[00:33] <Captainkrtek> Hello
[00:39] <Captainkrtek> quick question, today I was admitted to the BugSquad but It appears that I do not have the appropriate permissions to edit bugs. I can not triage bugs
[00:40] <killown> this bug is very annoying https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/607560
[00:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 607560 in linux (Ubuntu) "jbd2 writing block every 5 - 10 seconds, preventing disk spin-down and making noise (affects: 54) (heat: 296)" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[01:38] <jtaylor> can someone look bug 786032 and tell me if I (or dpkg) is going crazy or have forgotten some subtle differente between the two packages
[01:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 786032 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "dpkg treats two identical packages differently (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/786032
[02:23] <ohsix> brokem changelog format?
[02:39] <charlie-tca> jtaylor: where do the packages come from? Neither appears to be a natty package, but maybe I crossed something and that is wrong?
[02:43] <charlie-tca> I think the reason the -4 package fails is because it requires something not there in natty. -3 is the oneiric package, and not necessarily backwards compatible to natty
[07:28] <BigWhale> where would I find somebody that could help me with libdee?
[10:48] <jtaylor> ohsix: the changelog is fine, also a broken changelog should not cause such an error
[10:49] <jtaylor> charlie-tca: -3 is not from oneiric, is made in a chroot, and it has identical dependencies
[10:54] <Luca1> Hi! I'm trying to use Unity in dual screen but both screen result completely screwed up whatever I do. I've read many bugs but seems like I'm the only one experiencing this. Should I report this?
[10:56] <BigWhale> Luca1, what graphics card and drivers?
[10:56] <Luca1> I'm using an ATI with opensource drivers. Gnome seems quite OK in dual screen (quite means sometimes it suddenly logs out, but no more than once a day).
[11:04] <BigWhale> I had more luck with ATI and fglrx
[11:04] <BigWhale> right now with HD6850
[11:05] <Luca1> I tried to install fglrx but the installation failed. Didn't write down the error message. Anyway I can try again.
[11:10] <BigWhale> For me it worked with no problems. Natty has the latest drivers.
[11:11] <Luca1> Ok, I'm trying again. Thanks!
[11:24] <Luca1> I tried to install fglrx bug I got the error message. This is what I see in the log:
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:26,077 ERROR: update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of /usr/lib32/libaticalcl.so because associated file /usr/lib32/fglrx/libaticalcl.so (of link group gl_conf) doesn't exist.
[11:24] <Luca1> update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of /usr/lib32/libaticalrt.so because associated file /usr/lib32/fglrx/libaticalrt.so (of link group gl_conf) doesn't exist.
[11:24] <Luca1> W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8105e-1.fw for module r8169
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:26,309 WARNING: modinfo for module fglrx failed: ERROR: modinfo: could not find module fglrx
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:26,309 WARNING: /sys/module/fglrx/drivers does not exist, cannot rebind fglrx driver
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:26,309 ERROR: XorgDriverHandler.enable(): package or module not installed, aborting
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:47,879 DEBUG: XorgDriverHandler(%s, %s).enabled(): No X.org driver set, not checking
[11:24] <Luca1> 2011-05-21 12:21:47,897 DEBUG: XorgDriverHandler(%s, %s).enabled(): No X.org driver set, not checking
[11:25] <Luca1> If I'm restarting now I would get no graphics and I would have to switch to a VT to uninstall fglrx. At least this is what I had to do the last time.
[11:57]  * stjohnmedrano is away: Away lang!.
[21:26] <trinikrono> hi i was looking at the debugging procedures page and i believe the wikipage for plymouth shld be included also, what is the best way to do this
[21:27] <penguin42> which page were you looking at?
[21:28] <trinikrono> penguin42: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProcedures
[21:28] <trinikrono> i did not want to just go in and change things
[21:28] <penguin42> and which one are you suggesting including?
[21:29] <trinikrono> penguin42: well we dont use usplash anymore so plymouth :D https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Plymouth#Debugging
[21:29] <trinikrono> at least the link to the wikipage
[21:30] <penguin42> trinikrono: It's perhaps not as detailed as the other Debugging* pages linked off the DebuggingProcedures page
[21:31] <trinikrono> well that may be so, but it should be mentioned at least
[21:31] <penguin42> trinikrono: Those other pages have stuff about how to file the bug, particular tags to use, stock replies etc
[21:31] <trinikrono> maybe someone from the plymouth team can do it
[21:31] <trinikrono> file a bug?
[21:32] <penguin42> not sure who the best person to ask on that one is
[21:34] <penguin42> trinikrono: There is the template at the bottom of the Debugging* page
[21:39] <trinikrono> penguin42: i am going to look from someone from the plymouth team that can help me fill out the details
[22:26] <trinikrono> penguin42: are you still around
[22:47] <penguin42> yeh
[23:10] <trinikrono> ok penguin i created a wikipage https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPlymouth
[23:10] <trinikrono> i will look for someone that can put more details than me
[23:11] <trinikrono> umm penguin42 can i make a section named Boot in the debugging procedures
[23:11] <trinikrono> or put it in misc where the usplash was
[23:20] <penguin42> trinikrono: I think I'd put it in misc
[23:20] <penguin42> trinikrono: Once there are 2 or 3 boot related items then they can have a section
[23:21] <trinikrono> what should be done with the usplash one penguin42
[23:21] <trinikrono> left alone?
[23:22] <penguin42> not sure, I guess you could put 'obsolete' next to it
[23:44] <trinikrono> okie i done as much as i can think off with plymouth :D
[23:45] <trinikrono> i asked https://launchpad.net/~vorlon if he can look at the page as he works on a lot of the bugs in plymouth
[23:45] <trinikrono> so later penguin42 im off now
[23:46] <penguin42> yeh