[01:48] has oneiric alpha 1 hit testdrive yet? [03:38] wcchandler, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/ [03:39] has the images being tested. [03:57] Xubuntu tests are completed except wubi, which I can not do (no windows) [03:57] Kubuntu alternate tests are done except OEM, which fails for the same bug as the live install [03:57] Kubuntu optional tests are not done for alternate images [04:39] ⚝ [04:39] :D [10:28] brendand, ping [10:29] jibel - hey [14:18] hggdh, ping [14:20] jibel: how we looking today? Do we need more tests done? [14:21] charlie-tca, Hey charlie-tca , looks good, but we never have enough tests done :-) [14:21] charlie-tca, is there a bug report about the broken screen reader install ? [14:23] no, there is a blueprint that accessibility will not be ready for alpha1 [14:23] We can't make it work until unity makes 2d work [14:24] The importance of accessibility is always secondary to making the rest work first [14:44] jibel, pong [14:55] hggdh, Good morning Sir! [14:56] hggdh, I fail to understand the result matrix for ec2, what's the status of alpha1 testing ? [15:17] jibel, looking [15:18] jibel, ugh! A lot of tests failed [15:19] jibel, we now have to transpose the results, I will start on it [15:19] jibel, but, to answer your question (what is the status of alpha1 testing for ec2): done, barfing right and left [15:21] jibel, James already entered the data [15:22] er, _is_ entering [15:22] hggdh, oh nice, we need more James :-) [15:23] jenkins runs the tests, james enters the results, that's perfect. [15:30] heh [15:30] we are looking at an automation thingie for Oneiric, also [15:34] hggdh, if you can export the results from jenkins in a sane format, we can update the tracker automatically quite easily [15:35] hggdh, hm, I'm testing lightdm and I guess it killed my netbook :( [15:42] jibel, oh, thank you -- I am *not* going to test lightDM [15:42] jibel, yes, I think exporting the results would not be complex [15:48] aw, lightDM is fun to test :-) [15:49] hggdh: I can't seem to crash dasher in natty today [15:51] charlie-tca, good! (I think) [15:52] This is dasher testing day, too [16:55] patrickmw, do you have the privileges to change the topic of the channel ? [16:57] jibel, I do on certain channels, but I don't recall which ones. I can try changing this channel... send me what you'd like it to be [16:57] patrickmw, "Currently testing Oneiric Alpha 1 candidates | http://qa.ubuntu.com/testing/iso-testing/ | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com" [16:58] jibel, boo, I can't change this channel. I always bug ara :) [16:58] ara ^^^ :) [16:59] ara_ ^ === ara_ is now known as ara [17:00] pedro_, how did I do to make myself op? :D [17:00] (same questions over and over again) [17:00] ara, IIRC /msg chanserv op #ubuntu-testing [17:01] pedro_, cool, that worked [17:01] nice :-) === ara changed the topic of #ubuntu-testing to: Currently testing Oneiric Alpha 1 candidates | http://qa.ubuntu.com/testing/iso-testing/ | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com [19:54] hi jibel [19:54] jibel - would extra mago tests be seen as a valuable contribution? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [20:52] Just wanted to say thank you to everyone here who's helped test Alpha 1. Very much appreciate your efforts, and wanted to let you know its been released. :) [20:54] Thank you, skaet . We are gaining knowlege every time. [20:55] Thanks charlie-tca, indeed we are. :) [21:24] Sorry for the lack of macbook tests. I had allocated time on Tue, but the images weren't ready yet. Have the mac tests been dropped? [21:25] skaet, ^ [21:25] They were for alpha1, yes [21:26] charlie-tca, I see. But they'll be back for alpha2? Was there a particular problem there? [21:26] The idea was to have the tests that were done on the tracker for the release [21:26] They should be back for alpha2 [21:26] Makes sense. THanks. [21:26] Thank you for dropping by [21:27] I had to catch a plane on Wed and couldn't wait for the ISOs. I'll test them next week. And I'll be around for alpha2, and beyond. [21:27] it happens [22:19] cyphermox: echo $(cd "$directory" 2>/dev/null && pwd || echo "$directory")/$filename [22:19] thanks [22:19] cyphermox: where directory is $(dirname $path) and filename is $(basename $path) [22:19] yeah. I was thinking of using dirname to work through what I need [22:19] cyphermox: that should translate pretty well to C [22:19] yup [22:20] cyphermox: shell actually works well for inspiration in this particular case because string processing is just as crap as in C :) [22:20] I was really hoping to avoid changing directories though :/