[00:01] TheMuso (who should be on holiday ;) ), robert_ancell (who should still be recovering from ubuflu) bryceh_ (who is american) and RAOF (who is generally a really nice guy...sweet chap) [00:01] ready for meeting? [00:01] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2011-05-17 [00:02] probably quickest of the cycle! [00:02] Ok! [00:03] I'm now both in Hobart *and* awake! It's awesome! [00:03] everyone should be quite busy with blueprints and what not...anything else that someone would like to talk about? [00:03] rodrigo_: is there an early fix to the gnome-setting-daemon + libgnomekbd7 issue available, probably in a ppa? [00:03] anyone blocked from getting blueprints done on anything? [00:03] !seen rodrigo_ [00:03] I have no seen command [00:04] poor you! [00:05] !useful [00:05] Factoid 'useful' not found [00:05] ok...I take it the non-response is a sign that everyone's blueprints are going swimmingly and it is sunny out where people are! [00:05] Well, it's not sunny out. [00:05] well, hobart [00:05] But there's nothing blocking blueprints :) [00:05] ;) [00:05] !useful bot [00:05] Factoid 'useful bot' not found [00:06] * hv fails at bot abuse [00:07] hv: You'll find “/msg ubot2 $STUFF” to be a more polite way of abusing the bot :) [00:08] * hv apologizes to the bot and the readers of this channel [00:09] Did anyone else have problems getting all the way home? I was delayed in Hong Kong for 4 hours while they fixed the plane, which then made me miss my connecting flight to Hobart and so got stuck in Melbourne for 10 hours. [00:10] ok...sounds like we done [END MEETING] be back in 15 [00:26] RAOF: to answer your question...my flights were uneventful, but long [00:26] though, I know robert has a story to tell! Poor guy. [00:27] As well as being sick? Sucky! [00:45] bummer robert, plane travel while sick sucks [00:46] RAOF, the portland contingent had an uneventful flight, despite having to leave at crack of dawn [00:47] jasoncwarner, RAOF, regarding blueprints yep got them done yesterday. [00:47] leaving the wayland one for you to write up RAOF. ;-) [00:47] :) [00:48] (but I guess that one's going to be low priority) [00:48] Yup. [00:50] bryceh_: cool...anything surprising? Anything you think we won't get through? [00:52] jasoncwarner, there's a few tasks in the X tools blueprint that are kind of stretch goals, we'll see [00:52] https://code.launchpad.net/~bcurtiswx/ubuntu/oneiric/gnome-icon-theme/gnome-icon-theme-3.0.0/+merge/61337 [00:52] for oneiric, thanks :) [00:53] i will never try to get through JFK with a 1.5 hour layover ever again.. [01:36] * TheMuso checks in to see if anything important was mentioned in the meeting, and finds that there was not. [01:40] No. Just me bitching about air travel :) [01:42] oh, cool. I interrupted the meeting? :) [01:42] RAOF: Yeah I read about your delays, that really sucks. [01:42] My trip home was uneventful fortunately. [01:43] That's good. [01:44] Yeah. At least Qantas booked everyone who missed the Hobart flight a day room at a hotel. [01:44] That was nice and quiet. And had actual food for lunch. [01:49] jasoncwarner: hey [01:49] hey cyphermox [01:49] how are things in canananananda [01:50] heh, things are okay. [01:51] the broken pipe is definitely fixed now, tomorrow morning I'll have an insurance lady visit to assess the damage [01:51] in the meantime I got evo to work :) [01:51] nice! [01:51] 3.0? [01:51] yeah [01:51] sweet! [01:51] I like how the error messages and notifications are more visible and clearer [01:55] Oooh, time for me to upgrade to oneiric I see :) [01:56] RAOF: is it? [01:56] I meant to ask, I'm seeing weird redrawing issues on intel right now [01:56] In oneiric, or natty? [01:56] oneiric [01:56] * RAOF doesn't currently have an actual oneiric desktop install, so… [01:57] stuff gets painted on the screen fine, but not removed .. e.g you display the dash and it won't go away [01:57] ah. I guess there's nothing new in X land that landed either? [01:57] in Unity? [01:57] maybe there was... [01:58] jbicha: yes [01:58] Nothing much that I'm aware of; maybe kernel? [01:58] hi jbicha [01:58] * TheMuso will upgrade to oneiric at alpha 1. [01:58] you could see if gnome shell is any better [01:58] TheMuso, right