[00:53] <aroman> Hi, how can I remove projects from a metaproject I own? Or better yet, force those projects to be manually approved by me.
[00:58] <aroman> oh, by metaproject I mean project group.
[01:25] <aroman> anyone?
[07:27] <poolie> hi aro
[09:15] <aviksil> how can i upload a file in a project registered in launchpad? i could not see any "Add download file" link in the project i registered: https://launchpad.net/smartt
[09:15] <RAOF> aviksil: You first need to register a release, then you can upload files for the release.
[09:16] <aviksil> RAOF: in "series and milestone"?
[09:17] <RAOF> From https://launchpad.net/smartt/trunk you should be able to register a release (from memory).
[09:17] <fta> https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/2548698
[09:18] <fta> why is rutherfordium always so slow?
[09:23] <aviksil> RAOF: thanks!
[09:37] <dpm> hi henninge, last week deryck helped me change the export schedule of translation tarballs, but I'm not sure if the change was actually done. Would you be able to confirm that the cron job for exports has been updated?
[09:44] <dpm> (or anyone else)
[10:03] <henninge> dpm: I can have a look. Can you
[10:03] <henninge> please remind me of the wiki page that lists the schedule?
[10:06] <jfi> Hello, the package sync from debian is not automatic except for the first version? or it takes more than 2 weeks?
[10:07] <wgrant> jfi: The Debian->Ubuntu autosync?
[10:07] <jfi> wgran: yes, I have a package not synced since the 22may
[10:07] <wgrant> jfi: You probably want to talk to #ubuntu-devel.
[10:08] <jfi> wgrant: ok
[10:08] <henninge> dpm: does not look like it.
[10:15] <maxb> wgrant: Did you know that the bogus linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz was actually linked to two publications? :-)
[10:28] <wgrant> maxb: :(
[10:28] <wgrant> maxb: Which was the other one?
[10:29] <wgrant> I guess I should check on DF.
[10:29] <wgrant> Hmmm.
[10:29] <maxb> wgrant: 2.6.24-28.83
[10:30] <wgrant> Oh, yeah, that one.
[10:30] <wgrant> That was just a few months ago, right?
[10:30] <wgrant> That broke the primary archive, so we purged the old one more thoroughly.
[10:30] <wgrant> And hoped that nobody retained possession of the old one.
[10:31] <maxb> retained posession?
[10:31] <wgrant> Well, the security and kernel teams managed to reupload it a couple of times.
[10:31] <wgrant> No matter how much we deleted it from LP.
[10:31] <maxb> Ah
[10:31] <wgrant> So hopefully they've lost all their copies.
[10:32] <dpm> henninge, sorry for the delay in replying, I was on a call. Here's the link to the schedule page. The path to the crontab is also specified on that page. I think deryck had started already doing or requesting the change. Do you think it would be possible to track down what's been done and see if we can get it moving?
[10:32] <wgrant> Although the original bug is fixed.
[10:32] <maxb> The issue would never have arisen if they hadn't decided it was a good ideal to upload linux-2.6.24.2.tar.gz as linux_2.6.24.orig.tar.gz :-/
[10:32] <wgrant> maxb: Indeed.
[10:33] <wgrant> maxb: And then somehow managed to do it again.
[10:33] <maxb> Well, actually, the "good" version is 2.6.24.2 - the "bad" one is actually 2.6.24 like its version claims
[10:33] <wgrant> maxb: So, last time we tracked down the uploader, got him to delete his copy, and then deleted all visible Launchpad copies, so hopefully it's gone except for the copy I linked spiv to last week but I guess you have it now so who knows who else does oh dear we are going to die.
[10:34] <maxb> heh :-)
[10:35] <henninge> dpm: Yes, the process has been initiated. I just asked the admin to take care of it asap.
[10:35] <dpm> great, thanks henninge. Could you please ping me when it's been done, or alternatively, could you tell me where I can track the progress myself?
[10:38] <henninge> dpm: I subscribed you to the branch.
[10:39] <dpm> henninge, cool, thanks
[10:39] <henninge> dpm: It will be marked as "Merged" when it is done.
[10:45] <Daviey> Does launchpad lists not allow non-subsciber (team member) posting?
[11:05] <maxb> Daviey: I believe such posts go to the list moderation queue
[11:07] <wgrant> The first time, at least.
[11:27] <Daviey> Interesting, for a package the Maintainer filed was set to an LP list email address.  People were saying the mail went to /dev/null.
[11:28] <Daviey> (ie, unsuitable for a Maintainer field)
[12:03] <maxb> Daviey: Ask the team administrators to check the moderation queue
[12:25] <osallou> Hi, i am uploading a package to my ppa using dput (first time for me), using ubuntu 9.10, but it remains stuck on ".changes" file upload (dsc,orig,deb are shown as "done"). File is 3k only, and I tried several times... any idea of what could be wrong?
[12:26] <bigjools> osallou: it's a known bug using FTP, probably down to some routers not NATing properly.  You can use sftp instead and it will work
[12:26] <osallou> will try, thanks
[12:27] <Daviey> maxb: thanks
[12:28] <maxb> osallou: Also, 9.10 reached End Of Life some time ago. It's time to think about upgrading :-)
[12:37] <Cube``> hey guys, why don't we have a mobile site?
