[01:15] <cafuego> spiv: Thanks for the 'nest' tip the other day. I'm using that now and it makes for far prettier version numbers :-)
[04:11] <MTeck> OOPS-1978DY9 when trying to deactivate my user account :(
[04:18] <MTeck> Any ideas what's going on?
[04:22] <StevenK> MTeck: It was trying to remove you from all of your teams when it hit the timeout.
[04:22] <MTeck> StevenK: ah... so maybe I should go through and remove one by one?
[04:23] <StevenK> MTeck: That might help, yes.
[04:23] <MTeck> grrr......
[04:23] <MTeck> and this is exactly why I want to remove my account..... just toooooo much going on that everyone wants me to do :P
[04:27] <MTeck> StevenK: thanks for checking on that
[04:27] <MTeck> StevenK: not by chance any way you could deactivate on your end easier?
[04:38] <lifeless> MTeck: no, our tools run the same code
[04:38] <MTeck> oh
[08:10] <yofel> hm, recently if I press on the 'build now' link on a recipe I get 'All requested builds are already queued' like it checks whether it should build *after* it has processed my request. Bug? (Doesn't actually break anything, just confusing UI)
[08:13] <henninge> yofel: I remember discussing that UI in a review. What would you expect it to say?
[08:15] <yofel> henninge: I think 'all requested builds have been queued'. The 'already' makes it sound like you tried to request a build that you already requested. Which you did not
[08:16] <philip_stoev> hi, how do I remove a project from a bug , e.g .https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria/+bug/789632 should not have "Maria" attached to it, but I am unable to
[08:16] <philip_stoev> find a button to remove it
[08:17] <henninge> yofel: can you give me an example url, please?
[08:17] <yofel> henninge: well, happened on https://code.launchpad.net/~neon/+recipe/project-neon-runtime - but it only shows up with ajax when you press the build now link
[08:18] <maxb> henninge: This is the "Build now" AJAX link for invoking daily builds ahead of schedule
[08:18] <yofel> I can give you a screenshot later
[08:18] <maxb> I have noticed the behaviour that yofel mentions too
[08:18] <maxb> I think it must be a regression
[08:18] <henninge> yofel: I know that, I just need to be reminded how it looks
[08:18] <maxb> When the feature was originally released, it behaved better
[08:18] <yofel> right, it did say something different before, can't remember what though
[08:19] <maxb> It said something like "4 builds scheduled"
[08:20] <henninge> yofel, maxb: I am pretty sure that wording was deliberate. But please file a bug about it.
[08:21] <henninge> philip_stoev: I think marking it as "Invalid" is all you can do.
[08:21] <philip_stoev> henninge: I did already, but it looks ugly ...
[08:22] <henninge> philip_stoev: I am sorry. ;)
[08:24] <yofel> philip_stoev: IIRC you can move it to the 'Null' project, but not remove it
[08:24] <maxb> henninge: It's not the wording that is at issue here. I think the problem is that something is going wrong in requestbuild_overlay.js, and display_build_records is already returning zero
[08:26] <henninge> maxb: Ok, it's been too long that I reviewed this, I can't remember how it was supposed to work and why... ;)
[08:26] <henninge> If you feel it is a bug, please file it.
[08:31] <maxb> will do
[10:40] <dpm> hi, someone is trying to translate scilab and found out that some templates are somehow untranslatable, here is an example: https://translations.launchpad.net/scilab/trunk/+pots/double - does anyone have an idea of what's going on with those templates?
[10:43] <henninge> dpm: it looks like the template files were empty.
[10:44] <henninge> https://translations.launchpad.net/scilab/trunk/+templates
[10:44] <henninge> dpm: usually you get this state between approval of a new template and completed import of the template.
[10:44] <dpm> henninge, ah, yeah, good point, I forgot I could look at the templates list also for projects :)
[10:44] <henninge> dpm: so either the template file was empty or the queue entry was deleted before it was imported.
[10:45] <dpm> henninge, there is still something else, the stats don't match here: https://translations.launchpad.net/scilab/trunk/+lang/uk there is a total of 308 untranslated messages, but in the templates themselves it seems that there are only 114 untranslated ones
[10:46] <henninge> don't bother me about stats
[10:46] <henninge> ;-P
[10:46] <henninge> dpm: stats are broken and I have no idea in what way. jtv might know more but I think that really the whole stats business needs some series re-thinking and/or fixing.
[10:47] <dpm> ok, I'll forward that to the translator then ;)
[10:47] <henninge> dpm: ok, not really broken, but I just as lost as you are.
[10:47] <dpm> np
[11:15] <czajkowski> Aloha
[11:53] <spiv> losa ping: codehosting SSH seems to be down (gives “Permission denied (publickey).” when I try to connect)
[11:53] <mthaddon> spiv: checking
[11:54] <spiv> Although, hmm, maybe intermittent?
[11:54] <mthaddon> spiv: we're applying a firmware update to one of the frontends - question is why isn't it failing over properly
[11:54] <spiv> Certainly http://package-import.ubuntu.com/status/ is seeing lots of transient failures
[11:55] <spiv> mthaddon: cosmic rays and/or pixies I suppose
[11:55] <mthaddon> all the xmlrpc backends seem fine...
