[16:10] <cp1> The calendar appears to have multiple meetings scheduled at the same time coming up. Has anyone been working on resolving it?
[16:28] <JFo> cp1, what calendar are you referring to?
[16:58] <smoser> cp1, JFo probably http://www.ubuntu-news.org/calendars/fridge/
[16:58] <smoser> which, does in fact show overlaping meetings
[16:59] <charlie-tca> but it does depend on where the meeting is held, too.
[17:00] <Daviey> Hello!
[17:01] <cp1> It is supposed to be in UTC time, so it shouldn't matter where you are.  I have it available via my google cal and it adjusts to EST.
[17:02] <JFo> cp1, oh right, not all of those meetings are held in this chanel
[17:03] <hallyn> \o
[17:03] <JFo> interesting that the app review board meeting is scheduled to be at 5 though
[17:03] <smb> Just minor nitpick that the headline says fridge calendar is used for #ubuntu-meeting... :-P
[17:03] <cp1> I sent an email to the two people running the conflicting meetings.
[17:03]  * JFo goeas away
[17:03] <smb> But we are invading server-team meeting
[17:03] <cp1> Yes we invaded, or they haven't started yet...
[17:04] <smb> They try :)
[17:04] <robbiew> get out
[17:04] <smb> \o
[17:04] <robbiew> lol
[17:04] <charlie-tca> Also, sometimes the meeting times get confused and come out wrong
[17:04]  * hallyn holds off on hitting the trigger
[17:04] <SpamapS> o/
[17:04] <Daviey> hallyn, just shoot them all.
[17:04] <hallyn> are we good to go, or should another meeting take precedence?
[17:05] <hallyn> ok
[17:05] <hallyn> #startmeeting
[17:05] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:05. The chair is hallyn.
[17:05] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:05] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[17:05] <Daviey> \o
[17:05] <hallyn> oh no, my clipboard isn't working, this is gonna be a slow one
[17:05] <SpamapS> already on oneiric? ;)
[17:05] <robbiew> oh man...don't get me started
[17:06] <Daviey> oneiric is rocking.
[17:06] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Review ACTION items from previous meeting
[17:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION items from previous meeting
[17:06] <hallyn> no items?
[17:06] <Daviey> don't think there was
[17:06] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Oneiric Development
[17:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Oneiric Development
[17:07] <Daviey> Review blueprints!
[17:07] <Daviey> Thanks everyone who filed their blueprints already.
[17:07] <Daviey> This Thursday is feature definition freeze
[17:07] <Daviey> This means that they should all be squared away by then.
[17:07] <Daviey> We really, really need peer reviews
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> mine are waiting review
[17:07] <Daviey> (open to everyone in ~ubuntu-server)
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> :)
[17:08] <SpamapS> ugh..
[17:08] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx, I thought i sent you a mail asking some questions yesterday? :)
[17:08] <hallyn> action?
[17:08]  * SpamapS needs to finish boot-experience spec.. :-P
[17:08] <zul> i would like some reviews as well
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: uhmmmmmmm I didn't receive anything
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> :S
[17:08] <Daviey> Blueprints are the most important outcome of this week, really.
[17:08] <hallyn> [ACTION] All: spec peer reviews
[17:08] <MootBot> ACTION received:  All: spec peer reviews
[17:09] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: maybe you forgot to clic send :D
[17:09]  * Daviey checks
[17:09] <robbiew> what
[17:09] <robbiew> no
[17:09] <robbiew> I got iut
[17:09] <robbiew> it
[17:09] <hallyn> Daviey: for the meeting notes, what's that link again to get the list of server specs?
[17:09] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx, Subject: Infrastructure power management (server-o-infra-power) ?
[17:10] <smoser> what does "spec peer reviews" mean ?
[17:10] <Daviey> anyway, we'll take that out of band.
[17:10] <robbiew> hallyn:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-o?searchtext=server-o
[17:10] <smoser> where would i do such a thing ?