now oneiric is usable... keyword: "right now" [01:59] 8...or not, alpha 1 is June 2nd, a few weeks away. [01:59] I see the failed redrawing on the background [01:59] In any case, it won't be till next week. [01:59] I got vinagre 3 mostly packaged...but gtk-vnc isn't working right [01:59] I upgraded two of my desktops to oneiric [01:59] * TheMuso is just on to do blueprint stuff, and then off again for the rest of his holiday. [01:59] bcurtiswx: howdy [01:59] 779174 openjdk-6 - ca-certificates-java broken by multiarch [FIXED] [01:59] 784217 linux(?) - console text corrupted on first boot on a KVM [01:59] 784216 udev(?) - /run/udev not writable error message [01:59] 784214 apport - Failed to run dump_acpi_tables.py invoked via ssh [01:59] 784209 unity-2d - background fails to redraw (reproduced on 2 machines) [02:00] those are the bugs I ran into doing it [02:00] cyphermox, I think my bug 784209 corresponds to what you're seeing, however that was with unity-2d [02:00] Launchpad bug 784209 in unity-2d "Background fails to redraw" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784209 [02:01] I tested both the .38 and .39 kernels, same behavior. X hasn't changed, so guessing it's compiz or unity [02:02] yeah [02:02] well, I uploaded one of cnd's fixes to xserver today but that was for multitouch stuff, and fairly minor [02:02] here it shouldn't be unity-2d, anyway [02:03] bryceh_: well, i checked and saw X, but it's two hours ago according to the queue page, and I updated ~5 hours ago [02:03] is there anything changing in the lpi patches this cycle, or are we just focusing on getting them working ? [02:03] lpi? [02:04] launchpad integration i believe is what it stands for [02:04] ok, that's what I thought [02:04] don't know; wasn't aware of breakages, but I don't really follow that work much [02:04] I wonder if Get Help Online should redirect to askubuntu instead of answers.LP.net but that's above my paygrade [02:05] bcurtiswx: you might need to update lpi patches to use liblaunchpad-integration-3.0-dev? [02:05] jbicha, I think it'd be a good idea [02:05] indeed [02:05] cyphermox, ah yes you would probably be correct [02:05] depends if it should build with gtk3 [02:08] oops, seems like e-d-s was synced instead of e-d-s3. [02:16] standards is 3.9.2 now ? [02:17] bcurtiswx: yup [02:17] micahg, thx === hallyn is now known as hallyn_afk [02:32] anyone remember from one of the desktop roundtables, for the GNOME3 transition we were going to take the GNOME3 PPA and build those versions (3.0.x) or can I start a 3.1.x on top of the GNOME3 PPA Work ? [02:33] well it was the GTK3/GNOME3 session to be exact [02:42] Bah! Launchpad blueprints doesn't play nicely with accidental ctrl-w! [02:42] dep breakage with libnotify4-dev, its looking for -0ubuntu2 but -0ubuntu4 is installed [02:42] looking for -0ubuntu2 of libnotify but -ubuntu4 is the only available [02:48] I just went ahead and removed libnotify4-dev, at the moment I don't need it and maybe it's not needed anymore [02:48] RAOF, :-/ [02:48] we'll find out the next time I try to package something that needs it [02:48] bryceh_: Tomboy it is! [02:54] jbicha, seahorse needs it [02:54] there's dep issues, i'll see if i can bring it up to appropriate people tomorrow [02:54] im too tired to think that long anymore [02:54] lol [02:54] ah, that's important [02:55] i think the gist of it is that libpurple0 needs a dep bump on libperl [02:55] and to be rebuilt [02:57] ah seems it has [02:57] but the build fails [03:02] bcurtiswx: jbicha: re libnotify, isn't it libnotify-dev now, not libnotify4-dev, it was renamed [03:03] (or maybe it was accidental), the fact is, libnotify4-dev is at -0ubuntu2, libnotify-dev is at -0ubuntu4 ;) [03:16] cyphermox, thanks :) [03:17] bcurtiswx: afaict libnotify-dev is correct, and matches debian. I noticed there was a similar issue like that for libgweather but I think seb128 has already fixed it [03:17] yes it looks fixed, packages just have to be updated for that change [03:18] yup [03:18] cyphermox, you use quilt ? [03:18] I can see it's correctly named libgweather-3-dev and stuch [03:18] bcurtiswx: yes [03:18] or bzr bd-do ? [03:18] both [03:18] when i'm done with the bd-do how do i make sure