[00:18] <micahg> hggdh: now I am, what's up?
[00:19] <hggdh> micahg: remember the user we created to interface with the wiki changes for bugsquad?
[00:19] <micahg> hggdh: umm..., I can probably find it
[00:20] <hggdh> heh
[00:20] <hggdh> I just wanted to know if it is still defined on your domain -- we stopped receiving moderation requests for it, and I am just checking
[00:21] <micahg> hggdh: yep, still fwds to ubuntu-bugsquad@l.u.c
[00:21] <hggdh> micahg: all we needed, thanks, we will keep on with IS
[02:05] <charlie-tca> Could someone familiar take a look at bug 784342 for me?
[02:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784342 in notecase (Ubuntu) "Request notecase be removed from Repository (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784342
[02:06] <charlie-tca> Do I need anything else for that to be removed?
[02:07] <micahg> charlie-tca: looking
[02:11] <micahg> charlie-tca: is it broke?
[02:11] <charlie-tca> yup
[02:12] <micahg> charlie-tca: please note that in the bug and I'll ACK the removal
[02:12] <charlie-tca> uses most of the cpu, to the point nothing else can be run until it is killed
[02:12] <charlie-tca> Thanks
[02:12] <micahg> charlie-tca: BTW, normally, you'd subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to the bug when filing a request like this
[02:13] <micahg> the sponsor will check for rdepends and ACK or NACK the request
[02:14] <charlie-tca> That's what I didn't know
[02:14] <micahg> charlie-tca: sounds like another use case for the packaging guide :)
[02:14] <charlie-tca> heh, never tried this before.
[02:15] <charlie-tca> updated the bug with the issue and bug number for reference
[02:15] <micahg> charlie-tca: thanks
[02:15] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[02:16] <micahg> charlie-tca: you're welcome
[02:17]  * micahg thinks with a little work we can rope charlie-tca into a contributing developer :)
[02:20]  * charlie-tca thinks with a lot of work, he could learn something
[02:21] <micahg> charlie-tca: you just did learn something w/out a lot of work :)
[02:21] <charlie-tca> oops
[02:24]  * bcurtiswx wishes he could learn as fast as some people around here ;)
[12:29] <yofel> bug 784073
[12:29] <yofel> doesn't unitys search box support hidden menu items?
[12:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784073 in apport (Ubuntu) "Apport does not open whatsoever (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784073
[15:43] <roadmr> Hi! could someone help me with bug 724540? I think it should be Importance: Low and Status: Fix Released as it's fixed in Natty
[15:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 724540 in checkbox (Ubuntu) "System testing only worked once (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/724540
[15:45] <micahg> roadmr: you can mark a bug fix released
[15:45] <roadmr> micahg: you're right, thanks! I'll do that - how about importance?
[15:46] <micahg> roadmr: set
[15:46] <roadmr> micahg: thanks so much !
[15:46] <kamusin> roadmr, done
[15:47] <micahg> roadmr: thank you for your work :)
[15:48] <jibel> roadmr, also it's a good practice to paste the part of the changelog mentioning when and in which version or commit it was fixed.
[15:50] <jibel> RedSingularity, about bug 780474, the log files attached are from an upgrade to maverick (the logs are from 2010-10-10)
[15:50] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 780474 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to Natty Nawhal failed because package 'ubuntu-minimal' wasn't found (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/780474
[15:50] <jibel> RedSingularity, You must be careful about the actual content of the logs.
[15:51] <jibel> RedSingularity, update-manager moves the previous upgrade log files to a directory named with the date of the day, that confuses users sometimes.
[15:51] <jibel> RedSingularity, also do not ask to run potentially dangerous commands like 'sudo rm -r' unless it is really really needed to workaround a very specific issue and there is no standard command to fix it.
[15:52] <roadmr> jibel: that makes sense, I'll update the bug with the changelog snippet
[15:53] <roadmr> jibel: about bug 772820, the user replied with output from apt-cache policy debconf and he appears to have official ubuntu versions :-/ (you suspected he had a debian version). Maybe he did a fresh install and didn't tell us?
[15:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 772820 in checkbox (Ubuntu) "package checkbox 0.11.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/772820
[15:55] <jibel> roadmr, it is not the original reporter who replied :-) Both Jason but not the same name nor lpid
[15:56] <roadmr> jibel: ah! yes, somehow two jasons reported very similar bugs.. never mind then, I'll deal with them until we get the info we need
[15:57] <jibel> roadmr, and btw the second Jason already upgraded to Oneiric, that's likely a different problem
[16:44] <RedSingularity> jibel: hey.  I thought the most recent log files will be located at the root of the dist-upgrade directory?  You think the user uploaded logs from a folder higher in the tree?
[16:46] <RedSingularity> jibel: for example: /var/log/dist-upgrade/date-of-upgrade/files ?