[11:58] <mthaddon> spiv: it should be back soon, but we'll want to figure out why this failed after the fact - last time we did this it worked fine... :(
[11:58] <spiv> I'm still observing it happen intermittently.
[11:58] <spiv> Ok.
[11:59] <mthaddon> spiv: still happening? the server just came back
[12:01] <spiv> mthaddon: Not that I can see; I just made 10 successfully authenticated SSH connections in a row
[12:01] <mthaddon> ok thx - sorry about that, we'll have to look into what the problem was
[12:01] <spiv> Before I was getting a failure maybe 1 in 4 times?  (not a metric)
[12:11] <henninge> adeuring: Hi! I am off to lunch! ;-)
[12:11] <adeuring> henninge: ok
[15:33] <deryck> adeuring, my turn now
[15:34] <adeuring> deryck: thanks!
[15:54] <TheSheep> hello guys, I have recently received an 'invitation declined' e-mail from launchpad, for an invitation that I'm sure I didn't send. I suspect my account has been compromised, but I can't seem to find any way to change the password?
[15:55] <TheSheep> The only option I see now is deactivating my account, but I'd like to avoid that if possible.
[16:08] <deryck> Hi, TheSheep
[16:08] <deryck> TheSheep, can you paste me the message text or forwarded it to me in email, for me to take a look?
[16:11] <TheSheep> deryck: is /msg ok?
[16:15] <TheSheep> deryck: I've mailed it to you via launchpad
[16:15] <TheSheep> (btw, you are not identified)
[16:17] <deryck> TheSheep, thanks!  Sorry for no reply.  Desktop locked on me.
[16:18]  * deryck is still getting all the windows open from last session
[16:19] <TheSheep> deryck: but aside from that, there must be some way to change the password?
[16:20] <TheSheep> deryck: I've looked at help, but it only tells me how to close the account
[16:20] <deryck> TheSheep, yes.  See:  https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/51
[16:21] <TheSheep> thanks
[16:21] <deryck> np
[16:22] <deryck> TheSheep, and FWIW, this email doesn't look suspicious to me.  It's the standard mail sent to teams when a membership is declined for someone....
[16:22] <deryck> TheSheep, if the team doesn't have a mailing list, the mail goes to each member.
[16:22] <TheSheep> deryck: the suspicious thing is I didn't invite anyone
[16:23] <deryck> TheSheep, right.  but anyone could have tried to add this team, and everyone would get this mail once the team was rejected, assuming your team doesn't have a mailing list set as contact.
[16:23] <TheSheep> oh
[16:23] <TheSheep> that's confusing, it's specifically addressed to me, with my name in the heading
[16:25] <deryck> TheSheep, hmmm, and I do see you have a mailing list set for the team.
[16:25] <deryck> sinzui, could I send you the email TheSheep just sent me, and let you see if this looks suspicious?
[16:25] <sinzui> okay
[16:26] <sinzui> TheSheep: are you the only admin in the team?
[16:26] <sinzui> The headers in the team emails are very bad
[16:26] <TheSheep> sinzui: no, I din't even know I'm an admin
[16:26] <sinzui> They no not really explain who and why you get emails
[16:28] <deryck> sinzui, sent
[16:29] <TheSheep> actually, I'm not an admin in that team
[16:29] <deryck> sinzui, I assumed these would go to the list if they had a mailing list for contact.
[16:30] <sinzui> invitations are between admins, not teams
[16:31] <sinzui> deryck: This list of invited looks wrong https://launchpad.net/~linux-traipu
[16:32] <deryck> sinzui, yeah, that does look weird.
[16:32] <sinzui> I think someone randomly selected teams (I believe that may only be ~mauricio-machado at this moment)
[16:39] <sinzui> deryck: TheSheep, the email is fine. The headers and footer are too ambiguous to explain that each member got the email invitation decline. Invitations/proposals may not always state who initiated the proposal/invitiation
[16:40] <sinzui> deryck: We need to look that the personnotification code to very it selects the right users. I believe the email should have gone only to ~irc-xubuntu-ops admins
[16:41] <deryck> sinzui -- right, that's what I was thinking.  And I just noticed, TheSheep, was in the group declined, not the group doing the declining.  That's what threw me off.
[16:42] <sinzui> deryck: I think the code is in lp.registry. It is pre-job system
[16:42] <deryck> ok
[20:02] <Andre_Gondim> what's the url that dev launchpad to tests?
[20:33] <deryck> abentley, pitching to you now.
[20:33] <abentley> deryck: roger.
[20:34] <deryck> Andre_Gondim, you mean our staging server?  Or whan hacking locally?
[20:34] <deryck> s/whan/when/
[20:34] <Andre_Gondim> staging
[20:34] <Andre_Gondim> thanks
[21:51] <dart> I think a recent natty update to xorg has messed my system...Where do i report this?
[21:54] <micahg> dart: #ubuntu-bugs can help you file a bug
[23:06] <cjohnston> Is it possible to find out who approved someone to be a member of a restricted team?
[23:09] <lifeless> hmm, we have the fields
[23:09] <lifeless> perhaps via the API
[23:10] <lifeless> proposed_by, acknowledged_by, approved_by
[23:10] <lifeless> sorry, s/approved/reviewed/
[23:10] <lifeless> on the team membership record
[23:35] <cjohnston> thanks lifeless