[11:27] <dpm> hi chrisccoulson (or anyone else from the mozilla team) - do you think you could have a look at bug 542046 and merge the Traditional Chinese translation?
[11:27] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 542046 in ubufox "Translation for zh_TW" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/542046
[11:30] <chrisccoulson> dpm - yeah, will do that today. just trying to get enigmail working first
[11:30] <dpm> great, thanks chrisccoulson :)
[15:16] <chrisccoulson> dang, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/73152595/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.enigmail_2%3A1.2~a2~cvs20110606t2200-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[15:16] <chrisccoulson> really need to patch all of this stuff out :)
[15:55] <fta> cyphermox_, about n-m, just to clarify, i was not asking for assistance, i was not even complaining, i was just telling you it ate my conf (twice) for no reason :P
[15:55] <cyphermox_> oh, no problem
[15:55] <cyphermox_> but if you want me to fix what's broken and help others, you'll have to file a bug report ;)
[15:56] <cyphermox_> I'm especially curious about your /etc/network/interfaces file, maybe I screwed something up while porting one of the patches
[15:56] <fta> cyphermox_, this box only has 1 eth, no wifi or anything else. and that eth0 was unmanaged.
[15:56] <cyphermox_> yup, I remember
[15:56] <cyphermox_> but your eth, it has to be configured in /etc?
[15:57] <cyphermox_> or is it just auto eth0 / iface eth0 inet dhcp ?
[15:57] <fta> it used to not have n-m installed. it just came back last week when i forced the re-install of the ubuntu-desktop package
[15:57] <cyphermox_> ok
[15:57] <fta> not sure
[15:58] <fta> i always do my /etc/network/interfaces & /etc/resolv.conf manually
[15:58] <cyphermox_> but like I'm saying, when an interface is configured in /etc, it should just be ignored by NM, unless it's set to managed=true in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf
[15:58] <cyphermox_> ok
[15:58] <cyphermox_> well, I'll give it a shot later when I have a bit of time
[15:59] <fta> that file says:
[15:59] <fta> [ifupdown]
[15:59] <fta> managed=false
[15:59] <fta> (i removed without purging)
[16:08] <cyphermox_> ok, then yeah, it shouldn't have touched resolv.conf
[16:09] <cyphermox_> like I said, I'll give it a shot later today
[17:38] <chrisccoulson> m_conley, i'll upload your extensions once i've got lightning uploaded :)
[18:09] <m_conley> chrisccoulson: thanks!
[18:16] <fta> chrisccoulson, please pull the bot branch, i fixed something
[18:16] <chrisccoulson> fta - oh, thanks. will do
[18:18] <fta> gasp, i'm impacted by debian bug 625226
[18:18] <ubot2> Debian bug 625226 in libpam-modules "pam_limits: Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored" [Minor,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/625226
[18:22] <fta> weird, i'm longer receiving the commit emails from the chromium monitor..
[18:22] <fta> micahg, ^^
[18:23] <fta> micahg, ++ ch12 now stable
[18:23] <micahg> fta: heh, one day early :)
[18:23] <fta> incl a buch of sec fixes
[18:23] <fta> bunch
[18:23] <fta> is lp broken (the bzr emails)?? or is just me?
[18:24] <micahg> idk
[18:32] <fta> micahg, seems it's time to drop the -inspector deb
[18:32] <fta> or maybe i can keep it empty and drop it later
[18:59] <micahg> fta: let's keep it as an empty transitional package to ease upgrades
[18:59] <fta> yep, that was the plan
[19:15] <chrisccoulson> oops, i nearly uploaded the wrong version of lightning there :/
[19:21] <micahg> fta: so, there's still a plan to fix ld-gold in lucid
[19:22] <fta> micahg, is that a question?
[19:22] <micahg> fta: does the package in the toolchain PPA work for you?
[19:22] <micahg> fta: no, just letting you know
[19:22] <fta> chrisccoulson, 5th mistake in a week?