[17:56] <jibel> RedSingularity, yes, I think he did and the date in main.log is 2010-10-10
[18:03] <RedSingularity> jibel: my mistake then.  I always assume they upload the files from the root dir.  Will take note of that in the future.  While I have you here, take a look at bug 783549  I have never seen that type of log before.  Whats it about?
[18:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 783549 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "dist-upgrade ubuntu-minimal not found (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/783549
[18:04] <jibel> RedSingularity, expect the unexpected.
[18:04] <RedSingularity> jibel: indeed :)
[18:04]  * jibel looking
[18:05] <jibel> RedSingularity, Looks like the output has been redirected to screen rather than the logs.
[18:06] <jibel> interesting, I've never seen that before.
[18:06] <RedSingularity> jibel: me neither :/
[18:08] <jibel> RedSingularity, that makes 2 bugs. the ubuntu-minimal thing which can be any network or source related issue and the output being redirected to screen and not captured in the logs
[18:09] <jibel> RedSingularity, you can try to reproduce the 2nd one with a do-release-upgrade ran from screen. I'm curious if it can be reproduced this way.
[18:09] <RedSingularity> jibel: ran from a terminal?
[18:11] <jibel> RedSingularity, ssh to a headless box, run screen then do-release-upgrade, or before trying to reproduce ask for the setup of this user and how he did proceed. That will shorten the guess game.
[18:13] <RedSingularity> jibel: ok will do.
[18:36] <JoshuaL> Im not sure, someone marked bug 722024 as incomplete, however I think its invalid, what is your guys opinion?
[18:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 722024 in file-roller (Ubuntu) "Handle .rar files (affects: 1) (heat: 45)" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/722024
[18:40] <micahg> JoshuaL: convert to support request if it already works and the user needs help implementing
[18:41] <JoshuaL> micahg, thanks
[18:50] <jibel> qa meeting in 10mn on #ubuntu-quality
[18:50] <JoshuaL> qa?
[18:59] <ohsix> quality assurance
[18:59] <ohsix> hackers
[18:59] <JoshuaL> is the meeting open for everyone?
[19:00] <pedro_> yes it is
[19:01] <JoshuaL> ok thanks :)
[19:07] <ohsix> pretty much everything is open, doesn't mean there will be an opportunity for random people to offer useful input though :]
[19:27] <roadmr> jibel: the original jason posted back on bug 772820 and it looks like he has a non-ubuntu debconf installed.
[19:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 772820 in checkbox (Ubuntu) "package checkbox 0.11.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/772820
[19:27] <roadmr> jibel: should this bug then be invalid, and the duplicate delinked? (as in that one, it does have the ubuntu packages - it's the *other* jason)
[20:23] <njin> hello fellows, can someone look at bug 784705 ,thanks
[20:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784705 in ubuntu "i386 version of gcc-4.5 fails to compile C or Fortran files on CIFS mounts (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784705
[20:26] <micahg> njin: I'd suggest moving it to gcc-4.5 and letting the toolchain maintainers take a look
[20:27] <njin> ok thanks micahg
[20:37] <JoshuaL> Can someone take a look at the bug i report and confirm it when possible (importance low) bug 771983
[20:37] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 771983 in indicator-me (Ubuntu) "Sometimes I am unable to type in the "Post to.." input field. (affects: 1) (heat: 244)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771983
[21:13] <JoshuaL> what to do when a bug is solved by a workaround (for example removing package X and reinstall the package where the bug occurred)?
[21:24] <JoshuaL> And can someone check bug 784738, I believe it has all the info required.
[21:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784738 in linux (Ubuntu) "internal loudspeakers not switched off when pluging in headphones (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784738
[21:48] <braiam> JoshuaL: set it to invalid, also see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses/#Bugs%20resolved%20after%20update%20or%20config%20change
[22:03] <ohsix> does smspillaz have a work log or something public to see what he's working on; there's some fairly substantial bugs (2) with compiz that i'd like to see if anyone has even looked at
[22:05] <ohsix> specificly bug 774651 and bug 697358
[22:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 774651 in compiz (Ubuntu) "windows initially mapped with the fullscreen property are never "seen" by compiz (affects: 1) (heat: 244)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/774651
[22:05] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 697358 in gnome-panel (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Regression in window list applet (wnck-applet) behavior (affects: 78) (dups: 6) (heat: 440)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/697358
[22:06] <ohsix> theres basically some weird window lifetime stuff going on with some of the properties and compiz doesn't handle them properly anymore
[22:12] <roadmr> Can bug 784416 be set to triaged? there's output from ubiquity --debug and I can't make much sense of it but someone from ubiquity might. I'm not sure about importance though - looks pretty critical to this guy who can't use his computer :)
[22:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784416 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 11.04 installer crash (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784416
[22:33] <BUGabundo> evening