[11:11] <koolhead11> kim0, around?
[11:20] <kim0> koolhead11: hey
[11:20] <kim0> yeah I'm here .. refocusing after uds :)
[11:20] <koolhead11> lol. still not out of the hangover :D
[11:21] <kim0> :D
[11:21] <koolhead11> i got some chocolates and stickers BTW :)
[11:24] <koolhead11> so the announcement has finally come openstack :)
[11:40] <kim0> yeah .. eucalpytus is still cool though .. their v3 looks amazing
[12:43] <koolhead11> kim0, indeed!! :P
[16:16] <Kyle__> After launching vms I have troubles sshing to the head node, does that sound absolutely bonkers to anyone else?
[16:42] <obino> Kyle__: it does seems pretty weird. Have you checked the network configuration you gabe to UEC?
[16:48] <Kyle__> obino: It's abouslyte fine until I launch images.  I'm affraid I screwed something up tryign to grant network permissions.  Is there a way to clear them all out?
[17:00] <obino> Kyle__: please, check the VNET* values you gave to Eucalyptus. From your symptoms it looks like you are in MANGED* mode and that you instructed EUcalyptus to give to the instances a private networks in conflict with your real network
[17:00] <obino> when an instance starts, you then may loose access to some machines
[17:07] <Kyle__> obino: Err.  So I need one IP range for the head node, one for the worker nodes, and a third for the virtual machines?
[17:53] <obino> have you read our network documentation? there are some examples
[17:54] <obino> UEC uses MANAGED-NOVLAN by default
[18:05] <Kyle__> obino: I should go re-read it.  Confusing thing is this worked ok for linux clients.
[18:05] <Kyle__> s/clients/vms/
[18:09] <obino> Kyle__: if you can show your ip addr show, route -n and eucalyptus configuration I may be able to help
[18:09] <obino> I may be leaving soon though
[18:10] <obino> you can send a PM on the eucalyptus forum if you want
[18:10] <obino> id is graziano
[18:15] <Kyle__> OK. Thanks.
[20:11] <mathiaz> smoser: hi!
[20:11] <smoser> hi
[20:12] <mathiaz> smoser: are there are plans to release an updated version of lucid AMI soon?
[20:13] <smoser> mathiaz, its just something that has not had resources devoted to it.
[20:13]  * mathiaz nods
[20:13] <smoser> we should be moving towards getting those updates done in cycle with kernel releases for a stable release.
[20:14] <smoser> but it is just not somethign that has gotten cycles.
[20:19] <Kyle__> In general, is it a mistake to for the head-node to have it's public ip address in the same range as the external ip addresses given to virtual machines?