[14:33] <mhall119> cjohnston: nigelb: http://imagebin.org/153853
[15:04] <Ronnie> mhall119: nice!
[15:53] <nigelb> mhall119: Is that a bad thing?
[15:54] <nigelb> mhall119: I kind of like it.
[16:07] <cjohnston> I like it too
[16:07] <cjohnston> nigelb: thats what we need to be able to move to login.ubuntu.com
[16:07] <nigelb> mhall119: At this point, is there something we need to do to get that?
[16:08] <cjohnston> to move to l.u.c?
[16:54] <mhall119> nigelb: we need the django-openid-auth updates to get it
[16:55] <nigelb> cjohnston: yes
[16:55] <nigelb> mhall119: ah, ok
[16:55] <nigelb> mhall119: will you be pushing your work onto isd's ppa so we can bribe the sysadmins?
[16:55] <mhall119> the current django-openid-auth didn't pass along the cause of the login failure, so we wouldn't be able to get useful info
[16:56] <mhall119> nigelb: yes
[16:56] <cjohnston> mhall119: but the code that checks for a username being returned is going to have to be in loco dir and summit correct?
[16:56] <mhall119> there's also code changes to loco-dir for this
[16:56] <mhall119> cjohnston: yes
[16:58] <nigelb> its better we move onto it sooner than later.
[16:58] <cjohnston> moving to l.u.c it really doesnt matter.. getting the no username thing done is important
[16:59] <nigelb> yeah