my changes are saved [03:18] bzr bd-do; quilt push -a, etc [03:19] exit 0 to make sure it's saved [03:19] exit 1 to cancel your changes [03:19] cyphermox, thx :) [03:19] only what's in debian/ gets copied [03:19] the you'll still need to bzr add new patches and things like that [03:26] no new patches, just fixes to them [03:27] seahorse is building now, hopefully no fails [03:33] if anyone is feeling up to sponsoring into oneiric [03:33] https://code.launchpad.net/~bcurtiswx/ubuntu/oneiric/seahorse/3.1.1-0ubuntu1/+merge/61344 [03:40] gnome-icon-theme from the ~gnome3-team GNOME3 PPA can be merged too since it's the most recent [03:59] bcurtiswx: I think you missed a conflict in debian/changelog [03:59] cyphermox, which? [04:01] bcurtiswx: https://code.launchpad.net/~bcurtiswx/ubuntu/oneiric/seahorse/3.1.1-0ubuntu1/+merge/61344 complains about lines in debian/changelog, versions 2.90* and 3.0* vs. 2.32.0-0ubuntu2 and 2.32.0-0ubuntu3 [04:02] cyphermox, i took the changelog from the gnome3 PPA, maybe thats where i went wrong [04:03] ah I see [04:03] so the proper thing to do is? [04:03] notice the <<<<< TREE marker, you'll want to move the entries for 2.32.0-0ubuntu3 to below the changelog entries you added [04:04] seems like it may have been because the stuff from the GNOME3 ppa was started before -0ubuntu3 was uploaded [04:05] bcurtiswx: you just want to properly sort the versions and remove the <<<<, =====, and >>>>> lines [04:06] i didn't get a <<< TREE stuff [04:06] lemme think for a sec tho [04:07] oh i see, on the merge proposal [04:08] the diff has conflicts [04:08] how do I fix that? [04:08] i know how to fix the TREE stuff, but is there a special way i can do it in the merge review? [04:09] ohh, right, that wouldn't be on your tree [04:09] yes [04:10] merge lp:~ubuntu-desktop/seahorse/ubuntu back into your branch and you should be good (e.g. bzr merge lp:~ubuntu-desktop/seahorse/ubuntu) [04:10] actually no, I'm wrong [04:15] actually yes, that's exactly what you need to do ;) [04:15] lol, what is it?? :P [04:15] sorry, I had to try it to be sure [04:15] bzr merge lp:~ubuntu-desktop/seahorse/ubuntu [04:15] that adds 2.32.0-0ubuntu3 to your branch, with all the changes referenced in that changelog entry [04:19] OK, fixing [04:22] cyphermox, fixed [04:25] bcurtiswx: if I may nitpick, the Vcs-Bzr field in debian/control and debian/control.in also seems wrong, I think it should point to the branches under ~ubuntu-desktop, not ~gnome3-team, once merged, i would also have written the changelog entries about patches differently, but since I can't merge your branch, I'll let someone else bug you about stuff like this ;) [04:26] I guess the patch 91_ didn't apply? [04:26] ah, yes since this was gnome3 i ddin't even think to change that [04:26] cyphermox, the 91_ patch was a git pull, which is in it now. It also failed completely on attempt to push which hinted that it was already in upstream [04:27] yeah, cool [04:27] please mention that you drop it in changelog then :) [04:28] I fail! [04:28] sorry, I didn't see the entry [04:28] that's probably an indication that it's late enough for me to go to bed ;) [04:29] no big deal it's really late for me too [04:30] the VCZ-BZR was updated and mentioned in the changlog [04:30] and pushed, ready for review/merge again [04:30] cool [04:31] ugh and i can't type.. LOL [04:31] vzr-bzr.. [04:31] * cyphermox goes to sleep [04:32] me as well [04:32] nite everyone [05:21] Good morning [05:21] ugh, oneiric is starting to look really weird [05:24] pitti: yep, exactly [05:24] hey cdbs [05:25] pitti: That's because Unity sn't able to read settings from the new gnome-settings-daemon [05:25] pitti: That's what I warned of yesterday [05:25] cdbs: nice job with porting checkbox! [05:25] thanks pitti [05:25] File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/checkbox_gtk/hyper_text_view.py", line 78, in _motion [05:25] x, y, _ = window.get_pointer() [05:25] ValueError: too many values to unpack [05:25] hm, I get this a lot [05:25] That came in the old checkbox as well, I suppose? [05:26] Even I get it a lot, but it doesn't seem to hinder any functionality (as of my testing) [05:26] perhaps [05:26] but gdk_window_get_pointer() has three