[19:22] <fta> micahg, i still can't test, no arm h/w or ppa
[19:29] <micahg> fta: I was referring to amd64 and i386
[19:30] <fta> tried once with the dailies, it built, and it seemed to run fine, but i didn't do any extensive tests as i reverted it the next day, due to the disaster on the older dists
[19:31] <micahg> fta: that was with the one from the toolchain ppa?
[19:32] <fta> no, stock oneiric
[19:32] <fta> the ppa is the same for lucid, right?
[19:33] <micahg> idk, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ppa/+packages
[19:35] <fta> doko pointed me to ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test
[19:35] <micahg> oh, hmm, let me see that one
[19:35] <fta> with 2.21
[19:36] <micahg> ah, ok, and did that work for lucid?
[19:36] <fta> but he said it's not wanted
[19:36] <fta> so i didn't even test
[19:36] <micahg> it is wanted, it's lacking testing at the moment
[19:36] <fta> May 30 17:03:18 <doko>  17:01:23> fta: 2.21 did need fixes in a lot of packages. can't just update from 2.20 to 2.21
[19:37] <micahg> hmm, I guess I need to talk to doko
[19:37] <fta> upstream ch asked me to drop gold from lucid as it's clearly producing bogus code
[19:38] <micahg> right, that's why we should fix it :)
[19:41] <micahg> fta: I'll test that binutils with your test case over the weekend
[19:54] <fta> micahg, bug 794197
[19:54] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 794197 in chromium-browser "11.0.696.77 -> 12.0.742.91" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/794197
[19:58] <micahg> fta: thanks, I only have a few hours left today and am off the next 2 days, but will try to get this building at least
[19:58] <fta> i'm finishing oneiric right now, should just take a few more minutes
[20:00] <micahg> fta: cool, thanks
[20:01] <fta> when you merge, don't forget the libjpeg-turbo you dropped last time
[20:01] <micahg> k, thanks
[20:17] <fta> micahg, oh, i forgot to drop a few lines from the changelog..
[20:18] <fta> at the top, in the new features list, some don't apply to chromium and/or to linux
[20:18] <micahg> flash cookies and the Mac line?
[20:19] <fta> i reviewed all the sec bugs, but forgot to come back to the feature list :P
[20:27] <fta> micahg, (sorry, router crashed) screen reader is for win only, and i'm not sure about the launch app from the omnibox, ch-os only?
[20:28] <micahg> ok, thanks, will remove all those
[21:46] <micahg> fta: did you forget to push to chromium-browser.oneiric or is LP broke?
[21:46] <micahg> or is there a 3rd option :)
[21:47] <fta> r649
[21:47] <fta> re-pushing to be sure
[21:47] <micahg> k, didn't see in web interface
[21:47] <micahg> fta: got it now, thanks
[21:48] <micahg> fta: could you please push to .stable as well?
[21:48] <fta> 637
[21:49] <micahg> k, only saw r633
[21:49] <fta> i'm quite sure i did, but lp behaves strangely today
[21:50] <micahg> idk, I tried a bzr pull about 30 minutes ago and got nothing
[21:51] <micahg> it's all working now though
[21:53] <fta> i still have https://code.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels  stuck
[21:53] <fta> and it's hurting my workflow
[21:55] <micahg> fta: there should be a help contact coming into #launchpad soon I think
[21:56]  * micahg has no idea why there hasn't been one all day
[22:32] <BUGabundo> good evening folks
[23:03] <micahg> fta: do we even ship google gears?
[23:03] <BUGabundo> nope
[23:06] <fta> micahg, i didn't say we do, it's just no longer supported
[23:06] <micahg> fta: ah, ok
[23:06] <fta> it was possible to install it from upstream previously
[23:07] <micahg> eh, I'll leave that out then
[23:07] <micahg> fta: poolie wants to to file a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad for your stuck branch and he'll escalate
[23:07] <micahg> s/to to/you to
[23:12] <fta> done
[23:12] <fta> now, i'm off
[23:14] <micahg> fta: k, thanks