| michaelh1 | Hi there. Can a public project have private branches? I want to start a project for the Linaro benchmarks which will have public scripts, some public results, some private results, and some private licensed benchmarks | 02:29 |
|---|---|---|
| persia | michaelh1: No. The usual procedure in that case is to have parallel projects (e.g. foo and foo-private). | 02:34 |
| michaelh1 | persia: OK. How can I create a private project? | 02:34 |
| michaelh1 | (I already have a private group ~linaro-toolchain-benchmarks) | 02:35 |
| maco | pay canonical | 02:35 |
| michaelh1 | Already am :) | 02:35 |
| persia | Contact the LP admins. It's a commercial service. I think (but don't know) that one starts by asking a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 02:36 |
| michaelh1 | Ta. | 02:36 |
| wgrant | michaelh1: Does Linaro not have documented processes for requesting private projects? | 02:36 |
| maco | huh. interesting that the "register a project" page doesnt have a "i want to make this private [ ]" checkbox | 02:36 |
| wgrant | maco: There's no such thing as a private project yet. | 02:37 |
| wgrant | They can have private bugs and branches by default. | 02:37 |
| wgrant | But there are no private projects. | 02:37 |
| maco | ooh. well still, is there like a checkbox to be like "make this private and charge me $x"? | 02:37 |
| wgrant | Normally you'd select that your project's license is proprietary, and then purchase and apply a commercial usage voucher to the project. | 02:39 |
| wgrant | But Linaro is a bit special. | 02:39 |
| * michaelh1 feels special | 02:41 | |
| persia | The specialness ought be masked in invoicing details, rather than exposed in the intereface. | 02:41 |
| wgrant | Certainly. | 02:41 |
| michaelh1 | wgrant: no on the process. I'm sending Joey and Kiko an email asking... | 02:41 |
| wgrant | michaelh1: They are both former Launchpadders, so they are probably best, yes. | 02:41 |
| wgrant | Launchpad' | 02:41 |
| wgrant | s present privacy offerings were designed in 2007 or so and have not been touched since. They are known to be suboptimal. | 02:42 |
| wgrant | My squad is currently working on fixing this to suck a bit less. | 02:42 |
| wgrant | But it's not there yet. | 02:42 |
| === smoser` is now known as smoser | ||
| === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
| === jtv is now known as jtv-afk | ||
| === jtv-afk is now known as jtv | ||
| dart | hello, the new ubuntu mono font in launchpad is too small to read | 09:45 |
| dart | can i increase it in settings? | 09:46 |
| === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
| lag | How do you remove a single package from a PPA? | 09:59 |
| bigjools | Click "View packlage details" then click "Delete packages" | 10:00 |
| candrea | Hello! Could someone please take a look at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/159992 ? | 10:02 |
| bigjools | candrea: done | 10:04 |
| candrea | bigjools, thanks! | 10:04 |
| bigjools | np | 10:04 |
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| candrea | bigjools, I'm done with the project; feel free to change the ownership back to ~registry | 10:13 |
| bigjools | candrea: you need to do that yourself | 10:14 |
| candrea | bigjools, right, done | 10:15 |
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| === jtv is now known as jtv-eat | ||
| === matsubara-afk is now known as matsubara | ||
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| === deryck changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: deryck | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| === transitlogger is now known as apachelogger | ||
| === apachelogger is now known as randalogger | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
| === dpm_ is now known as dpm | ||
| apw | can anyone tell me why the pickers are not working on bug #791918 | 17:22 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 791918 in linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Hardy) "CVE-2011-1746" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/791918 | 17:22 |
| micahg | apw: you mean the AJAX selectors? | 17:31 |
| apw | micahg, erm, i mean the popups normally connected to the pencils on the stautus fields etc | 17:31 |
| micahg | yeah, it's because there are too many tasks, I'm looking for the bug | 17:32 |
| apw | micahg, ergle | 17:32 |
| deryck | apw, yeah, we disabled that intentionally for bugs with lots of tasks. it's a shortcoming in how that code was written, where pages would hang setting up the icons.... | 17:34 |
| micahg | deryck: I can't seem to find the bug... | 17:34 |
| apw | damn, those are exactly the bugs where you really need them | 17:34 |
| deryck | apw, we want to fix it so we have js icons and quick render, too. but it's not yet been a priority. | 17:34 |
| deryck | apw, yeah | 17:34 |
