| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| jam | morning all | 09:10 |
|---|---|---|
| poolie | hi jam! | 09:23 |
| poolie | want to dial in? | 09:23 |
| jam | certainly | 09:23 |
| * bialix waves | 09:23 | |
| mgz | jelmer, spiv: bug 597686 was the one I was talking about at breakfast | 09:32 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 597686 in Bazaar "bzr: ERROR: [Error 145] The directory is not empty: u'C:/Users/exarkun/twistedbot/windows7-64-py2.6-select/Twisted/.bzr/checkout/limbo/new-7/words'" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/597686 | 09:32 |
| === hunger_ is now known as hunger | ||
| poolie | jam: you need ":multiuser on" and ":addacl jriddell" i think | 09:36 |
| poolie | if they fail, i think root needs to allow the change | 09:36 |
| jam | Riddell: "screen -x jameinel/" | 09:47 |
| poolie | jam do you know what's up with https://answers.launchpad.net/loggerhead/+question/80612 | 12:16 |
| jam | poolie: I posted an info request. I don't specifically know on that part. | 12:18 |
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| jam | Riddell: https://code.launchpad.net/~jameinel/bzr/2.4-update-basis-by-delta-781168/+merge/61232 | 12:35 |
| spiv | mgz: fwiw I've pushed those experimental transform.py tweaks to lp:~spiv/bzr/treetransform-robustness-597686 | 13:48 |
| bialix | http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6009280/git-gui-like-bzr-explorer-but-for-git | 14:18 |
| mgz | spiv: lp:~gz/bzr/treetransform_create_file_interrupt_597686 has the tests in their current state | 14:23 |
| spiv | bialix: haha, nice answer :) | 14:23 |
| bialix | I know somebody from canonical did the same trick in the past | 14:23 |
| bialix | spiv: the comments for that question is very funny too | 14:25 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| apw | i presume if i see _th | 14:49 |
| apw | i presume if i see _this_, things are very very bad: bzr: ERROR: The file id "x_Matt_Zimmerman_<matt.zimmerman@canonical.com>_Sun_Mar_13_00:51:19_2005_1366.3" is not present in the tree <bzrlib.inventory.CHKInventory object at 0x3bf07d0>. | 14:49 |
| james_w | it depends what you are doing | 14:52 |
| etenil | Hi there | 15:56 |
| etenil | I'm trying to use the bzrlib with python, but I don't know where to start (the auto-documentation isn't that descriptive). What I want to do is just read the revision log of a repository. Could someone help? | 15:57 |
| spiv | etenil: http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/integration.html | 15:58 |
| etenil | oh I didn't find this | 15:59 |
| etenil | thanks | 15:59 |
| spiv | etenil: (and other docs in http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/, like http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/overview.html, will probably help) | 15:59 |
| etenil | awesome, it's exactly what I looked for | 16:00 |
| etenil | thanks a lot spiv | 16:00 |
| spiv | etenil: you're welcome :) | 16:07 |
| spiv | Riddell: we don't use Fix Committed for bzr bugs: http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/bug-handling.html#bug-status | 16:22 |
| spiv | poolie: added to http://webnumbr.com/profile?name=https%3A%2F%2Flaunchpad.net%2F~spiv | 16:28 |
| spiv | poolie: http://webnumbr.com/.join%28launchpad-oops-bugs.all,launchpad-timeout-bugs.all,launchpad-critical-bugs.all%29 | 16:31 |
| maxb | james_w: I'd like to ask you a question about something odd the UDD importer does, when you have some time? | 17:07 |
| james_w | maxb, I can talk now if you like | 17:08 |
| maxb | Specifically, I'm confused about why the importer uses the method it does for plucking out the upstream branch | 17:08 |
| maxb | This is in import_package.py extract_upstream_branch | 17:08 |
| maxb | What it does, is to examine all the upstream-* tags, and pick the revision with the highest revision timestamp | 17:09 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| maxb | This has been causing me problems because of an import where the highest timestamp is not actually the highest debian version | 17:10 |
| james_w | so it should just use highest debian version? | 17:10 |
| maxb | That is one option | 17:10 |
| maxb | The existing code in bzr-builddeb uses two different algorithms in different places | 17:11 |
