[08:49] I guess, if I us upstart, I do not need the /etc/init.d/cups any longer, just starting it from an upstart apps job, right ? [10:40] how can i source a file (from /etc/default) in a upstart "script" section? [14:42] Where can I find the debian/rules-like for ubuntu/cups ? [14:42] I would like to check out how they solve this package with upstart stuff. === marrusl_ is now known as marrusl [17:25] djszapi: do you have an ubuntu system? [17:28] on an Ubuntu system you can do "apt-get source cups" [17:30] if you don't have Ubuntu, the source package is available in http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/c/cups/ (you probably want the original tarbal & the diff) [18:09] hi Keybuk [18:09] hey [18:09] how's it going? [18:10] I have a small issue as usual :) [18:10] about upstart and deb packaging... [18:10] how about you ? [18:10] I'm good [18:10] excellent =) [18:10] I'm only my first cup of coffee, and I already know why CrOS comes up with "Unaccelerated graphics" after my CL [18:10] today is going to be a good day, I can tell [18:12] cool, Keybuk, I do not understand one thing about upstart [18:13] what is that one thing? [18:14] we use subfolders inside the /etc/init/ directory on maemo [18:14] and not just jobs inside /etc/init/ directly. [18:14] sure [18:14] and debian/ubuntu developers keep telling me that it is odd [18:14] no idea why [18:15] they're wrong [18:16] have you ever used cdbs style for debian package creation ? [18:17] not purposefully [18:17] I've had to patch packages that use it, and that was painful enough [18:19] mmh, my fresh debian-devel ml question is not online yet, but you can find it here: http://paste.kde.org/74185/ [18:26] right, debhelper [18:26] dh_installinit isn't anything to do with cdbs, except that cdbs happens to use it [18:26] it's certainly a valid debhelper patch to support installing to sub-directories of /etc/init [18:26] you might have to be creative [18:26] e.g. dh_installinit --name=apps!foo [18:27] and have debian/cups.app!foo.upstart [18:27] nope read again [18:27] I tried to set the [18:27] "--onlyscripts" option [18:32] so it should not install any init script/job with that and i could make a workaround from the postinst script without changing the packaging style [18:33] you don't want that option [18:33] that still installs the scripts [18:33] you want to not run dh_installinit [18:41] -o, --onlyscripts [18:41] Only modify postinst/postrm/prerm scripts, do not actually install any init script, default files, or upstart job. May be useful if the init script or upstart job is shipped and/or installed by upstream in a [18:41] way that doesn't make it easy to let dh_installinit find it. [18:41] Keybuk ^ [18:42] from man dh_installinit [18:42] the doc is wrong [18:42] I think [18:44] can that happen ? [18:44] can documentation be wrong? [18:44] sure [18:45] well, it is worth to report it as soon as possible then. [18:46] Debian is --> that way ;-) [18:46] what way ? [18:47] --> that way [18:47] ?? [18:47] I just mean that the appropriate place to file that report is with Debian, not here [18:48] oh yeah, sure. [18:48] are you also at the meego summit in San Francisco ? :D:D [18:48] I shouldn't imagine so [18:48] I don't have any vacation time left this year [18:49] well, cdbs is buggy [18:50] DEB_DH_INSTALLINIT_ARGS = --name=nonexistent -> I have just tried out this advice, but I still get the /etc/init.d/cups and I do not know why [18:50] no idea [18:51] seems there is no way to avoid the debhelper usage. === Md_ is now known as Md [22:14] djszapi: there's some planned work happening in Debian to make that you're struggling with a little easier. [22:15] Keybuk is probably right.. you will have to manually put your upstart job and init.d script in place until dh_installinit is modified.