[17:10] <robbiew> sort by spec name
[17:10] <Daviey> smoser, Question the implementation, and direction.
[17:10] <hallyn> thx
[17:10] <smoser> where?
[17:10]  * Daviey will send a post to ubuntu-server ml today with further details.
[17:10] <smoser> in the whiteboard ?
[17:10] <Daviey> smoser, on the whiteboard.
[17:10] <smoser> what a messy place for such a thing. I have no suggestion for anything better.
[17:11] <smoser> but conversations there are just about impssible to follow.
[17:11] <robbiew> fwiw,  all approved blueprints can be found here: http://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+specs?role=assignee
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: no nothign... didn't receive anything.. that bluprint is being driven by Arnaud from Eaton btw
[17:11] <hallyn> [LINK] http://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+specs?role=assignee
[17:11] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://blueprints.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-server/+specs?role=assignee
[17:11] <hallyn> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-o?searchtext=server-o
[17:11] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/sprints/uds-o?searchtext=server-o
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: cause it is not powernap :), but rather NUT
[17:11] <Daviey> RoAkSoAx, Yeah, i was asking input - i'll send it again.
[17:12] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: cool ;)
[17:12] <Daviey> That is all from me..
[17:12] <Daviey> ta
[17:12] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:12] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:13] <hallyn> anything new coming up?
[17:13] <hallyn> i intend to be at first part of plumber's for security mini-conf
[17:13] <Daviey> Nothing exciting comes to mind... i think we are all still resting.
[17:13] <Daviey> hallyn, Oh - interesting.. we all look forward to the blog post covering that.
[17:13] <hallyn> moving on, then
[17:14] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:14] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:14] <hallyn> hggdh: around?
[17:15] <hallyn> ok, moving on
[17:15] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:15] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:15] <hallyn> smb: hey
[17:15] <smb> hello
[17:15] <smb> Just one reminder about my asking about iscsitarget to be only userspace dkms for oneiric.
[17:16] <smb> I think it should be ok as it is imo not required for installation or boot
[17:16] <hallyn> any questions for smb?
[17:16]  * smb wonders whether he got moderated out of server-ml
[17:16] <hallyn> huh
[17:16] <Daviey> smb, no - i waved you through
[17:17] <smb> Daviey, Ta. :)
[17:17] <hallyn> ok, moving on then
[17:17] <smb> (actually meant still stuck in the moderation queue)
[17:17] <smb> ok with me
[17:17] <hallyn> Daviey: want an action to push that through? :)
[17:17] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:18] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:18] <Daviey> hmm
[17:18] <Daviey> hallyn / smb: i passed your message through the queue when you sent it.
[17:18] <cp1> I wanted to ask about how we might do a better job with security updates.  For example the last exim update was kind of slow compared to Debian, and if I had known about it earlier I could have helped patch it and get it out sooner. In that case some people at exim.org knew about the issue about a month ahead of time.  So how can we improve issues like that?
[17:19] <smb> Daviey, Understood that. Just thought my initial question was not put the right way
[17:19] <hallyn> does the security team have a list of pending security updates, for volunteers to look through?
[17:19] <hallyn> jdstrand: ^
[17:20] <Daviey> non embargoed ones, i guess.
[17:20] <Daviey> I don't know that you can split bugs by server, and security in launchpad easily.
[17:20] <kees> hallyn: yes: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/main.html
[17:20] <hallyn> [LINK] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/main.html
[17:20] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/main.html
[17:20] <dholbach> Daviey, package sets!
[17:20] <hallyn> kees: thanks
[17:20] <jdstrand> hallyn: yes, it is incorporated into the sponsoring list and patch piloting. that said, we will be offering up 10-15 packages a month for people to contribue to, as part of the security-o-community bp
[17:21] <kees> hallyn: and if you want to watch specific package, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/
[17:21] <ScottK> If you are aware of an embargoed issue and have a patch, you can file a private security bug with it so the security team can get a running start at it.
