctormo> But it's crazy because all I'll be doing is renaming  it.
[22:23] <paultag> doctormo: that's a pretty rad idea, actually
[22:23] <paultag> doctormo: you could merge it in as a gedit plugin when you are editing JSON
[22:23] <paultag> that would be a huge hit
[22:25] <doctormo> paultag: Do people often find they're editing json?
[22:26] <paultag> doctormo: I do it a bunch, but that's because when I write an app I tend to store conf files in JSON
[22:26] <paultag> doctormo: and I hate having to use the online validator all the time
[22:27] <doctormo> paultag: does the online validator just validate that it's valid json?
[22:27] <paultag> doctormo: yeah
[22:27] <paultag> http://www.jsonlint.com/
[22:27] <doctormo> paultag: This would validate that it's valid and which parts of it don't match a schema.
[22:27] <paultag> doctormo: it does that :)
[22:27] <doctormo> (the exact part)
[22:27] <paultag> but I don't like having to go on the web for that
[22:28] <doctormo> What kind of schema does it use?
[22:29] <paultag> doctormo: oh it does not do that, it just points out JSON issues
[22:29] <paultag> doctormo: there's a format like XLT for JSON?
[22:29] <paultag> that's awesome
[22:29] <doctormo> paultag: XLT is xml translation, XSD is the validation tech for xml.
[22:30] <paultag> XSD * right right
[22:30] <paultag> XLT was primed in my head for some reason. I think I was just looking over an old XLT I had for making svn pretty
[22:30] <paultag> svn, pfft :)
[22:30] <doctormo> So xsdvalidate is a module that uses a compressed xsd spec and can be used with any structure (json, yaml, xml, perl, python, js etc)
[22:31] <paultag> nice :)
[22:35] <doctormo> paultag: OK so you think it's a good idea :-) good, I'll do something about that idea then and prod you for some media exposure late.
[22:35] <doctormo> later*
[22:36] <paultag> doctormo: sure thing!!
[22:41] <paultag> BBL :)