| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| dholbach | good morning | 07:48 |
|---|---|---|
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chr1sccoulson | ||
| Laney | ARGH | 10:35 |
| Laney | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html | 10:35 |
| Laney | I should have predicted this :( :( :( | 10:51 |
| * Laney mashes the keyboard in irritation | 10:51 | |
| jpds | For a second there, I read tradition. | 10:51 |
| Laney | when you maintain GHC it does become rather traditional, indeed | 10:52 |
| geser | Laney: do ghc transitions ever end? | 11:02 |
| Laney | this one was about to | 11:02 |
| Laney | and then I uploaded GHC again last night | 11:02 |
| geser | I have the impression that at least one package on any arch has always a wrong dependency and needs a rebuild | 11:02 |
| Laney | imagine yourself travelling around a circle :-0 | 11:02 |
| Laney | :-)* | 11:02 |
| * DktrKranz patpats Laney | 11:03 | |
| * Laney shelters underneath DktrKranz | 11:03 | |
| Laney | you have the power of 'wb nmu' | 11:03 |
| DktrKranz | nope | 11:04 |
| Laney | 'you' as in 'debian' | 11:04 |
| Laney | makes such frustrations go away somewhat :P | 11:04 |
| DktrKranz | definitely | 11:04 |
| DktrKranz | wasn't "rebuild package" button in progress? | 11:05 |
| Laney | not that i've heard | 11:05 |
| geser | DktrKranz: not "rebuild package" but a "sync package" button is worked on | 11:07 |
| Laney | https://dogfood.launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+localpackagediffs | 11:08 |
| DktrKranz | cool | 11:11 |
| geser | yes, really interesting | 11:12 |
| === med_out is now known as med | ||
| === med is now known as medberry | ||
| === BackFromTheUnder is now known as Slick | ||
| === Slick is now known as Ekx | ||
| Ekx | Vortexirc looks for linux/chat interested people, if you want to join irc.vortexirc.com 6667 see ya :D | 17:33 |
| === Ekx is now known as Ekx-Off | ||
| Laney | don't do that | 17:35 |
| micahg | broder: regarding seamonkey, we'll need to push 2.1 when it's released to the stable releases, so idk if an SRU is worthwhile | 17:59 |
| micahg | 2.1 uses the newer hunspell | 18:00 |
| broder | oh, really? yeah, in that case it doesn't seem like it makes much sense to keep working | 18:00 |
| micahg | yeah, the 3.5 branch which seamonkey 2.0 is based on will be EOL on June 21, so there will be no more releases for it | 18:01 |
| * micahg probably should've commented on that bug | 18:02 | |
| micahg | bdrung: I never got an answer about syncing eclipse from experimental, I did a test build on amd64 on oneiric and it was fine, I would do one more with i386 before requesting the sync since i386 failed before with gcc-4.6 | 18:56 |
| andersk | What went wrong there? Shouldn’t it be possible to change ghc’s debian/control without breaking all the ABI hashes? | 19:04 |
| KNRO | Hi. I'm stuck with updating a package. I've already uploaded the .orig.tar.gz (2.3) version to ppa, and I later discovered there was a missing dependency, so I edited debian/control, but I can't reupload the .diff.gz file because the same version of the diff file (2.3) was uploaded and launchpad won't accept same version but different content. | 20:18 |
| KNRO | and if I pump the number in debian/changelog, I can't seem to get an updated .diff.gz (to 2.3ppa1 for example), I have to rename the orig file 2.3ppa1 as well which is wrong | 20:19 |
| KNRO | so how do I fix that, what am I doing wrong? | 20:19 |
| jtaylor | upload without the orig source | 20:20 |
| broder | KNRO: it sounds like you've done a handful of things wrong | 20:20 |
| micahg | KNRO: you should use a debian revision (i.e. 2.3-0ppa1 | 20:21 |
| jtaylor | debuild -sa | 20:21 |
