| bryceh_ | raevol, you'd need to specifically install it; nothing in the ppa has a direct depend on it so it won't get pulled in automatically | 00:48 |
|---|---|---|
| raevol | bryceh_: even though the note on the package says not to specifically install it? | 00:49 |
| bryceh_ | raevol, I'm fairly sure, but sarvatt could tell us for certain | 00:54 |
| RAOF | The package description is copied from the main archive one which, indeed, you don't want to install explicitly. | 00:56 |
| RAOF | But in edgers you do, because we don't upload a new linux-meta that would pull it in. | 00:57 |
| bryceh_ | the edgers docs could stand some freshening | 00:57 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, I've pushed the xorg changes to migrate failsafex and the apport hook; would appreciate your review, I had to fight with git a bit to get it in | 03:50 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| tjaalton | bryceh_: the failsafex-extraction -branch? yeah new branches need force to push them to origin | 07:05 |
| tjaalton | hum no, I think the other branch was mistakenly pushed, and the ubuntu branch already has the changes? | 07:27 |
| tjaalton | looks like there are some changes in the extraction-branch that need to be merged with ubuntu | 07:28 |
| tjaalton | em, pulled to ubuntu | 07:29 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: so the versioning at least is messed up :) | 07:43 |
| tjaalton | natty has 1:7.6+4ubuntu5, while the current git has u4 | 07:43 |
| tjaalton | and natty didn't get u4 at all | 07:44 |
| tjaalton | and sru's should use X.N | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | and be in their own branch, IMO, but that hasn't been discussed | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | that's the only way we'll be able to keep sanity when doing point-release updates | 07:45 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: also, I think we should use name the patches as '.diff', so git will complain if you haven't added it | 07:50 |
| tjaalton | re: libxi missing a patch from git | 07:51 |
| tjaalton | and xorg-server upload not pushed :) | 07:51 |
| tjaalton | to git | 07:51 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: sorry, now I saw the natty upload, and it has 4ubuntu3.1 which is correct | 09:37 |
| tjaalton | and indeed there is no xorg upload to oneiric yet, so ubuntu4 is the right version for it | 09:38 |
| tjaalton | just got confused about the other branch | 09:38 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: so I'll just merge the failsafe-branch and delete it from origin, i believe you pushed it by mistake | 09:39 |
| janimo | what is a good tool to monitor/debug X window messages in a running session, seeing which window/app sent what and when | 11:25 |
| tjaalton | janimo: can't think of one, but iirc there was something similar that I accidentally bumped into recently.. | 12:22 |
| tjaalton | if only i could remember the name | 12:22 |
| janimo | tjaalton, I saw xmsgtrace but it is old and not packaged so I suspected there must be something better | 12:44 |
| tjaalton | janimo: well, if it does the job then use it :) | 12:49 |
| janimo | tjaalton, did not try it yet, hence my inquiry for one that can be apt-get installed first | 13:21 |
| cnd | bryceh_, thanks for uploading the xorg-server with the fix to oneiric | 17:58 |
| cnd | for natty, would you be able to upload an sru to proposed for me? | 17:58 |
| cnd | do you want me to generate the package, or is that simple enough for you to do? | 17:59 |
| cnd | should just be a changelog edit from 2:1.10.1-1ubuntu2 to 2:1.10.1-1ubuntu1.1 and oneiric to natty-proposed right? | 17:59 |
| tjaalton | yep, and preferably in another branch | 18:10 |
| tjaalton | *in a branch of its own | 18:11 |
| cnd | tjaalton, ahh yes, I'll make a new branch | 18:13 |
| tjaalton | note that the current branch doesn't have the commit closing the version | 18:13 |
| tjaalton | which isn't an issue in this case though | 18:14 |
| tjaalton | and, I have another patch to push there | 18:14 |
| tjaalton | for an sru | 18:14 |
| cnd | tjaalton, the current branch has been released | 18:14 |
| cnd | just fyi | 18:14 |
| tjaalton | released yes | 18:15 |
| cnd | wasn't sure if you knew that | 18:16 |
| tjaalton | oh wait, maybe I'm trusting debian-x@ commit logs too much | 18:16 |
