[11:00] urgh, I ought to remove my old transition pages [11:00] spent a while just now looking at ancient output [17:10] s there a reasone why the last natty daily build for preinstalled-headless-armel is being copied in with the current daily headless-preinstalled for oneiric? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-headless/daily-preinstalled/ [17:11] GrueMaster, looks like a bug to me [18:08] I've filed the MIR for promotion of new binary packages from a Main source as doko requested (Bug #789659). In the meantime kde4libs is now depwait and further work on KDE is blocked waiting for libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev. I would appreciate it if someone would promote them so the team can keep working. If the MIR review produces issues, then I'll make sure they are addressed. [18:08] Launchpad bug 789659 in pkg-kde-tools (Ubuntu) "MIR libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789659 [19:31] GrueMaster: long-standing known bug/misfeature in the cdimage code. I'll clean up the stale images in a bit. [19:33] cjwatson: If you have a moment, I'd really appreciate it if you would do the promotion of libdlrestrictions1 and libdlrestrictions-dev I mentioned above? [19:37] doko's been very annoyed with people doing pre-promotions in the past [19:38] though I find it weird that we've started needing MIRs for binaries. When and why did that change? [19:40] No idea. [19:41] Since it's either approve the MIR or carry a permanent significant delta from Debian in all the core KDE packages, I think I know what happens in the end. [19:41] If there's stuff that needs fixing in the new code, we'll work it out with Debian (this is native Debian code) [19:42] So I think the point of the MIR would be to identify issues that ought to be worked out, not do we promote it or not. === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:18] ScottK: done, see bug comment [21:18] Thanks. [21:20] I think the comment makes complete sense.