Laney | maybe we'll get this finished in debian over the weekend | 00:00 |
---|---|---|
Laney | fingers crossed | 00:00 |
cjwatson | 33 left, seems doable | 00:01 |
Laney | even fewer in sid | 00:01 |
cjwatson | hmm, how come we're behind? | 00:02 |
cjwatson | or is that just the difference from today? | 00:02 |
Laney | a couple of outstanding syncs and today's uploads | 00:02 |
cjwatson | oh wow, http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ghc7.html looks good | 00:03 |
Laney | that is broken :-( | 00:03 |
Laney | http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/haskell-pkg-graph.pdf is probably the best view | 00:04 |
cjwatson | I don't see any Haskell-related sync requests | 00:05 |
cjwatson | there was one retry request oddly in the archive queue, for alex | 00:05 |
cjwatson | I'll do an autosync run now, might as well | 00:07 |
cjwatson | overnight capacity and all | 00:07 |
Laney | outstanding> I haven't requested them | 00:08 |
cjwatson | ah | 00:08 |
Laney | hopefully almost all of the deltas should go away | 00:08 |
Laney | I had to introduce a lot in natty due to moving haskell-utf8-string ahead of Debian | 00:08 |
cjwatson | yeah | 00:09 |
cjwatson | there you go, have a bunch of syncs | 00:19 |
cjwatson | Laney: shouldn't we flag .build-depends ~ /ghc6/ as bad? | 00:31 |
cjwatson | (but not symmetrically for good, since the new packages have to build) | 00:31 |
Laney | could do, yeah | 00:32 |
Laney | might correctly make the apps show up as bad | 00:32 |
cjwatson | that was my thought | 00:32 |
cjwatson | I'll try it | 00:32 |
cjwatson | Laney: that didn't have any effect that I noticed. Maybe it doesn't process build-depends for is_good/is_bad :-( | 00:41 |
cjwatson | bed | 00:41 |
cjwatson | Laney: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/72490176/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.haskell-hs3_0.5.6-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz - does missingh need to be rebuilt against current hslogger or something? | 09:09 |
Laney | urgh, yeah | 09:10 |
Laney | thought we'd avoided those this time | 09:10 |
ScottK | Would someone please promote libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev to Main? They come from existing source in Main and will be depends/bulid-depends for the current set of KDE uploads we are preparing. | 14:36 |
doko__ | please file a MIR to document that | 17:02 |
ScottK | doko__: For promotion of a new binary from existing Main source? | 17:11 |
doko__ | yes, it's non obvious; did do the same for other packages too | 17:21 |
ScottK | Sigh. | 17:34 |
=== doko__ is now known as doko | ||
ScottK | doko: Bug #789659 | 21:08 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 789659 in pkg-kde-tools (Ubuntu) "MIR libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789659 | 21:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!