micahg | hey, the global menu in akregator started working randomly... | 00:42 |
---|---|---|
randalogger | ScottK: phonon now officially commits to the kde minor point release policy | 00:48 |
* debfx watches the dots while running pull-debian-source kdeartwork | 01:09 | |
randalogger | oh, I should go to bed | 01:11 |
randalogger | ScottK: is it leate yet? | 01:12 |
debfx | JontheEchidna: you haven't converted some cdbs cruft to dhmk in kdeartwork | 01:17 |
debfx | JontheEchidna: I'll fix that and upload | 01:17 |
JontheEchidna | armel opengl stuff? | 01:18 |
debfx | yep | 01:18 |
JontheEchidna | yeah, I wasn't sure how to exactly do that | 01:18 |
randalogger | kubuntu on arrrrrm | 01:19 |
* micahg is trying to make xubuntu on arm | 01:19 | |
randalogger | micahg: that is just wrong, you should make kubuntu on arrrrm :P | 01:24 |
randalogger | also I should really go to bed | 01:24 |
randalogger | like desperately | 01:24 |
randalogger | nites | 01:24 |
debfx | JontheEchidna: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kdeartwork/ubuntu/revision/112#debian/rules | 01:25 |
JontheEchidna | oh, cool | 01:26 |
JontheEchidna | simple | 01:26 |
debfx | yeah it is | 01:38 |
debfx | uploading kdeartworks however is not that easy | 01:38 |
debfx | could one of you core-devs please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~debfx/ubuntu-seeds/kubuntu.oneiric/+merge/63320 | 01:57 |
debfx | should help us a bit to return to a sane image size | 01:58 |
JontheEchidna | debfx: sure | 02:53 |
JontheEchidna | debfx: done, thanks | 02:55 |
ScottK | randalogger: No. It's not late yet. | 04:55 |
ScottK | It's still before midnight here. | 04:55 |
ScottK | randalogger: The arm boxen are back up, but the 100 box doesn't have it's bigger /var/cache mounted. I missed one step in the instructions when directing what needed doing to bring them back to life. | 04:56 |
ScottK | It should be fine for building stuff smaller than Qt. | 04:57 |
ScottK | I'll be home tomorrow evening and can fix it properly then. | 04:57 |
=== jjesse_ is now known as jjesse | ||
debfx | yofel: I think we can drop the dolphin-plugins transitional package as it isn't in lucid | 09:03 |
yofel | debfx: yes, as long as the new 4.6.3 package never makes it back into natty, anything that gets put into natty in some way needs it | 10:44 |
yofel | so I would say keep it and drop it for 4.7 | 10:45 |
debfx | yofel: I hope no one puts 4.6 into natty | 10:50 |
debfx | ah, wait | 10:51 |
yofel | depends if we want to resync the natty PPA with the new packaging | 10:51 |
debfx | yofel: when you upgrade to natty the transitional package gets pulled in | 10:51 |
debfx | yofel: nevermind, I confused natty with lucid | 10:52 |
yofel | yes, I'm just thinking whether we want to put 4.6.5 with new or old packaging into natty-updates. If we use new ones it might not work | 10:52 |
debfx | we don't want the new ones, such drastic packaging changes don't qualify for a SRU | 10:54 |
yofel | k, then drop it | 10:54 |
debfx | has anyone found a way to make authentication in launchpadlib work? | 10:58 |
yofel | as in login_with() ? | 10:59 |
debfx | not sure, whatever ubuntu-dev-tools uses in natty | 11:00 |
yofel | uh, no idea, they had some manager-credentials command or so IIRC | 11:01 |
debfx | that was the old system afaik | 11:01 |
* debfx tries the unencrypted storage backend | 11:02 | |
yofel | then they probably use the keyring now | 11:02 |
debfx | yeah, the kwallet backend seems to be broken beyond repair | 11:07 |
randalogger | yay | 11:21 |
debfx | randalogger: do you know anyone we could poke for https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/100157/ ? | 11:23 |
randalogger | ScottK: I only get connected to 2 arms, what gives? | 11:47 |
