[05:19] <nigelb> Good morning
[13:24] <daker> no rss pictogram :/
[13:42] <YoBoY> daker: http://ubuntu-party.org/wp-content/themes/ubuntu-party_light/images/icons/up_rss.svg << like this ?
[14:23] <daker> YoBoY, yes but it's not orange :/
[14:27] <YoBoY> it's a svg, just change the color, the size, whatever :)
[14:30] <YoBoY> I use it without colors, and have a separate round colored background to make an effect on mouse hover
[14:31] <daker> ok thanks
[14:31] <YoBoY> my png file : http://ubuntu-party.org/wp-content/themes/ubuntu-party_light/images/icons/up_rss.png not really usefull for you (and the orange background : http://ubuntu-party.org/wp-content/themes/ubuntu-party_light/images/icons/up_fondO64.png )
[14:33] <daker> ok
[17:45] <nigelb> render.py is pure evil.
[17:50] <cjohnston> I blame nigelb
[17:51] <nigelb> I haven't touched.
[17:51] <nigelb> Yet.
[18:25] <Flimm> Is there anyway I can help get help.ubuntu.com's theme updated?
[18:27] <mhall119> Flimm: hmmm, it is a moinmoin site?
[18:28] <Flimm> mhall119: everything under /community definitely is
[18:29] <mhall119> well that can use the moin theme that is currently used on wiki.ubuntu.com
[18:29] <mhall119> not sure about the rest of the site
[18:30] <Flimm> Do you know who to contact?
[18:30] <Flimm> It seems like nobody on the documentation team has enough access to do it
[18:31] <mhall119> looks like there's already a bug to track it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/589057
[18:31] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 589057 in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) "help.ubuntu.com still uses old logo/branding (affects: 3) (heat: 21)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[18:32] <Flimm> Shall I add ubuntu-website project to that bug?
[18:33] <mhall119> yeah, that'll at least put it on someone else's radar too
[18:42] <cjohnston> Flimm: I believe it will be up to the docs team to get the theme done, and then IS will be able to update it. adding ubuntu-website will not be able to help in the process
[18:51] <Flimm> cjohnston: IS?
[18:51] <cjohnston> The sysadmins
[18:52] <Flimm> Do they have a mailing list?
[18:52] <cjohnston> They have a ticketing system..  When the theme is ready, you submit a ticket.
[18:53] <cjohnston> Flimm: read my response on bug 589057
[18:53] <Flimm> Oh, OK
[18:53] <ubot4`> Launchpad bug 589057 in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "help.ubuntu.com still uses old logo/branding (affects: 4) (heat: 22)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/589057
[18:55] <Flimm> cjohnston: brilliant
[18:56] <cjohnston> So, if the docs team can get the theme ready, I'll be happy to review it, and then assist in getting it released
[18:57] <Flimm> OK, great.
[18:57] <Flimm> It just seemed to me like everybody was waiting for everybody else to get this resolved
[18:57] <Flimm> Glad we've got some action points now
[18:58] <cjohnston> I thought that was all discussed and all at uds
[18:59] <Flimm> Didn't go to UDS, what I've gathered since is that there are definitely plans to overhaul help.ubuntu.com
[18:59] <cjohnston> ya
[18:59] <Flimm> I was hoping that in the mean time, we could switch help.ubuntu.com's moinmoin theme to the new branding
[19:00] <cjohnston> the switching the theme should be pretty easy since there is somethign to start from
[19:00] <Flimm> I'm only just getting into the contributing with the documentation team
[19:00] <cjohnston> gotcha
[19:01] <Flimm> I was surprised to find out that help.ubuntu.com is actually considered to be the place to go for documentation
[19:01] <Flimm> whereas wiki.ubuntu.com is just supposed to be a wiki of random pages for any Ubuntu releated teams
[19:01] <cjohnston> yup
[19:02] <cjohnston> part of it is you dont want just anyone changing the documentation
[19:02] <Flimm> I'd always assumed that help.ubuntu.com was leftover from old releases, and I never trusted the documentation there
[19:02] <Flimm> Makes sense
[19:03] <Flimm> Anyway, I think my misconception was because of the look and feel of the page, hence why I'm here
[19:03] <cjohnston> ya
[19:03] <cjohnston> its.... well... hehe
[19:14] <YoBoY> maintaining documentation is a never-ended work in progress, it's really hard
[19:15] <Flimm> yeah
[19:26] <YoBoY> only 3684 pages on the community documentation... people seems to have switched to another support sources (like stackexchange?)