[00:08] <bazhang> Please don't invite random teams to join   <----- odd mailing to myself as #xubuntu op; in reference to ubuntu-al
[00:09] <bazhang> err me
[00:47] <IdleOne> !membership > omega
[01:50] <Jordan_U> !bootinfo
[01:50] <Jordan_U> !no bootinfo is <reply> Boot info script is a usefull script for diagnosing boot problems. Run the script following the directions here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1291280 and then look at RESULTS.txt (or !pastebin it for others to look at).
[05:15] <bazhang>  vibhav (~vibhav@59.94.140.218) has joined #ubuntu
[05:15] <bazhang> ban evading again vibhav
[05:15] <vibhav> NO
[05:15] <vibhav> I have a dynamic IP
[05:15] <vibhav> Thats why
[05:15] <vibhav> I can prove it
[05:16] <bazhang> thats ban evading
[05:16] <vibhav> but it was not my fault
[05:16] <bazhang> sure it is.
[05:16] <rww> You know you're banned from #ubuntu. You go in #ubuntu anyway. This is bad.
[05:16] <vibhav> Everytime I open my computer , my ip is changed
[05:16] <vibhav> and Xchat always leads me to the Ubuntu Channel
[05:16] <bazhang> vibhav, your chances of being unbanned just went way down.
[05:16] <rww> Then tell it to stop.
[05:17] <vibhav> WHY?
[05:17] <bazhang> rww, you want to handle this, or me
[05:17] <vibhav> Ok I am deleting it from the favourite channels
[05:17] <rww> bazhang: if you're familiar with the history, I'll step back. I'm not.
[05:18] <bazhang> rww, sure, I can handle it
[05:18] <vibhav> vibhav, your chances of being unbanned just went way down Why?
[05:18] <vibhav> And BTW i was goin to offtopic
[05:18] <vibhav> So bazhang why have my chances went down?
[05:19] <vibhav> hey bazhang!
[05:20] <bazhang> vibhav, just a moment please.
[05:20] <vibhav> ok
[05:21] <vibhav> Ban is removed
[05:21] <IdleOne> not it isn't
[05:21] <vibhav> IdleOne removes ban on *!*@59.94.131.220 what does this mean then?
[05:22] <IdleOne> you were told not to return for 96 hours
[05:22] <IdleOne> Now I am wondering if I should just make it a full 30 days
[05:22] <IdleOne> but I am stepping back
[05:23] <vibhav> You removed the ban?
[05:23] <IdleOne> vibhav: bazhang is going to help you in a minute
[05:23] <bazhang> vibhav, please be patient.
[05:23] <vibhav> Ok
[05:24] <Flannel> vibhav: The ban removed was not your ban in #ubuntu, which is currently still there.
[05:24] <vibhav> which ban was removed then Flannel ?
[05:24] <Flannel> vibhav: You were banned in this channel for two minutes.  Prior to that, a ban on someone else was removed (again, in this channel).
[05:25] <Flannel> vibhav: I expect it'll be made clear in english that your #ubuntu banned is removed once it is.  You won't have to try to decypher anything.
[05:25] <vibhav> ok
[05:25] <vibhav> but atleast I can be on the offtopic community?
[05:27] <bazhang> vibhav, sure
[05:28] <bazhang> vibhav, your ban in #ubuntu will be the original 96 hours, provided you dont try to join #ubuntu in that time, nor your MOM using that IP address, etc
[05:28] <bazhang> vibhav, please come back here at that time, and we can then move forward.
[05:29] <vibhav> OK
[08:42] <Jordan_U> WoundedPhoenix in #ubuntu appears to be lying and giving edited (s/parted/fdisk/)output from parted rather than the requested output from fdisk. I have no idea why, and I'm hoping I'm just missing something but I can't explain the output any other way.
[08:43]  * Jordan_U is confused.
[08:46] <rww> I usually shrug and stop replying when that happens. Too many people, too little time.
[08:47] <Jordan_U> This has me intregued though. Either this person is lying about something really odd or something even more odd is happening on their system.
[09:05] <Jordan_U> I learned something new, there is a separate GNU fdisk based on libparted in universe that when installed superceeds util-linux's fdisk.
[09:08] <rww> !nickspam > squirming
[09:10] <rww> hell of an attitude on yagoo all evening, btw.
[09:10] <rww> I almost had words with them about accusing another user of trolling.
[09:27] <vibhav> I have a slight requesy
[09:27] <vibhav> *request*
[09:27] <Tm_T> yes?
[09:28] <vibhav> can my ban be shortened to 48 hours or 72 hours??