| deryck | micahg, let me see if we have a bug. there may just be the one that was marked fix. the slow render one. | 17:35 |
| deryck | micahg, apw -- I cannot find a bug either. not an old or new one. Can one of you file a bug about needing this back? | 17:41 |
| * micahg digs a little more | 17:41 | |
| deryck | it was intentional to remove it until we could address the performance issues, but we need a bug tracking that we should fix said performance issues and bring it back :) | 17:42 |
| * micahg remembers being showed the bug at one point... | 17:45 | |
| micahg | apw: can you file a new one? | 17:45 |
| apw | micahg, against which thing | 17:46 |
| micahg | apw: launchpad | 17:46 |
| apw | https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/791936 | 17:48 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 791936 in Launchpad itself "AJAX selectors not available on bugs with large numbers of tasks" [Undecided,New] | 17:48 |
| apw | micahg, ^^ | 17:49 |
| micahg | apw: looks good, I figure lifeless will probably remember if there's a duplicate or not | 17:50 |
| deryck | micahg, apw I've commented and triaged that bug. Thanks for filing it! | 17:58 |
| deryck | It should be fixed, so it's high. but unfortunately, I have no idea when someone will get to it with the number of critical issues we have open at the moment. | 17:59 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| deryck | abentley, I'll pass to you now. | 18:40 |
| === deryck changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Help contact: abentley | Launchpad is an open source project: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | This channel is logged: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | ||
| abentley | deryck: aye aye. | 18:40 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| Renegade15 | good day | 20:24 |
| Renegade15 | in the sidebar, Launchpad is telling me I'm at 100% configuration, but complains "Launchpad needs to know where the user can submit code"...how do I tell it that? | 20:25 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Darxus | Pedro Villavicencio's habbit of marking bugs incomplete just because they're old is pissing me off. | 20:56 |
| micahg | Darxus: you should talk to pedro in #ubuntu-bugs about that, nothing to do with #launchpad | 20:58 |
| Darxus | Thanks, sorry. | 20:59 |
| Renegade15 | in the sidebar, Launchpad is telling me I'm at 100% configuration, but complains "Launchpad needs to know where the user can submit code"...how do I tell it that? | 21:01 |
| === Renegade|ghost is now known as Renegade15 | ||
| abentley | Renegade15: Have you set a development focus yet? That might be it. | 21:19 |
| Renegade15 | I have indeed, and it is connected to a branch...the branch is a git import, though, can that be the reason? | 21:20 |
| abentley | Renegade15: that could be the reason. That area seems to have changed recently. Used to be you could set whether the project used Launchpad for Code. | 21:22 |
| abentley | Renegade15: what project is this? | 21:22 |
| Renegade15 | openyr - it's fairly new | 21:22 |
| abentley | Renegade15: I think the text is inaccurate-- if development happens elsewhere, then users definitely can't submit code. | 21:24 |
| Renegade15 | I see | 21:25 |
| Renegade15 | I'll send users around in the description, then. I was just wondering if I was missing a piece of config | 21:26 |
| Renegade15 | thank you :) | 21:26 |
| abentley | Renegade15: No problem. | 21:26 |
| Renegade15 | see ya | 21:26 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| maxb | Hrm. it is irksome not being able to retry a binary build resulting from a recipe build | 23:37 |
| lifeless | I think we should allow that | 23:38 |
| lifeless | but we need a solution to the unique-version-string-thing | 23:38 |
| maxb | how does that impact retrying binary builds? | 23:40 |
| lifeless | hmm | 23:40 |
| lifeless | ah | 23:41 |
| lifeless | ok, so I didn't click to your point | 23:41 |
| lifeless | do we really not permit that? | 23:41 |
| maxb | Apparently not | 23:41 |
| lifeless | iz bug | 23:41 |
| maxb | Boo, I tried to cheat via the WS, but it threw an AssertionError :-) | 23:42 |
| mwhudson | that means it oopsed i guess, which makes it critical at least! | 23:48 |
| maxb | x-lazr-oopsid: OOPS-1979AY85 :-) | 23:51 |
| ubot5 | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1979AY85 | 23:51 |
| maxb | ooh | 23:52 |
| maxb | All recipe builds end with something like ~lucid1 | 23:53 |
| maxb | It would be awesome if they snooped the target archive before they started the build, and incremented the final digit until there was no published source that they would collide with | 23:53 |
| wgrant | maxb: Huh, you should be able to retry binary builds. There's no difference. | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!