[03:24] this gnome3 transition on oneiric is really rough [03:24] i think firefox is having focus issues because of it [03:26] LLStarks: I'm waiting for the first update-manager upload with the devel release enabled to update [03:26] s/update/upgrade/ [03:27] one more time plz [03:27] LLStarks: I haven't upgraded yet, so I can't confirm or deny [03:27] ah === yofel_ is now known as yofel [10:06] i doubt the gnome 3 transition has anything to do with focus issues in firefox [10:06] it's because of compiz. and it's broken in natty too [10:07] i'm really starting to hate compiz [10:07] i should maybe start using reverse psychology on it, because it always does the opposite of what i wanted it to do [10:42] is the ppa ppa:ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa ? [12:57] fta - did you upgrade to oneiric yet? i'm just starting it now [12:57] chrisccoulson, i did, 2 days ago [12:57] how did it go? [12:58] quite ok. the upgrade fails because of bug 779174 but no big deal [12:58] Launchpad bug 779174 in openjdk-6 "package ca-certificates-java 20110426 failed to install/upgrade: fix path to libnss3 for multiarch" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/779174 [12:58] nice. the upgrade is going to remove evolution. i smell a conspiracy here [12:58] and the gnome theme is weird [12:58] fta - i guess the theme is weird because we don't have a gtk3 engine or theme yet [12:59] yep, saw that this morning [12:59] that's being worked on [12:59] The following packages have been kept back: [12:59] evolution-data-server evolution-data-server-common libebook1.2-10 openarena openarena-server [12:59] if i force it, it removes evo [12:59] but i depend on it [13:01] and i can't use tb [13:15] fta - do you want me to look after the umd PPA btw? [13:15] yes [13:15] fta - i can do that. but i'll need some help from you to run your bot ;) [13:15] (to start with) [13:16] sure. There's a README in the sources, and i'd be happy to help if it's not enough [13:16] fta - cool, thanks. i'll take a look whilst my machine is upgrading [13:18] micahg, which interfaces does gcu-plugin use btw? (I saw your comment on desktop-o-mozilla-rapid-release-maintenance) [13:38] fta - oh, that's quite well documented :) [13:38] where do you keep the current config for umd? [13:38] in a branch [13:38] let me check if it's committed [13:38] fta - i found lp:~fta/+junk/ppa-confs, but it looks out of date [13:39] rev45 [13:40] and rev151 for the bot itself [13:43] and my crontab has "0 5 * * * /data/bot/src/daily.sh -e umd" [13:43] chrisccoulson, ^^ [13:43] fta - excellent, thanks [13:43] you should probably pull the .daily branches to preserve the history [13:45] also, iirc, the get-orig-source of the mozilla packages (mozclient) is not able to properly initiate the upstream cache [13:58] fta - how do you sign the packages from a cron job btw? [13:59] i use a key without password [14:00] fta - ah, ok. i thought that might be the answer [14:01] hmmm, my machine is really starting to crawl now === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:31] chrisccoulson, did it work? [15:33] fta - the bot or the upgrade? ;) [15:33] my machine is in a pretty bad way [15:33] uh, both? :) [15:35] fta - yeah, i'll try the bot now i've upgraded [15:40] bug 147080 [15:40] Launchpad bug 147080 in update-manager-core "do-release-upgrade should make disabling third party repositories optional" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/147080 [16:00] fta - yeah, the bot seems to be working so far (although, it's just downloading mozilla-central atm) [16:20] chrisccoulson, yep, that's why you'd better use the cache [16:22] * micahg hugs fta and chrisccoulson [16:25] hi micahg, how are you? did you upgrade to oneiric yet? ;) [16:25] chrisccoulson: no, waiting for update-manager to recognize oneiric :) [16:26] i just did an apt-get dist-upgrade ;) [16:26] * micahg supposes he could do that [16:26] maybe over the weekend [16:27] it's a lot of fun ;) [16:31] fta - ok, that seems to be working fine [16:32] could you add me to ~ubuntu-mozilla-daily too please? [16:35] [reed]: hey man! [16:35] [reed]: who should we talk to on automated benchmarking of browser rendering and what benchmarks you use and have in the repo? [16:35] asac! [16:35] hi :) [16:35] hello friends! [16:37] asac - how are you? recovered from UDS? [16:37] yes!! i am back on track [16:37] foot is back to human shapes [16:37] that's good :) [16:37] antibiotics and sleep for 60 of 80 hours helped [16:38] still not 100% ok but i see light === m_conley is now known as m_conley-lunch [17:19] chrisccoulson, done. could I stop the bot on my side then? [17:19] asac, hey [17:20] fta - thanks. yeah, i can take over that now [17:20] hello fta [17:22] fta: thank you for running the bot all these years [17:43] fta: you got rid of the bot? wow [17:44] congrats for the transition ... hope you can use the new time to contribute more to the core of things [18:03] asac, well, the plan was more to retire [18:12] fta: retire entirely? [18:12] dont tell me that ... how comes? [18:14] tell me what you want! [18:15] chrisccoulson, i'm on oneiric and i've been having sporadic focus issues with firefox since gnome3 started landing [18:16] asac, i drafted something on my blog weeks ago explaining why, i still need to finish it [18:18] fta: ic ... whatver that is, I loved working with you! and it is a pleasure to know you! [18:18] if you need anything you know where to find me! [18:18] i hope you still stay in low maintenance mode [18:18] rather blog about what is bad etc. ;) [18:18] but not sure; i understand if you are super fed up. just would have loved to help more and feel really bad that i couldnt [18:31] asac, well, thanks. but i guess there's nothing you don't already know === m_conley-lunch is now known as m_conley [20:12] chrisccoulson: libgtk2-mozembed-perl is a suggests of perl, no need to drop the package from the archive [20:12] oops, suggests of gmusicbrowsert [20:22] micahg, right. i haven't checked all the package relationships in detail yet. all i've checked is that they are there [20:23] * chrisccoulson sharpens axe for thunderbird-locales [20:28] anyone know if there's plans to add mozilla-aurora and/or mozilla-beta based builds to the Mozilla Daily PPA? [20:34] bhearsum: ask again, now that chrisccoulson is back. :) [20:34] heh [20:34] my connection died when i undocked my laptop [20:34] chrisccoulson: bhearsum asked: "are there plans to add mozilla-aurora and/or mozilla-beta based builds to the Mozilla Daily PPA?" [20:34] hehe [20:35] m_conley, bhearsum - there are no plans for aurora atm [20:35] for beta, we will provide beta builds in the firefox-next PPA [20:35] and we will also upload them to the development release of ubuntu [20:35] ah [20:35] i'm already ready to push the button on 5.0 ;) [20:37] would it be a lot of work to set-up mozilla-aurora based builds? i've got no experience with Ubuntu PPAs, but tons of experience with Mozilla builds [20:37] bhearsum, it probably wouldn't be too much effort if there is a demand for it [20:38] beta builds are definitely important for us, as thats what we'll be using to test our security updates in the future ;) [20:38] yeah [20:40] thanks for your time chrisccoulson, i think i'm going to do some reading about PPAs and see if i can get one for mozilla-aurora going [20:40] chrisccoulson: is there a bug report for quicklists for tbird? [20:42] bhearsum, cool, no problem. i can probably get aurora builds going soon. i'm still adjusting to my new workflow :) [20:42] jcastro, i'm not sure if there is a bug report for that [20:43] cool :) [20:43] chrisccoulson: so 5 will be built the moment it's official? ;) [20:44] Dimmuxx, it will be uploaded to oneiric, yes. i'm already running our build here [20:44] what about the -next ppa? [20:44] chrisccoulson: there's no WI for it in the unity-integration spec, did we forget or is it one of those assumed tasks? [20:44] i'll put it in the firefox-next PPA too, which will probably become the staging area for transitioning