| palhmbs | Hey! I've found a bug on a ubuntu website @ https://help.launchpad.net/BlueprintRoadmaps | 05:56 |
|---|---|---|
| palhmbs | where do I go to file bugs against it? | 05:56 |
| palhmbs | their is an invalid link on that page | 05:56 |
| palhmbs | also, could somebody point me to a blog post / some help, cause I want to create my own blueprint for a crazy cool idea I have. | 05:57 |
| micahg | palhmbs: you should probably file a question (answer) against the launchpad project on launchpad | 06:46 |
| palhmbs | thanks - will do, is there any wiki / tutorial / blog on how to write a blueprint that isn't currentl connected to a project? | 06:48 |
| palhmbs | I'm guessing it just isn't possible... | 06:48 |
| palhmbs | I'm sorry, probably the wrong place to ask | 06:49 |
| micahg | palhmbs: launchpad support questions should go in #launchpad, but no, that's not possible at the moment | 07:08 |
| palhmbs | thanks again micahg - I got the page fixed | 07:39 |
| palhmbs | they took it down :D | 07:39 |
| kamel | hi, is it possible to get a nomination of bug 789259 and 789268 for natty. thanks | 10:13 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 789259 in batman-adv-kernelland (Ubuntu) "Please remove batman-adv-kernelland from the Ubuntu archives (FTBFS) (affects: 7) (dups: 6) (heat: 60)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789259 | 10:13 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 789268 in batmand (Ubuntu) "Please remove batmand-gateway-(source|dkms) from the Ubuntu archives (FTBFS) (affects: 8) (dups: 9) (heat: 80)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789268 | 10:13 |
| micahg | kamel: we generally don't remove a package from a stable release without a *really* good reason | 10:14 |
| kamel | is: it doesnt build and work - and is replaced by a module already in linux-2.6 not a good reason? | 10:15 |
| micahg | kamel: our kernels are very different | 10:16 |
| kamel | so different that they included batman-adv.ko earlier than the debian kernel | 10:16 |
| micahg | kamel: ugh, I shouldn't say very different, but they are not derived from one another | 10:17 |
| micahg | kamel: if nothing bad happens when people try to use it, there's no reason to remove the stable release | 10:25 |
| kamel | there are just upset people which don't know what they do, but report bugs about things they don't know but were installed | 10:29 |
| micahg | kamel: ok, well, the sponsors will review the bugs and take appropriate action, I see you mentioned in the description about natty | 10:30 |
| xelister | is there any bug making fglrx not work on maverick recently? | 10:49 |
| === jibel_ is now known as jibel | ||
| xelister | blargh. | 11:41 |
| benonsoftware | Quick question | 11:46 |
| benonsoftware | At the top of PChat it says the next meeting is on the 6/9/11 is that the 9th or 6th month? | 11:47 |
| JoshuaL | benonsoftware, i assume june 9th | 11:48 |
| jibel | benonsoftware, 2011-06-09 | 11:48 |
| jibel | benonsoftware, 2nd thursday of each month | 11:48 |
| benonsoftware | Thanks for that. | 11:48 |
| benonsoftware | I just saw the meeting Wiki page :) | 11:49 |
| benonsoftware | Is anyone here wanting to mentor someone age 12? | 11:55 |
| ohsix | christ, can't get ahead; compiz update that just dropped a while ago really messes up drag/snap edges | 12:36 |
| roadmr | Hi folks! I have a bug that's actually about a feature not implemented in the package, should it be wishlist? (as I don't see any reports or discussion upstream) bug 793831 | 16:05 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 793831 in gcalctool (Ubuntu) "3!! is not equal to 720 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793831 | 16:05 |
| roadmr | I think triaged/wishlist and open a feature request upstream, hopefully I'm not too wrong :) | 16:09 |
| pedro_ | roadmr, that sounds good, please also update the description / title | 16:11 |
| roadmr | pedro_: OK, i'll do that then, thanks | 16:12 |
| pedro_ | you're welcome, thanks for helping :-) | 16:12 |
| === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox | ||
| roadmr | pedro_: coudl I trouble you with the importance (wishlist) for bug 793831? I opened and linked an upstream request, set it to triaged and changed the title to be more descriptive | 16:35 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 793831 in gcalctool (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "Feature request: support for double factorial (!!) operator (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793831 | 16:35 |
| pedro_ | roadmr, sure, doing it now | 16:35 |
| pedro_ | roadmr, btw you should be able to change the importance :P | 16:36 |
| pedro_ | your team is part of bug control now | 16:36 |
| pedro_ | btw done | 16:37 |
| roadmr | thanks! | 16:37 |
| === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] | ||
| RedSingularity | chrisccoulson: ping | 17:51 |
| chrisccoulson | RedSingularity ? | 17:52 |
| chrisccoulson | you should add some context to your ping btw ;) | 17:52 |
| RedSingularity | chrisccoulson: yeah i just figured ;) Anyway, bug 728797 is not update-manager. Gnome-control-center maybe? | 17:53 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 728797 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "When using "Make Caps Lock an additional Ctrl" keyboard option, doing a dist-upgrade causes caps lock to revert to a caps lock key (affects: 1) (heat: 36)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728797 | 17:53 |
| RedSingularity | or something more specific you think? | 17:53 |
| chrisccoulson | RedSingularity, i'm not sure, sorry. i'm probably not the best person to ask ;) | 17:54 |
| RedSingularity | chrisccoulson: I thought you work the control-center? | 17:54 |
| chrisccoulson | RedSingularity, not really | 17:54 |
| RedSingularity | chrisccoulson: my mistake. Know anyone who does? | 17:55 |
| RedSingularity | Thats not my area :) | 17:55 |
| chrisccoulson | hmm, not sure | 17:55 |
| RedSingularity | chrisccoulson: alright, thanks anyway :) Will ask around. | 17:56 |
| === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck | ||
| micahg | RedSingularity: pedro_ should be able to help you | 18:21 |
| penalvch | Hey I'd like a 2nd opinion on bug 733128 it looks like a kernel panic on a Release Candidate kernel cause a LibreOffice dataloss and seems invalid due to old kernel... what do you think? | 18:28 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 733128 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "Libreoffice doesn't start (affects: 3) (heat: 16)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/733128 | 18:28 |
| penalvch | old/non-stable kernel | 18:29 |
| bdmurray | RedSingularity: bug 769751 might be what you are looking for | 18:31 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 769751 in libravatar "Allow images to be marked as private (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769751 | 18:31 |
| bdmurray | RedSingularity: bug 769571 might be what you are looking for | 18:31 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 769571 in console-setup (Ubuntu) "updates cause caps lock to revert until a reboot (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 82)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/769571 | 18:31 |
| bdmurray | or at least that is probably the right package | 18:31 |
| charlie-tca | penalvch: is the bug still present in final release of natty? | 18:33 |
| charlie-tca | The user should verify if the bug is still present now. | 18:34 |
| penalvch | charlie-tca: I don't know if/think the panic is reproducible in current kernel. I'll request reproduction of the panic w/ current kernel to see if it causes LO dataloss. Thanks for the help! | 18:37 |
| njin | Hello, are we tracking gallium ? | 18:49 |
| njin | bug 793834 | 18:50 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 793834 in ubuntu "Gallium\r300g doesn't enable 3D acceleration unless S-video output detects a TV. (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793834 | 18:50 |
| === davmor2 is now known as Nijerian_Prince | ||
| === Nijerian_Prince is now known as davmor2 | ||
| brendand | is it bad form to touch hug day bugs before the hug day ? :) | 21:07 |
| micahg | brendand: nope | 21:09 |
| pedro_ | brendand, nope :-) | 21:09 |
| roadmr | as long as you leave a couple for the rest :) | 21:10 |
| micahg | nope, pedro_ can always add more :) | 21:10 |
| pedro_ | oh yes we have plenty :-) | 21:10 |
| jpiche | hi. i've been struggling with bug 775950 for a while, and I'm wondering if someone could help me figure out the best way to debug or fix it | 21:12 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 775950 in linux (Ubuntu) "fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed! upon boot (always reproducible on battery only, but sometimes on AC too) (affects: 18) (heat: 92)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/775950 | 21:12 |
| brendand | seems like it should be critical | 21:29 |
| brendand | jpiche - do you have an ATI card? | 21:31 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| jpiche | braiam, yes I do | 21:33 |
| jpiche | I'm actually the original reporter of the bug | 21:33 |
| jpiche | brendand, sorry. not braiam. | 21:34 |
| brendand | jpiche - i know :) i looked at it just now | 21:34 |
| brendand | jpiche - and you are using fglrx. have you tried with using radeon? | 21:34 |
| jpiche | brendand, not yet. When I get time, I'll try that next--switching from fglrx to radeon is a bit of a pain | 21:35 |