[12:48] <Daviey> maxb: Is it possible to allow from all?
[12:48] <Daviey> Apparently it conflicts with Debian policy to have an address which is anything but open.
[12:50] <maxb> That's.. dumb
[12:50] <maxb> There's this thing called spam
[12:50] <soren> I think filtering spam is allowed.
[12:50] <maxb> I don't think this is customizable for launchpad lists, sorry
[12:51] <soren> Daviey: I guess we could ask Luca..
[12:56] <soren> Done. (in /msg)
[13:13] <Daviey> maxb / soren: thanks
[13:14] <Daviey> maxb: Yes, i know pkg-voip list is almost unusable due to spam.
[19:43] <paultag> Hey Launchpaders. Has anyone worked out Java bindings to Launchpad yet? I really don't want to write it all out :)
[19:56] <geser> paultag: google found this: https://launchpad.net/lpadjavalib, perhaps it's a starting point for you
[19:57] <paultag> geser: Thanks! You did not have to go out of your way, I was just seeing if anyone knew :)
[19:57] <paultag> geser: I'll look into that, thanks so much
[20:41] <CarlFK> i reported Bug #792451, it got marked as a dupe
[20:41] <CarlFK> should't I be on the list of "This bug affects 1 person. Does this bug affect you?"
[20:43] <micahg> CarlFK: that's bug 678090
[20:44] <CarlFK> yep.  thanks.  another dupe I dont need to enter :)
[21:49] <Mez> How would I get a local version of LP (after iniail rocketfuel setup) work on external interface?  just change the apache config?
[21:59] <paissad> hello all, i have packaged a free  & open-source program, .. but the "problem" is that that project contains/uses an external lib which is free but not open-source ... please, is there a way/chance to upload the package in PPA anyway ?
[22:00] <paissad> the project is licensed under GPLv2 .. the closed module which is include into the project is tsMuxeR
[22:00] <paissad> thanks in advance
[22:01] <bac> paissad: no, i'm sorry you cannot package the proprietary code in a PPA.
[22:01] <paissad> bac, https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/40633
[22:02] <bac> paissad: I assumed you were speaking of free hosting on Launchpad.
[22:02] <paissad> bac, indeed
[22:03] <bac> paissad: you can host a proprietary project on Launchpad which will give you a private PPA..
[22:03] <bac> paissad: but in order to do that you must buy a commercial subscription, as explained in that question you posted.
[22:03] <paissad> ok, i see
[22:03] <paissad> thanks for the explanation
[22:04] <bac> Even then, I don't think you'd be allowed to upload another proprietary library which you are not the IP owner.
[22:04] <paissad> ok
[22:06] <Mez> jelmer *hugs*
[22:06] <jelmer> Mez!
[22:06] <Mez> How're things ?
[22:07] <Mez> jelmer: any idea why when I attempt to access launchpad.dev locally - I go into a redirect loop?
[22:08] <Mez> I followed the instructions :(
[22:17] <Mez> aha - because there's two SSH :D
[22:18] <Mez> HTTPS *
[22:30] <Mez> How do I make a LP install with no sample data?
[23:00] <poolie> o/ Mez
[23:00] <Mez> poolie: \o
[23:00] <Mez> you have too mnay nicknames :D
[23:00] <poolie> ?
[23:01] <poolie> oh, hi Martin
[23:01] <poolie> i would guess the redirect loop is either
[23:01] <Mez> poolie: I worked it out :D
[23:01] <poolie> something about the port you're using to connect, or the apach configuration
[23:01] <poolie> oh ok
[23:02] <Mez> I'd changed the apache config so that it was on a public IP - forgetting there were two https:// - meaning bazaar. took over.
[23:02] <Mez> meaning it tried to redirect to launchpad.dev - which went to bazaar... which tried to redirect...
[23:03] <Mez> Now to try and work out how I can make a blank setup :)
[23:03] <Mez> (and work out how LP knows it's admins :D)
[23:04] <Mez> how're things poolie ?
[23:04] <Mez> ah poolie - ignore the comment about too many nicknames :D
[23:04]  * Mez got confused
[23:41] <bdmurray> lifeless: what is the next step for bug 787294?
[23:44] <lifeless> bdmurray: someone needs to update the compiler in lp.bugs.model.bugtask that creates these queries
[23:45] <bdmurray> lifeless: if you could provide some more guidance than that I'd be interested in working on it
[23:47] <lifeless> cool
[23:48] <lifeless> so, have a look at lib/lp/bugs/model/bugtask.py line 2478
[23:48] <lifeless> thats the entry point for bug searches in the very core
[23:48] <lifeless> somewhere in this file (ugh, sorry!) there is code to generate structural subscription constraints
[23:49] <lifeless> that code needs to change from the current approach to one where each of the sorts of links is a separate table alias as my query in comment 11 shows
[23:53] <bdmurray> I think the structural subscription contraints start at line 1846
[23:55] <lifeless> yes, that looks right
[23:55] <bdmurray> If I were to work on this how could I actually test it?