jussi | randalogger: I got my mx53 today :D | 11:50 |
jussi | Quintasan: ScottK ^^^:D | 11:50 |
randalogger | debfx: sho | 11:53 |
randalogger | in #konversation | 11:53 |
randalogger | that is eike hein | 11:53 |
randalogger | s/that/he | 11:54 |
randalogger | cant type while people talk all the time | 11:54 |
randalogger | jussi: congrats | 11:56 |
jussi | randalogger: I cant wait to get home and play :) | 11:57 |
* Quintasan 's PC is working | 12:17 | |
Quintasan | jussi: \o/ | 12:17 |
Quintasan | jussi: I almost got it sorted out, now they whine about that the package says price is $149 whereas I have paid $99 | 12:18 |
jussi | oh lol | 12:18 |
jussi | Quintasan: want a scan of one of the vouchers? | 12:18 |
Quintasan | I asked Freescale to send FedEx a statement that it is $99 indeed and I still got no response | 12:19 |
Quintasan | jussi: Sure, I wonder if they will accept one but it is worth a try | 12:19 |
yofel | Yay :) | 12:19 |
jussi | Quintasan: pm me your email addy | 12:19 |
ScottK | randalogger: I didn't check all 4, so I'm not sure. I'll check it in detail tonight when I've got physical access to the boxen again. | 13:14 |
randalogger | ScottK: okok | 13:18 |
randalogger | ScottK: not doing anything right now anyway | 13:19 |
randalogger | !find autoreconf.mk | 13:20 |
ubottu | File autoreconf.mk found in dh-autoreconf | 13:20 |
=== rdieter is now known as rdieter_work | ||
sithlord48 | can any one help me pack a deb file here ? i think my problem is it has two executibles being build. after running debuild i do get a deb file but its list of installed files do not list anything for /usr/bin | 15:41 |
ScottK | sithlord48: Is this a package you intend to try to get into the official repository? | 15:43 |
sithlord48 | ScottK: no my ppa, | 15:43 |
ScottK | sithlord48: #ubuntu-packaging is the best place to ask about that then. | 15:44 |
sithlord48 | yea no answer there. | 15:44 |
ScottK | It's OT here since this channel is about Kubuntu development. | 15:44 |
randalogger | we refactor all KDE MM userbase pages to be one sentence related to .prn | 15:44 |
randalogger | highly efficient \o/ | 15:45 |
sithlord48 | ScottK: is packaging not part of development | 15:51 |
ScottK | sithlord48: Packaging for random PPAs is not part of Kubuntu development. | 15:51 |
shadeslayer | huh | 16:37 |
shadeslayer | for some reason my extra cmake flags are not picked up during kdeedu compilation, http://paste.kde.org/77881/ | 16:43 |
shadeslayer | not even -DMARBLE_PLUGIN_PATH | 16:44 |
shadeslayer | and just noticed something else | 16:44 |
ScottK | shadeslayer: You did notice we're not using CDBS anymore, right? | 16:45 |
shadeslayer | ScottK: i haven't modded any part of the rules except line 10 to 13 | 16:45 |
shadeslayer | and line 19 ofcourse | 16:45 |
ScottK | Isn't debian-qt-kde.mk for CDBS? | 16:48 |
* ScottK thought there was something different for DH. | 16:48 | |
ScottK | dhmk or some such. | 16:48 |
yofel | ScottK: depends if it's 2/ or 1/ | 16:48 |
shadeslayer | ^^ | 16:48 |
yofel | 1/ is cdbs, 2/ dhmk | 16:48 |
ScottK | Ah. | 16:48 |
ScottK | It's 2 | 16:48 |
ScottK | Good then. | 16:48 |
shadeslayer | http://paste.kde.org/77887 << fixed it a bit | 16:49 |
* ScottK is leaving for the airport, so good luck. | 16:49 | |
shadeslayer | cya | 16:49 |
shadeslayer | here's the build log where you can see it doesn't pick up any of the options : http://paste.kde.org/77893 | 16:50 |
shadeslayer | lin 1953 | 16:50 |
shadeslayer | okay figured it all out | 17:20 |
bambee | evening | 19:04 |
bambee | http://paste.ubuntu.com/617719/ <--- wtf ? | 19:04 |
bambee | (line 6) | 19:04 |
LaserJock | do you need oneiric's pkg-kde-tools to build the Debian 4.6.3 packages? | 19:05 |
