[10:20] <koolhead11> hi all
[10:36] <TeTeT> hi koolhead11
[10:39] <koolhead11> hello TeTeT
[10:39] <koolhead11> hi Kiall
[10:39] <koolhead11> kim0,
[10:53] <kim0> koolhead11: hey man :)
[10:53] <koolhead11> kim0, how are things :D
[10:54] <kim0> all good :)
[10:54] <kim0> writing Ensemble formula (for writing a writer's tutorial)
[10:54] <koolhead11> awesome!!
[10:54] <kim0> uncovered many bugs which Gustavo is resolving
[10:55] <koolhead11> i saw this 25$ device running ubuntu
[10:55] <kim0> yeah it's a lot of fun
[10:55] <kim0> yeha seen that
[10:55] <kim0> cool!
[10:55] <koolhead11> on prakas`s blog
[10:55] <koolhead11> http://cityblogger.com/archives/2011/05/14/usb-size-pc-for-25
[10:56] <kim0> yeah that's awesome
[10:56] <koolhead11> UK Ngo working on it. looks awesome :D
[10:57]  * koolhead11 needs this device :)
[10:59] <dahw> indeed
[11:48] <koolhead11> kim0, ping
[13:12] <muppis> Planning to set up two Storage Controllers to tave one for backup. Any hint to keep them in sync?
[13:13] <muppis> s/tave/have/
[13:15] <TeTeT> muppis: two walrus or two sc?
[13:16] <muppis> TeTeT, sc
[13:16] <muppis> Or no matter, which one is easier.
[13:17] <TeTeT> muppis: I'd try to make the dir where the vgs reside on the vg redundant, probably with drbd
[13:17] <TeTeT> muppis: it's one of the things I'd love to try if I had enough h/w for it
[13:20] <muppis> Well, I'm making a plan to our customer about two HP DL380 (with 16 x 600 GB SAS disks) sc's coonected to each other with 10 Gbps fiber.
[13:28] <muppis> TeTeT, thank you. That could be the thing I've been looking for. :)
[13:30] <TeTeT> muppis: even when using drbd, you need to be aware that hot fail-over is probably not possible, as the SC's ip is hardcoded in UEC
[13:35] <muppis> Maybe I invest some workaround for it.
[15:19] <hallyn> SpamapS: in a formula 'provides/requires' in the metadata, is the interface for a 'requires' valid so long as it matches a 'provides' from another formula?
[15:20] <hallyn> SpamapS: is the whole syntax documented somewhere?
[15:23] <hallyn> oh i think i get it
[15:32]  * hallyn finally found the relation.rst file
[15:42] <kim0> hallyn: would https://ensemble.ubuntu.com/docs/ be easier to read :)
[15:42] <hallyn> actually the textfiles are really nice
[15:43] <hallyn> kim0: you'd *think* that url would be easier, but there are too many fonts and it kinda makes the eye tired
[15:43] <kim0> hallyn: nothing better than a terminal trained eye ;)
[15:43] <hallyn> :)
[15:44] <hallyn> now i'm just trying to figure out which slave hook gets called after master-relation-joined (to pull a variable that the master just set)
[15:44] <hallyn> i haven't found a definitive timeline
[15:48] <kim0> hallyn: afaik, after a joined fires, a "changed" fires as well
[15:53] <hallyn> kim0: right, but which goes first, master or slave?
[15:54] <kim0> hallyn: which one fires first ?
[15:54] <kim0> afaik, the order is non deterministic
[15:54] <kim0> hallyn: you'd better jump in #ubuntu-ensemble
[15:55] <hallyn> oh, ithought that had gotten consolidated into this one
[16:36] <SpamapS> hallyn: joined always fires before changed the first time
[16:37] <hallyn> SpamapS: i was asking about master vs slave for either joined or changed,
[16:37] <hallyn> SpamapS: but #ubuntu-ensemble gave me waht i needed.  thanks!
[16:37] <hallyn> SpamapS: this is great fun, btw
[16:40] <SpamapS> oh I'm an hour behind. ;)
[16:40] <SpamapS> hallyn: isn't it?
[16:40] <SpamapS> I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks so
[20:54] <nRy> hello!
[20:55] <nRy> Can someone please tell me what happened to AMI: ubuntu-natty-daily-amd64-server-20110323  ???
[20:55] <nRy> I am trying to find am Ubuntu GPU AMI on EC2
[20:55] <nRy> and I was told during the Ubuntu Cloud Days that ubuntu-natty-daily-amd64-server-20110323 was the AMI I should test with
[20:55] <nRy> but can't find it now
[21:03] <kim0> nRy: as new versions are released .. old one are removed
[21:04] <kim0> nRy: check out natty ami-1cad5275
[21:04] <kim0> nRy: search for "cluster" on http://cloud.ubuntu.com/ami/
[23:05] <nRy> thank you KimO
[23:05] <nRy> or kim0
[23:05] <kim0> o/
[23:06] <nRy> could not find any images for: natty ami-1cad5275
[23:07] <nRy> found these two AMI's when I searched for "cluster" http://screencast.com/t/jSp4A9CwW
[23:07] <nRy> are either of these GPU instances?
[23:10] <nRy> ok, I figured it out
[23:11] <nRy> ami-1cad5275 is a GPU instance
[23:11] <nRy> thanks for the help