[00:04] <wgrant> doko, lifeless: There are binaries there...
[00:04] <wgrant> Surely you know how package pools work :)
[00:05] <doko> please fix the error message
[00:10] <lifeless> wgrant: so I think this is a UI bug
[00:10] <lifeless> wgrant: we shouldn't offer impossible options
[00:17] <wgrant> lifeless: Sure, but that requires JS.
[00:17] <jcsackett> huwshimi: current work on wallyworld's part http://people.canonical.com/~ianb/person-picker-extra-detail.png
[00:17] <lifeless> wgrant: oh noes, we would have a real UI ?
[00:17] <lifeless> :P
[00:18] <jcsackett> ugh, channel fail.
[00:18] <wgrant> lifeless: Adding trivial JS like that to a non-AJAXy form is non-ideal, given our bad JS stuff.
[00:18] <lifeless> wgrant: I don't follow; its not high pri anyhow so deferrable
[01:58] <Andre_Gondim> Hi, I need some help to use people.ubuntu.com
[02:01] <wgrant> Andre_Gondim: #canonical-sysadmin may be more helpful.
[02:01] <Andre_Gondim> thanks wgrant
[05:45] <ajmitch> where should I report spam on launchpad?
[05:46] <lifeless> answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[05:48] <ajmitch> ok, done
[05:49] <lakin> Ok, I know launchpad is an open source project now - which is awesome.  Is it something that's intended to be run as a standalone project on ones own server? If so, are there instructions for doing it?  I've found https://dev.launchpad.net/Running - but that seems more like instructions on how to build it if you're developing on it.
[05:52] <wgrant> lakin: No, it's still intended that Launchpad.net should be the only instance.
[05:52] <lifeless> lakin: its only intended to be deployed by canonical. Other folk can deploy it but it /must/ be rethemed before doing that.
[05:52] <wgrant> It's possible to run your own, but you'd have to rebrand it and replace all the images.
[05:52] <lakin> Thanks for the info
[05:53] <lifeless> I believe there to be sites running LP
[05:53] <wgrant> There are a couple I know of.
[05:53] <lifeless> inhouse hosting setups and the like
[05:53] <lakin> Rebranding it makes sense.  I wouldn't be running it to compete with lp.net - mostly I'm intrigued about using it as a private bug tracking software for clients
[12:51] <maxb> Urgh, git.debian.org has now been down long enough that vcs-imports are starting to toggle to failed status
[12:55] <geser> maxb: does it use anonymous read-only access? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/05/msg00009.html
[12:55] <maxb> Oh joy, they changed the URLs
[12:56] <maxb> lovely
[12:57] <StevenK> Yes, because stable access is hard
[12:57] <geser> you might want to wait on an answer on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/05/msg00889.html as the Vcs-* headers in packages are affected too
[13:43] <ahasenack> hi guys, this bug is weird, it has no project: https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape/+bug/784749
[13:43] <ahasenack> I then tried to add one ("also affects project") and got an oops
[13:43] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape/+bug/784749
[13:43] <ahasenack> er
[13:43] <ahasenack> OOPS-1970D404
[13:50] <gmb> ahasenack: Hmm. Weird. Looking into it now.
[13:51] <ahasenack> gmb: thanks
[14:39] <gmb> ahasenack: Can you see anything in the Affects table on bug 784749 now? I see two tasks.
[14:39] <gmb> Shush, Ubotu.
[14:41] <ahasenack> gmb: one of them beret managed to add a few minutes ago
[14:41] <ahasenack> gmb: he said that he thinks the problem is that someone managed to unsubscribe landscape from that bug
[14:41] <ahasenack> gmb: I see one task now, a side effect of how beret fixed it
[14:41] <ahasenack> well, one "11.06" "thing" (is that what you call a task?)
[14:42] <gmb> ahasenack: I think we may have (had) a cache invalidation problem here. It's not possible for a bug to have no tasks (yes, anything under "Affects" is a Bug Task, in LP parlance).
[14:42] <gmb> It would have OOPSed all the time if the tasks were deleted.
[14:42] <ahasenack> gmb: did you get to see the oops yet?
[14:42] <ahasenack> it's synced every hour or so IIRC
[14:43] <gmb> ahasenack: Yes; the OOPS is telling me that you tried to add a task to the bug for a project (Landscape, I assume) that was already listed as being affected by the bug.
[14:43] <ahasenack> gmb: ok, that was when I saw no tasks for it
[14:43] <wgrant> gmb: Ah, see #launchpad-ops, I didn't see that the problem was here too.
[14:43] <gmb> So whilst you couldn't see Landscape in the Affects table, internally it was there.
[14:43] <ahasenack> ok
[14:44] <wgrant> ~launchpad-bugs had been unsubscribed, but they could still see the bug because of that hack that allows pillar owners to partially see all of their private bugs.
[14:44] <wgrant> s/launchpad-bugs/landscape-bugs/
[14:44] <wgrant> That partial visibility somehow caused the tasks to not show.
