=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [08:40] mdeslaur, fyi, just upgraded a lucid server, pam once again broke cron. 1.1.1-2ubuntu5.3 [08:43] mdeslaur, n-m, it auto-installed the bogus one before, and i missed it as cron failed to inform me [12:51] fta2: 1.1.1-2ubuntu5.3 is the one that fixes cron, how could it have broken it? [12:51] fta2: what are the symptoms? [12:53] fta2: ah, sorry, didn't notice your other comment [13:16] mdeslaur, i guess i depend too much on logcheck and cron. i should probably turn some of my tools to daemons rather than cron jobs [13:19] fta2: well, the broken pam was only in the archive for a few hours, and it's unlikely to ever happen again [13:19] pam_limits(cron:session): Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored [13:20] pam_limits(sshd:session): Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored [13:20] fta2: that's unrelated to the update [13:20] yep, i know, it's oneiric [13:20] but it's another unexpected issue with cron [13:21] ...showing me that i really need to cut my dependency on cron [13:24] fta2: looks like http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625226 [13:24] Debian bug 625226 in libpam-modules "pam_limits: Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored" [Minor,Open] [13:25] yep [13:25] fta2: could you please file a new launchpad bug against pam and link that one? [13:32] mdeslaur, bug 794531 [13:32] Launchpad bug 794531 in pam "pam_limits: Unknown kernel rlimit 'Max realtime timeout' ignored" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/794531 [13:33] fta2: cool, thanks === m_conley_away is now known as m_conley [14:03] chrisccoulson: #thunderbird-unity [14:04] m_conley, there now ;) [20:35] chrisccoulson: ping [20:35] hi m_conley [20:36] chrisccoulson: hey - I was wondering if you happened to know which version of libebook and libedataserver was going to be shipped in O? [20:36] m_conley, good question :) [20:36] that might be a question for seb128 in #ubuntu-desktop [20:36] chrisccoulson: it just occurred to me that it'd be an awful shame if I did all this work, and then all of the APIs changed on me with a version bump. :) [20:36] although, he's finished for the day [20:36] chrisccoulson: alright, I'll ask him tomorrow. Thanks! [20:37] m_conley, so, i guess it will be 3.2 we ship with [20:38] we're currently on the stable gnome 3.0 packages, but we'll start tracking the unstable 3.1 packages soon (including e-d-s) [20:38] chrisccoulson: ok, good to know. [21:00] chrisccoulson: Is there a timeline for Unity to be on gtk3? [21:01] m_conley, this cycle [21:01] chrisccoulson: cool - do you know when that'll land? I appear to have broken my Unity. :p [21:02] oh, how did you manage that? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:02] chrisccoulson: I installed Evolution 3.1, and it brought all of that GTK3 business with it [21:03] chrisccoulson: I can get into Gnome3 alright...but switching back doesn't appear to work. [21:03] Is there a way for these two to coexist? [21:03] is this on oneiric? [21:03] Hm - no, Natty. I guess I'm behind the curve. Oh, and maybe it matters that I'm using Unity 2D. :p [21:04] ah, ok. i'm not too sure about that :) [21:04] it seems to be working ok in oneiric (the gtk2 unity is running alongside all the gtk3 stuff) [21:04] chrisccoulson: maybe I should get Oneiric on this machine. Is it relatively stable right now for me to grab it? [21:04] but theming is all messed up still, as there's no gtk3 port of ambiance yet [21:05] m_conley, it seems to work ok atm, but there's no guarantee it won't break ;) [21:05] hooray! :) [21:05] i'm quite conservative with applying updates normally though. once my machine works, i generally stay a few days behind with updates to see if anybody elses machine breaks [21:06] chrisccoulson: that's a good plan. [21:07] i remember it being particularly difficult with Natty [21:12] hmmm, i really hate arm [21:12] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/73216703/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-armel.lightning-extension_1.0~b4~hg20110607r7804%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz === m_conley is now known as m_conley_away [22:43] hi