[05:35] <ppisati> morning
[09:04] <ppisati> ogra_: do you have an imx51? or do you know who has one besides GrueMaster and ericm|ubuntu?
[09:04] <ppisati> ogra_: i need an info about the parport module
[10:07] <ogra_> hmm, so oneiric is a big fail here
[12:27] <dhana013> Hi
[12:28] <dhana013> any one haveing ubuntu 10.04 rootfs
[12:28] <ogra_> just use rootstock
[12:28] <ogra_> (see topic)
[12:32] <dhana013> thanks
[12:32] <dhana013> @ogra_
[12:46] <ogra_> geez, oneiric is shaky
[12:54] <ppisati> cool, using my own oneiric kernel i got usb back
[12:54] <ppisati> config are the same
[12:54] <ppisati> and kernel version is the same on both
[12:54] <ppisati> uhmm....
[12:54] <ogra_> toolchain isnt probably
[12:54] <ppisati> ogra_: uh
[12:55] <ppisati> ogra_: but would be really nasty
[12:55] <ogra_> just a guess :)
[12:55] <ppisati> ogra_: yep, but it's a variable indeed
[12:57] <ppisati> ogra_: which toolchain do we use on the builder?
[13:00] <ppisati> i think i can guess it from the boot msg
[13:05] <ppisati> ogra_: and indeed the toolchain are different... oh sh*t...
[14:08] <Utrinqueparatus> Has anyone here any experience with installing Ubuntu on a portable tegra based device like the advent vega?
[14:33] <ogra> ha !
[14:33]  * ogra has a stable oneiric session on the ac100
[14:46] <lilstevie> :o
[14:58] <hrw> ogra_: ubuntu/r will give sound?
[15:04] <ogra_> hrw, ??
[15:06] <hrw> ogra_: iirc you still lack sound on ac100 - right?
[15:06] <ogra_> yep
[15:06]  * hrw jokes about ubuntu/r
[15:06] <ogra_> we have a working driver, but nobody understands the wiring
[15:06] <ndec|home1> ogra_: sounds issues are chasing you ;-)
[15:07] <ogra_> i'm pretty sure that will be fixed soon, with so many people getting ac100s suddenly
[15:07] <ogra_> ndec|home1, lol, yeah
[15:07] <ogra_> on the ac100 its easily worked around with a BT headset though
[15:07] <hrw> ogra_: replaced screen with 720p one?
[15:07] <ogra_> not yet
[15:08] <ogra_> currently i use the second one to run oneiric on it :)
[15:08] <ogra_> and to test the installer
[15:08] <hrw> one with natty and one to tests?
[15:08] <ogra_> yep
[15:09] <hrw> like my pandas - one ubuntu, one linaro
[15:57] <Utrinqueparatus> I am trying to slim down an install I have running on vega
[15:57] <Utrinqueparatus> Is there anyway to do that without using the actual device?
[15:58] <Utrinqueparatus> i.e i have gnome and unity 2d installed but they are killing it so I want to try XFCE or similar?
[17:06] <ppisati> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/791552
[17:06] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 791552 in linux "No USB support on beagle/beagleXM" [Undecided,New]
[17:06] <ppisati> yes, in the end seems it was the toolchain
[17:09] <GrueMaster> ppisati: Weird.
[17:09] <GrueMaster> Good hunting though.
[17:09] <ppisati> GrueMaster: at least reverting to 4.5 fixes it
[17:10] <ppisati> GrueMaster: actually ogra had the idea to check the toolchain :)
[17:10] <ppisati> GrueMaster: we don't know yet if 4.5 was borked and proced a working code, and 4.6 broke it
[17:10] <ppisati> or the other way around
[17:12] <GrueMaster> Its odd that it broke omap but omap4 is ok.
[17:12] <GrueMaster> I would think they use close to the same code for USB.
[17:12]  * ppisati shrugs
[17:12] <ppisati> really dunno
[17:13] <ppisati> let me try the linaro kernel
[17:14] <ppisati> uh wait
[17:14] <ppisati> omap4 is still using 2.6.38
[17:14] <ppisati> because we don't have a 2.6.39+omap4 branch
[17:14] <ppisati> while for omap3 we are using 2.6.39
[17:15] <ppisati> perhaps that's why we don't see the breakage there
[17:15] <ppisati> natty kernel are ok, right?
[17:16] <GrueMaster> Might be an interesting test to take the natty omap kernel and rebuild it with oneiric toolchain.
[17:16] <ppisati> i'll do that
[17:16] <GrueMaster> Yes, natty works fine.
[17:16] <ppisati> ok
[17:16] <ppisati> so, i try natty with 4.6
[17:16] <ppisati> that's the new toolchain
[17:22] <GrueMaster> on the parport_pc issue, it never really affected lucid (although the potential was there).
[17:23] <GrueMaster> Maverick cups added a modprobe line to force the parport_pc module to load on start.  The simple solution was to not include that module in the armel kernels.
[17:23] <GrueMaster> The proper fix would be to actually fix the driver to fail gracefully.
[17:23] <dcordes> ogra_: with you being a member of the unity-2d team, may I ask you to have a quick look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/791852 and decide wether or not it's valid? I fear it will drown in the noise
[17:23] <ubot2> Ubuntu bug 791852 in unity-2d "unity-2d: does not parse QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM env var" [Undecided,New]
[17:47] <ppisati> oh
[17:47] <ppisati> gcc 4.6 and natty = same problem
[17:49] <ppisati> on omap3 i mean
[18:05] <GrueMaster> oops.
[18:05] <GrueMaster> That's not good.