| broder | KNRO: first, if this isn't a "Debian/Ubuntu-native package" - i.e. the software meaningfully exists outside of Debian/Ubuntu, you should add a Debian revision number, like micahg said | 20:21 |
| KNRO | it's not native to Debian/Ubuntu | 20:22 |
| broder | but also, while you're experimenting in PPAs, you should add something to the version number - something like ~ppa1 - that leaves you room to change the version number in your PPA | 20:22 |
| broder | KNRO: right, so the version of the Debian package shouldn't be "2.3", it should be "2.3-0ubuntu1" | 20:22 |
| broder | then you add on the PPA tag (so "2.3-0ubuntu1~ppa1") | 20:22 |
| KNRO | okay, and the .orig filename is then what? | 20:23 |
| KNRO | 2.3.orig.tar.gz ? or 2.3-0ubuntu1.tar.gz ?? | 20:23 |
| jtaylor | the furst | 20:30 |
| jtaylor | s/u/i/ | 20:30 |
| KNRO | so if the orig file was foo_2.3.orig.tar.gz and my debian version is 2.3-0ubuntu1~ppa1, I can't run debuild -sd or -sa or any combination without renaming the .orig file!!! | 20:32 |
| KNRO | But the .orig file name should remain the same!! | 20:32 |
| micahg | KNRO: what does debian/source/format say if anything? | 20:32 |
| KNRO | I see ... dpkg-source: warning: no source format specified in debian/source/format, see dpkg-source(1) | 20:33 |
| KNRO | guess that's my problem... | 20:33 |
| micahg | KNRO: that's the debian version set in debian/changelog? | 20:34 |
| KNRO | in debian/changelog I have 2.3-0ubuntu1~ppa1 | 20:34 |
| Laney | if it can't find the orig then you'll get a native package | 20:35 |
| KNRO | there is no source/format under debian | 20:35 |
| Laney | don't worry about that | 20:35 |
| KNRO | how do I tell it to look for foo_2.3.orig.tar.gz then? | 20:35 |
| KNRO | and take the diff from that? | 20:35 |
| Laney | show us the complete output from 'debuild -S' please :-) | 20:36 |
| KNRO | ok | 20:37 |
| KNRO | here http://pastebin.com/cE3xGsyj | 20:38 |
| Laney | ls ../libapogee2_2.3.orig.tar.gz | 20:40 |
| broder | KNRO: dpkg-source is using the version number 2.3ubuntu1~ppa1, not 2.3-0ubuntu1~ppa1 | 20:40 |
| broder | the hyphen is critical | 20:40 |
| KNRO | Laney: yes it exists... ? | 20:41 |
| Laney | yeah, you need to fix that version :-) | 20:41 |
| KNRO | ohhhhh | 20:42 |
| KNRO | 2.3 then hypthen | 20:42 |
| KNRO | okay let me try | 20:42 |
| KNRO | it worked!! Thanks guys, this was driving me insane | 20:46 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| KNRO | another question, if I have a package already built in maverick, and I want to build it for natty ppa, is it possible to build without updating the changelog file? | 21:04 |
| Laney | no | 21:07 |
| Laney | you can't have different binaries from the same revision | 21:07 |
| KNRO | even for different distributions? | 21:08 |
| Sarvatt | you can binary copy it from maverick to natty in the PPA without changing the versions but thats usually a bad idea and can't rebuild it that way | 21:08 |
| Laney | actually it's often not a bad idea | 21:09 |
| Laney | that's what happens for new ubuntu series after all | 21:09 |
| KNRO | I'll just update the changelog file and do it the easy way | 21:10 |
| Laney | try copying the binaries and see if it works | 21:11 |
| === roaksoax__ is now known as andreserl | ||
| bdrung | micahg: i answer yesterday or so. the answer was: yes, please sync it. | 23:16 |
| micahg | bdrung: ah, sorry, must have missed it, xchat doesn't always tell me when I have a message waiting, thanks, will do over the weekend | 23:16 |
| === randalogger is now known as info | ||
| bdrung | micahg: np. i would have done it yesterday if requestsync wouldn't crash | 23:17 |
| === info is now known as infologger | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!