returns [05:26] x, y, mask [05:26] so you should probably do get_pointer()[:2] [05:26] or (x, y, mask) = ... [05:26] pitti: okay, thanks [05:26] will push a branch for that today [05:26] cheers [05:27] but nice to see so much gnome 3 stuff being in already [05:27] pitti: To get Oneiric nice again, we need to 1) Fix nux FTBFS 2) Fix unity ftbfs 3) Get Unity work with the new gnome-settings-daemon [05:27] I'd help with 2 and 3, but 1 is too complicated, from what I've seen [05:27] I wonder why empathy already looks bad, it's still 2.32 [05:27] 2.34, but all the same [05:28] cdbs: sounds like a plan [05:28] pitti: GTK2 apps look bad, because GTK2 can't get settings out of gnome-settings-daemon [05:28] I'm still untangling the gtk3/glade/glade-3/vte FTBFS and dependency stack, once that's done I can help out with more [05:28] ah, right [05:41] waiting for didrocks to come so that I could ask him to sponsor patch on bug #745392 which fixes the nux FTBFS [05:41] Launchpad bug 745392 in nux "Fails to compile with GCC 4.6 (unless using -fpermissive)" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/745392 [05:49] cdbs: ok, these need to be applied upstream, so I can't sponsor this properly [06:03] kenvandine: can you please upload the fix for bug 768974 to oneiric as well? [06:03] Launchpad bug 768974 in papyon "papyon doesn't answer server's pings" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/768974 [07:49] 10.04 LTS: Just resumed from hibernation (went quit well other than) & my cursor was not being drawn (still "existed" & moved, just not drawn) this was "fixed" when I started up X-Chat... For future reference what is the name of the program that is responsible for drawing the cursor? (from "man -k cursor" > "XFreeCursor (3) - manipulate cursors" is this it?) [07:50] :/ quite* [07:55] Dr_Heckle: This isn't the right place for bug reports :). And it's the X server that draws the cursor; there isn't really a separate program. From your description I'd guess that the cursor sprite wasn't preserved properly over hibernate/resume, so it was invisible until something set a different sprite. [07:57] as this is a 1st time I wasn't trying to make a bug report, i "figured" it was something along those lines, Thx for pointing me to X [07:58] Of course, the problem will probably be in the kernel driver :) [07:58] Because *all* X problems now are basically kernel bugs :) [07:59] in other words X is perfect? [08:01] Yes! [08:02] (Says the X maintainer ☺) [08:02] lulz [08:04] Dr_Heckle: they moved all the buggy bits out :-P [08:04] Hush! [08:04] XD [08:04] genius! [08:08] good morning [08:12] pitti: Re: xorg-tools-and-processes - Defaulting to recovery mode when recordfail is set seems like the right thing to do regardless of the other things. [08:14] good morning everyone [08:14] IE: if the last boot has failed, doing the same thing again is unlikely to improve matters. [08:14] chrisccoulson: Howdie! [08:14] hi RAOF, how are you? [08:14] recovered from your journey? [08:15] chrisccoulson: Much better after a couple of nights of sleep :) [08:15] heh, i can imagine [08:16] And, somewhat miraculously, I managed a bit of Banshee hacking on the flights home. [08:16] nice! [08:16] hey RAOF [08:16] i can't do useful things on a flight, as my battery dies too quickly! [08:16] bonjour didrocks [08:16] hey chrisccoulson, good morning [08:16] hi pitti, how are you? [08:16] chrisccoulson: x200s. It's the way of the future! [08:16] RAOF: as long as this won't also automatically move your monitors.xml away, etc. [08:17] RAOF, i want one ;) [08:17] i'm thinking of buying a new machine this week [08:17] if we do this automatically without proof that it was e. g. monitors.xml which caused the breakage, then we certainly shouldn't touch it without asking [08:17] Absolutely. [08:17] X200 ++! [08:17] 10 h battery life FTW [08:18] still waiting for an USB-pluggable hamster wheel [08:18] chrisccoulson: Obviously you'd get an x220 now; 24hr battery life with the sheet battery! Also, an IPS screen. [08:18] or a set of bike pedals and a generator [08:19] RAOF, i'm not sure if my budget will stretch that far ;) [08:19] I'll sell you my old x200s once I buy a macbook :P [08:19] heh :) [08:20] It's time