/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/08/#ubuntu-website.txt

mhall119cjohnston: no calendar program on your mobile is going to make the value if X-Blueprint readily accessible01:41
mhall119daker_: not at a quick glance, no01:42
mhall119the decorator unfortunately muddles the traceback01:42
cjohnstonmhall119: since guidebook doesnt use json03:15
mhall119guidebook won't use X-Blueprint either will it?03:18
cjohnstonI think it could be made to?03:23
mhall119maybe, would blueprints be useful on a phone though?03:32
cjohnstondunno03:34
cjohnstonmake a hold tag and hold it?03:34
cjohnstonoff to bed03:35
cjohnstong'nite03:35
=== daker_ is now known as daker
nigelbcjohnston, mhall119: Welcome to our latest summit contributor \m/ https://code.launchpad.net/~pendulum/summit/665589-launchpad-request-retries13:27
mhall119yay!13:27
mhall119Pendulum++13:27
Pendulumwe'll see how y'all feel about it in a month when I still don't know what I'm doing :P13:29
nigelbPendulum: we've all been there :-)13:30
nigelbmhall119: I'm voting that we get joey to organize a summit hackathon and get james_w and salgado to review all the summit merges :P13:31
mhall119I'm pretty sure nigelb is still winging it13:36
nigelbmhall119: winging?13:37
mhall119improv13:37
mhall119playing by ear13:37
mhall119making it up as you go13:37
mhall119mucking around in production just to see what breaks13:37
nigelboh, haha :p13:37
nigelbNo, I have my own set up which plays with my own launchpad.13:37
nigelbSo its awesome ;)13:37
mhall119nice13:38
nigelbI can do anything on the sprint and get feedback immediately13:38
mhall119nigelb: do you think the linaro guys are familiar enough with the summit codebase to be doing code reviews?13:38
nigelbmhall119: I think james_w is. But if you insist, you can do them all yourself.13:39
cjohnstonmhall119: did you tell him about what you found last night?13:39
nigelbmhall119: Right now, the merges are getting stale.13:39
nigelbcjohnston: what?13:39
cjohnstonthen dont make code that makes code change13:39
mhall119nigelb: oh, there are *still* changes in production13:39
nigelbmhall119: wtf.13:39
nigelbDaviey: PING.13:40
nigelbDaviey: ^^13:40
nigelbDaviey: You said there aren't any more changes in production :/13:40
mhall119bzr st shows something was changed13:40
nigelbmhall119: lots of changes?13:40
mhall119maybe it'http://paste.ubuntu.com/621728/13:41
Davieynigelb: o/13:41
nigelbDaviey: :( More changes in production, that's not checked in :(13:42
Davieynigelb: that change was not there when i told you it was clean.13:42
DavieyWhen i said, there is no diff in production, that was valid for that time - not forever in the future.13:43
nigelbDaviey: oh, wait.  That change is now committed. I believe we can ignore.13:43
nigelbmhall119: ^^13:43
mhall119:(13:43
Davieywho commited that change nigelb ?13:43
mhall119I see a similar but not exact change in the bzr history13:43
DavieyWould like to get an idea of who edited it.13:43
nigelbDaviey: I did. The edit was done by you on my suggestion. I remember sitting the back of the ballroom and doing that ;)13:43
* nigelb takes blame for this diff.13:44
mhall119nigelb: check rev 111 of the summit trunk, that looks the closest, but it's not the same13:44
nigelbmhall119: Remember you rejected one of my MPs?13:44
nigelbmhall119: the last time you did code reviews, this was the change.13:45
mhall119oh, so the code I rejected is already in production?13:45
mhall119:(++13:45
nigelbmhall119: no, I accidentally had that code in a unclean branch which you committed before reviewing that.13:45
nigelbbasically, its all goo13:46
nigelbbasically, its all good13:46
nigelbThe code is all committed now.13:46
mhall119nigelb: I'm still not seeing that exact change in the bzr tree...13:46
mhall119so which is correct?13:46
nigelbyes13:46
nigelbI believe, yes13:46
Daviey:o13:47
mhall119that wasn't a yes or no question13:47
nigelboh right.13:47
nigelbI believe the code committed is correct.13:47
* mhall119 needs more coffee for this13:47
nigelbI can't get to my summit install to test and give you updated results.13:48
* nigelb is still at work.13:48
mhall119okay, let me know for sure later, as we'll have to revert what's in production before we deploy in order to avoid a conflict13:48
nigelbmhall119: okay, sure.13:49
nigelbmhall119: are we doing something this weekend for summit?13:49
mhall119drinking, it seems13:50
mhall119btw, http://paste.ubuntu.com/621734/ is going up somewhere13:50
nigelbmhall119: I read that line without the "so" ;)13:51
nigelbit read like a rhetoric question13:51
mhall119oh, I see now13:51
mhall119I no longer think you're totally insane then13:51
nigelbI'm not sure I like the "totally" there ;)13:52
mhall119well, you are still working on summit code, that can't be normal13:52
nigelbheh13:52
dakerthe invisible window sucks >:(14:26
cjohnston+1 mhall11914:28
cjohnstonHe's just working excuses to get out of it.. kinda like comitting to production14:29
mhall119I told him the other day that the only way to get away from the curse of summit development was to trick somebody else into taking over, and he's already got Pendulum submitting patches14:31
sbcdoes anyone know where I can download the theme for planet.ubuntu ? I can find the config file in LP, but not the templates.14:39
cjohnstonI don't think they are public14:40
cjohnstonI could be wrong tho14:40
sbcWould there be a reason for not publishing them?14:40
dakerthey are public14:41
dakersbc, https://code.launchpad.net/~rhlee/ubuntu-website/light-planet-theme214:41
cjohnstono14:41
cjohnstoncool14:41
cjohnstonsbc: what are you wanting to do with it?14:41
sbccjohnston: update the theme we use for the Danish planet.14:41
sbcdaker: Thanks!14:41
dakeryw14:43
=== daker is now known as daker_
cjohnstonmhall119: is the only reason that we havent asked for a Django and South update on cranberry because we had wanted to throw in the django-openid-auth at the same time?22:08
cjohnstondaker: bug 794756 please when you get a moment22:25
ubot4Launchpad bug 794756 in ubuntu-cloud-portal "Link in footer to report a bug (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/79475622:25
dakersure22:25
cjohnstonty22:25
mhall119cjohnston: no, it's because it would affect all sites on cranberry, so we'll need to make sure they're all compatible, or use some method of isolating them22:30
cjohnstongotcha22:30
cjohnstonhas anyone began checking into this that you are aware of?22:31
mhall119either that or they'd have to setup a new server and move those sites over that are ready22:31
mhall119not that I'm aware of, no22:31
cjohnstonwhat versions are we wanting to go to?22:34
cjohnstonit looks like natty is running 1.2.5-ubuntu122:35
cjohnstonand 0.7-122:35
mhall119I guess we can go to 1.2.522:41
mhall119though we have packages for 1.322:41
mhall119so, what would be the rational for using 1.2.5?22:41
cjohnstonI'm +1 for going 1.3.. I was just thinking 1.2.5 already has packages.. but if 1.3 does, then I'm all for it22:45
mhall119it has packages in a PPA22:45
mhall119and I can setup LTP to use virtualenv for local development22:45
cjohnstonmhall119: http://pad.ubuntu.com/daY3vyyn3C22:49
mhall119cjohnston: might be worth it to just ask the sysadmins first if it would be easier to get a new server for those sites we're upgrading22:53

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!