[17:21] <ScottK> cp1: ^^^
[17:21] <jdstrand> hallyn: this is of course all in addition to what kees just mentioned
[17:21] <ScottK> I've done this a number of times and it's worked out nicely.
[17:21] <hallyn> jdstrand: ScottK: dholbach: thanks :)
[17:22] <hallyn> cp1: maybe you can convert that to an rss feed :)
[17:22] <cp1> My problem is I wasn't aware of it early enough.
[17:23] <kees> cp1: if you want to watch exim4 specifically, this works: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/pkg/exim4.html
[17:23] <hallyn> Right, whatever form the list takes - or if you watch one of the many CVE lists - you do simply need to watch it or have a running search for exim
[17:23] <cp1> CVE tagging isn't always helpful, for example mhonarc has some issues now and the bug in lauchpad doesn't have the CVE's associated with it.
[17:23] <hallyn> just have a cronjob scrape it daily and check for diffs...
[17:24] <hallyn> So we need to do a better job with taggin?
[17:24] <Daviey> yah.. more stuff to do :)
[17:25] <hallyn> cp1: let's discuss anything further in #ubuntu-hardened
[17:25] <hallyn> moving on,
[17:25] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[17:25] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[17:25] <hallyn> any?
[17:25] <Daviey> Blueprints, Blueprints and Blueprints
[17:25] <Daviey> :)
[17:26] <SpamapS> BadgersBadgersBadgers
[17:26]  * RoAkSoAx hates university's wifi network :)
[17:26] <hallyn> I'm hoping to fill in the packaging requests for all spice related packages before i slip away
[17:26] <ttx> RoAkSoAx: switch :)
[17:26] <SpamapS> hallyn: do not go quietly into the night
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> ttx: can't... I'm gonna be here for the rest of the day
[17:26] <ScottK> hallyn: You know what packaging requests get you, right?
[17:26] <RoAkSoAx> :(
[17:26] <ScottK> hallyn: With a packaging request and a package you've created then you'll get a package.
[17:27] <hallyn> ScottK: not sure i follow
[17:27] <Daviey> 1. Packaging Request
[17:27] <Daviey> 2. Package
[17:27] <Daviey> 3 Profit!
[17:28] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: 3. Upload
[17:28] <Daviey> We've solved it.
[17:28] <RoAkSoAx> 4. Profit
[17:28] <hallyn> yeah, i did them out of order...
[17:28] <hallyn> dat be how i roll
[17:28] <Daviey> Thanks for the meeting hallyn .
[17:28] <hallyn> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[17:28] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time
[17:28] <SpamapS> One more topic.. any pies in the face planned for UDS-P ?
[17:29] <hallyn> Tuesday, May 31st 2011 16:00 UTC
[17:29] <ScottK> hallyn: Just filing package requests almost never results in an actual package being created.
[17:29] <zul> SpamapS:  yeah thats what motivates me ;)
[17:29] <hallyn> ScottK: i just want the permission to upload them to universe :)
[17:29] <hallyn> ScottK: you're just telling me i need to do the packaging, right?
[17:29] <ScottK> hallyn: No packaging bug is needed for that.
[17:29] <ScottK> yes.
[17:29] <SpamapS> hallyn: quick end it before it grows another head!
[17:29] <hallyn> #endmeeting
[17:29] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:29.
[17:29] <hallyn> :)
[17:29] <hallyn> ScottK: yup, thanks
[17:30] <hallyn> thanks all, see ya
[17:30] <SpamapS> hallyn: ty!
[17:30] <ScottK> There is no requirement in Ubuntu for such things.
[17:30] <ScottK> No requirement in Debian either, but Lintian tells fibs about that.
[17:30] <hallyn> ScottK: lemme move to #ubuntu-server and inquire further
[17:30] <ScottK> OK
[17:57] <bjf> tick
[17:57] <bjf> tock
[17:59] <jjohansen> \o
[17:59] <ppisati> o/
[17:59] <apw> o/
[17:59] <herton> o/
[17:59] <smb> \o
[17:59] <sforshee> o/
[18:00] <bjf> #startmeeting
[18:00] <JFo> o/
[18:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:00. The chair is bjf.