debfx | LaserJock: yes, but it's also in natty-backports | 19:06 |
yofel | bambee: that looks about right if you're on oneiric | 19:07 |
yofel | don't dist-upgrade ;) | 19:07 |
bambee | how do you upgrade your oneiric ? | 19:08 |
cnd | I've got a fix for bug 785433 in Qt pushed as a merge proposal at https://code.launchpad.net/~utouch-team/qt/touch-end-fix/+merge/63417 | 19:08 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 785433 in qt4-x11 (Ubuntu) "Touch end events not handled" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/785433 | 19:08 |
cnd | would someone be able to review it? | 19:08 |
yofel | bambee: aptitude safe-upgrade? I have like 100 packages held back here, not upgradable | 19:12 |
yofel | or I'll remove KDE | 19:12 |
* bambee tests safe-upgrade | 19:12 | |
yofel | does /almost/ the same thing as apt-get upgrade | 19:13 |
bambee | yofel: it does the trick, thanks ;) | 19:15 |
randalogger | jussi: Re-Scheduled 04-JUN-2011 | 19:36 |
_Groo_ | hi/2 all | 19:59 |
_Groo_ | could anyone explain to me why kamoso alpha is being installed when we have 2.0 final in backports? | 19:59 |
_Groo_ | for natty | 19:59 |
_Groo_ | see http://paste.ubuntu.com/617752/ | 20:00 |
_Groo_ | its not respecting the version number, or the number is wrong | 20:01 |
_Groo_ | and installing the alpha instead of the backports 2.0 final | 20:02 |
_Groo_ | i had to force it with apt-get install kamoso=2.0-0ubuntu1~natty1 | 20:03 |
yofel | _Groo_: afaik we have an apt-pin in natty so backports aren't installed by default | 20:21 |
yofel | _Groo_: can you show me the apt-cache policy output? | 20:22 |
_Groo_ | hi/2 all | 20:27 |
yofel | _Groo_: afaik we have an apt-pin in natty so backports aren't installed by default | 20:28 |
yofel | _Groo_: can you show me the apt-cache policy output? | 20:28 |
_Groo_ | yofel: http://paste.ubuntu.com/617768/ | 20:31 |
_Groo_ | also kamoso 2.0 and 2.0 alpha are broken, cant acess the /dev/video, 2.0.2 backported works just fine with phonon | 20:32 |
_Groo_ | same hardware works with cheese for ex | 20:32 |
_Groo_ | and kopete | 20:32 |
_Groo_ | yofel_: anything that pops out? | 20:35 |
_Groo_ | hello? | 20:38 |
yofel_ | sorry, had some connection issues | 20:49 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
=== rdieter_work is now known as rdieter | ||
yofel | _Groo_: see that -backports has a priority of 100? So if you install a package it will be taken from there, but it won't be upgraded automatically if there's a new version in -backports | 20:51 |
=== valorie_ is now known as valorie | ||
_Groo_ | yofel: how do i change that? and from all i knew, this is new in natty, maverick didnt had that pin | 21:00 |
yofel | it is new, usually that would be in /etc/apt/preferences[.d/] | 21:01 |
_Groo_ | nothing backports related in preferences.d | 21:02 |
yofel | not sure how they set that then | 21:02 |
_Groo_ | found it | 21:03 |
yofel | where? | 21:03 |
_Groo_ | its in apt.conf.d | 21:03 |
_Groo_ | apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades | 21:03 |
_Groo_ | updated, proposed and backports are commented out :P | 21:03 |
_Groo_ | which kinda defeats the purpose of having them :P | 21:03 |
yofel | hm, I think that does something else | 21:04 |
_Groo_ | well then i dont know :P | 21:04 |
_Groo_ | grep doesnt show any entires for backports besides the source.list ones | 21:05 |
_Groo_ | and that | 21:05 |
debfx | since natty backports aren't installed automatically but once you install a package from backports it gets upgrades from there | 21:05 |
debfx | kamoso 2.0.2 simply hasn't been backported to natty | 21:05 |
_Groo_ | debfx: just backported it.. its the only one working btw | 21:06 |
