=== fenris is now known as Guest8457 [11:27] hi chrisccoulson (or anyone else from the mozilla team) - do you think you could have a look at bug 542046 and merge the Traditional Chinese translation? [11:27] Launchpad bug 542046 in ubufox "Translation for zh_TW" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/542046 [11:30] dpm - yeah, will do that today. just trying to get enigmail working first [11:30] great, thanks chrisccoulson :) === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [15:16] dang, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/73152595/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.enigmail_2%3A1.2~a2~cvs20110606t2200-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [15:16] really need to patch all of this stuff out :) [15:55] cyphermox_, about n-m, just to clarify, i was not asking for assistance, i was not even complaining, i was just telling you it ate my conf (twice) for no reason :P [15:55] oh, no problem [15:55] but if you want me to fix what's broken and help others, you'll have to file a bug report ;) [15:56] I'm especially curious about your /etc/network/interfaces file, maybe I screwed something up while porting one of the patches [15:56] cyphermox_, this box only has 1 eth, no wifi or anything else. and that eth0 was unmanaged. [15:56] yup, I remember [15:56] but your eth, it has to be configured in /etc? [15:57] or is it just auto eth0 / iface eth0 inet dhcp ? [15:57] it used to not have n-m installed. it just came back last week when i forced the re-install of the ubuntu-desktop package [15:57] ok [15:57] not sure [15:58] i always do my /etc/network/interfaces & /etc/resolv.conf manually [15:58] but like I'm saying, when an interface is configured in /etc, it should just be ignored by NM, unless it's set to managed=true in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf [15:58] ok [15:58] well, I'll give it a shot later when I have a bit of time [15:59] that file says: [15:59] [ifupdown] [15:59] managed=false [15:59] (i removed without purging) [16:08] ok, then yeah, it shouldn't have touched resolv.conf [16:09] like I said, I'll give it a shot later today === cyphermox_ is now known as cyphermox [17:38] m_conley, i'll upload your extensions once i've got lightning uploaded :) === gavin__ is now known as gavin [18:09] chrisccoulson: thanks! [18:16] chrisccoulson, please pull the bot branch, i fixed something [18:16] fta - oh, thanks. will do [18:18] gasp, i'm impacted by debian bug 625226 [18:18] Debian bug 625226 in libpam-modules "pam_limits: Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored" [Minor,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/625226 [18:22] weird, i'm longer receiving the commit emails from the chromium monitor.. [18:22] micahg, ^^ [18:23] micahg, ++ ch12 now stable [18:23] fta: heh, one day early :) [18:23] incl a buch of sec fixes [18:23] bunch [18:23] is lp broken (the bzr emails)?? or is just me? [18:24] idk [18:32] micahg, seems it's time to drop the -inspector deb [18:32] or maybe i can keep it empty and drop it later [18:59] fta: let's keep it as an empty transitional package to ease upgrades [18:59] yep, that was the plan [19:15] oops, i nearly uploaded the wrong version of lightning there :/ [19:21] fta: so, there's still a plan to fix ld-gold in lucid [19:22] micahg, is that a question? [19:22] fta: does the package in the toolchain PPA work for you? [19:22] fta: no, just letting you know [19:22] chrisccoulson, 5th mistake in a week? [19:22] micahg, i still can't test, no arm h/w or ppa [19:29] fta: I was referring to amd64 and i386 [19:30] tried once with the dailies, it built, and it seemed to run fine, but i didn't do any extensive tests as i reverted it the next day, due to the disaster on the older dists [19:31] fta: that was with the one from the toolchain ppa? [19:32] no, stock oneiric [19:32] the ppa is the same for lucid, right? [19:33] idk, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ppa/+packages [19:35] doko pointed me to ppa:ubuntu-toolchain-r/test [19:35] oh, hmm, let me see that one [19:35] with 2.21 [19:36] ah, ok, and did that work for lucid? [19:36] but he said it's not wanted [19:36] so i didn't even test [19:36] it is wanted, it's lacking testing at the moment [19:36] May 30 17:03:18 17:01:23> fta: 2.21 did need fixes in a lot of packages. can't just update from 2.20 to 2.21 [19:37] hmm, I guess I need to talk to doko [19:37] upstream ch asked me to drop gold from lucid as it's clearly producing bogus code [19:38] right, that's why we should fix it :) [19:41] fta: I'll test that binutils with your test case over the weekend [19:54] micahg, bug 794197 [19:54] Launchpad bug 794197 in chromium-browser "11.0.696.77 -> 12.0.742.91" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/794197 [19:58] fta: thanks, I only have a few hours left today and am off the next 2 days, but will try to get this building at least [19:58] i'm finishing oneiric right now, should just take a few more minutes [20:00] fta: cool, thanks [20:01] when you merge, don't forget the libjpeg-turbo you dropped last time [20:01] k, thanks [20:17] micahg, oh, i forgot to drop a few lines from the changelog.. [20:18] at the top, in the new features list, some don't apply to chromium and/or to linux [20:18] flash cookies and the Mac line? [20:19] i reviewed all the sec bugs, but forgot to come back to the feature list :P [20:27] micahg, (sorry, router crashed) screen reader is for win only, and i'm not sure about the launch app from the omnibox, ch-os only? [20:28] ok, thanks, will remove all those === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:46] fta: did you forget to push to chromium-browser.oneiric or is LP broke? [21:46] or is there a 3rd option :) [21:47] r649 [21:47] re-pushing to be sure [21:47] k, didn't see in web interface [21:47] fta: got it now, thanks [21:48] fta: could you please push to .stable as well? [21:48] 637 [21:49] k, only saw r633 [21:49] i'm quite sure i did, but lp behaves strangely today [21:50] idk, I tried a bzr pull about 30 minutes ago and got nothing [21:51] it's all working now though [21:53] i still have https://code.launchpad.net/~chromium-team/chromium-browser/channels stuck [21:53] and it's hurting my workflow [21:55] fta: there should be a help contact coming into #launchpad soon I think [21:56] * micahg has no idea why there hasn't been one all day [22:32] good evening folks === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [23:03] fta: do we even ship google gears? [23:03] nope [23:06] micahg, i didn't say we do, it's just no longer supported [23:06] fta: ah, ok [23:06] it was possible to install it from upstream previously [23:07] eh, I'll leave that out then [23:07] fta: poolie wants to to file a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad for your stuck branch and he'll escalate [23:07] s/to to/you to [23:12] done [23:12] now, i'm off [23:14] fta: k, thanks