for me to get a broken system to work on. Maybe then I'll see all the bugs everyone always complains about :) [08:20] guten morgen pitti [08:20] hey chrisccoulson, RAOF [08:20] hi didrocks, how are you? [08:20] chrisccoulson: apparently, got a long (and so needed?) night :) excellent otherwise, thanks! You? [08:21] pitti: I agree with the monitors.xml thingy; my understanding of that was that it'd be one of the “would you like to try $FOO to fix things” options of xdiagnose, rather than done by default. [08:21] didrocks, i don't feel too well today. my throat is really sore :( [08:21] * RAOF heads off to buy stuff for dinner. [08:21] RAOF: ah, I see [08:22] you can dock the x220 can't you? [08:22] chrisccoulson: oh, take care :/ [08:23] pitti: Good morning Martin, today back to a more ordinary matter: Asking for your sponsoring of https://code.launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/language-selector/lp-778869/+merge/60329 [08:23] pitti: Since it's a fix of a Natty regression, I think it should be SRUed into Natty as well. (Also the Lucid and Maverick backports need to be updated as soon as a backporter has approved those MPs.) [08:23] hey GunnarHj, good morning [08:24] GunnarHj: yes, I'll review/sponsor this ASAP [08:24] in fact I just caught up with spec reviews and some oneiric gnome updates, so attacking my mail backlog next [08:25] pitti: Ok, great. [08:25] GunnarHj: https://code.launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/ubuntu/lucid/language-selector/lucid-backports-lp-778869/+merge/60556 is by and large the same for -backports, right? [08:27] pitti: "By and large"? It's basically the same thing, but the code is different in Lucid. [08:27] *nod* [08:39] didrocks: Hi, it seems GCC 4.6 ftbfss have been fixed in both nux and Unity? [08:39] GunnarHj: FYI, I'm creating lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/language-selector/natty for the natty backports [08:39] GunnarHj: sorry, not for backports, for natty-proposed [08:40] so we can cherrypick easily from trunk [08:40] (which I'll do now for bug 778869 ) [08:40] cdbs: seems so, it's not in the ftbfs list, but I didn't upload anything for nux/unity. So should have been done in the gcc side [08:40] Launchpad bug 778869 in language-selector "[natty] fontconfig-voodoo -a does not work in Japanese locales" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/778869 [08:40] pitti: I see, thanks for letting me know. [08:42] GunnarHj: I'll upload natty-proposed package now [08:53] pitti: And now that I'm back - the crash database on that blueprint was talking about a kerneldump style database. I guess I should really comment on the blueprint, though, for posterity :) [08:56] RAOF: right, just add a blob below my questions and bump it back to "review" [08:56] thanks! [08:57] (or, better, clarify the wording in the WIs) [08:57] morning [08:57] Right. [08:58] hey rodrigo_ [09:00] hey rodrigo_ [09:01] hey seb128 [09:01] hey [09:01] hi njpatel, how are you? [09:01] seb128, good, thanks. Hoping to get some coding done for the first time in about three weeks today [09:02] \o/ [09:02] njpatel, close IRC before someone grabs you ;-) [09:02] heh :) [09:02] salut seb128 [09:02] lut didrocks, ca va ? [09:02] seb128: ça va bien, et toi? [09:03] ca va nickel ;-) [09:03] bonjour seb128 [09:03] (making some Qt testbuild to see how components fits together and making my computer crying ;)) [09:03] hey pitti, how are you? [09:03] seb128: I'm great, thanks! [09:03] got the gtk+3.0/glade/glade-3/vte chain resolved for good [09:04] and all pending specs reviewed [09:04] seb128: d-conf also uploaded to sid/oneiric [09:04] FTR, svn-buildpackage is a pain in the arse [09:04] (or svn in general) [09:05] pitti: hum, let me check why you didn't review the session management one then, I should have done something wrong [09:06] didrocks: what's the spec URL? [09:06] oh, seb is the reviewer :) [09:06] https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-o-session-management [09:06] pitti, great work! [09:08] pitti, didn't we say we need to check what happens to custom widgets for glade3? [09:09] seb128: ah, I misunderstood then; I wasn't even aware that glade supports custom widgets [09:09] * pitti