_Groo_ | 2.0 and alpha are both broken | 21:06 |
_Groo_ | no video pops out | 21:06 |
_Groo_ | only 2.0.2 fixes it for me | 21:06 |
_Groo_ | kopete and cheese work just fine | 21:06 |
yofel | file a backport request | 21:06 |
_Groo_ | how do i change the pin then?? im clueless | 21:07 |
yofel | _Groo_: add something like this to /etc/apt/preferences, should override it: | 21:07 |
yofel | Package: * | 21:07 |
yofel | Pin: release a=natty-backports | 21:07 |
yofel | Pin-Priority: 500 | 21:07 |
_Groo_ | yofel: cant... someone forgot to add libqtgstreamer-dev to natty | 21:08 |
_Groo_ | which is strange since it backports just fine with the same code from oniric | 21:08 |
debfx | you probably don't want to pin backports like that | 21:08 |
debfx | _Groo_: the package is called qtgstreamer-dev in natty | 21:09 |
_Groo_ | debfx: oh | 21:10 |
_Groo_ | -.- | 21:10 |
_Groo_ | this is apachelogger fault, im sure of it!!!! | 21:10 |
yofel | well, that's what the configuration was before natty, but yeah, usually 100 sounds right for backports | 21:10 |
_Groo_ | debfx: so, what am i suposed to do, to make sure backports are used always? same for proposed | 21:11 |
debfx | _Groo_: if you are sure that you want everything from backports do what yofel posted | 21:12 |
yofel | erm, -proposed should really not be at 500 | 21:13 |
yofel | you might as well run oneiric then (ok, not as bad, but possibly so) | 21:13 |
_Groo_ | yofel: if i had proposed its because i WANT to use proposed | 21:14 |
_Groo_ | if now, whats the point? | 21:14 |
_Groo_ | how do i keep track of whats going in proposed then? | 21:14 |
yofel | you check natty-changes ML for what what uploaded to -proposed and help with the SRU testing? | 21:15 |
yofel | s/what what/what was/ | 21:15 |
kubotu | yofel meant: "you check natty-changes ML for what was uploaded to -proposed and help with the SRU testing?" | 21:15 |
yofel | *SIGH* | 21:15 |
_Groo_ | Package: * Pin: release a=natty-backports Pin-Priority: 500 Package: * Pin: release a=natty-proposed Pin-Priority: 500 | 21:15 |
LaserJock | people had lots of problem when -proposed had normal pinning | 21:16 |
_Groo_ | something like this to have both? | 21:16 |
_Groo_ | i like to live on the edge | 21:16 |
LaserJock | it was difficult to test the packages in isolation, that's why it was changed I believe | 21:16 |
yofel | well, -proposed wasn't enabled by default for a reason | 21:16 |
yofel | exactly | 21:16 |
_Groo_ | exactly, but if i enable it i want to use it | 21:16 |
LaserJock | _Groo_: but the point of using it was for testing individual packages, not the whole repo | 21:17 |
yofel | yes, for SRU testing, it's not meant to be used in general | 21:17 |
yofel | and for SRU testing you need to be able to update only one specific package | 21:17 |
_Groo_ | i prefer to update and see what breaks | 21:17 |
_Groo_ | and come here shouting | 21:17 |
_Groo_ | like kamoso | 21:17 |
yofel | having the pin is easier than constantly: enable -p -> update and test -> disable -p | 21:17 |
_Groo_ | ho btw | 21:17 |
_Groo_ | if anyone is using fancy tasks | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | a very very bad news | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | its broken in 4.6.3 UNTIL you recompile it | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | you have 2 scenarios | 21:18 |
yofel | that's SRU material :P | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | one: it will crash plasma-desktop imediatly as soon as you update | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | two: it will crash plasma-desktop when you click on configure | 21:18 |
_Groo_ | solution:? recompile it with 4.6.3.. i know.. it should be ABI compatible... but plasma is .. well... plasma... :P | 21:19 |
