[10:51] <primes2h> jibel: ping
[10:52] <jibel> primes2h, pong
[10:52] <primes2h> hello jibel, how are you?
[10:52] <jibel> primes2h, I'm good, and you ?
[10:53] <primes2h> jibel: fine, thanks. :-)
[10:53] <jibel> primes2h, I enabled OO a1, you must have been notified.
[10:53] <primes2h> jibel: yes, thank you! What about http://releases.ubuntu.com ?
[10:54] <primes2h> do you think it's a mirroring issue?
[10:54] <jibel> primes2h, idk, I'm looking at it.
[10:55] <primes2h> jibel: derivatives are not published as well, btw.
[10:56] <jibel> kubuntu is there http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/oneiric/alpha-1/
[10:56] <jibel> xubuntu as well http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/oneiric/alpha-1/
[10:57] <primes2h> jibel: I mean this site  http://releases.ubuntu.com
[10:57] <primes2h> jibel: http://releases.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/
[10:58] <primes2h> jibel: xubuntu is even not present
[10:59] <jibel> primes2h, right for kubuntu but not all the derivatives are published to releases.u.c
[10:59] <primes2h> jibel: ah , ok.
[11:16] <jibel> primes2h, only beta and releases are on releases.u.c otherwise it's on http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-1/
[11:17] <jibel> that will make the mapping algorithm of the tracker a bit trickier. I'll add a notice for the moment
[11:18] <primes2h> jibel: d'oh
[11:20] <jibel> primes2h, noticed added. one more detail learned today :-)
[11:20] <primes2h> jibel: ok, thank you. eh eh :-)
[11:24] <primes2h> jibel: I'll have a look to provide a patch about this for the LT
[11:24] <jibel> primes2h, we should move this code to a stored procedure as I did for the iso tracker. That's easier to manage on my side.
[11:25] <jibel> primes2h, and we have more flexibility
[11:25] <primes2h> jibel: sure!
=== ara_ is now known as ara
[19:57] <letozaf_> Hello can someone help me with testing of Oneiric on my laptop ?
[19:58] <letozaf_> the image I downloaded doesn't even start
[19:58] <letozaf_> sorry boot
[20:00] <charlie-tca> which image is it?
[20:00] <charlie-tca> Today's images boot, it might be a bad burn
[20:00] <letozaf_> http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.04.2/ubuntu-10.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso
[20:00] <charlie-tca> oops
[20:00] <letozaf_> I downloaded it twice
[20:01] <letozaf_> and created the usb key 3 times
[20:01] <letozaf_> with zsync http://releases.ubuntu.com/10.04.2/ubuntu-10.04.2-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync
[20:01] <letozaf_> I get this message before boot:
[20:01] <letozaf_> vesamenu.c32: not a COM32R image
[20:03] <charlie-tca> something wrong with burn, then. The only issues reported when we released were a crash on boot on some systems - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LucidLynx/ReleaseNotes#Desktop%20installer%20sometimes%20crashes%20on%20startup
[20:03] <charlie-tca> Is that a USB image?
[20:04] <letozaf_> I created a bootable usb key from the image using startup disk creator
[20:04] <davmor2> letozaf_: that's not oneiric.
[20:05] <charlie-tca> that's probably something to do with the usb image, then.
[20:05] <davmor2> charlie-tca: that is 10.04.2 so lucid s .2
[20:05] <letozaf_> oh! sorry...
[20:05] <charlie-tca> right, which is the release notes I referenced
[20:05] <charlie-tca> letozaf_: Is the computer 64bit?
[20:06] <letozaf_> yes
[20:06] <charlie-tca> It is telling you the image is not 32bit?
[20:06] <letozaf_> yes I felt a bit silly and checked twice
[20:06] <charlie-tca> I would try the 32bit image and see what it does?
[20:06] <letozaf_> ok
[20:06] <charlie-tca> but, you do know we are not testing lucid images now, right?
[20:07] <letozaf_> but I'm sure it's a 64 bit
[20:07] <letozaf_> yes
[20:07] <letozaf_> I think I got the wrong link
[20:08] <letozaf_> sorry again I'll check again
[20:08] <charlie-tca> no problem
[20:08] <letozaf_> thank you
[20:08] <charlie-tca> the current images are at
[20:08] <charlie-tca> !daily
[20:08] <ubot4> Daily builds of the CD images of the current development version of Ubuntu are available at http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily/current/ and http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/
[20:09] <letozaf_> yes thank you I clicked a link in a mail, and got it wrong sorry
[20:09] <letozaf_> I'll retry over again
[20:12] <charlie-tca> no problem
[20:12] <charlie-tca> Good luck testing, and have fun!
[20:13] <letozaf_> thank you :)
[20:17] <davmor2> letozaf_: have fun
[20:19] <letozaf_> thanks :)
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:48] <jibel> charlie-tca, to late but it is bug 645818 . If you meet letozaf again, the workaround is to enter 'live' at the boot prompt
[20:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Fedora) (and 5 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 84) (dups: 5) (heat: 286)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818
[20:52] <charlie-tca> thanks, jibel
[20:52] <charlie-tca> I forgot that one.
[20:52] <charlie-tca> but he wanted to test oneiric instead of lucid
[20:53] <jibel> ok, that's the primary bug then :-)