lucid, maverick and natty too [20:45] jcastro, it's all part of launcher integration. that is there isn't it? [20:45] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-o-default-apps-unity-integration [20:45] firefox is mentioned, but not tbird. [20:45] great to hear, the 4 betas were usually a couple days after release [20:45] (I'm not trying to generate more work, just trying to get them all sorted) [20:46] chrisccoulson: someone from the community made a .desktop file, I just want to make sure it gets to the right spot, should I file a bug in lp with it or upstream? [20:47] oh, xchat died there. i'm loving oneiric [20:47] jcastro, i think m_conley already has plans for quicklists [20:48] ah cool [20:48] m_conley: is there a bug report somewhere? [20:48] bhearsum, do you run ubuntu btw? [20:48] chrisccoulson: yeah, i'm on 11.04 currently [20:49] chrisccoulson: it's just telling you to switch to irssi [20:49] bhearsum, oh, cool. you work on firefox don't you? [20:50] Dimmuxx, i like xchat (when it doesn't crash) [20:50] chrisccoulson: yeah, i'm a Release Engineer at Mozilla [20:50] bhearsum, oh, that's good to know :) [20:51] chrisccoulson: all gui clients I've tried always have some flaws [20:52] Dimmuxx, i think that's true of all software ;) [20:52] some more than others :) [20:52] probably but there are some that you can live with at least :P [20:52] heh [20:53] this windows 95 look is really starting to hurt my eyes now [20:53] i want ambiance back again! [20:53] so 11.10 will look like win95? [20:53] Dimmuxx, it does at the moment because there is no gtk3 theme [20:54] ah [20:54] i guess if i fix my theme settings that i can get ambiance back for firefox though [20:54] i'm sure we still have gtk2 themes installed [20:57] * bhearsum decides to wait a bit before upgrading to 11.10 [20:57] the linux server I'm using at work is using a really old suse version so it's a good reminder of how terrible gnome can look :P [20:58] jcastro: no bug report, no. :/ [20:58] bhearsum, yes, 11.10 is only for the crazy at the moment :) [20:59] jcastro: but i'm hoping to get the Unity Launcher extension into the PPAs tomorrow, and have the .desktop updated to include the quicklists. [20:59] jcastro: that's the plan, anyhow. [21:03] m_conley, i've just thought of something [21:03] your extension depends on tbird 3.3 doesn't it? [21:04] chrisccoulson: it does indeed [21:04] heh :) [21:04] we don't have 3.3 just yet [21:04] although, i'm almost ready to upload it [21:05] isn't it in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa already? [21:05] bhearsum, i think that build has been broken for a little while. i'm going to transition that to comm-central this evening [21:05] ah [21:05] i was sort-of hoping we would get a 3.3 beta release soon :) [21:17] m_conley, http://is.gd/xLruvu [21:17] looks whats at number 10 [21:26] chrisccoulson: uh oh. :/ [21:26] m_conley, i've got a fix for that already though [21:26] it's pretty easily reproducible by installing the MR Tech Toolkit addon [21:26] what's the issue? [21:27] m_conley, pretty much the same issue that was causing the lightning crash you looked at ages ago [21:27] chrisccoulson: a new type of node? [21:27] chrisccoulson: something that dummy doesn't account for? [21:27] except it seems to be adding a non-XUL element to the menu, and the extension just bails out of building the menu then [21:28] but then another bug causes it to crash [21:28] all of the destructors were assuming that the nodes initialized correctly [21:28] so i've fixed that now [21:28] whew. :) [21:29] i'm also causing a common crash in firefox too, but for a different issue :( [21:29] but that's an easy fix too [21:29] i only realized after someone reported that to launchpad, and then i decided to do a search on crash-stats, and found the tbird crasher too === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [23:32] route [23:34] hey fta [23:35] oops [23:35] bad focus [23:35] unity.. [23:37] don't complain [23:37] Classic dies on me today [23:37] no gtk themes