=== braiam is now known as la
=== la is now known as la_tierra
=== la_tierra is now known as braiam
[04:42] <RedSingularity> Anyone have the next -control meeting date available?
[04:44] <RedSingularity> Oh and the next bug day...?
[04:44] <micahg> RedSingularity: next meeting should be on june 9
[04:44] <micahg> RedSingularity: bugday is thursday I think
[04:45] <RedSingularity> micahg: know the times UTC?
[04:45] <micahg> RedSingularity: 19:00 I think
[04:46] <RedSingularity> micahg: both days?
[04:46] <micahg> RedSingularity: bug day has no time AFAIK, it's when  you're available
[04:46] <RedSingularity> micahg: ah ok.  Thanks buddy :)
=== nigelb_ is now known as nigelb
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
=== kirrus is now known as totally-not-kirr
=== totally-not-kirr is now known as kirrus
[12:44] <jtaylor> can someone check if bug 777420 qualifies for a natty SRU?
[12:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 777420 in ipython (Ubuntu) "show() blocks in pylab mode with ipython 0.10.1 (affects: 2) (heat: 12)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777420
[14:17] <hggdh> jtaylor: it would only qualify for SRU if we could isolate the patches & apply it on the 0.10.1 codebase
[14:17] <jtaylor> hggdh: that can be done
[14:17] <hggdh> jtaylor: as it seems -- caveat, I have not looked at it in detail, it could be requested as a backport
[14:18] <hggdh> jtaylor: do you have the changeset?
[14:19] <jtaylor> hggdh: https://github.com/ivanov/ipython/tree/fix185
[14:20] <hggdh> good!
[14:21] <hggdh> and sorry I had not gone thru all ;-)
[14:21] <hggdh> let me see what would take
[14:21] <jtaylor> I can backport the patch
[14:21] <jtaylor> but I would like to know if the release team would accept it
[14:22] <jtaylor> ah backport would also be a possibility, 0.10.2 works well in natty, I' using it since release via my ppa
[14:33] <hggdh> jtaylor: let me see if I get any position re. this
[14:52] <micahg> jtaylor: is this a regression over previous versions?
[14:53] <jtaylor> micahg: yes it works in 0.10
[14:53] <jtaylor> and its fixed in oneiric
[14:53] <micahg> jtaylor: then we can try for SRU depending on how "bad" the fix is
[14:54] <jtaylor> the fix is simple, it just removes a feature check, the feature is available in natty so its not needed
[14:55] <micahg> jtaylor: tasks are added, if you can make a debdiff, please subscribe ubuntu-sponsors
[14:56] <jtaylor> micahg: thx
[14:56] <micahg> jtaylor: thank you for finding the upstream commit :)
[16:56] <davmor2> kamusin: updated https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/banshee/+bug/785690 with shots
[16:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 785690 in compiz (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "banshee has somehow caused the compiz to mis function (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[16:57] <kamusin> thanks davmor2 , looking..
[16:57] <davmor2> before and after added
=== steveire_ is now known as steveire
[17:01] <davmor2> kamusin: interesting issue isn't it :)
[17:02] <davmor2> kamusin: by the way the white block behind the screenshot tool is banshee :D
[17:04] <kamusin> doh.. davmor2 , are you using nvidia propietary controllers right?
[17:05] <davmor2> kamusin: I am
[17:42] <bdmurray> mvo: how does the meta-release file get created or where does it come from?
[17:53] <braiam> davmor2: I cannot duplicate de bug... how you made it?
[17:53] <davmor2> braiam: the banshee one?
[17:53] <braiam> yes
[17:54] <braiam> davmor2: yes
[17:56] <hggdh> QA meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in 5 minutes
[17:56] <davmor2> braiam: It just happened one day,  I didn't create it.  I opened banshee one morning and got the white block instead of banshee been the same since if I unmaximise it.
[17:58] <braiam> davmor2: it's still reproducible?
[17:59] <davmor2> braiam: for me yes
[17:59] <braiam> davmor2: you have any plugin in compiz that I should know?
[18:00] <davmor2> braiam: nope stock install not played with anything other than the backgorund
[18:00] <pedro_> so only reproducible on compiz/unity?
[18:00] <pedro_> what about metacity without any effects
[18:00] <braiam> pedro_: no for me.
[18:01] <davmor2> braiam: I can possibly start it from terminal and see if any info shows up there and also from ubuntu old school too and see if it starts up there.
[18:01] <braiam> ok then davmor2
[18:02] <davmor2> braiam: the only thing is I need to do some work now so I'll add info to the bug in the morning probably
[18:03] <braiam> the only thing that i have different is the video card, the mine is ati
=== kklimonda is now known as Guest62081
=== Guest62081 is now known as kklimonda^
[19:27] <mvo> bdmurray: its in a bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/meta-release/ubuntu/
[19:29] <bdmurray> mvo: yes, I found it and proposed a merge
[19:30] <mvo> great, thanks!
[19:34] <mvo> bdmurray: thanks, looks great, merged
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:36] <roadmr> Hey! can someone help me with bug 787779? Should be importance: medium, I also confirmed/reproduced it, so I already set status to confirmed
[20:36] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 787779 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "battery power notification is not fully shown in french (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/787779
[20:53] <rsalveti> hggdh: bdmurray: hey, anything else I need to do to be approved for the bug control lp group? :-)
[20:53] <rsalveti> wait would probably be a valid answer too :-)
[20:53] <micahg> rsalveti: I thought I saw you were approved...
[20:54] <rsalveti> seems I was, just not part of the group yet
[20:54] <hggdh> rsalveti: we are just waiting the regulatory 7 days
[20:54] <rsalveti> my membership is still pending
[20:54] <micahg> rsalveti: oh sorry, that was someone else
[20:54] <hggdh> you have 2 +1 votes, which is enough
[20:55] <hggdh> but we wait for a week for additional comments
[20:55] <rsalveti> hggdh: got it, makes sense :-)
[20:55] <hggdh> :-)
[20:55] <rsalveti> that's fine, thanks again!
=== braiam is now known as s112___
=== s112___ is now known as s__s
=== s__s is now known as braiam
[21:20] <hggdh> yw
=== micahg_ is now known as micahg