[18:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[18:00] <bjf> ##
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <bjf> # Meeting Etiquette
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[18:00] <bjf> #       'o/' indicates you have something you'd like to add (wait until you are recognized)
[18:00] <bjf> #
[18:00] <bjf> [TOPIC] Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics (JFo)
[18:00] <JFo> Release Meeting Bugs (0 bugs, 18 Blueprints)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux kernel bugs ()
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-ti-omap4 bugs ()
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug ()
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 21 linux kernel bugs ()
[18:00] <JFo>  * 6 linux-ti-omap4 bugs ()
[18:00] <JFo>  * 0 linux-meta-ti-omap4 bug ()
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 1 blueprint (Including HWE Blueprints)
[18:00] <JFo> [18:00] <JFo>  * 28 Linux Bugs ()
[18:00] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 5 Linux Bugs (no change)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * 17 Linux Bugs (up 1)
[18:01] <JFo> [18:01] <JFo>  * [[https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bugs?field.has_patch=on | Bugs with Patches]]
[18:01] <JFo>  * [[http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/csv-stats/bugs-with-patches/linux/ | Breakdown by status]]
[18:01] <JFo> ..
[18:01] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-bug-handling
[18:01] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Bug Handling (JFo)
[18:01] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-bug-handling
[18:01] <JFo> All alpha 1 items are in progress:
[18:01] <JFo> [jeremyfoshee] work with SRU team and KRM to develop/define process for addressing development kernel bugs.: INPROGRESS
[18:01] <JFo>  * started this conversation with an e-mail.
[18:01] <JFo> [jeremyfoshee] Generate specific hotlist for devel bugs focus: INPROGRESS
[18:01] <JFo>  * will initially use the same requirements as the 'by team' hotlist, but focused on Oneiric
[18:01] <JFo>  * copied the hotlist script and currently working through changes
[18:01] <JFo> [jeremyfoshee] drive new state bugs to 0 and maintain 0 new status bugs daily: INPROGRESS
[18:01] <JFo>  * 8 current oneiric bugs. All have been initially triaged and are now going through deeper analysis
[18:01] <JFo>  * so far this has helped me determine what skills I'd like to further develop
[18:01] <JFo> [jeremyfoshee] identify which scripts we no longer run which we should port forward (with the aim of 0 New bugs): INPROGRESS
[18:01] <JFo>  * Brad's confirmed script is doing a great job currently of identifying what bugs are complete
[18:02] <JFo>    enough to be set confirmed
[18:02] <JFo>  * Started the discussion on this in e-mail. Will follow up with some thoughts as soon as I have had the time
[18:02] <JFo>    to evaluate the responses and chatted with Pete (he's been quite busy lately :))
[18:02] <JFo> ..
[18:02] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Config Review (ogasawara)
[18:02] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-config-review
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Config Review (ogasawara)
[18:02] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-config-review
[18:02] <ogasawara> We just need to schedule a follow on config review session to look at jj's config comparisons.  I suggest we do this at the Rally.  I'm continuing to work through some of the config options noted from UDS, none of which are critical for the Alpha-1 release.
[18:02] <ogasawara> ..
[18:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review (ogasawara)
[18:03] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-ubuntu-delta-review
[18:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review (ogasawara)
[18:03] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-ubuntu-delta-review
[18:03] <ogasawara> apw, bjf, jjohansen, kees, lag, manjo, mpoirier, ralveti, rtg: you have Alpha-1 work items to review your set of Ubuntu patches.  Please take a moment to review or postpone till Alpha-2. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelOneiricUbuntuDeltaReview for your specific set of patches.
[18:03] <ogasawara> ..
[18:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[18:03] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[18:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[18:03] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[18:03] <smb> All good (nothing started)
[18:03] <smb> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[18:04] <ogasawara> We've uploaded the 2.6.39-3.9 kernel which is based on upstream v2.6.39 final.  I intend to keep us on v2.6.39 final for our Alpha-1 release on Thurs June 2.
