[00:00] <Laney> maybe we'll get this finished in debian over the weekend
[00:00] <Laney> fingers crossed
[00:01] <cjwatson> 33 left, seems doable
[00:01] <Laney> even fewer in sid
[00:02] <cjwatson> hmm, how come we're behind?
[00:02] <cjwatson> or is that just the difference from today?
[00:02] <Laney> a couple of outstanding syncs and today's uploads
[00:03] <cjwatson> oh wow, http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ghc7.html looks good
[00:03] <Laney> that is broken :-(
[00:04] <Laney> http://pkg-haskell.alioth.debian.org/haskell-pkg-graph.pdf is probably the best view
[00:05] <cjwatson> I don't see any Haskell-related sync requests
[00:05] <cjwatson> there was one retry request oddly in the archive queue, for alex
[00:07] <cjwatson> I'll do an autosync run now, might as well
[00:07] <cjwatson> overnight capacity and all
[00:08] <Laney> outstanding> I haven't requested them
[00:08] <cjwatson> ah
[00:08] <Laney> hopefully almost all of the deltas should go away
[00:08] <Laney> I had to introduce a lot in natty due to moving haskell-utf8-string ahead of Debian
[00:09] <cjwatson> yeah
[00:19] <cjwatson> there you go, have a bunch of syncs
[00:31] <cjwatson> Laney: shouldn't we flag .build-depends ~ /ghc6/ as bad?
[00:31] <cjwatson> (but not symmetrically for good, since the new packages have to build)
[00:32] <Laney> could do, yeah
[00:32] <Laney> might correctly make the apps show up as bad
[00:32] <cjwatson> that was my thought
[00:32] <cjwatson> I'll try it
[00:41] <cjwatson> Laney: that didn't have any effect that I noticed.  Maybe it doesn't process build-depends for is_good/is_bad :-(
[00:41] <cjwatson> bed
[09:09] <cjwatson> Laney: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/72490176/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.haskell-hs3_0.5.6-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz - does missingh need to be rebuilt against current hslogger or something?
[09:10] <Laney> urgh, yeah
[09:10] <Laney> thought we'd avoided those this time
[14:36] <ScottK> Would someone please promote libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev to Main?  They come from existing source in Main and will be depends/bulid-depends for the current set of KDE uploads we are preparing.
[17:02] <doko__> please file a MIR to document that
[17:11] <ScottK> doko__: For promotion of a new binary from existing Main source?
[17:21] <doko__> yes, it's non obvious; did do the same for other packages too
[17:34] <ScottK> Sigh.
[21:08] <ScottK> doko: Bug #789659
[21:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 789659 in pkg-kde-tools (Ubuntu) "MIR libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789659