| maxb | merge-package, import-dsc and merge-upstream look at the changelog in the branch, take the upstream version from that, and find the appropriate upstream-<version> tag | 17:11 |
| maxb | import-upstream reviews all upstream-* tags and picks the one with the highest debian version | 17:11 |
| maxb | I was wondering if you had any insight on how the importer came to be using a third, different algorithm | 17:12 |
| james_w | I think it was actually the first alogrithm :-) | 17:16 |
| james_w | but I don't really know why there are three versions | 17:16 |
| maxb | It looks like you introduced the algorithm in udd r36, replacing the old algorithm based on find_changelog | 17:17 |
| * jelmer 's ignorance is probably the cause of one of the extra versions | 17:17 | |
| maxb | Ironically, the fix I've developed for the problem I'm having is effectively reverting back to the find_changelog algorithm | 17:17 |
| maxb | "Hopefully fix the problems with resurrecting the upstream branches. | 17:17 |
| maxb | is what you said back in 2009 :-) | 17:18 |
| james_w | yeah, now I wish I had been more specific | 17:18 |
| maxb | Hm. This poses a problem, because the current algorithm is definitely broken for my current pet testcase | 17:21 |
| maxb | Whereas the other algorithm was presumably broken for something in the past | 17:22 |
| spiv | Thinking of webnumbrs: http://webnumbr.com/.join%28bzr-active-reviews,bzr-pqm-queue-length,bzr-merged-reviews.derivative%29 | 17:28 |
| etenil | The example on how to get a revision doesn't work here: http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/integration.html | 17:30 |
| etenil | It complains that the module repository doesn't contain any "get_revision" function | 17:31 |
| etenil | mistake? | 17:31 |
| etenil | mmh, maybe I don't understand well | 17:36 |
| etenil | let's say I have a done a bzr branch <some_repo> /tmp/branch/ | 17:36 |
| etenil | then should I consider /tmp/branch as a repository in itself? | 17:37 |
| etenil | hum, that did it | 17:39 |
| etenil | not as simple as expected | 17:40 |
| etenil | ok so the example at http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr.dev/developers/integration.html is indeed incorrect and should read as http://dpaste.com/543458/ | 17:49 |
| etenil | http://dpaste.com/543461/ wrong paste :( | 17:49 |
| etenil | dunno who I should contact to correct it | 17:50 |
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| Riddell | mgz: voila https://code.launchpad.net/~jr/qbzr/778012-user-error-handling/+merge/61289 | 19:06 |
| jam | etenil: actually, the way it is written is correct, but assumes you already have a Branch object named "branch". | 19:06 |
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| maxb | james_w: I have an udd importer branch with 1 approve review. What are the next steps? (This change is separate to what I was asking about a few hours ago) | 19:15 |
| james_w | you can go ahead and merge it | 19:15 |
| james_w | then someone on the bzr team can help you get it deployed | 19:15 |
| maxb | james_w: I'm not an ~udd member - jelmer is, but wasn't clear on whether it was OK to land without an OK on deploying it from someone | 19:17 |
| james_w | yeah, I think you can go ahead | 19:17 |
| maxb | Alright, so then I just have to ask around for a ~canonical-bazaar member who is confident in deploying the change themselves? | 19:18 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| james_w | maxb, yeah | 19:26 |
| acrawford | Hi all, I've set up a no-trees shared remote repository -nested style- | 19:55 |
| acrawford | I branched it, checked it out | 19:55 |
| acrawford | to my local machine, added source | 19:56 |
| acrawford | committed | 19:56 |
| acrawford | what is the preferred method to publish /auto mirror /push a copy of the working tree to a directory | 19:57 |
| acrawford | ? like /var/www/site? | 19:57 |
| acrawford | I tried export but the dir is empty | 19:57 |
| acrawford | I am trying to automirror the shared remote repository (which has no working tree)) | 19:59 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| awilkins | Do branches that contain a debian/ folder need a packaging recipe? | 20:50 |
| meoblast001 | hi | 23:38 |
| meoblast001 | hm.. i think i answered my question by relooking at a directory string | 23:38 |
| meoblast001 | heh | 23:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!