[14:44] <gmb> wgrant: Ah, right. See, I'm out of the loop on bugs stuff now, unless it's bug mail. We have ACLs now?
[14:45] <wgrant> gmb: No.
[14:45] <wgrant> Some time pre-squads pillar owners were granted access to their bugs.
[14:45] <wgrant> Partly.
[14:45] <gmb> 0.o
[14:45] <wgrant> Not sure why, and it's certainly unwanted in some cases, but it clearly doesn't quite work properly either.
[14:45] <wgrant> :/
[14:45] <gmb> Ooo-kay.
[14:46] <wgrant> So, what happened here is that a LOSA accidentally hit the unsubscribe button for ~landscape-bugs while unsubscribing the user.
[14:46] <wgrant> So then the bug was only partially visible, and the world ended.
[14:46] <wgrant> Now they are subscribed again, all is OK.
[14:47] <gmb> Right.
[14:47] <gmb> wgrant: I'll file a bug, then, unless there's one already.
[14:48] <wgrant> gmb: There may be one for the general issue of pillar owners being able to see all bugs.
[14:48] <wgrant> But there isn't one for this particular bug.
[14:48] <gmb> Ok.
[15:22] <RedSingularity> lifeless: ping
[15:39] <benji> RedSingularity: it's 2:30 AM for him so you might not get a reply (but knowing him, you just might)
[15:40] <RedSingularity> benji: ohh ok.  Thanks for the heads up :)
[15:41] <RedSingularity> lifeless: When you get a chance, take a look at this error I am getting when trying to mark a duplicate.  http://i.imgur.com/Q7Qw3.png
[16:47] <commandoline> Hello, I'm wondering who has more rights in a project: a maintainer or a driver? I believe the second has the bonus of settings the direction of a project (registering series etc.), but I'm not sure and the docs don't help me out since I didn't find a good description of the role of a Maintainer.
[17:01] <commandoline> OK, I've found a good description now, it seems like I was mistaken.
[17:02] <DooitzeCompaq> Yes, and I was right
[17:29] <CarlFK> how do I search lp ppa for jsondiff?
[17:37] <bigjools> CarlFK: you want to search all PPAs?
[17:38] <bigjools> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas will do that
[17:44] <ahasenack> hi guys, i'm getting timeout errors when trying to copy packages between private ppas
[17:44] <ahasenack> OOPS-1970L526
[17:44] <ahasenack> here is a second one: OOPS-1970CO451
[17:46] <CarlFK> bigjools: cool - thanks
[17:46] <bigjools> np
[17:57] <suihkulokki> The page https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=arm-porting-queue fails to load with a timeout
[17:57] <suihkulokki> I understand it is a known bug in launchpad?
[17:58] <ahasenack> I'm also getting timeouts, but elsewhere
[17:59] <gmb> suihkulokki: We do still get timeouts on search pages on occasion, unfortunately. It may work shortly if you refresh the page.
[17:59] <gmb> ahasenack: Where abouts?
[17:59] <ahasenack> gmb: copying packages between ppas, see oopses above
[17:59] <gmb> Ah.
[17:59] <gmb> ahasenack: Could you file a bug about those please if you haven't already?
[18:00] <ahasenack> gmb: I haven't, but I really need those packages copied, is there another way? Or do I have to upload them again to the other ppa then?
[18:00] <bigjools> ahasenack: don't, it's a known bug
[18:00] <bigjools> ahasenack: copy fewer at once
[18:00] <suihkulokki> gmb: is there a bug# ?
[18:00] <ahasenack> bigjools: thanks, I'll try
[18:00] <bigjools> ahasenack: the time taken is a function of the number of *binaries* getting copied.
[18:01]  * ahasenack tries 4
[18:02] <ahasenack> hmm, the info note only mentions 2
[18:02] <gmb> suihkulokki: I thought there was, but apparently not (or at least not one that's immediately obvious). Please file one at https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+filebug.
[18:02] <ahasenack> ah, the others were the same version probably
[19:03] <suihkulokki> gmb: filed as LP#787710
[19:10] <rsalveti> don't know if anyone posted already, but would like to search for bugs using a specific tag at ubuntu
[19:10] <rsalveti> but launchpad hates me and always gives me timeout
[19:11] <rsalveti> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=arm-porting-queue
[19:11] <micahg> rsalveti: search for +MYTAG in the box
[19:12] <maxb> Is there still no joy on killing off the launchpad-bugs contact address that spams any non-Canonicalite who touches a code import?
[19:12] <micahg> rsalveti: I think that's bug 735977
[19:13] <rsalveti> micahg: yup, thanks
[20:38] <lifeless> RedSingularity: hi
[20:38] <lifeless> probably a timeout
[20:38] <lifeless> ah yes
[21:31] <SpamapS> How does one flag a comment as spam on a bug?
[21:31] <SpamapS> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysqmail/+bug/573633/comments/26
[21:37] <micahg> SpamapS: file a question against launchpad?
[22:29] <RedSingularity> lifeless: ok, thanks :)