debfx | _Groo_: proposed has priority 500 by default, you only need to change it for backports | 21:19 |
_Groo_ | just try it :D | 21:19 |
_Groo_ | debfx: k, done :) | 21:19 |
yofel | well, blame aseigo probably :P, but file a bug about it and we can get it rebuilt | 21:20 |
_Groo_ | debfx: so let me guess this straight... backports which are packages already tested as 100.. proposed whihc is the :"denagerous" stuff as 100? | 21:20 |
_Groo_ | very logical :P | 21:20 |
_Groo_ | yofel: test it! | 21:20 |
_Groo_ | yofel: i always like to test if im not crazy | 21:20 |
_Groo_ | yofel: about the package i mean.. im crazy as it gets | 21:21 |
yofel | which was that, smooth-tasks? | 21:21 |
_Groo_ | plasma-widget-fancytasks | 21:21 |
_Groo_ | oh btw | 21:21 |
debfx | _Groo_: the barrier to get something into proposed is much higher than backports | 21:21 |
_Groo_ | acroread is broken in 64bits | 21:21 |
yofel | ah right, proposed is at 500 | 21:22 |
yofel | I just pin that to 100 here ^^ | 21:22 |
_Groo_ | it tries to force to install nspluginwrapper, which breaks in 64, should have be changed for flash64 or nothing at all | 21:22 |
_Groo_ | i remade the partners package and its working like a charm now | 21:22 |
_Groo_ | so, 3 bugs... | 21:23 |
_Groo_ | 1 - kamoso is broken | 21:23 |
yofel | file a bug, flash64 isn't released, so rather remove the dep | 21:23 |
_Groo_ | 2 - acroread is broken in 64 | 21:23 |
yofel | if it doesn't require it this should be a recommends anyway | 21:23 |
_Groo_ | yofel: yeah, for 64 bits you need, it wont install | 21:23 |
_Groo_ | yofel: it was in previous version, dont know who was the genius who decided to force it | 21:24 |
_Groo_ | brian thomason | 21:24 |
_Groo_ | where are my laser glasses | 21:24 |
_Groo_ | 3 - plasma-widget-fancy is broken if you use 4.6.3 from backports, need to be added to backports too and recompiled with that code | 21:25 |
_Groo_ | you welcome :P | 21:25 |
yofel | ah, that's the PPA, right, need to go home, then I can upload a rebuild | 21:25 |
yofel | wait, you can do that yourself! | 21:25 |
_Groo_ | yofel: yeah | 21:26 |
_Groo_ | yofel: im at work... no way to upload it from here | 21:26 |
_Groo_ | and im an unoficial minion | 21:26 |
yofel | heh, then I'll do it later | 21:26 |
_Groo_ | im not gonna put my dirty paws in the ppa without being told so | 21:26 |
_Groo_ | apachelogger or other officer would hunt me down like a dog | 21:26 |
yofel | heh, well, I'm gone, bbl | 21:27 |
_Groo_ | yofel: did you test fancy? | 21:27 |
yofel | not yet, my battery's empty :P | 21:27 |
_Groo_ | yofel: ah ok :D | 21:27 |
_Groo_ | btw after it crashes, it crashes plasma always | 21:27 |
_Groo_ | so be ready to compile it locally and replace it | 21:27 |
_Groo_ | cause your precious desktop wont go up again | 21:28 |
_Groo_ | or edit plasma-appletsrc and remove it | 21:28 |
_Groo_ | if you are lucky and it doesnt crash plasma right away | 21:28 |
_Groo_ | it will as soon as you hit configure | 21:28 |
* yofel just noticed he can't install fancytasks as it depends on libkonq5a | 22:29 | |
yofel | can someone rebuild that in oneiric? | 22:30 |
* Quintasan can't request rebuilds :< | 22:35 | |
debfx | Quintasan: why not? | 22:44 |
Quintasan | no idea why | 22:44 |
Quintasan | Or I am looking in the wrong place | 22:44 |
debfx | where are you looking? ^^ | 22:45 |
Quintasan | debfx: launchpad site for <package name> | 22:46 |
debfx | you just download the package, call dch -R, build it and upload | 22:46 |
Quintasan | oh | 22:46 |
debfx | maybe even needs a SRU in natty: bug #750925 | 22:48 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 750925 in plasma-widget-fancytasks (Ubuntu) "Fancy Tasks widget crashes plasma" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/750925 | 22:48 |