[18:04] <ogasawara> ..
[18:04] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin / bjf)
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || All kernel packages in -proposed have had verification complete and will be published when Certification and
[18:04] <sconklin> || QA are complete (Not all series receive Certification). The Stable team will prepare new kernel packages this
[18:04] <sconklin> || week to begin a new cycle.
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || As decided at UDS, the stable kernel cadence will change to a three week cycle, in order to allow time to
[18:04] <sconklin> || properly prepare the kernel packages
[18:04] <sconklin> ..
[18:05] <bjf> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin / bjf)
[18:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin / bjf)
[18:05] <sconklin> Oh, forgot to mention that we Have Herton helping us now (YAY)
[18:05] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[18:05] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-314.27        || 2.6.32-316.31        ||    8 ||        8 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.31.23         || 2.6.32.32.24         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick  || 2.6.35.25.36         || 2.6.35.28.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-28.50~lucid1  ||   13 ||       13 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-31.31         || 2.6.32-32.32         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.34.7               || 1.34.10              ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-31.61         || 2.6.32-32.62         ||    4 ||        4 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.31.37         || 2.6.32.32.38         ||    1 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ec2                    || 2.6.32.314.15        || 2.6.32.316.17        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || maverick linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.35.28.21         || 2.6.35.29.22         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.35    || 2.6.35-28.20         || 2.6.35-29.21         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.35.28.36         || 2.6.35.29.37         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.6               || 1.38.8               ||    1 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <smb> \o
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-28.50         || 2.6.35-29.51         ||   11 ||        9 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || natty    linux-ti-omap4                    ||                      || 2.6.38-1209.13       ||   10 ||       10 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.38    ||                      || 2.6.38-9.3           ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ti-omap4               ||                      || 2.6.38.1209.7        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        ||                      || 2.6.38.9.23          ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             ||                      || 2.6.38-9.43          ||    9 ||        9 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ..
[18:06] <smb> Maverick proposed fails to boot on ec2. Currently investigating.
[18:06] <smb> ..
[18:06] <bjf> smb go
[18:06] <bjf> heh
[18:07] <bjf> [TOPIC] Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  Incoming Bugs: Regressions (JFo)
[18:07] <JFo> Incoming Bugs
[18:07] <JFo>  9 Oneiric Bugs ()
[18:07] <JFo>  1207 Natty Bugs (up 273)
[18:07] <JFo>  1142 Maverick Bugs (up 13)
[18:07] <JFo>  1029 Lucid Bugs (up 7)
[18:07] <JFo> Current regression stats (broken down by release):
[18:07] <JFo> [18:07] <JFo>   * 1 natty bug ()
[18:07] <JFo>   * 42 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 74 lucid bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 4 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 0 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo> [18:07] <JFo>   * 458 natty bugs (down 26)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 244 maverick bugs (up 2)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 222 lucid bugs (up 4)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 37 karmic bugs (down 1)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 2 hardy bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo> [18:07] <JFo>   * 1 natty bugs (up 1)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 2 maverick bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 0 lucid bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo>   * 0 karmic bugs (no change)
[18:07] <JFo> ..
[18:08] <bjf> probably don't need to be tracking the karmic bugs :-)
[18:08] <JFo> thanks bjftrue
[18:08] <JFo> :
[18:08] <JFo> :)
[18:08] <bjf> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:09] <bjf> sorry for the long, drawn out meeting, the one right after UDS is usually brutal
[18:09] <bjf> :-)
[18:09] <kamal> :-)  thanks bjf
[18:09] <bjf> thanks everyone
[18:09] <bjf> #endmeeting
[18:09] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:09.
[18:09] <JFo> bjf, thank you sir
[18:09] <smb> thanks bjf
[18:09] <apw> :)
[18:09] <ppisati> cool
[18:45] <kees> ogasawara: thanks, I'll get nx-emu done today
[18:45] <ogasawara> kees: no hurry