reopens then [09:09] seb128: I clarified the WI to say "for custom widgets" [09:09] it's not frequently use but still I want to check [09:09] thanks [09:12] doh [09:12] pitti, do you ever sleep? syncs at 6am is early! [09:12] seb128: I get up at 6, yes :) [09:13] pitti, btw I didn't accept the gvfs binaries from the sync yesterday to avoid upgrade conflicts [09:13] I went to bed at 10 pm [09:13] seb128: ah, good; 1.8.1 should be fine, though [09:13] right [09:13] seb128: I'll wait for armel to finish and then NEW then [09:14] ok [09:17] btw as a channel notice, we have quite some sponsoring requests pending on version [09:17] if some people can do 1 or 2 today we can clean the backlog [09:20] will do some once my local build finishes [09:20] noted [09:35] didrocks: cdbs pointed to FTBFS fixes for nux and unity, I guess these are "your" two? :-) [09:36] seb128: ok if I grab seahorse? [09:37] pitti, sponsoring? sure ;-) [09:37] seb128: it updates to 3.1 already, but I'll test it properly [09:37] bcurtiswx: hm, seems you didn't merge with Debian along the way? [09:37] 09:39:34 cdbs | didrocks: Hi, it seems GCC 4.6 ftbfss have been fixed in both nux and Unity? [09:37] pitti: I understood that it doesn't FTBFS anymore [09:37] bcurtiswx, thanks for the update but could you start by going to 3 and not 3.1 for the updates you do? [09:38] pitti: the yorba guys made a patch a month ago, but as the trunk changed a lot, I think that the dx team have to do a review [09:38] pitti: I'll try to rebuild unity in a pbuilder just to confirm it's fixed [09:38] pitti, you should probably send it back to Needs Work and ask for proper merge and use of the stable serie [09:38] seb128: just done [09:39] thanks [09:39] morning guys... [09:39] hey jasoncwarner, how are you? [09:39] hey jasoncwarner [09:40] hey jasoncwarner [09:40] seb128: moving to xscreensaver then [09:40] jasoncwarner, did you manage to avoid the ubuflu? ;-) [09:40] I think I've finally succumbed to ubuflu full on. Took a couple of days... [09:40] pitti, ok [09:40] :-( [09:40] it's a .auflu it seems [09:40] how are you guys? everyone manage to stay healthy? [09:40] seb128: must be the sinagpore airport! beware! [09:40] killer viruses from Europe invading Australia! [09:41] european people are stronger ;) [09:41] didrocks heh...we'll, you won't find arguments from me on that one ;) [09:41] didrocks: It's because you all sleep in tiny villages overrun by cows! [09:42] RAOF: of course :-) [09:42] what do they have against the cows? ;-) [09:42] jasoncwarner: for our 1-on-1 in 45 minutes, want to s/pitti/bed/ and s/mubmle/sleep/? [09:45] hey jasoncwarner [09:46] hey rodrigo_ [09:46] hi seb128 [09:46] morning rodrigo_ [09:53] didrocks: The rebuild, what was the outcome? [09:54] cdbs: still building in my pbuilder right now [09:57] * Sweetshark is timezoned again by seeing who is online and awake and guessing their locsl times ... [10:01] didrocks: I'd like to get Unity working on GTK3, so that it takes care and uses GTK3 theme defaults instead of GTK2 ones. I have a branch which makes Unity build well with GTK3, but still its taking the theming settings from GTK2. Do you have an idea of what all needs to be changed in Unity to make it run well with the new GNOME? [10:02] cdbs: maybe, wait for the next SRU first (next Tuesday) before thinking of merging it [10:03] cdbs: well, we will have both theming anyway and dx is building a gate between them [10:03] didrocks: okay, nice. welcome news. Will wait for another week and then get back to you on this [10:03] cdbs: ensure that nobody else is working on it as well on #ayatana btw :) [10:04] didrocks: hmm :) [10:04] cdbs: it's not the case AFAIK, but better to avoid duplication of an awesome work ;) [10:05] didrocks: I really am not able to understand but the GTK3 port is just a 200 line diff! [10:05] cdbs: yeah, it's very small as most of the work was done to be GTK3 compatible [10:05] also compiz (the decorator I think) would be a nice target [10:05] the only change was needed to correct those _window->window into gtk_widget_get_window [10:06] didrocks: yup, the decorator needs a port [10:06] right, because of the gseal [10:12] cdbs: unity built successfully FYI, trying nux now [10:13]