[09:28] <Tm_T> no
[09:28] <vibhav> please
[09:29] <Tm_T> we have asked you to stay away until given time, and you still fail to follow it
[09:29] <vibhav> ok
[09:29] <vibhav> Sorry
[11:48] <LjL> @mark #ubuntu yagoo being clueless and mildly annoying
[13:16] <ikonia> vibhav is not getting unbanned soon - he is clearly ot listning to what is being aid to him
[13:19] <Tm_T> ikonia: same in english?
[13:19] <ikonia> "not"
[13:19] <ikonia> "said"
[13:19] <Tm_T> makes sense now (:
[13:19] <ikonia> my keyboard is lagging due to a large repo sync]#
 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=freenode+register
[13:46] <bazhang> !lmgtfy
[13:52] <LjL> bazhang: did you send that and !register to him or shall i?
[13:53] <bazhang> LjL, he presumably saw it the few times others got when asking about it.
[13:53] <bazhang> again, with his 'u' and 'ur' and 'cos' perhaps not
[13:59] <bazhang> Chris_H, hi
[13:59] <Chris_H> Hi, why am I banned in #ubuntu
[13:59] <bazhang> LjL, thanks for getting him to drop the "u"
[13:59] <Chris_H> or is it my username
[14:00] <LjL> let me look at it chris
[14:00] <Chris_H> ok
[14:00] <LjL> Chris_H: you've changed your nickname, that's why
[14:01] <LjL> Chris_H: unfortunately webchat clients have to be treated specially on #Ubuntu
[14:01] <LjL> Chris_H: so if you change nicknames, you need to part and rejoin
[14:01] <LjL> please try doing that
[14:01] <Chris_H> ok
[14:01] <Chris_H> thanks
[14:41] <bazhang> sug is jungli?
[14:42] <bazhang> seem to be from same IP
[14:43] <bazhang> ie victor and alejandro
[14:47] <Tm_T> hmm, all these are from same IP?
[14:47] <bazhang> yep
[14:48] <bazhang>  a simple +q perhaps
[14:48] <Tm_T> ye, about to do that
[14:49] <bazhang> that should fix it
[14:49] <Tm_T> ...I pressed the enter with the same mask at the same time as you did (:
[14:49] <bazhang> hehe
[14:50] <Tm_T> and no, I'm not slow
[14:50] <bazhang> anything but
[14:58] <bazhang> if sug is in fact jungli, he's ban evading again in #ubuntu
[15:09] <rukix1x> quti
[20:14] <LjL> !surround is <reply> If you're having trouble getting surround sound working in Ubuntu, try the instructions on this page: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SurroundSound
[20:14] <Logan_> LjL: thanks :)
[20:14] <LjL> no prob
[20:30] <Amaranth> Dave2: You around? Or any other staff?
[20:30] <Amaranth> Wondering who owns urd
[20:53] <micahg> hi, how do we get ubottu to recognize the xfce bugtracker/
[21:00] <tsimpson> what kind of tracker is it?
[21:05] <charlie-tca> bugzilla.xfce.org
[21:05] <charlie-tca> modified bugzilla, as far as i know
[21:06] <asac> who is tunning the ubotX nowadays?
[21:06] <asac> and running?
[21:06] <tsimpson> depending on the bot, me
[21:06] <asac> ubot2 ;)
[21:07] <tsimpson> then you want jpds
[21:07] <ikonia> bazhang: sug is jungli and he was removed for ban evading using sug yesterday,Corey was pushing this with staff, I note he's done it again
[21:07] <asac> tsimpson: gratias
[21:09] <ikonia> tsimpson: apologies for missing you yesterday
[21:09] <tsimpson> ikonia: no problem
[21:09] <ikonia> tsimpson: my question was around the same as bazhang's I got an email response from the #xubuntu-ops launchpad team, but it's not something I'd triggered, do you know what this was about ?
[21:09] <tsimpson> charlie-tca: ubottu should now work with it
[21:09] <ikonia> the response came from you, hence asking you
[21:10] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[21:10] <micahg> thanks tsimpson
[21:10] <charlie-tca> Great! it does work!
[21:10] <tsimpson> ikonia: LP being silly, it was "to" another team which invited ~irc-xubuntu-ops to join it, but LP apparently isn't too discreet
[21:11] <ikonia> ahh
[21:11] <ikonia> so not something I should be actually bothere about
[21:11] <ikonia> I wondered if something had gone wrong, or I'd actually requested something by accident
[21:11] <tsimpson> nope, they invited just about every team with "ubuntu" in it from what I could tell
[21:12] <charlie-tca> Yes, I don't know who sent the invite out.