| brendand | jpiche - you can just use jockey? | 21:36 |
| roadmr | how about booting in rescue mode (single), does the problem happen then? | 21:36 |
| jpiche | roadmr, most of the time it still happens in single. About 1 / 10 reboots, single will work. | 21:37 |
| jpiche | brendand, jockey doesn't always work for me because I switch secondary monitors all the time and the last time I tried it, my X config got a bit messed up--just annoying though, not a real problem | 21:40 |
| roadmr | jpiche: no useful logs in /var/log? that might help | 21:40 |
| jpiche | roadmr, no. I've tried reading through them after plugging in and booting up, but I've never seen anything out of the ordinary | 21:42 |
| roadmr | jpiche: so, the actual kernel panic log doesn't get written to disk | 21:42 |
| jpiche | roadmr, that's what it seems like. it happens pretty quick | 21:43 |
| braiam | Im a bit used to it | 21:46 |
| braiam | jpiche: ↑ | 21:47 |
| roadmr | hmm. One way to capture a useful log would be via remote syslog, but it's a bit involved to setup, and it'd require an extra pc | 21:47 |
| roadmr | not sure it would even work, if the kernel can't set up networking before panicking | 21:48 |
| brendand | jpiche - what's your kernel version? | 21:54 |
| brendand | probably on the bug | 21:54 |
| brendand | 2.6.38-8 | 21:55 |
| brendand | that's the original kernel (fresh install) | 21:55 |
| jpiche | brendand, yeah 2.6.38-8-generic | 21:56 |
| brendand | my own feeling would be that someone from bug control should set it to critical. at least high | 21:56 |
| * micahg wonders where jFo is... | 21:56 | |
| komputes | bdmurray: ping | 22:06 |
| komputes | bdmurray: I was reviewing the BugControl wiki page and found the following line which doesn't seem right: | 22:07 |
| komputes | One of the team's administrators should e-mail the team's application to ubuntu-bugcontrol AT lists.launchpad.net. Please give us: | 22:07 |
| hggdh | komputes: that sounds weird | 22:07 |
| hggdh | no | 22:07 |
| hggdh | this is correct | 22:07 |
| micahg | why is that weird, makes sense for team apps | 22:07 |
| hggdh | :-) | 22:07 |
| hggdh | komputes: this is for team applications | 22:07 |
| komputes | It could read easily as, Please email your team application to... | 22:08 |
| komputes | ...and include: | 22:08 |
| hggdh | komputes: as long as it is one of the admins, yes | 22:08 |
| hggdh | komputes: we only want to hear from team admins; I agree it could be better worded, but the restriction must be present | 22:09 |
| micahg | I think being explicit in this case is better | 22:10 |
| komputes | ok | 22:10 |
| RedSingularity | bdmurray: ah yeah, that looks like it... | 22:15 |
| RedSingularity | bdmurray: great, i will link it to that. Thanks :) | 22:18 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: thanks for that info btw. I wasn't aware he worked that package :/ | 22:21 |
| micahg | RedSingularity: no, he's the defect analyst for the desktop team | 22:23 |
| RedSingularity | micahg: ahhh, ok | 22:23 |
| bcj | How do I open a bug on an update to a driver? | 22:48 |
| bcj | iwlagn was updated yesterday by the Ubuntu 10.04 auto-update tool and it's broken my wireless. | 22:48 |
| bcj | It looks like the latest driver no longer supports the firmware I have | 22:48 |
| charlie-tca | ubuntu-bug DRIVER | 22:49 |
| charlie-tca | and explain in comments that the update for 2011-06-06 broke it | 22:49 |
| RedSingularity | bcj: may I ask what driver? | 22:49 |
| bcj | iwlagn | 22:49 |
| bcj | I think | 22:49 |
| RedSingularity | ok never mind then :) | 22:50 |
| bcj | iwlagn 0000:04:00.0: Driver unable to support your firmware API. Driver supports v5, firmware is v0. | 22:50 |
| RedSingularity | thought it may have been another one.... | 22:50 |
| bcj | I'll try opening a bug | 22:51 |
| RedSingularity | bcj: yeah follow charlie-tca's advice | 22:52 |
| bcj | ubuntu-bug DRIVER doesn't work, nor does ubuntu-bug iwlagn | 22:52 |
| RedSingularity | charlie-tca: ^ maybe it doesnt have the hooks....? | 22:53 |
| charlie-tca | !info iwlagn | 22:53 |
| ubot4 | charlie-tca: Package iwlagn does not exist in maverick | 22:54 |
| bcj | ...so how do I find out what to raise the bug against? | 22:54 |
| bcj | (you can probably tell that I keep knocking the ethernet cable out) | 22:54 |
| charlie-tca | bcj: ubuntu-bug module-init-tools | 22:54 |
| charlie-tca | That includes iwlagn | 22:55 |
| bcj | Thanks for the help all; here is the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/module-init-tools/+bug/794291 | 23:06 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 794291 in module-init-tools (Ubuntu) "iwlagn driver update breaks compatibilty with firmware (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] | 23:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!