| cnd | tjaalton, bryceh_: I just pushed a new branch ubuntu-natty | 18:16 |
| tjaalton | nope, the ubuntu branch is still UNRELEASED | 18:16 |
| bjsnider | why does natty have a 2 year old version of ia32-libs? | 19:31 |
| ScottK | It doesn't. | 19:31 |
| jcristau | it just has a silly version number | 19:32 |
| ScottK | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/20090808ubuntu13 <-- Less than a month old. | 19:32 |
| bjsnider | it is not 20090808 at the present time, and it hasn't been for almost 2 years | 19:33 |
| bjsnider | and it's not likely to be 2009 again any time soon | 19:33 |
| bjsnider | debian packages that depend on 20101012 are uninstallable | 19:34 |
| bryceh_ | bjsnider, the package itself is from 2009 but the contents have been updated with newer packages. So like jcristau says it's just a silly version number, not an indication of internal ancientness | 19:47 |
| bjsnider | bryceh_, i understand, but by not syncing the version number with debian, the debian packages built around the newest version there fail to install because of dependency issues | 19:55 |
| jcristau | so don't install debian packages on ubuntu | 19:55 |
| tjaalton | it's hopefully going away this cycle | 19:55 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: did you get my msgs from earlier today? you forgot to git push xorg-server | 19:56 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, no missed that | 19:57 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, there's no changes though, only a changelog bump | 19:58 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: right, just wanted to let you know :) | 19:59 |
| tjaalton | i have pending patches | 19:59 |
| tjaalton | to push | 19:59 |
| bryceh_ | pushed | 19:59 |
| tjaalton | thanks | 19:59 |
| tjaalton | well, patch | 19:59 |
| === seb128_ is now known as seb128 | ||
| bjsnider | tjaalton, the package in question doesn't exist in ubuntu | 20:02 |
| tjaalton | bjsnider: i meant ia32-libs gets removed iff multiarch is finalized by 11.10 | 20:03 |
| bjsnider | tjaalton, i didn't even know multiarch was on the table for oneiric. | 20:04 |
| tjaalton | natty already has some of it completed | 20:04 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: also, did you mean to push the ubuntu-failsafe-extraction -branch to alioth? | 20:08 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, is that a problem? | 20:08 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, it's no longer needed if you want to remove it | 20:08 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: no, just wondering since there only is a few lines diff | 20:08 |
| tjaalton | the ubuntu proper is missing the removal of po-failsafe and dh_installinit failsafe-x | 20:09 |
| tjaalton | but that's all | 20:10 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, if you were just wondering if yesterday I was finding git frustrating, well the answer would be an affirmative | 20:10 |
| tjaalton | well merging changes to the changelog surely will make you feel miserable :) | 20:11 |
| tjaalton | i bet no vcs would be different there | 20:11 |
| bryceh_ | hmm, po-failsafe is not in my local copy | 20:12 |
| tjaalton | of the ubuntu-branch? | 20:12 |
| bryceh_ | yeah | 20:12 |
| tjaalton | hang on, I'll pastebin the diff | 20:12 |
| bryceh_ | well, the most frustrating bit was deleting debian/apport/source_xorg.py | 20:13 |
| tjaalton | http://paste.ubuntu.com/609677/ | 20:13 |
| tjaalton | maybe I'm reading the diff wrong :P | 20:14 |
| tjaalton | grah, yeah | 20:14 |
| tjaalton | damnit | 20:14 |
| tjaalton | so, no worries, I'll just purge the extraction-branch | 20:14 |
| bryceh_ | (dammit is spelt without an n; go english consistency) | 20:15 |
| bryceh_ | ok, so no other changes needed in the branch? | 20:15 |
| bryceh_ | if it looks ok, should I go ahead and push it, or should I wait until xdiagnose is in main? | 20:16 |
| tjaalton | maybe I'll check it out properly tomorrow, this kinda held me back so I did other things | 20:17 |
| tjaalton | well, not maybe, but definitely :) | 20:25 |
| bryceh_ | tjaalton, also review 7eda07c4dea6e6f2ae6e6892bf6f77af0834f231 on -intel | 21:28 |
| tjaalton | bryceh_: sure thing | 21:28 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!