[21:12] <charlie-tca> I thought it was me, at first, too.
[21:12] <ikonia> excellent, so another quality team who are just behaving like idiot facebook processes
[21:12] <charlie-tca> yes, but I thought tsimpson responded very good.
[21:13] <ikonia> totally
[21:17] <topyli> yes the reply was nice and to the point
[21:44] <asac> LjL: jpds: hey ho! ... what we would like to have is ubot2 to join #linaro-android on top of #linaro and #linaro-meeting (where it is already) :) ... let me know! thanks!
[21:44] <LjL> i don't manage the ubots, you probably want tsimpson
[21:45] <asac> heh. thats a loop then
[21:45] <LjL> why, did tsimpson tell you to ask me?
[21:45] <asac> jpds said that jpds runs ubot2 ... so i guess i have to wait
[21:45] <asac> LjL: no that was someone else ;)
[21:45] <LjL> i used to run an "ubotwo" but that's long gone :)
[21:45] <asac> kk
[21:45] <asac> and only the runner is admin?
[21:46] <LjL> i'm not sure, maybe the irc council is also admin
[21:48] <nhandler> asac: I think you might want ubot5 (based on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/Bots), which is run by jussi and tsimpson
[21:48]  * asac checks
[21:48] <asac> all i need is lp bugs ;)
[21:49] <asac> ubutu wiki is on snail today again
[21:49] <tsimpson> ubot5 does bugs too
[21:50] <asac> tsimpson: i am happy then ;) ... can you invite him to #linaro-android?
[21:51] <asac> thx!
[21:51] <tsimpson> :)
[21:52] <asac> thanks!
[21:52] <asac> works well
[21:52] <asac> the best bot so far!
[21:52] <asac> has the highest number, so must be best :)
[21:53] <tsimpson> well, it's the newest...
[21:55]  * Flannel goes off to register ubot99
[22:03]  * popey registers ubotA0 through ubotFF
[22:45] <rww> ldunn_fn, soren: please /msg nickserv identify :)
[22:48] <Jordan_U> rww: ':)' isn't a very secure password.
[22:50] <rww> Jordan_U: It's the perfect password. It looks like an emoticon, so if you type it in-channel people don't suspect a thing!
[23:31] <topyli> some say the best password is 'incorrect'
[23:31] <topyli> (if you forget it, your computer will simply tell you what it is)
[23:32] <LjL> when i get my password wrote my computer tells me things like "you type like you drive" :\
[23:32] <LjL> and i don't drive very well :/
[23:34] <rww> sudo insults?
[23:36] <Jordan_U> Anyone against "!dpkglock is <alias> aptlock"?
[23:37] <rww> !aptlock
[23:37] <rww> oh that. works for me
[23:37] <Jordan_U> !dpkglock is <alias> aptlock
[23:43] <topyli> i don't know. isn't it better to hunt down and gracefully kill the process that's responsible?
[23:44] <topyli> not sure, that gets the job done just as well
[23:44] <Flannel> topyli: If there's no process responsible (because it's dead) you need to manually delete the lockfile
[23:45] <topyli> yeah i suppose
[23:45] <rww> fwiw, this has never ever happened to me in all my insane apt wanderings. perhaps I am merely lucky.
[23:45] <topyli> most of the times users just have synaptic runnign somewhere though
[23:45] <LjL> that's why you only use the factoid if you have a clue what's going on :P
[23:46] <Flannel> That's why I always force people to give me a ps aux before recommending it :)
[23:46] <topyli> fair enough :)
[23:46] <Flannel> too many apt/synaptic/adept/whatever-etc's to enumerate
[23:46] <rww> I thought we had another factoid somewhere for gracefully killing the process based on the PID in the lockfile
[23:46] <rww> !search pkill
[23:46] <rww> guess not
[23:47] <rww> !search kill
[23:47] <rww> !opguide
[23:47] <rww> huh, didn't know we had that one.
[23:47] <Flannel> Why does "kill" return that?
[23:47] <topyli> we do. feel free to improve
[23:47] <Flannel> oh, skills.
[23:47] <Jordan_U> It's apropos still :)
[23:47] <rww> topyli: i meant the factoid, not the guide
[23:48] <topyli> ah
[23:49] <topyli> grr it's late again and i'm pretty sure tomorrow will bring another morning
[23:49] <Flannel> topyli: That usually happens, yes.
[23:49] <LjL> is there any hope :(
[23:50] <Jordan_U> rww: I don't see any PID in my lock file here, it's just empty.
[23:50] <rww> maybe i'm thinking of something else then
[23:52] <Jordan_U> Interestingly the lock file is still there after dpkg finished.