Quintasan | yofel: it depends on libkonq5-dev 4:4.5.2 :S | 22:48 |
yofel | >=, doesn't change the fact that it depends on the wrong binary package | 22:49 |
Quintasan | oh wait | 22:50 |
Quintasan | so it just a rebuild in oneric | 22:51 |
Quintasan | oneiric | 22:51 |
debfx | and probably in natty | 22:52 |
Quintasan | debfx: do we need to do SRU's for rebuilds? | 22:53 |
debfx | Quintasan: yes | 22:53 |
* Quintasan tests in oneiric first | 22:54 | |
ScottK | It's not pinning. Backports is set to be a 'not-automatic' repository. The results are similar. | 23:00 |
debfx | ScottK: yes, but pinning can override the not-automatic flag | 23:09 |
ScottK | OK. | 23:10 |
Quintasan | yofel: lol, on oneiric | 23:11 |
Quintasan | after a rebuild | 23:12 |
Quintasan | it depends on libkonq5abi1 | 23:12 |
Quintasan | no idea | 23:12 |
ScottK | That's the new packagename. That's what I'd expect. | 23:12 |
Quintasan | so it is the desired behavior in oneiric? | 23:12 |
ScottK | Yes. | 23:13 |
* Quintasan goes to build natty | 23:13 | |
debfx | ScottK: has the not-automic and but-upgrades been introduced for automatic backports->backports updates? | 23:14 |
ScottK | debfx: Yes, if I understand the question correctly. | 23:15 |
=== randalogger is now known as info | ||
=== info is now known as infologger | ||
LaserJock | ScottK: are you familiar with kdemultimedia at all? | 23:18 |
ScottK | LaserJock: If the criteria is 'at all', yes. | 23:19 |
ScottK | What's the question? | 23:19 |
LaserJock | well, I got what i thought would be a good stab at a merge | 23:19 |
LaserJock | but it doesn't build | 23:19 |
ScottK | What's the error? | 23:20 |
LaserJock | it fails in ffmpegthumbs with a : error: 'CODEC _TYPE_VIDEO' was not declared in this scope | 23:20 |
LaserJock | I wondered if it might have something to do with disabling xine | 23:20 |
ScottK | It might also have something to do with our switch from ffmpeg to libal source. | 23:21 |
ScottK | It could also be GCC 4.6 related. | 23:21 |
* Quintasan will file SRU tomorrow | 23:22 | |
Quintasan | yofel: uploading rebuild to oneiric | 23:22 |
ScottK | LaserJock: You're not the only one: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274666 | 23:23 |
ubottu | KDE bug 274666 in general "ffmpegthumbs-4 6 3 fails to build with libav-0 7_beta2 (Gentoo bug #369515)" [Normal,Unconfirmed] | 23:23 |
ScottK | Not GCC 4.6 then. | 23:23 |
ScottK | LaserJock: I'd see if you can build it against Natty. That would give us an idea if it was related to Oneiric toolchain or not. | 23:24 |
LaserJock | ScottK: oh, ok, good idea | 23:25 |
LaserJock | ScottK: I tried the vanilla debian package on oneiric and it died at the same place | 23:26 |
Quintasan | yofel: should work in oneiric soon | 23:26 |
ScottK | LaserJock: I'm pretty sure it's an upstream issue. The question is where. | 23:27 |
ScottK | The bug I pointed you at is from Gentoo, so probably not our fault. | 23:27 |
Quintasan | Good night. | 23:28 |
debfx | libav broke API compatibility in 0.7 | 23:28 |
ScottK | LaserJock: ^^^ There you go. Please whine to siretart. | 23:29 |
debfx | might be worth checking the svn repository, maybe it already got fixed | 23:30 |
ScottK | Good point. | 23:30 |
ScottK | Particularly with 4.6.4 being close to release. | 23:30 |
micahg | there's a tracker for the libav transition: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/libav.html | 23:34 |
debfx | micahg: does it also track the required patches? ;) | 23:35 |
micahg | debfx: I'm sure patches are welcome :) | 23:35 |
ScottK | Yeah, they're welcome here too. | 23:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!